Definition 11.2University Mathematics — Year 2 · Chapter 11 — Power Series
The radius of convergence of ∑anzn is
R=sup{r≥0:(anrn) bounded}∈[0,+∞].
By Lemma 11.1: absolute convergence for ∣z∣<R (normal on compact subdisks), divergence — indeed unbounded terms — for ∣z∣>R. On the boundary circle, anything can happen (Exercise 11.2). In practice R is computed by d’Alembert’s ratio test on ∣an∣∣z∣n or by comparison.
Examples
Example 11.3(A radius with no ratio test)
What is the radius of ∑sin(n)zn? The ratio ∣sin(n+1)/sinn∣ has no limit, but the definition works directly. R≥1:∣sinn∣≤1, so (sinn⋅rn) is bounded for every r<1 — indeed for r=1. R≤1: it suffices that sinn→0. Suppose sinn→0; the addition formula
sin(n+1)=sinncos1+cosnsin1
would force cosn→0 (solve for cosn: sin1=0), contradicting sin2n+cos2n=1. So the terms sin(n)1n do not tend to 0: the series diverges at z=1, and R≤1. Conclusion: R=1. Closing insight: the radius is a statement about ∣an∣rn being bounded — no limit of ratios is ever required, and boundedness arguments settle cases the ratio test cannot touch (compare the oscillating coefficients of Exercise 11.1).
Example 11.6(Multiplying by 1−x1 sums the coefficients)
A Cauchy product against the geometric series has a memorable meaning: for any ∑anxn of radius R>0 and ∣x∣<min(R,1),
1−x1n≥0∑anxn=n≥0∑(k=0∑nak)xn:
multiplication by 1−x1 replaces coefficients by their partial sums (convolve with the all-ones sequence). Instance: 1−xex=∑nsnxn with sn=∑k≤nk!1, the partial sums of e — compare Exercise 11.11, where the same product with e−x encodes the derangement counts. Closing insight: operations on power series are operations on coefficient sequences in disguise (multiply by 1−x1: sum; multiply by x: shift; differentiate: multiply by n and shift) — a dictionary the generating-functions chapter will read fluently.
Example 11.20(Binet’s formula, carried out)
Let φ=21+5 and ψ=21−5, the roots of X2=X+1; since φ+ψ=1 and φψ=−1,
1−x−x2=(1−φx)(1−ψx).
Partial fractions: seeking (1−φx)(1−ψx)x=1−φxA+1−ψxB, the constant term gives A+B=0 and the x-coefficient −Aψ−Bφ=1, so A(φ−ψ)=1: A=51=−B. Two geometric series later,
F(x)=51n≥0∑(φn−ψn)xn⟹Fn=5φn−ψn
by uniqueness of coefficients (Theorem 11.7). Since ∣ψ∣<1, the term 5ψn has absolute value <21: Fn is the nearest integer to 5φn. Closing insight: the radius φ1 of F is the reciprocal of the dominant root — growth of coefficients and radius of convergence are the same information read in opposite directions.