All books

Professional

Apps About Coach Log in Start reading

Mathematics · Glossary

What is Statement, connectives?

Also known as: statement

Definition 1.1 University Mathematics — Year 1 · Chapter 1 — Logic, Sets and Maps

A statement (or proposition) is a sentence which is either true (T) or false (F) — exactly one of the two. From statements PP and QQ one forms:

  • the negation ¬P\lnot P (“not PP”), true exactly when PP is false;
  • the conjunction P∧QP \land Q (“PP and QQ”), true exactly when both are true;
  • the disjunction P∨QP \lor Q (“PP or QQ”), true exactly when at least one is true (this “or” is inclusive);
  • the implication P  ⟹  QP \implies Q, false exactly when PP is true and QQ is false;
  • the equivalence P  ⟺  QP \iff Q, true exactly when PP and QQ have the same truth value.

Examples

Example 1.6 (Negating everyday mathematical sentences)

Let f ⁣:R→Rf \colon \R \to \R. The sentence “ff is increasing” reads

∀x∈R, ∀y∈R,x≤y  ⟹  f(x)≤f(y),\forall x \in \R,\ \forall y \in \R,\quad x \leq y \implies f(x) \leq f(y) ,

and its negation, by Proposition 1.5 plus the rule ¬(P  ⟹  Q)  ⟺  P∧¬Q\lnot(P \implies Q) \iff P \land \lnot Q:

∃x∈R, ∃y∈R,x≤y  and  f(x)>f(y):\exists x \in \R,\ \exists y \in \R,\quad x \leq y \ \text{ and }\ f(x) > f(y) :

a single witnessing pair suffices. Likewise “ff is bounded” is ∃M∈R, ∀x∈R, ∣f(x)∣≤M\exists M \in \R,\ \forall x \in \R,\ \abs{f(x)} \leq M, with negation

∀M∈R, ∃x∈R,∣f(x)∣>M:\forall M \in \R,\ \exists x \in \R,\quad \abs{f(x)} > M :

whatever bound is proposed, some point beats it. The insight: a correct negation never contains “not” applied to a quantified block — it is a new positive statement, in which the roles are exchanged: one now produces the witnesses one previously received.

Example 1.7 (Order of quantifiers)

The order of different quantifiers matters:

∀x∈R, ∃y∈R, y>xis true (take y=x+1),\forall x \in \R,\ \exists y \in \R,\ y > x \quad\text{is true (take } y = x+1\text{),}
∃y∈R, ∀x∈R, y>xis false (no real number exceeds all reals).\exists y \in \R,\ \forall x \in \R,\ y > x \quad\text{is false (no real number exceeds all reals).}

In the first statement yy may depend on xx; in the second, one single yy must work for all xx. Two identical quantifiers, on the other hand, always commute.

Example 1.13 (Proving unique existence)

A statement ∃! x, P(x)\exists!\,x,\ P(x) is two statements, proved separately: existence (exhibit or construct some x0x_0 with P(x0)P(x_0)) and uniqueness (assume P(x)P(x) and P(x′)P(x'), deduce x=x′x = x'). Sample: there is a unique real xx with x3+x=2x^3 + x = 2. Existence: x0=1x_0 = 1 works, since 1+1=21 + 1 = 2. Uniqueness: if x3+x=x′3+x′x^3 + x = x'^3 + x', then

0=(x3−x′3)+(x−x′)=(x−x′) (x2+xx′+x′2+1),0 = (x^3 - x'^3) + (x - x') = (x - x')\,\bigl(x^2 + xx' + x'^2 + 1\bigr),

and the second factor is positive (it equals (x+x′2)2+34x′2+1≥1\bigl(x + \tfrac{x'}2\bigr)^2 + \tfrac34 x'^2 + 1 \geq 1), so x=x′x = x'. Note the division of labor: existence used a lucky guess, uniqueness used algebra valid for arbitrary solutions — neither argument does the other’s job, and forgetting the second half is a standing temptation once a solution has been found.

Read in context →