Biology · Glossary

What is The risks of smallness?

Definition 27.1 University Biology — Year 3 · Chapter 27 — Conservation Biology

A large population declines when its death rate exceeds its birth rate; a small one can vanish without any change in either. Demographic stochasticity is the chance that, among a few individuals, more happen to die than are born, or all the survivors are male: it matters below a few dozen. Environmental stochasticity — a bad winter, a drought, a disease — strikes every individual at once, and a population of a few hundred that a large one would ride out can be wiped out; catastrophes are its tail. The Allee effect makes the per-capita growth rate fall at low density — mates cannot be found, colonial breeders cannot nest, herds cannot defend their young, the passenger pigeon’s flocks could not saturate the predators that took their squabs — so that below a threshold density the population declines toward zero on its own. And below a few hundred, the genetic processes of the next section reduce fitness generation by generation. These feed one another: a smaller population loses variation, becomes less fertile, grows smaller, is likelier to be hit by chance, and loses more — the extinction vortex (Gilpin and Soulé, 1986). A minimum viable population is the size above which the probability of extinction over a stated horizon (say 5%5\,\% in a century) is acceptable; it depends on the species’ biology and on how variable its environment is, and is usually in the thousands.

The extinction vortex. An external blow makes a population small; smallness then loses variation, lowers fitness, exposes the population to chance, and makes it smaller still. Conservation’s task is to break the loop before it closes.
The extinction vortex. An external blow makes a population small; smallness then loses variation, lowers fitness, exposes the population to chance, and makes it smaller still. Conservation’s task is to break the loop before it closes.
Read in context →