Mathematics · Glossary

What is associate elements?

Also known as: irreducible element · prime element

Definition 2.11 University Mathematics — Year 3 · Chapter 2 — Rings and Arithmetic

Let AA be an integral domain, a,bAa, b \in A. We say aa divides bb (aba \mid b) if b(a)=aAb \in (a) = aA. Elements a,ba, b are associates if a=uba = ub with uA×u \in A^\times (equivalently (a)=(b)(a) = (b)). A nonzero nonunit pp is:

  • irreducible if p=abp = ab forces aA×a \in A^\times or bA×b \in A^\times;
  • prime if pabp \mid ab forces pap \mid a or pbp \mid b (i.e. the ideal (p)(p) is prime).

Examples

Example 2.20 (A ring without unique factorization)

None of the implications Euclidean \Rightarrow PID \Rightarrow UFD is an equivalence, and the failure of the last is worth seeing once in complete detail. In

A=Z[i5]={a+ib5:a,bZ},N(a+ib5)=a2+5b2,A = \Z[\iu\sqrt5] = \{a + \iu b\sqrt5 : a, b \in \Z\}, \qquad N(a + \iu b\sqrt5) = a^2 + 5b^2,

the norm is multiplicative and N(z)=1N(z) = 1 iff zA×={±1}z \in A^\times = \{\pm1\}. Consider

6=23=(1+i5)(1i5).6 = 2 \cdot 3 = (1 + \iu\sqrt5)(1 - \iu\sqrt5).

All four factors are irreducible: their norms are 4,9,6,64, 9, 6, 6, and a proper factorization z=z1z2z = z_1z_2 would force N(z1){2,3}N(z_1) \in \{2, 3\} — but a2+5b2a^2 + 5b^2 never equals 22 or 33 (b=0b = 0 leaves the non-squares 2,32, 3; b1\abs b \geq 1 gives 5\geq 5). Yet 22 is associate to neither 1±i51 \pm \iu\sqrt5 (norms 464 \neq 6): two genuinely different factorizations of 66 into irreducibles. Equivalently, irreducible \neq prime here: 22 divides the product (1+i5)(1i5)=6(1 + \iu\sqrt5)(1 - \iu\sqrt5) = 6 but neither factor (norms again). The ideal-theoretic repair of this failure — factorizing ideals rather than elements — is the birth of algebraic number theory; at our level, the example calibrates how special the Euclidean rings Z\Z, K[X]K[X], Z[i]\Z[\iu] of this chapter really are.

Example 2.26

XnpX^n - p is irreducible over Q\Q for every prime pp and n1n \geq 1 (Eisenstein at pp): there are irreducible polynomials of every degree over Q\Q — in stark contrast with C\C (degree 11, d’Alembert–Gauss, proved in Chapter 16) and R\R (degrees 1,21, 2). The trick of shifting enlarges Eisenstein’s reach: the pp-th cyclotomic polynomial Φp=Xp1++X+1=Xp1X1\Phi_p = X^{p-1} + \dots + X + 1 = \frac{X^p - 1}{X - 1} has

Φp(X+1)=(X+1)p1X=Xp1+(p1)Xp2++(pp1),\Phi_p(X + 1) = \frac{(X+1)^p - 1}{X} = X^{p-1} + \binom{p}{1}X^{p-2} + \dots + \binom{p}{p-1},

Eisenstein at pp (p(pk)p \mid \binom pk for 0<k<p0 < k < p, and (pp1)=p≢0modp2\binom{p}{p-1} = p \not\equiv 0 \bmod p^2): Φp(X+1)\Phi_p(X+1), hence Φp\Phi_p, is irreducible over Q\Q. This is the algebraic heart of the 1717-gon story told in Chapter 4.

Read in context →