Mathematics · Glossary

What is Ideal?

Also known as: quotient ring

Definition 1.25 University Mathematics — Year 2 · Chapter 1 — Sets and Structures

Let AA be a commutative ring. An ideal IAI \subseteq A is an additive subgroup such that axIa x \in I for all aAa \in A, xIx \in I. Kernels of ring morphisms are ideals; I=AI = A iff 1I1 \in I iff II contains a unit. The ideal generated by xx is xA={xa}xA = \{xa\} (a principal ideal).

Examples

Example 1.27 (A polynomial gcd, two ways)

Compute gcd(X31, X21)\gcd(X^3 - 1,\ X^2 - 1) in Q[X]\Q[X]. By Euclid:

X31=X(X21)+(X1),X21=(X+1)(X1)+0,X^3 - 1 = X\,(X^2 - 1) + (X - 1), \qquad X^2 - 1 = (X + 1)(X - 1) + 0 ,

so the gcd is X1X - 1, and back-substitution gives the Bézout relation

X1=1(X31)X(X21).X - 1 = 1\cdot(X^3 - 1) - X\cdot(X^2 - 1).

By ideals: the ideal (X31)Q[X]+(X21)Q[X](X^3 - 1)\Q[X] + (X^2 - 1)\Q[X] is principal (Theorem 1.26); it contains X1X - 1 (the display) and is contained in (X1)Q[X](X - 1)\Q[X] (both generators vanish at 11, hence are multiples of X1X - 1): the monic generator is X1X - 1. The closing insight: the ideal viewpoint identifies the gcd without dividing — common roots locate the ideal, and Euclid merely certifies it.

Example 1.34 (An evaluation morphism and its kernel)

Take A=(0100)A = \begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix} and the evaluation εA ⁣:R[X]M2(R)\varepsilon_A \colon \R[X] \to \mathcal{M}_2(\R), PP(A)P \mapsto P(A). Since A2=0A^2 = 0,

P(A)=P(0)I+P(0)A=(P(0)P(0)0P(0)),P(A) = P(0)\,I + P'(0)\,A = \begin{pmatrix} P(0) & P'(0)\\ 0 & P(0)\end{pmatrix},

(only the constant and linear terms of PP survive). Hence kerεA={P:P(0)=P(0)=0}=X2R[X]\ker\varepsilon_A = \{P : P(0) = P'(0) = 0\} = X^2\,\R[X]: a principal ideal, exactly as Theorem 1.26 predicts, generated by the monic X2X^2 of least degree in the kernel — the minimal polynomial of AA, star of Chapter 3. The image is the two-dimensional commutative algebra {aI+bA}\{aI + bA\}: evaluation morphisms shrink the infinite-dimensional R[X]\R[X] onto small, computable algebras.

Read in context →
Definition 2.1 University Mathematics — Year 3 · Chapter 2 — Rings and Arithmetic

An ideal II of a ring AA is an additive subgroup such that AIIAI \subseteq I. The quotient ring A/IA/I is the quotient group (A,+)/I(A, +)/I with the multiplication (a+I)(b+I)=ab+I(a + I)(b + I) = ab + I: well defined, since changing aa to a+xa + x, bb to b+yb + y (x,yIx, y \in I) changes abab by ay+xb+xyIay + xb + xy \in I. The projection π ⁣:AA/I\pi \colon A \to A/I is a surjective ring morphism with kernel II, and kernels of ring morphisms are exactly the ideals.

Examples

Example 2.20 (A ring without unique factorization)

None of the implications Euclidean \Rightarrow PID \Rightarrow UFD is an equivalence, and the failure of the last is worth seeing once in complete detail. In

A=Z[i5]={a+ib5:a,bZ},N(a+ib5)=a2+5b2,A = \Z[\iu\sqrt5] = \{a + \iu b\sqrt5 : a, b \in \Z\}, \qquad N(a + \iu b\sqrt5) = a^2 + 5b^2,

the norm is multiplicative and N(z)=1N(z) = 1 iff zA×={±1}z \in A^\times = \{\pm1\}. Consider

6=23=(1+i5)(1i5).6 = 2 \cdot 3 = (1 + \iu\sqrt5)(1 - \iu\sqrt5).

All four factors are irreducible: their norms are 4,9,6,64, 9, 6, 6, and a proper factorization z=z1z2z = z_1z_2 would force N(z1){2,3}N(z_1) \in \{2, 3\} — but a2+5b2a^2 + 5b^2 never equals 22 or 33 (b=0b = 0 leaves the non-squares 2,32, 3; b1\abs b \geq 1 gives 5\geq 5). Yet 22 is associate to neither 1±i51 \pm \iu\sqrt5 (norms 464 \neq 6): two genuinely different factorizations of 66 into irreducibles. Equivalently, irreducible \neq prime here: 22 divides the product (1+i5)(1i5)=6(1 + \iu\sqrt5)(1 - \iu\sqrt5) = 6 but neither factor (norms again). The ideal-theoretic repair of this failure — factorizing ideals rather than elements — is the birth of algebraic number theory; at our level, the example calibrates how special the Euclidean rings Z\Z, K[X]K[X], Z[i]\Z[\iu] of this chapter really are.

Read in context →