Definition 10.1University Mathematics — Year 1 · Chapter 10 — Real Numbers
Let A⊆R be nonempty. A real M is an upper bound of A when a≤M for all a∈A; A is bounded above when it has an upper bound (similarly below, with lower bounds; bounded means both). A maximum of A is an upper bound belonging to A.
The supremumsupA is the least upper bound of A, when it exists; the infimuminfA is the greatest lower bound.
The setA={1−n1:n∈N∗} on the number line: its points pile up toward 1 without reaching it. Every number ≥1 is an upper bound (the ray), and nothing smaller is, because an element of A enters each interval(1−ε,1): the two clauses of Proposition 10.4 in one picture. The supremum is the left endpoint of the ray of upper bounds — and the completeness axiom is precisely the guarantee that this ray always has a left endpoint.
Examples
Example 10.5
sup(0,1)=1, not attained (no maximum); sup[0,1]=1=max. For A={1−n1:n∈N∗}: supA=1, not attained; infA=minA=0. A maximum, when it exists, is the supremum; the whole point of sup is to have a substitute when the maximum does not exist.
The setA={x+x1:x>0}. For every x>0, x+x1−2=1(x−1/x)2≥0, so 2 is a lower bound; and 2=1+11∈A: therefore infA=minA=2, attained at x=1. Above, A is unbounded (x+x1>x can exceed any M by Theorem 10.10): supA does not exist in R (it is +∞ in R).
The setB={m+nm:m,n∈N∗}. Every element lies in (0,1), so 0 and 1 are bounds. Neither is attained: m+nm=1 would force n=0. For the supremum, freeze n=1 and let m grow: m+1m=1−m+11>1−ε as soon as m+1>ε1 (Archimedes): supB=1. Symmetrically (m=1, n large), infB=0. The closing insight: to pin a supremum, one well-chosen one-parameter path inside the set suffices — here the path n=1 — and the ε-characterization asks for nothing more.
Example 10.7(The infimum mirror)
The infimum has its own ε-characterization, obtained from Proposition 10.4 through infA=−sup(−A): i=infA iff i bounds A below and, for every ε>0, some a∈A has a<i+ε. A workout with both bounds at once: let
A={(−1)n+n1:n∈N∗}={0,23,−32,45,−54,…}.
Even indices give 1+n1≤23, with equality at n=2: since also the odd-index values are ≤0<23, we get supA=maxA=23. Odd indices give −1+n1>−1, decreasing toward −1: every element of A is >−1, and −1+ε is beaten by −1+n1 for odd n>ε1: infA=−1, not attained. One set, all four behaviors on display: a supremum that is a maximum, an infimum that is not a minimum.