Let be a countable index set. A family of nonnegative reals is summable when the finite partial sums are bounded; its sum is
A family of reals or complexes (or Banach vectors) is summable when is; its sum is then defined by splitting into positive/negative (or real/imaginary) parts — equivalently, as the common value of over all enumerations of (see below).
Examples
Example 7.10 (Summability by diagonal counting)
For which is the family summable? Group the finite partial sums by diagonals : the diagonal carries pairs, each contributing , so the finite sums are exactly bounded by (and exhaust)
a series with positive terms equivalent to : summable iff , i.e. . The two-dimensional index eats one full power: a plane of terms is “one dimension more divergent” than a line — the counting geometry of the index set, not the size of individual terms, decides summability. (The same census shows is not summable: on the diagonal , each term is at least , and sums like the harmonic series.)
Example 7.12 (A rearrangement caught red-handed)
The alternating harmonic series sums to (Year 1 volume). Rearrange it as “one positive, two negatives”:
Grouping each block of three,
so the rearranged series converges to — half the original sum, with exactly the same terms. Non-absolutely convergent series remember the order of their terms; summable families are precisely the ones that do not.
Example 7.17 (A double-sum evaluation)
For real, let . Counting divisors by double summation — the family over is summable (product of convergent positive series) — and grouping by the product :
where is the number of divisors of . Summable families turn combinatorics into analysis.