Definition 2.5University Mathematics — Year 2 · Chapter 2 — Linear Algebra
For a subspace F⊆E, the annihilator is
F∘={φ∈E∗:φ∣F=0},
a subspace of E∗.
Examples
Example 2.7(An annihilator, both directions)
Let F=Vect((1,2,1),(1,0,−1))⊆R3. A form φ=ae1∗+be2∗+ce3∗ annihilates F iff
a+2b+c=0anda−c=0,
i.e. c=a and b=−a: F∘=R(e1∗−e2∗+e3∗), of dimension 3−2=1 as Theorem 2.6 requires. Reading it backwards: F={(x,y,z):x−y+z=0} — the plane recovered as the kernel of the single form spanning F∘. Going from a spanning family to equations is computing an annihilator; going from equations to a parametrization is computing a pre-annihilator. (Check: both spanning vectors satisfy x−y+z=0.)
Example 2.11(Rank read on both sides)
Let
A=101213011112.
Column rank: the third row is the sum of the first two, so rkA≤2; columns 1 and 2 are free: rkA=2. The transpose’s kernel: solving ATy=0 gives y∈R(1,1,−1), so kerAT has dimension 1=3−2: exactly (imA)∘ under the identification of (R3)∗ with row vectors, as Proposition 2.10 asserts — the single relation “row3 = row1 + row2” is the annihilator of the column space. Row rank (2 free rows) and column rank agree not by accident but because both equal rkA=rkAT.
Example 2.24(The trace pairing splits the matrix space)
On M2(R) with the pairing ⟨A,B⟩=tr(AB) of Exercise 2.9: decompose M=(1243) into symmetric and antisymmetric parts,
M=S+A,S=21(M+MT)=(1333),A=21(M−MT)=(0−110).
Then tr(SA)=tr(−3−313)=0: the two parts are “orthogonal” for the trace pairing — an instance of the general fact (proved in the weekend problem of this chapter) that antisymmetric matrices form exactly the annihilator of the symmetric ones. Duality sees the decomposition Mn=Sn⊕An before any inner product is chosen.