So uT(ψ)=(b1+3b3)e1∗+(2b1+b2)e2∗, and in the dual bases the matrix of uT is
(120130)=AT:
the abstract transposeis the flipped matrix, with no computation left to believe on faith. Note the mechanism: the j-th column of A became the j-th row of the new matrix because ψ∘u reads u’s outputs through ψ’s coefficients.
Example 2.11(Rank read on both sides)
Let
A=101213011112.
Column rank: the third row is the sum of the first two, so rkA≤2; columns 1 and 2 are free: rkA=2. The transpose’s kernel: solving ATy=0 gives y∈R(1,1,−1), so kerAT has dimension 1=3−2: exactly (imA)∘ under the identification of (R3)∗ with row vectors, as Proposition 2.10 asserts — the single relation “row3 = row1 + row2” is the annihilator of the column space. Row rank (2 free rows) and column rank agree not by accident but because both equal rkA=rkAT.