Mathematics · Book 5 · Bachelor Year 3

University Mathematics — Year 3

University Mathematics — Year 3 · Bachelor Year 3

14The Fourier Transform

Fourier series decompose periodic signals into discrete harmonics; the Fourier transform does the same for signals on the whole line, with a continuum of frequencies. It converts differentiation into multiplication, convolution into products, and Gaussians into Gaussians — the reasons it solves differential equations, drives signal processing, and will prove the central limit theorem in Chapter 23. This chapter develops the L1L^1 theory (Riemann–Lebesgue, inversion, injectivity), the Schwartz class where the transform is a perfect bijection, and the L2L^2 theory (Plancherel: the transform is, up to a constant, a unitary operator), with two showpiece applications: the heat equation, solved end to end in the weekend problem, and the Poisson summation formula. Convention:

f^(ξ)=∫Rf(x) e−iξx  ⁣dx.\hat f(\xi) = \int_\R f(x)\,\eu^{-\iu\xi x}\,\dd x .

14.1 The transform on L1L^1

Proposition 14.1

For f∈L1(R)f \in L^1(\R): f^\hat f is well defined, bounded (∥f^∥∞≤∥f∥1\norm{\hat f}_\infty \leq \norm f_1), continuous, and:

  1. τaf^(ξ)=e−iaξf^(ξ)\widehat{\tau_af}(\xi) = \eu^{-\iu a\xi}\hat f(\xi) and eiaxf^(ξ)=f^(ξ−a)\widehat{\eu^{\iu ax}f}(\xi) = \hat f(\xi - a);
  2. f(⋅/λ)^(ξ)=λf^(λξ)\widehat{f(\cdot/\lambda)}(\xi) = \lambda\hat f(\lambda\xi) for λ>0\lambda > 0;
  3. if xf∈L1xf \in L^1, then f^\hat f is C1\mathcal C^1 with (f^)′(ξ)=(−ix)f^(ξ)(\hat f)'(\xi) = \widehat{(-\iu x)f}(\xi);
  4. if f∈C1f \in \mathcal C^1 with f′∈L1f' \in L^1 (and f→0f \to 0 at ±∞\pm\infty, automatic here), then f′^(ξ)=iξf^(ξ)\widehat{f'}(\xi) = \iu\xi\hat f(\xi);
  5. f∗g^=f^ g^\widehat{f * g} = \hat f\,\hat g for f,g∈L1f, g \in L^1.

Proof. Boundedness: ∣f^∣≤∫∣f∣\abs{\hat f} \leq \int\abs f. Continuity: DCT with dominator ∣f∣\abs f (Theorem 10.14). (1), (2): substitutions (Theorem 11.10). (3): differentiation under the integral, dominator ∣xf∣\abs{xf} (Theorem 10.15). (4): first, f(x)=f(0)+∫0xf′f(x) = f(0) + \int_0^xf' has a limit at ±∞\pm\infty (f′∈L1f' \in L^1), which must be 00 (f∈L1f \in L^1); then integrate by parts on [−A,A][-A, A] and let A→∞A \to \infty. (5): Fubini, legitimate since (x,y)↦f(x−y)g(y)e−iξx(x,y)\mapsto f(x - y)g(y)\eu^{-\iu\xi x} is absolutely integrable (Theorem 11.9):

f∗g^(ξ)=∬f(x−y)g(y)e−iξ(x−y)e−iξy ⁣dx  ⁣dy=f^(ξ) g^(ξ).\widehat{f*g}(\xi) = \iint f(x - y)g(y)\eu^{-\iu\xi(x - y)} \eu^{-\iu\xi y}\dd x\,\dd y = \hat f(\xi)\,\hat g(\xi).

∎

Example 14.2

The Gaussian: for a>0a > 0,

e−ax2^(ξ)=πa  e−ξ2/4a:\widehat{\eu^{-ax^2}}(\xi) = \sqrt{\frac\pi a}\;\eu^{-\xi^2/4a} :

by Exercise 10.7 (the ODE F′=−ξ2FF' = -\frac\xi{2}F trick, rescaled), or by (3): g=e−ax2^g = \widehat{\eu^{-ax^2}} satisfies g′(ξ)=−ξ2ag(ξ)g'(\xi) = -\frac{\xi}{2a}g(\xi) (integrate by parts), g(0)=π/ag(0) = \sqrt{\pi/a}. Gaussians are fixed points of the transform up to scaling — the deep reason they rule the central limit theorem.

Theorem 14.3 (Riemann–Lebesgue)

For f∈L1(R)f \in L^1(\R): f^(ξ)→0\hat f(\xi) \to 0 as ∣ξ∣→∞\abs\xi \to \infty. Thus f^ ⁣:L1→C0(R)\widehat{\phantom f} \colon L^1 \to \mathcal C_0(\R) (continuous functions vanishing at infinity).

Proof. For an indicator of an interval, 1[a, b]^(ξ)=e−iaξ−e−ibξiξ→0\widehat{\mathbf 1_{\intcc ab}}(\xi) = \frac{\eu^{-\iu a\xi} - \eu^{-\iu b\xi}}{\iu\xi} \to 0; hence for step functions. Step functions are dense in L1L^1 (Theorem 12.6(1) plus approximation of finite-measure sets by finite unions of intervals, Exercise 9.7), and the transform is ∥⋅∥∞\norm\cdot_\infty-∥⋅∥1\norm\cdot_1 continuous: for ∥f−s∥1<ε\norm{f - s}_1 < \varepsilon, lim sup⁡∣ξ∣→∞∣f^(ξ)∣≤ε\limsup_{\abs\xi\to\infty}\abs{\hat f(\xi)} \leq \varepsilon. ∎

14.2 Inversion and injectivity

Lemma 14.4 (Multiplication formula)

For f,g∈L1(R)f, g \in L^1(\R): ∫f^ g=∫f g^\displaystyle\int \hat f\,g = \int f\,\hat g.

Proof. Both sides equal ∬f(x)g(ξ)e−ixξ ⁣dx  ⁣dξ\iint f(x)g(\xi)\eu^{-\iu x\xi}\dd x\,\dd\xi (Tonelli–Fubini: the double integral of the absolute value is ∥f∥1∥g∥1\norm f_1\norm g_1). ∎

Theorem 14.5 (Inversion)

Let f∈L1(R)f \in L^1(\R).

  1. (Gaussian summability) For every xx,

    (f∗gε)(x)=12π∫Rf^(ξ) e−εξ2 eixξ  ⁣dξ,where gε(y)=12πε e−y2/4ε,(f * g_\varepsilon)(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int_\R \hat f(\xi)\, \eu^{-\varepsilon\xi^2}\,\eu^{\iu x\xi}\,\dd\xi, \qquad\text{where } g_\varepsilon(y) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi\varepsilon}}\, \eu^{-y^2/4\varepsilon},

    and f∗gε→ff * g_\varepsilon \to f in L1L^1 as ε→0\varepsilon \to 0.

  2. If moreover f^∈L1\hat f \in L^1, then for almost every xx

    f(x)=12π∫Rf^(ξ) eixξ  ⁣dξ,f(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_\R \hat f(\xi)\,\eu^{\iu x\xi}\,\dd\xi ,

    and ff has a continuous representative.

  3. (Injectivity) If f^=0\hat f = 0 then f=0f = 0 a.e.

Proof. (1) Fix xx and apply Lemma 14.4 to ff and g(ξ)=12πe−εξ2eixξg(\xi) = \frac1{2\pi}\eu^{-\varepsilon\xi^2}\eu^{\iu x\xi}: by Example 14.2 (with the modulation rule),

g^(y)=12ππε e−(y−x)2/4ε=gε(x−y),\hat g(y) = \frac1{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac\pi\varepsilon}\, \eu^{-(y - x)^2/4\varepsilon} = g_\varepsilon(x - y),

so 12π∫f^(ξ)e−εξ2eixξ ⁣dξ=∫f(y)gε(x−y) ⁣dy=(f∗gε)(x)\frac1{2\pi}\int\hat f(\xi)\eu^{-\varepsilon\xi^2} \eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi = \int f(y)g_\varepsilon(x - y)\dd y = (f*g_\varepsilon)(x). The gεg_\varepsilon are an approximate identity: gε≥0g_\varepsilon \geq 0, ∫gε=1\int g_\varepsilon = 1 (Gaussian integral), concentrating at 00; the proof of Theorem 12.9(2) applies verbatim (only ∫gε=1\int g_\varepsilon = 1 and concentration were used: for the tail, ∫∣y∣>δgε→0\int_{\abs y > \delta}g_\varepsilon \to 0): ∥f∗gε−f∥1→0\norm{f * g_\varepsilon - f}_1 \to 0.

(2) If f^∈L1\hat f \in L^1: the right side of (1) converges, by DCT (dominator ∣f^∣\abs{\hat f}), to 12π∫f^(ξ)eixξ ⁣dξ\frac1{2\pi}\int\hat f(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi for every xx, and this limit function is continuous (DCT again). On the other hand f∗gε→ff * g_\varepsilon \to f in L1L^1, so along a subsequence a.e. (Theorem 12.4): the two limits agree a.e.

(3) f^=0\hat f = 0 makes the right side of (1) vanish: f∗gε=0f * g_\varepsilon = 0 for all ε\varepsilon, and f∗gε→ff * g_\varepsilon \to f in L1L^1: f=0f = 0 a.e. ∎

14.3 The Schwartz class

Definition 14.6

The Schwartz class S(R)\mathcal S(\R) consists of the C∞\mathcal C^\infty functions ff with sup⁡x∣xmf(n)(x)∣<∞\sup_x\abs{x^m f^{(n)}(x)} < \infty for all m,n≥0m, n \geq 0 (all derivatives decay faster than any power). Examples: e−ax2\eu^{-ax^2}, Cc∞\mathcal C_c^\infty. Clearly S⊆Lp\mathcal S \subseteq L^p for every pp (bound by C(1+x2)−1C(1 + x^2)^{-1}), and S\mathcal S is stable under derivatives, multiplication by polynomials, and products.

Theorem 14.7

The Fourier transform maps S(R)\mathcal S(\R) bijectively onto itself, with inverse gˇ(x)=12π∫g(ξ)eixξ ⁣dξ\check g(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int g(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi.

Proof. Let f∈Sf \in \mathcal S. Iterating Proposition 14.1(3), (f^)(n)=(−ix)nf^(\hat f)^{(n)} = \widehat{(-\iu x)^nf} (each xkf∈L1x^kf \in L^1); iterating (4) with h=(−ix)nf∈Sh = (-\iu x)^nf \in \mathcal S (all of whose derivatives are integrable), (iξ)mh^=h(m)^(\iu\xi)^m\hat h = \widehat{h^{(m)}}. Combining,

∣ξm (f^)(n)(ξ)∣=∣ h(m)^(ξ)∣≤∥((−ix)nf)(m)∥1<∞\abs{\xi^m\,(\hat f)^{(n)}(\xi)} = \bigl|\widehat{\,h^{(m)}}(\xi)\bigr| \leq \bigl\|\bigl((-\iu x)^nf\bigr)^{(m)}\bigr\|_1 < \infty

uniformly in ξ\xi: f^∈S\hat f \in \mathcal S. Since f^∈L1\hat f \in L^1, inversion (Theorem 14.5(2)) holds everywhere (both sides continuous): f^ˇ=f\check{\hat f} = f, and symmetrically gˇ^=g\widehat{\check g} = g (the check transform is g↦12πg^(−⋅)g \mapsto \frac1{2\pi}\hat g(-\cdot), again preserving S\mathcal S): bijection. ∎

14.4 Plancherel and L2L^2

Theorem 14.8 (Plancherel)

For f∈L1∩L2(R)f \in L^1 \cap L^2(\R):

∥f^∥22=2π ∥f∥22.\norm{\hat f}_2^2 = 2\pi\,\norm f_2^2 .

Consequently f^\widehat{\phantom f} extends uniquely to a continuous linear map F ⁣:L2(R)→L2(R)\mathcal F \colon L^2(\R) \to L^2(\R) with ∥Ff∥2=2π∥f∥2\norm{\mathcal Ff}_2 = \sqrt{2\pi}\norm f_2; F\mathcal F is bijective, with F−1=12π F∘σ\mathcal F^{-1} = \frac1{2\pi}\,\mathcal F\circ\sigma where σf=f(−⋅)\sigma f = f(-\cdot), and it preserves inner products up to the factor 2π2\pi.

Proof. Let f∈L1∩L2f \in L^1\cap L^2 and h=f∗f~h = f * \tilde f with f~(x)=f(−x)‾\tilde f(x) = \overline{f(-x)}. Then h∈L1h \in L^1 (Theorem 11.9), hh is continuous and bounded (Exercise 12.6: f,f~∈L2f, \tilde f \in L^2), h(0)=∫ffˉ=∥f∥22h(0) = \int f\bar f = \norm f_2^2, and h^=f^ f~^=f^ f^‾=∣f^∣2≥0\hat h = \hat f\,\widehat{\tilde f} = \hat f\,\overline{\hat f} = \abs{\hat f}^2 \geq 0 (compute f~^=f^‾\widehat{\tilde f} = \overline{\hat f}). Apply Theorem 14.5(1) to hh at x=0x = 0:

(h∗gε)(0)=12π∫h^(ξ) e−εξ2 ⁣dξ.(h * g_\varepsilon)(0) = \frac1{2\pi}\int \hat h(\xi)\,\eu^{-\varepsilon\xi^2}\dd\xi .

As ε→0\varepsilon \to 0: the left side tends to h(0)h(0) (hh continuous bounded: (h∗gε)(0)−h(0)=∫(h(−y)−h(0))gε(y) ⁣dy→0(h*g_\varepsilon)(0) - h(0) = \int(h(-y) - h(0))g_\varepsilon(y)\dd y \to 0 by splitting small/large yy); the right side increases to 12π∫h^\frac1{2\pi}\int\hat h by MCT (h^≥0\hat h \geq 0). Hence 12π∫∣f^∣2=∥f∥22\frac1{2\pi}\int\abs{\hat f}^2 = \norm f_2^2, finite or not a priori — and finite, proving both membership and the identity.

Extension: L1∩L2⊇CcL^1\cap L^2 \supseteq \mathcal C_c is dense in L2L^2 (Theorem 12.6); the transform is 2π\sqrt{2\pi}-isometric there, so extends uniquely to an isometry-up-to-constant F\mathcal F on L2L^2 (Theorem 7.2). Inversion for S\mathcal S (Theorem 14.7) transfers by the same density (both sides L2L^2-continuous): F(12πF(σf))=f\mathcal F\bigl(\frac1{2\pi}\mathcal F(\sigma f)\bigr) = f on S\mathcal S, hence on L2L^2: bijectivity. Inner products: polarization from the norm identity. ∎

Theorem 14.9 (Poisson summation)

Let f∈S(R)f \in \mathcal S(\R) (continuous ff with ∣f∣+∣f^∣≤C(1+∣⋅∣)−2\abs{f} + \abs{\hat f} \leq C(1 + \abs\cdot)^{-2} suffices). Then

∑n∈Zf(n)  =  ∑k∈Zf^(2πk).\sum_{n\in\Z} f(n) \;=\; \sum_{k\in\Z}\hat f(2\pi k) .

Proof. Let F(x)=∑n∈Zf(x+n)F(x) = \sum_{n\in\Z}f(x + n): the series converges normally on compacts (decay of ff), so FF is continuous, and it is 11-periodic. Its Fourier coefficients (period 11: ck(F)=∫01F(t)e−2iπkt ⁣dtc_k(F) = \int_0^1F(t)\eu^{-2\iu\pi kt}\dd t):

ck(F)=∑n∫01f(t+n) e−2iπkt ⁣dt=∫Rf(t) e−2iπkt ⁣dt=f^(2πk)c_k(F) = \sum_n\int_0^1 f(t + n)\,\eu^{-2\iu\pi kt}\dd t = \int_\R f(t)\,\eu^{-2\iu\pi kt}\dd t = \hat f(2\pi k)

(normal convergence justifies the interchange; the phase is 11-periodic). The series ∑k∣ck(F)∣\sum_k\abs{c_k(F)} converges (decay of f^\hat f), so the Fourier series of FF converges normally; its sum is a continuous function with the same Fourier coefficients as FF, hence equals FF (injectivity on the circle: the difference has zero coefficients, and Theorem 13.9 gives zero in L2L^2, hence everywhere by continuity). Evaluate at x=0x = 0. ∎

Example 14.10 (The theta identity)

Applying Poisson to f(x)=e−πtx2f(x) = \eu^{-\pi tx^2} (t>0t > 0), whose transform is f^(ξ)=t−1/2e−ξ2/4πt\hat f(\xi) = t^{-1/2}\eu^{-\xi^2/4\pi t} (Example 14.2 with a=πta = \pi t):

∑n∈Ze−πn2t=1t∑k∈Ze−πk2/t:\sum_{n\in\Z}\eu^{-\pi n^2t} = \frac1{\sqrt t}\sum_{k\in\Z}\eu^{-\pi k^2/t} :

the functional equation of Jacobi’s theta function, key to the functional equation of Riemann’s ζ\zeta — and a spectacular numerical accelerator: for tt small, the left side converges slowly, the right side blazingly fast.

Method 14.11

Working ranges: L1L^1 — transform defined pointwise, inversion needs f^∈L1\hat f \in L^1; S\mathcal S — everything is legal, prove here first; L2L^2 — transform defined by density (not by the integral!), perfect symmetry, Parseval bookkeeping. To compute a transform: reduce to the table (indicator, exponential, Gaussian) by the rules of Proposition 14.1; to prove an identity: establish it on S\mathcal S (or Cc∞\mathcal C_c^\infty) and extend by density and continuity (Method 12.13); to solve a linear PDE or ODE with constant coefficients: transform, divide, invert.

The heat kernel g_t(x) = 12√π t\, -x2/4t at three times: total mass 1 forever, height t-1/2, width √ t. Convolving initial data with this spreading Gaussian is the entire content of the weekend problem; in frequency, the same picture reads g_t( ) = -t 2 — high frequencies die first, and that asymmetry is the arrow of time.
The heat kernel gt(x)=12πt e−x2/4tg_t(x) = \frac1{2\sqrt{\pi t}}\,\eu^{-x^2/4t} at three times: total mass 11 forever, height ∼t−1/2\sim t^{-1/2}, width ∼t\sim \sqrt t. Convolving initial data with this spreading Gaussian is the entire content of the weekend problem; in frequency, the same picture reads g^t(ξ)=e−tξ2\hat g_t(\xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2} — high frequencies die first, and that asymmetry is the arrow of time.

14.5 Exercises

Exercise 14.1 ★

Compute the Fourier transforms of: 1[−a, a]\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-a}a}; e−a∣x∣\eu^{-a\abs x} (a>0a > 0); the tent function max⁡(0,1−∣x∣)\max(0, 1 - \abs x); 1x2+a2\frac1{x^2 + a^2} (use inversion on the second). Record the emerging table.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.1.

1[−a, a]^(ξ)=∫−aae−iξx ⁣dx=2sin⁡(aξ)ξ\widehat{\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-a}a}}(\xi) = \int_{-a}^a\eu^{-\iu\xi x}\dd x = \frac{2\sin(a\xi)}{\xi} (value 2a2a at 00). e−a∣x∣^(ξ)=∫0∞e−(a+iξ)x+e−(a−iξ)x  ⁣dx=1a+iξ+1a−iξ=2aa2+ξ2\widehat{\eu^{-a\abs x}}(\xi) = \int_0^\infty\eu^{-(a + \iu\xi)x} + \eu^{-(a - \iu\xi)x}\,\dd x = \frac1{a + \iu\xi} + \frac1{a - \iu\xi} = \frac{2a}{a^2 + \xi^2}. Tent: max⁡(0,1−∣x∣)=1[−1/2, 1/2]∗1[−1/2, 1/2]\max(0, 1 - \abs x) = \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1/2}{1/2}} * \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1/2}{1/2}}, so its transform is (2sin⁡(ξ/2)ξ)2=(sin⁡(ξ/2)ξ/2)2\bigl(\frac{2\sin(\xi/2)}\xi\bigr)^2 = \bigl(\frac{\sin(\xi/2)}{\xi/2}\bigr)^2. Last: 2aa2+ξ2∈L1\frac{2a}{a^2+\xi^2} \in L^1, so inversion (Theorem 14.5(2)) applied to e−a∣x∣\eu^{-a\abs x} gives, after renaming variables,

(1x2+a2)^(ξ)=πa e−a∣ξ∣.\widehat{\Bigl(\frac1{x^2 + a^2}\Bigr)}(\xi) = \frac{\pi}{a}\,\eu^{-a\abs\xi} .

Exercise 14.2 ★

Let f∈L1f \in L^1. Express in terms of f^\hat f the transforms of: f(x−a)f(x - a), f(x)cos⁡(bx)f(x)\cos(bx), f(ax+b)f(ax + b), f(−x)‾\overline{f(-x)}, (f∗f)(x)(f * f)(x). Verify each rule on the Gaussian.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.2.

From Proposition 14.1: f(⋅−a)^=e−iaξf^(ξ)\widehat{f(\cdot - a)} = \eu^{-\iu a\xi}\hat f(\xi); fcos⁡(b⋅)^=12(f^(ξ−b)+f^(ξ+b))\widehat{f\cos(b\cdot)} = \frac12\bigl(\hat f(\xi - b) + \hat f(\xi + b)\bigr); f(a⋅+b)^(ξ)=1a eibξ/a f^(ξ/a)\widehat{f(a\cdot + b)}(\xi) = \frac1a\,\eu^{\iu b\xi/a}\,\hat f(\xi/a) (a>0a > 0); f(−⋅)‾^=f^‾\widehat{\overline{f(-\cdot)}} = \overline{\hat f}; f∗f^=f^2\widehat{f * f} = \hat f^2. On the Gaussian (e−x2^=πe−ξ2/4\widehat{\eu^{-x^2}} = \sqrt\pi\eu^{-\xi^2/4}) each rule is a one-line check — e.g. e−(x−a)2\eu^{-(x-a)^2} has transform π e−iaξe−ξ2/4\sqrt\pi\,\eu^{-\iu a\xi}\eu^{-\xi^2/4}, which the direct computation (complete the square) confirms.

Exercise 14.3 ★★

(a) Show that 1[−1, 1]∗1[−1, 1]\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1}1} * \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1}1} has transform (2sin⁡ξξ)2\bigl(\frac{2\sin\xi}\xi \bigr)^2, and deduce ∫R(sin⁡ξξ)2 ⁣dξ=π\int_\R\bigl(\frac{\sin\xi}\xi\bigr)^2\dd\xi = \pi by Plancherel — or by inversion at 00. Compare Problem 10.1. (b) Compute ∫R ⁣dx(x2+1)2\int_\R\frac{\dd x}{(x^2+1)^2} via Plancherel applied to e−∣x∣\eu^{-\abs x}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.3.

(a) h=1[−1, 1]∗1[−1, 1]h = \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1}1}*\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1}1} has h^=(2sin⁡ξξ)2∈L1\hat h = \bigl(\frac{2\sin\xi}\xi\bigr)^2 \in L^1; inversion at x=0x = 0, where h(0)=λ([−1, 1]∩[−1, 1])=2h(0) = \lambda(\intcc{-1}1\cap\intcc{-1}1) = 2:

2=12π∫R(2sin⁡ξξ)2 ⁣dξ ⟹ ∫R(sin⁡ξξ)2 ⁣dξ=π,2 = \frac1{2\pi}\int_\R\Bigl(\frac{2\sin\xi}\xi\Bigr)^2 \dd\xi \ \Longrightarrow\ \int_\R\Bigl(\frac{\sin\xi}\xi\Bigr)^2\dd\xi = \pi ,

consistent with ∫0∞sin⁡2ξ2=π2\int_0^\infty\frac{\sin^2}{\xi^2} = \frac\pi2 (Problem 10.1).

(b) Plancherel for f=e−∣x∣f = \eu^{-\abs x}: ∫∣f^∣2=2π∫∣f∣2\int\abs{\hat f}^2 = 2\pi\int\abs f^2 reads ∫4  ⁣dξ(1+ξ2)2=2π∫e−2∣x∣ ⁣dx=2π\int\frac{4\,\dd\xi}{(1 + \xi^2)^2} = 2\pi\int\eu^{-2\abs x}\dd x = 2\pi: ∫R ⁣dξ(1+ξ2)2=π2\int_\R\frac{\dd\xi}{(1+\xi^2)^2} = \frac\pi2.

Exercise 14.4 ★★

(Heat kernel algebra) With gt(x)=12πte−x2/4tg_t(x) = \frac1{2\sqrt{\pi t}}\eu^{-x^2/4t}: (a) verify g^t(ξ)=e−tξ2\hat g_t(\xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2}; (b) deduce the semigroup law gt∗gs=gt+sg_t * g_s = g_{t+s} without any integral computation; (c) show ∥gt∥1=1\norm{g_t}_1 = 1 and ∥gt∥22=(8πt)−1/2\norm{g_t}_2^2 = (8\pi t)^{-1/2}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.4.

(a) gt(x)=12πte−x2/4tg_t(x) = \frac1{2\sqrt{\pi t}}\eu^{-x^2/4t}: by Example 14.2 with a=14ta = \frac1{4t}, g^t(ξ)=12πt4πt e−tξ2=e−tξ2\hat g_t(\xi) = \frac1{2\sqrt{\pi t}}\sqrt{4\pi t}\,\eu^{-t\xi^2} = \eu^{-t\xi^2}. (b) gt∗gs^=e−tξ2e−sξ2=gt+s^\widehat{g_t * g_s} = \eu^{-t\xi^2}\eu^{-s\xi^2} = \widehat{g_{t+s}}, and the transform is injective on L1L^1 (Theorem 14.5(3)): gt∗gs=gt+sg_t * g_s = g_{t+s}. (c) ∥gt∥1=1\norm{g_t}_1 = 1 (Gaussian integral); ∥gt∥22=14πt∫e−x2/2t ⁣dx=2πt4πt=18πt\norm{g_t}_2^2 = \frac1{4\pi t}\int\eu^{-x^2/2t}\dd x = \frac{\sqrt{2\pi t}}{4\pi t} = \frac1{\sqrt{8\pi t}}.

Exercise 14.5 ★★

Show that if f∈L1f \in L^1 is even and real, f^\hat f is even and real; if ff is odd and real, f^\hat f is odd and purely imaginary. What does f^(0)\hat f(0) compute? Deduce that f≥0f \geq 0 forces ∥f^∥∞=f^(0)=∫f\norm{\hat f}_\infty = \hat f(0) = \int f, and interpret for probability densities (Chapter 23: a characteristic function has modulus ≤1\leq 1, attained at 00).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.5.

For real even ff: f^(ξ)=∫fcos⁡(ξx) ⁣dx\hat f(\xi) = \int f\cos(\xi x)\dd x (the sine part cancels): real and even. Odd: f^(ξ)=−i∫fsin⁡(ξx)\hat f(\xi) = -\iu\int f\sin(\xi x): odd, purely imaginary. f^(0)=∫f\hat f(0) = \int f: the total mass. If f≥0f \geq 0: ∣f^(ξ)∣≤∫∣f∣=∫f=f^(0)\abs{\hat f(\xi)} \leq \int\abs f = \int f = \hat f(0), so the sup is attained at 00. For a probability density, f^(−ξ)\hat f(-\xi) is the characteristic function of Chapter 23: modulus ≤1\leq 1 everywhere, =1= 1 at the origin.

Exercise 14.6 ★★★

(Non-surjectivity) Show that f^ ⁣:L1→C0\widehat{\phantom f}\colon L^1 \to \mathcal C_0 is injective and continuous, but not surjective, in three steps. (i) Injectivity (Theorem 14.5) and continuity (∥f^∥∞≤∥f∥1\norm{\hat f}_\infty \leq \norm f_1), and C0\mathcal C_0 is a Banach space (closed in ∥⋅∥∞\norm\cdot_\infty). (ii) If the map were surjective, it would be bijective, and the open mapping theorem (Theorem 8.12) would give a constant CC with ∥f∥1≤C∥f^∥∞\norm f_1 \leq C\norm{\hat f}_\infty for all f∈L1f \in L^1. (iii) Contradict this with fn(x)=sin⁡xx⋅sin⁡(x/n)x/nf_n(x) = \frac{\sin x}{x}\cdot\frac{\sin(x/n)}{x/n}: its transform is (up to constants) the convolution 1[−1, 1]∗1[−1/n, 1/n]\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1}1} * \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1/n}{1/n}}-type trapezoid — show ∥f^n∥∞≤π\norm{\hat f_n}_\infty \leq \pi uniformly, while ∥fn∥1≥cln⁡n\norm{f_n}_1 \geq c\ln n by counting the arches of ∣sin⁡x∣x\frac{\abs{\sin x}}x on [1,n][1, n] (where the second factor is bounded below), as in Theorem 8.11.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.6.

(i) Injectivity is Theorem 14.5(3); continuity is ∥f^∥∞≤∥f∥1\norm{\hat f}_\infty \leq \norm f_1 (with values in C0\mathcal C_0 by Riemann–Lebesgue); C0\mathcal C_0 is closed in the sup norm (uniform limits of vanishing-at-infinity functions vanish at infinity): Banach.

(ii) A continuous bijection between Banach spaces has continuous inverse (Theorem 8.12): there would be CC with ∥f∥1≤C∥f^∥∞\norm f_1 \leq C\norm{\hat f}_\infty.

(iii) Let fn(x)=sin⁡xx⋅sin⁡(x/n)x/nf_n(x) = \frac{\sin x}x\cdot\frac{\sin(x/n)}{x/n}: a product of two L2L^2 functions, and O(x−2)O(x^{-2}) at infinity, so fn∈L1∩L2f_n \in L^1\cap L^2. Since (sin⁡(ax)ax)\bigl(\frac{\sin(ax)}{ax}\bigr) has L2L^2-transform πa1[−a, a]\frac\pi a\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-a}a}, the product formula gh^=12πg^∗h^\widehat{gh} = \frac1{2\pi}\hat g * \hat h (valid for g,h∈L2g, h \in L^2 with gh∈L1gh \in L^1; check it on Schwartz functions by Fubini and extend by L2L^2-continuity of both sides via Plancherel) gives

f^n=12π (π1[−1, 1])∗(πn 1[−1/n, 1/n]):\hat f_n = \frac1{2\pi}\,\bigl(\pi\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1}1}\bigr) * \bigl(\pi n\,\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1/n}{1/n}}\bigr):

a trapezoid of height πn2⋅2n=π\frac{\pi n}2\cdot\frac2n = \pi: ∥f^n∥∞=π\norm{\hat f_n}_\infty = \pi for every nn. But on [1,n][1, n], sin⁡(x/n)x/n≥sin⁡1>0\frac{\sin(x/n)}{x/n} \geq \sin 1 > 0, so

∥fn∥1≥sin⁡1∫1n∣sin⁡x∣x ⁣dx≥cln⁡n\norm{f_n}_1 \geq \sin 1\int_1^n\frac{\abs{\sin x}}x\dd x \geq c\ln n

(arch-counting, as in Theorem 8.11). The bound ∥fn∥1≤Cπ\norm{f_n}_1 \leq C\pi fails for large nn: not surjective. (The image is a dense — by Stone–Weierstrass-type arguments — but proper subspace of C0\mathcal C_0.)

Exercise 14.7 ★★

(Smoothness ↔\leftrightarrow decay dictionary) Prove: f∈L1f \in L^1 with f^(ξ)=O(∣ξ∣−k−1−δ)\hat f(\xi) = O(\abs\xi^{-k-1-\delta}) for some δ>0\delta > 0 implies ff has a Ck\mathcal C^k representative. Conversely f∈Cckf \in \mathcal C^k_c implies f^(ξ)=O(∣ξ∣−k)\hat f(\xi) = O(\abs\xi^{-k}). Illustrate both directions on the tent function.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.7.

If f^(ξ)=O(∣ξ∣−k−1−δ)\hat f(\xi) = O(\abs\xi^{-k-1-\delta}): then ξjf^∈L1\xi^j\hat f \in L^1 for 0≤j≤k0 \leq j \leq k (integrable at infinity by the decay, locally by continuity of f^\hat f). Inversion (Theorem 14.5(2)) represents ff a.e. by x↦12π∫f^(ξ)eixξ ⁣dξx \mapsto \frac1{2\pi}\int\hat f(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi, and differentiation under the integral (dominators ∣ξjf^∣\abs{\xi^j\hat f}) makes this representative Ck\mathcal C^k. Conversely for f∈Cckf \in \mathcal C_c^k: iterating Proposition 14.1(4), (iξ)kf^=f(k)^(\iu\xi)^k\hat f = \widehat{f^{(k)}}, so ∣f^∣≤∥f(k)∥1∣ξ∣−k\abs{\hat f} \leq \norm{f^{(k)}}_1\abs\xi^{-k}. Tent function: continuous with compact support (k=0k = 0: transform bounded), and its transform ∼ξ−2=O(∣ξ∣−0−1−1)\sim \xi^{-2} = O(\abs\xi^{-0-1-1}) returns, by the first direction, a C0\mathcal C^0 representative — both sharp: the tent is not C1\mathcal C^1, and its transform decays no faster than ξ−2\xi^{-2}.

Exercise 14.8 ★★★

(Heisenberg’s inequality) For f∈S(R)f \in \mathcal S(\R) real with ∥f∥2=1\norm f_2 = 1, prove

(∫x2f(x)2 ⁣dx)⋅(12π∫ξ2∣f^(ξ)∣2 ⁣dξ)  ≥  14,\Bigl(\int x^2f(x)^2\dd x\Bigr)\cdot \Bigl(\frac1{2\pi}\int \xi^2\abs{\hat f(\xi)}^2\dd\xi\Bigr) \;\geq\; \frac14 ,

with equality for Gaussians. (Write 1=∫f2=−∫x (f2)′1 = \int f^2 = -\int x\,(f^2)' by parts, bound by Cauchy–Schwarz, and convert ∥f′∥2\norm{f'}_2 by Plancherel.) Interpretation: a signal and its spectrum cannot both be concentrated.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.8.

Integration by parts (f∈Sf \in \mathcal S; boundary terms vanish):

1=∫f2=[xf2]−∞∞−∫x (f2)′=−2∫xff′≤2 ∥xf∥2 ∥f′∥2.1 = \int f^2 = \bigl[xf^2\bigr]_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int x\,(f^2)' = -2\int xff' \leq 2\,\norm{xf}_2\,\norm{f'}_2 .

Plancherel and f′^=iξf^\widehat{f'} = \iu\xi\hat f: ∥f′∥22=12π∫ξ2∣f^∣2\norm{f'}_2^2 = \frac1{2\pi}\int\xi^2\abs{\hat f}^2. Squaring the display:

14≤∥xf∥22⋅12π∫ξ2∣f^∣2 ⁣dξ.\frac14 \leq \norm{xf}_2^2\cdot\frac1{2\pi} \int\xi^2\abs{\hat f}^2\dd\xi .

Equality requires equality in Cauchy–Schwarz: f′=λxff' = \lambda xf with λ<0\lambda < 0 (integrability), i.e. f(x)=c eλx2/2f(x) = c\,\eu^{\lambda x^2/2}: Gaussians. A signal concentrated in xx (small ∥xf∥2\norm{xf}_2) must have spread-out spectrum, and conversely: the uncertainty principle.

Exercise 14.9 ★★

Justify Example 14.10 in detail (hypotheses of Poisson for the Gaussian), and use the identity to evaluate ∑n∈Ze−πn2\sum_{n\in\Z}\eu^{-\pi n^2} to six decimals with three terms. How many terms of the defining series would the same accuracy require at t=10−2t = 10^{-2}, versus the transformed series?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.9.

The Gaussian f(x)=e−πtx2f(x) = \eu^{-\pi tx^2} is Schwartz, so Theorem 14.9 applies, and f^(ξ)=t−1/2e−ξ2/4πt\hat f(\xi) = t^{-1/2}\eu^{-\xi^2/4\pi t}; at ξ=2πk\xi = 2\pi k the right side becomes t−1/2e−πk2/tt^{-1/2}\eu^{-\pi k^2/t}: the theta identity. At t=1t = 1:

∑n∈Ze−πn2=1+2e−π+2e−4π+⋯≈1+0.0864278+0.0000070=1.0864348,\sum_{n\in\Z}\eu^{-\pi n^2} = 1 + 2\eu^{-\pi} + 2\eu^{-4\pi} + \cdots \approx 1 + 0.0864278 + 0.0000070 = 1.0864348,

accurate to 66 decimals with three terms (e−9π≈5⋅10−13\eu^{-9\pi} \approx 5\cdot10^{-13}). At t=10−2t = 10^{-2}: the defining series needs e−πn2/100<10−7\eu^{-\pi n^2/100} < 10^{-7}, i.e. n≳23n \gtrsim 23 — about 4747 terms — while the transformed series is 10∑ke−100πk210\sum_k\eu^{-100\pi k^2}, where already the k=1k = 1 term is ∼10−136\sim 10^{-136}: one term suffices.

Exercise 14.10 ★★

(Band-limited functions) Let f∈L2(R)f \in L^2(\R) with Ff\mathcal Ff supported in [−π, π]\intcc{-\pi}\pi. Show that ff has a representative extending each of whose values is recoverable from samples: prove the Shannon interpolation at the integers,

f(x)=∑n∈Zf(n) sin⁡(π(x−n))π(x−n)in L2,f(x) = \sum_{n\in\Z} f(n)\, \frac{\sin\bigl(\pi(x - n)\bigr)}{\pi(x - n)} \quad\text{in } L^2,

by expanding Ff\mathcal Ff in the Fourier basis of L2([−π, π])L^2(\intcc{-\pi}\pi) (Theorem 13.9) and transforming back term by term.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.10.

Ff∈L2([−π, π])⊆L1([−π, π])\mathcal Ff \in L^2(\intcc{-\pi}\pi) \subseteq L^1(\intcc{-\pi}\pi) (finite measure), so inversion gives the continuous representative f(x)=12π∫−ππFf(ξ)eixξ ⁣dξf(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^\pi\mathcal Ff(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi, with

f(n)=12π∫−ππFf(ξ) einξ ⁣dξ=⟨e−n,Ff⟩f(n) = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\mathcal Ff(\xi)\,\eu^{\iu n\xi}\dd\xi = \langle e_{-n}, \mathcal Ff\rangle

in the notation of Theorem 13.9. Expanding in that Hilbert basis: Ff=∑nf(n) e−inξ\mathcal Ff = \sum_nf(n)\,\eu^{-\iu n\xi} in L2([−π, π])L^2(\intcc{-\pi}\pi). Apply the L2L^2-continuous F−1\mathcal F^{-1} term by term:

F−1(1[−π, π]e−inξ)(x)=12π∫−ππeiξ(x−n) ⁣dξ=sin⁡(π(x−n))π(x−n),\mathcal F^{-1}\bigl(\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-\pi}\pi}\eu^{-\iu n\xi}\bigr)(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\eu^{\iu\xi(x - n)}\dd\xi = \frac{\sin\bigl(\pi(x-n)\bigr)}{\pi(x - n)} ,

giving f=∑nf(n)sinc⁡(⋅−n)f = \sum_nf(n)\operatorname{sinc}(\cdot - n) in L2L^2: a band-limited signal is determined by its integer samples — Shannon’s sampling theorem.

Exercise 14.11 ★★

(The transform as an operator of order four) On S(R)\mathcal S(\R), let Ff=f^\mathcal F f = \hat f. (a) Using the inversion formula, show (F2f)(x)=2π f(−x)(\mathcal F^2f)(x) = 2\pi\,f(-x), and deduce F4=(2π)2 id\mathcal F^4 = (2\pi)^2\, \mathrm{id}. (b) Deduce that every eigenvalue of F\mathcal F on S\mathcal S belongs to {±2π,±i2π}\{\pm\sqrt{2\pi}, \pm\iu\sqrt{2\pi}\}, and exhibit an eigenfunction for +2π+\sqrt{2\pi} (which function of this chapter is proportional to its own transform?). (c) Show that even functions satisfy F2f=2πf\mathcal F^2f = 2\pi f and odd ones F2f=−2πf\mathcal F^2f = -2\pi f; produce an eigenfunction for the eigenvalue −i2π-\iu\sqrt{2\pi} from xe−x2/2x\eu^{-x^2/2} by computing its transform (differentiate the Gaussian’s transform).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.11.

(a) Inversion on S\mathcal S: f(x)=12π∫f^(ξ)eixξ ⁣dξ=12π(Ff^)(−x)f(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int\hat f(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi = \frac1{2\pi}(\mathcal F\hat f)(-x), i.e. (F2f)(x)=2πf(−x)(\mathcal F^2f)(x) = 2\pi f(-x). Applying twice: F4f=2π F2f(−⋅)=(2π)2f\mathcal F^4f = 2\pi\,\mathcal F^2f(-\cdot) = (2\pi)^2f.

(b) If Ff=λf\mathcal Ff = \lambda f with f≠0f \neq 0: (2π)2f=F4f=λ4f(2\pi)^2f = \mathcal F^4f = \lambda^4f, so λ4=(2π)2\lambda^4 = (2\pi)^2: λ∈{±2π,±i2π}\lambda \in \{\pm\sqrt{2\pi}, \pm\iu\sqrt{2\pi}\}. The Gaussian g(x)=e−x2/2g(x) = \eu^{-x^2/2} has g^=2π g\hat g = \sqrt{2\pi}\,g (Example 14.2 at a=12a = \frac12): eigenfunction for +2π+\sqrt{2\pi}.

(c) F2f=2πf(−⋅)\mathcal F^2f = 2\pi f(-\cdot) equals ±2πf\pm2\pi f according to parity. For h(x)=xe−x2/2h(x) = x\eu^{-x^2/2}: differentiating g^(ξ)=2πe−ξ2/2\hat g(\xi) = \sqrt{2\pi}\eu^{-\xi^2/2} with the rule xf^=i ⁣d ⁣dξf^\widehat{xf} = \iu\frac{\dd}{\dd\xi}\hat f:

h^(ξ)=i  ⁣d ⁣dξ(2πe−ξ2/2)=−i2π ξe−ξ2/2=−i2π h(ξ):\hat h(\xi) = \iu\,\frac{\dd}{\dd\xi}\bigl(\sqrt{2\pi} \eu^{-\xi^2/2}\bigr) = -\iu\sqrt{2\pi}\,\xi\eu^{-\xi^2/2} = -\iu\sqrt{2\pi}\,h(\xi) :

an eigenfunction for −i2π-\iu\sqrt{2\pi}. (The Hermite functions continue the pattern, cycling through the four eigenvalues — the discrete Fourier clock.)

Exercise 14.12 ★★

(Autocorrelation and Wiener’s lemma) For f∈L2(R)f \in L^2(\R) define f~(x)=f(−x)‾\tilde f(x) = \overline{f(-x)} and the autocorrelation Af=f∗f~A_f = f * \tilde f. (a) Show that AfA_f is a bounded continuous function with Af(0)=∥f∥22≥∣Af(x)∣A_f(0) = \norm f_2^2 \geq \abs{A_f(x)} for all xx (Exercise 12.6 and Cauchy–Schwarz). (b) Show, first for f∈L1∩L2f \in L^1\cap L^2, that Af^=∣f^ ∣2≥0\widehat{A_f} = \abs{\hat f\,}^2 \geq 0: the autocorrelation has nonnegative transform — spectra of autocorrelations are power spectra. (c) Deduce the identity ∫R∣f^(ξ)∣2eixξ  ⁣dξ=2πAf(x)\int_\R\abs{\hat f(\xi)}^2\eu^{\iu x\xi}\,\dd\xi = 2\pi A_f(x) (inversion; justify its applicability when f^∈L2\hat f \in L^2 has ∣f^∣2∈L1\abs{\hat f}^2 \in L^1), and evaluate it for f=1[−1/2, 1/2]f = \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1/2}{1/2}} at x=0x = 0: recover ∫R(sin⁡uu)2 ⁣du=π\int_\R\bigl(\frac{\sin u}u\bigr)^2\dd u = \pi.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 14.12.

(a) f~∈L2\tilde f \in L^2 with ∥f~∥2=∥f∥2\norm{\tilde f}_2 = \norm f_2; Exercise 12.6 (conjugate exponents p=q=2p = q = 2) makes Af=f∗f~A_f = f * \tilde f bounded and uniformly continuous, with

Af(x)=∫f(y) f(y−x)‾  ⁣dy,Af(0)=∥f∥22,∣Af(x)∣≤∥f∥2 ∥f(⋅−x)∥2=Af(0)A_f(x) = \int f(y)\,\overline{f(y - x)}\,\dd y, \qquad A_f(0) = \norm f_2^2, \qquad \abs{A_f(x)} \leq \norm f_2\,\norm{f(\cdot - x)}_2 = A_f(0)

by Cauchy–Schwarz.

(b) For f∈L1∩L2f \in L^1\cap L^2: f~∈L1\tilde f \in L^1 too, and the convolution theorem gives Af^=f^ f~^\widehat{A_f} = \hat f\, \widehat{\tilde f}; computing, f~^(ξ)=∫f(−x)‾e−iξx ⁣dx=∫f(u)e−iξu ⁣du‾=f^(ξ)‾\widehat{\tilde f}(\xi) = \int\overline{f(-x)}\eu^{-\iu\xi x}\dd x = \overline{\int f(u)\eu^{-\iu\xi u}\dd u} = \overline{\hat f(\xi)}: Af^=∣f^∣2≥0\widehat{A_f} = \abs{\hat f}^2 \geq 0.

(c) When ∣f^∣2∈L1\abs{\hat f}^2 \in L^1, inversion applies to the continuous AfA_f (its transform is integrable; Theorem 14.5):

Af(x)=12π∫∣f^(ξ)∣2eixξ  ⁣dξ.A_f(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int\abs{\hat f(\xi)}^2 \eu^{\iu x\xi}\,\dd\xi .

For f=1[−1/2, 1/2]f = \mathbf 1_{\intcc{-1/2}{1/2}}: f^(ξ)=2sin⁡(ξ/2)ξ=sin⁡(ξ/2)ξ/2\hat f(\xi) = \frac{2\sin(\xi/2)}\xi = \frac{\sin(\xi/2)}{\xi/2}, and at x=0x = 0:

1=∥f∥22=12π∫R(sin⁡(ξ/2)ξ/2)2 ⁣dξ=12π⋅2∫R(sin⁡uu)2 ⁣du1 = \norm f_2^2 = \frac1{2\pi}\int_\R \Bigl(\frac{\sin(\xi/2)}{\xi/2}\Bigr)^2\dd\xi = \frac1{2\pi}\cdot2\int_\R\Bigl(\frac{\sin u}u\Bigr)^2\dd u

(ξ=2u\xi = 2u), i.e. ∫R(sin⁡uu)2 ⁣du=π\int_\R\bigl(\frac{\sin u}u\bigr)^2\dd u = \pi — Plancherel’s favorite integral, recovered by autocorrelation.

14.6 Problem: the heat equation on the line

Problem 14.1

Weekend problem — ∂tu=∂xx2u\partial_tu = \partial^2_{xx}u, solved end to end

Heat spreads; the equation ∂tu=∂xx2u\partial_tu = \partial_{xx}^2u says its density diffuses at a rate given by the local curvature of the temperature profile. We solve the Cauchy problem on R\R — given ff, find u(t,x)u(t, x) for t>0t > 0 with u(0,⋅)=fu(0, \cdot) = f — prove the solution’s remarkable properties, and see why time cannot be reversed. Throughout, gt(x)=12πte−x2/4tg_t(x) = \frac1{2\sqrt{\pi t}}\eu^{-x^2/4t} is the heat kernel and u(t,⋅)=gt∗fu(t, \cdot) = g_t * f.

Part I — Deriving the kernel. Work formally first: suppose u(t,⋅)∈Su(t, \cdot) \in \mathcal S solves the equation, and let u^(t,ξ)\hat u(t, \xi) be the transform in xx.

  1. Show (formally) ∂tu^=−ξ2u^\partial_t\hat u = -\xi^2\hat u, hence u^(t,ξ)=e−tξ2f^(ξ)\hat u(t,\xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2}\hat f(\xi), and recognize u(t)=gt∗fu(t) = g_t * f (Exercise 14.4). This motivates the definition of uu; everything is now proved directly, for f∈Cb(R)f \in \mathcal C_b(\R) (bounded continuous) or f∈Lpf \in L^p.

Part II — Verification.

  1. Show that for t>0t > 0, u(t,x)=∫gt(x−y)f(y) ⁣dyu(t, x) = \int g_t(x-y)f(y)\dd y is well defined for f∈Cbf \in \mathcal C_b, and that uu is C∞\mathcal C^\infty in (t,x)(t, x) on (0, ∞)×R\intoo0\infty\times\R (differentiate under the integral; dominate Gaussian derivatives locally uniformly in (t,x)(t,x)).
  2. Verify ∂tgt=∂xx2gt\partial_tg_t = \partial^2_{xx}g_t by direct computation, and deduce ∂tu=∂xx2u\partial_tu = \partial^2_{xx}u for t>0t > 0.
  3. (Initial condition) Show that for f∈Cbf \in \mathcal C_b, u(t,x)→f(x)u(t, x) \to f(x) as t→0+t \to 0^+, uniformly on compacts (approximate identity: split ∣y∣≤δ\abs y \leq \delta, ∣y∣>δ\abs y > \delta); for f∈Lpf \in L^p (p<∞p < \infty), show ∥u(t)−f∥p→0\norm{u(t) - f}_p \to 0.
  4. (Instant smoothing) Conclude: even for merely bounded continuous ff, the solution is C∞\mathcal C^\infty for every t>0t > 0 — heat instantly erases roughness. Compute u(t,⋅)u(t, \cdot) explicitly for f=1(0, ∞)f = \mathbf 1_{\intoo0\infty} (an error function) and sketch its profile for three values of tt.

Part III — Structural properties.

  1. (Positivity and comparison) If f≥0f \geq 0 then u>0u > 0 for all t>0t > 0 (strictly, unless f=0f = 0 a.e.); if f1≤f2f_1 \leq f_2 then u1≤u2u_1 \leq u_2. A cold spot warms instantly: comment.
  2. (Conservation) For f∈L1f \in L^1: ∫u(t,x) ⁣dx=∫f\int u(t, x)\dd x = \int f for all tt (Tonelli) — total heat is conserved.
  3. (Dissipation) For f∈L1∩L2f \in L^1\cap L^2, show via Plancherel that t↦∥u(t)∥2t \mapsto \norm{u(t)}_2 is nonincreasing, strictly unless f=0f = 0, and compute its limit as t→∞t \to \infty. Show moreover ∥u(t)∥∞≤∥f∥12πt→0\norm{u(t)}_\infty \leq \frac{\norm f_1}{2\sqrt{\pi t}} \to 0: heat spreads and dies.
  4. (Uniqueness, L2L^2 class) Let uu be a solution with u(t)∈L2u(t) \in L^2 for all tt, u∈C1((0, ∞),L2)u \in \mathcal C^1(\intoo0\infty, L^2) in the natural sense and u(t)→fu(t) \to f in L2L^2 as t→0t\to0; admitting that the transform converts it to ∂tu^=−ξ2u^\partial_t\hat u = -\xi^2\hat u pointwise a.e. in ξ\xi for a.e. tt (justified by testing against Cc∞\mathcal C_c^\infty in ξ\xi — outline this), show u^(t,ξ)=e−tξ2f^(ξ)\hat u(t,\xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2}\hat f(\xi), hence uniqueness in this class.

Part IV — The arrow of time.

  1. Show that the backward problem is ill-posed: for the solution to exist at time −s-s (s>0s > 0) with data ff at time 00 — i.e. for f=gs∗hf = g_s * h to have a solution h∈L2h \in L^2 — it is necessary that esξ2f^(ξ)∈L2\eu^{s\xi^2}\hat f(\xi) \in L^2: an extreme decay condition on f^\hat f. Exhibit an explicit smooth f∈L2f \in L^2 for which no backward solution exists on any time interval: take the function with f^(ξ)=e−∣ξ∣\hat f(\xi) = \eu^{-\abs\xi} — identify ff (Exercise 14.1) and show esξ2e−∣ξ∣∉L2\eu^{s\xi^2}\eu^{-\abs\xi} \notin L^2 for every s>0s > 0.
  2. (Smoothing vs. information) Explain in a short paragraph, using questions 5, 9 and 10, why the heat semigroup (f↦gt∗f)t≥0(f \mapsto g_t * f)_{t\geq0} is injective but not surjective on L2L^2, and why this expresses the irreversibility of diffusion.

Part V — Shannon’s sampling theorem. A function f∈L2(R)f \in L^2(\R) is band-limited to Ω\Omega if f^=0\hat f = 0 a.e. outside [−Ω, Ω]\intcc{-\Omega}\Omega; write PWΩPW_\Omega (Paley–Wiener space) for these.

  1. Show that every f∈PWΩf \in PW_\Omega agrees a.e. with the C∞\mathcal C^\infty function 12π∫−ΩΩf^(ξ)eixξ  ⁣dξ\frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\Omega}^{\Omega}\hat f(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\,\dd\xi (justify smoothness and the identification), with all derivatives bounded: band limitation is an extreme form of regularity. From now on ff denotes this representative.
  2. Expand f^∈L2([−Ω, Ω])\hat f \in L^2(\intcc{-\Omega}\Omega) in the Fourier basis of that interval and identify the coefficients as samples of ff:

    f^(ξ)=πΩ∑n∈Zf(nπΩ) e−inπξ/Ωin L2([−Ω, Ω]).\hat f(\xi) = \frac\pi\Omega\sum_{n\in\Z} f\Bigl(\frac{n\pi}\Omega\Bigr)\, \eu^{-\iu n\pi\xi/\Omega} \quad\text{in } L^2(\intcc{-\Omega}\Omega) .
  3. Deduce the sampling theorem: for f∈PWΩf \in PW_\Omega,

    f(x)=∑n∈Zf(nπΩ) sinc⁡(Ωx−nπ),sinc⁡t=sin⁡tt,f(x) = \sum_{n\in\Z}f\Bigl(\frac{n\pi} \Omega\Bigr)\,\operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x - n\pi), \qquad \operatorname{sinc}t = \frac{\sin t}t,

    with convergence in L2(R)L^2(\R) and uniformly on R\R (inject the series of question 13 into the inversion formula and compute the elementary integral): a band-limited signal is entirely determined by its values on a grid of step π/Ω\pi/\Omega — the Nyquist rate.

  4. Show that the functions x↦sinc⁡(Ωx−nπ)x \mapsto \operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x - n\pi), n∈Zn \in \Z, form an orthogonal family in L2(R)L^2(\R) with constant norm π/Ω\sqrt{\pi/\Omega}, and deduce the energy identity ∥f∥22=πΩ∑n∣f(nπ/Ω)∣2\norm f_2^2 = \frac\pi\Omega\sum_n\abs{f(n\pi/\Omega)}^2.
  5. (Aliasing) Exhibit a nonzero g∈PW2Ωg \in PW_{2\Omega} vanishing at every sample point nπΩ\frac{n\pi}\Omega (consider g(x)=sin⁡(Ωx)sinc⁡(Ωx)g(x) = \sin(\Omega x)\operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x) and check its band): sampling below the Nyquist rate loses information — two different signals can share all samples: the stroboscopic wagon-wheel effect, mathematized.
  6. (Degrees of freedom) Using questions 14–15, justify the engineering rule: a signal band-limited to Ω\Omega whose energy is essentially carried by a time window of length TT is described by approximately ΩTπ\frac{\Omega T}\pi real samples — make “essentially” precise through the energy identity and the tail ∑∣nπ/Ω∣>T/2\sum_{\abs{n\pi/\Omega} > T/2}.
  7. (Consistency checks) Verify the sampling theorem by hand on two members of PWΩPW_\Omega: (a) f=sinc⁡(Ω ⋅)f = \operatorname{sinc}(\Omega\,\cdot), whose samples are δn0\delta_{n0}; (b) f(x)=cos⁡(ωx)sinc⁡(εx)f(x) = \cos(\omega x) \operatorname{sinc}(\varepsilon x)-type narrowband signals — more precisely, show that for f∈PWΩ′f \in PW_{\Omega'} with Ω′<Ω\Omega' < \Omega, the Ω\Omega-rate series also reconstructs ff (oversampling is harmless), by embedding PWΩ′⊆PWΩPW_ {\Omega'} \subseteq PW_\Omega.

Part VI — Uncertainty, twice more. Heisenberg’s inequality (Exercise 14.8) bounds how concentrated ff and f^\hat f can jointly be; here are its all-or-nothing sibling and its exact saturation.

  1. Let f∈L1f \in L^1 with supp⁡f⊆[−A, A]\operatorname{supp}f \subseteq \intcc{-A}A. Show that f^\hat f is the sum of an everywhere-convergent power series:

    f^(ξ)=∑k≥0(−iξ)kk! mk,mk=∫−AAxkf(x)  ⁣dx,∣mk∣≤Ak∥f∥1\hat f(\xi) = \sum_{k\geq0}\frac{(-\iu\xi)^k}{k!} \,m_k, \qquad m_k = \int_{-A}^{A}x^kf(x)\,\dd x, \quad \abs{m_k} \leq A^k\norm f_1

    (expand e−iξx\eu^{-\iu\xi x} and justify the interchange by normal convergence): the transform is real-analytic, with infinite radius of convergence at every point.

  2. Deduce the support dichotomy: a real-analytic function vanishing on a nonempty open interval vanishes identically (the set where all derivatives vanish is open and closed — work out the Taylor argument); conclude that no nonzero ff has both ff and f^\hat f compactly supported, and that PWΩPW_\Omega contains no nonzero compactly supported function — band-limited signals last forever, and time-limited signals leak into all frequencies.
  3. (Saturation of Heisenberg) On the Gaussian family f=e−ax2f = \eu^{-ax^2}, compute both concentration factors and verify that the normalized product (∫x2∣f∣2)(12π∫ξ2∣f^∣2)/∥f∥24\bigl(\int x^2\abs f^2\bigr)\bigl(\frac1{2\pi}\int \xi^2\abs{\hat f}^2\bigr)\big/\norm f_2^4 equals 14\frac14 for every aa — the equality family of Exercise 14.8 in the flesh; explain by a scaling argument why the product must be constant along the family.
  4. Explain the physical reading (position/momentum densities of a quantum state; ℏ\hbar in the normalization gives σxσp≥ℏ2\sigma_x\sigma_p \geq \frac\hbar2), and connect across the chapter: instant smoothing (Part II), irreversibility (Part IV), sampling (Part V), Heisenberg and the support dichotomy are five expressions of one law — the behavior of f^\hat f at infinity legislates what ff may do anywhere.

Part VII — The kernel’s algebra, and one solvable example.

  1. (Semigroup) Prove the Chapman–Kolmogorov identity gt∗gs=gt+sg_t * g_s = g_{t+s} for t,s>0t, s > 0 (via the convolution theorem and injectivity of the transform on L1L^1), and deduce u(t+s)=gs∗u(t)u(t + s) = g_s * u(t): evolving for time t+st + s is evolving for tt, then for ss. Sharpen the dissipation of question 8: writing ∥u(t)∥22=12π∫e−2tξ2∣f^(ξ)∣2 ⁣dξ\norm{u(t)}_2^2 = \frac1{2\pi}\int \eu^{-2t\xi^2}\abs{\hat f(\xi)}^2\dd\xi, show by Cauchy–Schwarz that

    t⟼ln⁡ ∥u(t)∥2is convex on (0, +∞):t \longmapsto \ln\,\norm{u(t)}_2 \quad\text{is convex on } \intoo0{+\infty} :

    the L2L^2 energy does not merely decrease, it decreases in a log-convex way.

  2. (Where the heat goes) Let f≥0f \geq 0, f∈L1f \in L^1, with ∫x2f(x) ⁣dx<∞\int x^2f(x)\dd x < \infty. Show that for all t>0t > 0

    ∫Rx u(t,x)  ⁣dx=∫Rxf(x)  ⁣dx,∫Rx2u(t,x)  ⁣dx=∫Rx2f(x)  ⁣dx+2t∫Rf:\int_\R x\,u(t, x)\,\dd x = \int_\R x f(x)\,\dd x, \qquad \int_\R x^2u(t, x)\,\dd x = \int_\R x^2f(x)\,\dd x + 2t\int_\R f :

    the center of heat never moves, and the variance grows linearly in time — the diffusive scaling x∼2tx \sim \sqrt{2t}, to be reread when Brownian motion appears in Chapter 22. (Compute the first two moments of gtg_t and use Tonelli on the convolution.)

  3. (The Gaussian, solved end to end) For f(x)=e−x2f(x) = \eu^{-x^2}, establish the closed form

    u(t,x)=11+4t exp⁡(−x21+4t),u(t, x) = \frac1{\sqrt{1 + 4t}}\, \exp\Bigl(-\frac{x^2}{1 + 4t}\Bigr),

    and verify on it, by hand: the equation ∂tu=∂xx2u\partial_tu = \partial^2_{xx}u; conservation ∫u(t)=π\int u(t) = \sqrt\pi; the dissipation law ∥u(t)∥2=(π/2)1/4(1+4t)−1/4\norm{u(t)}_2 = (\pi/2)^{1/4}(1 + 4t)^{-1/4} (compare its t−1/4t^{-1/4} decay with the t−1/2t^{-1/2} sup-norm decay of question 8); and the exact variance growth of question 24. At t=6t = 6: the peak has dropped to 15\frac15 of its initial height while the profile is five times wider — same heat, spread out.

Solution

Solution of Problem 14.1.

1. Transforming the equation in xx (formally): ∂tu^(t,ξ)=∂xx2u^=(iξ)2u^=−ξ2u^\partial_t\hat u(t,\xi) = \widehat{\partial^2_{xx}u} = (\iu\xi)^2\hat u = -\xi^2\hat u, an ODE in tt for each frequency: u^(t,ξ)=e−tξ2f^(ξ)\hat u(t,\xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2}\hat f(\xi). Since e−tξ2=g^t\eu^{-t\xi^2} = \hat g_t (Exercise 14.4), the product is the transform of gt∗fg_t * f.

2. ∣u(t,x)∣≤∥f∥∞∫gt=∥f∥∞\abs{u(t,x)} \leq \norm f_\infty\int g_t = \norm f_\infty: well defined. On [t0,T]×[−A,A][t_0, T]\times[-A, A]: each mixed derivative ∂tm∂xngt(x−y)\partial^m_t\partial^n_xg_t(x - y) is a polynomial in (x−y)(x - y) and t−1t^{-1} times e−(x−y)2/4t\eu^{-(x-y)^2/4t}, bounded for ∣y∣≥2A\abs y \geq 2A by C (1+y2)Ne−(∣y∣−A)2/4TC\,(1 + y^2)^N\eu^{-(\abs y - A)^2/4T}, an integrable dominator independent of (t,x)(t, x) in the window (and bounded for ∣y∣≤2A\abs y \leq 2A): repeated differentiation under the integral (Theorem 10.15) applies: u∈C∞((0, ∞)×R)u \in \mathcal C^\infty(\intoo0\infty\times\R).

3. With gt(x)=12πte−x2/4tg_t(x) = \frac1{2\sqrt{\pi t}}\eu^{-x^2/4t}:

∂tgt=gt(x24t2−12t)=∂xx2gt\partial_tg_t = g_t\Bigl(\frac{x^2}{4t^2} - \frac1{2t}\Bigr) = \partial^2_{xx}g_t

(differentiate twice in xx: ∂xgt=−x2tgt\partial_xg_t = -\frac x{2t}g_t, ∂xx2gt=(x24t2−12t)gt\partial^2_{xx}g_t = \bigl(\frac{x^2}{4t^2} - \frac1{2t}\bigr)g_t). By question 2 the derivatives pass under the integral: ∂tu=∂xx2u\partial_tu = \partial^2_{xx}u.

4. u(t,x)−f(x)=∫gt(y)(f(x−y)−f(x)) ⁣dyu(t,x) - f(x) = \int g_t(y)\bigl(f(x - y) - f(x)\bigr)\dd y. Given a compact KK and ε\varepsilon: uniform continuity of ff on a neighborhood of KK gives δ\delta with ∣f(x−y)−f(x)∣<ε\abs{f(x-y) - f(x)} < \varepsilon for x∈Kx \in K, ∣y∣≤δ\abs y \leq \delta; the tail contributes ≤2∥f∥∞∫∣y∣>δgt(y) ⁣dy=2∥f∥∞ P\leq 2\norm f_\infty\int_{\abs y > \delta}g_t(y)\dd y = 2\norm f_\infty\,\P-mass beyond δ\delta, which is 2π∫δ/2t∞e−z2 ⁣dz→0\frac2{\sqrt\pi}\int_{\delta/2\sqrt t}^\infty\eu^{-z^2}\dd z \to 0 as t→0t \to 0. For f∈Lpf \in L^p: ∥u(t)−f∥p≤∫gt(y)∥τyf−f∥p ⁣dy\norm{u(t) - f}_p \leq \int g_t(y)\norm{\tau_yf - f}_p\dd y (Minkowski/Jensen as in Theorem 12.9), split the same way using Theorem 12.6(3).

5. Instant smoothing is question 2 (u(t)u(t) is C∞\mathcal C^\infty for t>0t > 0 with no smoothness of ff used). For f=1(0, ∞)f = \mathbf 1_{\intoo0\infty}:

u(t,x)=∫0∞gt(x−y) ⁣dy=1π∫−x/2t∞e−z2 ⁣dz=12(1+erf⁡(x2t)),erf⁡(s)=2π∫0se−z2 ⁣dz:u(t, x) = \int_0^\infty g_t(x - y)\dd y = \frac1{\sqrt\pi}\int_{-x/2\sqrt t}^{\infty}\eu^{-z^2}\dd z = \frac12\Bigl(1 + \operatorname{erf}\Bigl(\frac{x}{2\sqrt t}\Bigr)\Bigr), \qquad \operatorname{erf}(s) = \frac2{\sqrt\pi}\int_0^s\eu^{-z^2}\dd z :

a smoothed step whose transition zone widens like t\sqrt t (profiles at t1<t2<t3t_1 < t_2 < t_3: ever flatter ramps through (0,12)(0, \frac12)).

6. The integrand gt(x−y)f(y)g_t(x-y)f(y) is ≥0\geq 0 and the kernel is strictly positive: u(t,x)=0u(t,x) = 0 would force f=0f = 0 a.e. Monotonicity in ff is monotonicity of the integral. A spot where f=0f = 0 on an interval still has u(t,⋅)>0u(t, \cdot) > 0 there for every t>0t > 0: heat propagates at infinite speed (any positivity anywhere is felt everywhere instantly).

7. Tonelli (gt(x−y)∣f(y)∣g_t(x-y)\abs{f(y)} is integrable on R2\R^2): ∫u(t,x) ⁣dx=∫f(y)(∫gt(x−y) ⁣dx) ⁣dy=∫f\int u(t,x)\dd x = \int f(y)\bigl(\int g_t(x - y)\dd x\bigr)\dd y = \int f.

8. Plancherel: 2π∥u(t)∥22=∫e−2tξ2∣f^(ξ)∣2 ⁣dξ2\pi\norm{u(t)}_2^2 = \int\eu^{-2t\xi^2}\abs{\hat f(\xi)}^2\dd\xi, nonincreasing in tt (pointwise), strictly unless f^=0\hat f = 0 a.e. (=f=0= f = 0), with limit 00 as t→∞t\to\infty by DCT. And ∥u(t)∥∞≤∥gt∥∞∥f∥1=∥f∥12πt→0\norm{u(t)}_\infty \leq \norm{g_t}_\infty\norm f_1 = \frac{\norm f_1}{2\sqrt{\pi t}} \to 0.

9. For φ∈Cc∞\varphi \in \mathcal C_c^\infty, t↦⟨φ,u^(t)⟩t \mapsto \langle\varphi, \hat u(t)\rangle is C1\mathcal C^1 with derivative ⟨φ,∂tu^⟩=⟨φ,∂xxu^⟩=⟨ξ2φ… ⟩\langle\varphi, \partial_t\hat u\rangle = \langle\varphi, \widehat{\partial_{xx}u}\rangle = \langle\xi^2\varphi\dots\rangle — precisely, ∂xx2u^=−ξ2u^\widehat{\partial^2_{xx}u} = -\xi^2\hat u transfers the equation. Then for a.e. ξ\xi, the absolutely continuous function t↦etξ2u^(t,ξ)t \mapsto \eu^{t\xi^2}\hat u(t,\xi) has derivative etξ2(ξ2u^+∂tu^)=0\eu^{t\xi^2}(\xi^2\hat u + \partial_t\hat u) = 0 in the integrated sense: it is constant, and letting t→0t \to 0 (u^(t)→f^\hat u(t) \to \hat f in L2L^2, a.e. along a subsequence): u^(t,ξ)=e−tξ2f^(ξ)\hat u(t, \xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2}\hat f(\xi) a.e. Two solutions in the class have the same transform: they are equal.

10. f=gs∗hf = g_s * h with h∈L2h \in L^2 forces f^=e−sξ2h^\hat f = \eu^{-s\xi^2}\hat h, i.e. h^=esξ2f^∈L2\hat h = \eu^{s\xi^2}\hat f \in L^2. Take f^(ξ)=e−∣ξ∣\hat f(\xi) = \eu^{-\abs\xi}: then f(x)=1π⋅11+x2f(x) = \frac1\pi\cdot\frac1{1 + x^2} (Exercise 14.1, inversion), a perfectly smooth L2L^2 function; but e2sξ2−2∣ξ∣→∞\eu^{2s\xi^2 - 2\abs\xi} \to \infty: esξ2f^∉L2\eu^{s\xi^2}\hat f \notin L^2 for every s>0s > 0. The Cauchy profile is never the result of prior diffusion.

11. The heat semigroup multiplies transforms by e−tξ2\eu^{-t\xi^2}, which vanishes nowhere: injective — formally, no information is destroyed. But its range consists of functions whose transforms decay like e−tξ2\eu^{-t\xi^2}: a tiny, dense-but-proper subspace of L2L^2 (question 10 shows even excellent functions lie outside). Inverting would amplify the frequency ξ\xi by etξ2\eu^{t\xi^2}: unbounded, hence unstable against any perturbation. Diffusion is irreversible not because the map forgets, but because its inverse cannot be continuous — an arrow of time made of functional analysis.

12. f^∈L2([−Ω, Ω])⊆L1\hat f \in L^2(\intcc{-\Omega}\Omega) \subseteq L^1 (Cauchy–Schwarz on a bounded interval), so F(x)=12π∫−ΩΩf^(ξ)eixξ ⁣dξF(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\Omega}^\Omega\hat f(\xi)\eu^{\iu x\xi}\dd\xi is defined everywhere, and differentiation under the integral (dominated by Ωk∣f^∣∈L1\Omega^k\abs{\hat f} \in L^1 on the band) makes it C∞\mathcal C^\infty with ∣F(k)∣≤Ωk2π∥f^∥L1\abs{F^{(k)}} \leq \frac{\Omega^k}{2\pi}\norm{\hat f}_{L^1} everywhere. And F=fF = f a.e.: both sides have the same transform, and the transform is injective on L2L^2 (Theorem 14.8 and its L2L^2 extension).

13. The exponentials ξ↦e−inπξ/Ω\xi \mapsto \eu^{-\iu n\pi\xi/\Omega}, n∈Zn \in \Z, form a Hilbert basis of L2([−Ω, Ω])L^2(\intcc{-\Omega}\Omega) (Theorem 13.9, rescaled). The coefficient of f^\hat f along the nn-th one is

12Ω∫−ΩΩf^(ξ) einπξ/Ω ⁣dξ=2π2Ω⋅12π∫−ΩΩf^(ξ) ei(nπ/Ω)ξ ⁣dξ=πΩ f(nπΩ),\frac1{2\Omega}\int_{-\Omega}^\Omega\hat f(\xi)\, \eu^{\iu n\pi\xi/\Omega}\dd\xi = \frac{2\pi}{2\Omega}\cdot \frac1{2\pi}\int_{-\Omega}^{\Omega}\hat f(\xi)\, \eu^{\iu(n\pi/\Omega)\xi}\dd\xi = \frac\pi\Omega\,f\Bigl(\frac{n\pi}\Omega\Bigr),

by question 12’s formula at x=nπΩx = \frac{n\pi}\Omega: the stated expansion holds in L2L^2 of the band.

14. Insert the expansion into the inversion formula of question 12; the exchange of sum and integral is the continuity of the L2L^2 pairing against 12πeixξ1∣ξ∣≤Ω\frac1{2\pi} \eu^{\iu x\xi}\mathbf 1_{\abs\xi\leq\Omega} (of L2L^2 norm 2Ω2π\frac{\sqrt{2\Omega}}{2\pi}, independent of xx — whence uniformity):

f(x)=∑nf(nπΩ)⋅12Ω∫−ΩΩei(x−nπ/Ω)ξ ⁣dξ=∑nf(nπΩ)sinc⁡(Ωx−nπ),f(x) = \sum_nf\Bigl(\frac{n\pi}\Omega\Bigr)\cdot \frac1{2\Omega}\int_{-\Omega}^\Omega \eu^{\iu(x - n\pi/\Omega)\xi}\dd\xi = \sum_nf\Bigl(\frac{n\pi}\Omega\Bigr) \operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x - n\pi),

since 12Ω∫−ΩΩeiuξ ⁣dξ=sin⁡(Ωu)Ωu\frac1{2\Omega}\int_{-\Omega}^\Omega\eu^{\iu u\xi}\dd\xi = \frac{\sin(\Omega u)}{\Omega u}.

15. Reading question 14’s computation backwards, the transform of sn=sinc⁡(Ω⋅−nπ)s_n = \operatorname{sinc}(\Omega\cdot - n\pi) is s^n=πΩ e−inπξ/Ω 1[−Ω, Ω]\hat s_n = \frac\pi\Omega\,\eu^{-\iu n\pi\xi/\Omega}\,\mathbf 1_{\intcc{-\Omega}\Omega}. Plancherel:

⟨sn,sm⟩=12π(πΩ)2∫−ΩΩei(n−m)πξ/Ω ⁣dξ=πΩ δnm:\langle s_n, s_m\rangle = \frac1{2\pi} \Bigl(\frac\pi\Omega\Bigr)^2\int_{-\Omega}^\Omega \eu^{\iu(n-m)\pi\xi/\Omega}\dd\xi = \frac\pi\Omega\,\delta_{nm} :

an orthogonal family of constant norm π/Ω\sqrt{\pi/\Omega}. Taking norms in question 14’s expansion: ∥f∥22=πΩ∑n∣f(nπ/Ω)∣2\norm f_2^2 = \frac\pi\Omega\sum_n\abs{f(n\pi/\Omega)}^2.

16. g(x)=sin⁡(Ωx)sinc⁡(Ωx)=sin⁡2(Ωx)Ωxg(x) = \sin(\Omega x)\operatorname{sinc} (\Omega x) = \frac{\sin^2(\Omega x)}{\Omega x} vanishes at every grid point nπΩ\frac{n\pi}\Omega (including 00, by the limit) and is not identically zero. Its band: write g=12i(eiΩx−e−iΩx)sinc⁡(Ωx)g = \frac1{2\iu}\bigl(\eu^{\iu\Omega x} - \eu^{-\iu\Omega x}\bigr)\operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x); modulation by e±iΩx\eu^{\pm\iu\Omega x} shifts the transform by ∓Ω\mp\Omega, so g^\hat g is supported in [−2Ω, 2Ω]\intcc{-2\Omega}{2\Omega} (indeed in the union of two shifted bands): g∈PW2Ωg \in PW_{2\Omega}, invisible to Ω\Omega-rate sampling — aliasing incarnate.

17. By question 15 the samples carry the energy democratically: ∥f∥2=πΩ∑∣f(nπ/Ω)∣2\norm f^2 = \frac\pi\Omega\sum \abs{f(n\pi/\Omega)}^2. If the signal’s energy outside the time window [−T/2, T/2]\intcc{-T/2}{T/2} is ≤ε2∥f∥2\leq \varepsilon^2\norm f^2, the samples outside the window satisfy (up to boundary terms controlled by the uniform bound of question 12) πΩ∑∣nπ/Ω∣>T/2∣f(nπ/Ω)∣2≈∥f 1∣x∣>T/2∥2≤ε2∥f∥2\frac\pi\Omega\sum_{\abs{n\pi/\Omega} > T/2} \abs{f(n\pi/\Omega)}^2 \approx \norm{f\,\mathbf 1_{\abs x > T/2}}^2 \leq \varepsilon^2\norm f^2: truncating the sampling series to the ≈ΩTπ\approx \frac{\Omega T}\pi in-window indices reconstructs ff up to relative error ≈ε\approx\varepsilon. Hence the time–bandwidth product ΩTπ\frac{\Omega T}{\pi} counts the effective real degrees of freedom of the signal — the rule behind every audio format.

18. (a) sinc⁡(Ωx)\operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x) has samples f(nπ/Ω)=sinc⁡(nπ)=δn0f(n\pi/\Omega) = \operatorname{sinc}(n\pi) = \delta_{n0}: the series reduces to its n=0n = 0 term, sinc⁡(Ωx)\operatorname{sinc}(\Omega x) — the theorem reproduces its own kernel. (b) If f^\hat f is supported in [−Ω′, Ω′]⊆[−Ω, Ω]\intcc{-\Omega'}{\Omega'} \subseteq \intcc{-\Omega}\Omega, every step of questions 13–14 runs verbatim with the larger band Ω\Omega (the expansion of f^\hat f on the bigger interval is still legitimate): sampling faster than one’s own Nyquist rate changes nothing in the reconstruction — oversampling is harmless, and in practice beneficial (faster-decaying reconstruction kernels can then be used).

19. Expand e−iξx=∑k(−iξx)kk!\eu^{-\iu\xi x} = \sum_k\frac{(-\iu\xi x)^k}{k!} inside the integral; on [−A, A]\intcc{-A}A the series converges normally (∑k∣ξ∣kAkk!∣f∣∈L1\sum_k\frac{\abs{\xi}^kA^k}{k!}\abs f \in L^1), so integration term by term is legitimate:

f^(ξ)=∑k≥0(−iξ)kk!mk,∣mk∣≤Ak∥f∥1.\hat f(\xi) = \sum_{k\geq0}\frac{(-\iu\xi)^k}{k!}m_k, \qquad \abs{m_k} \leq A^k\norm f_1 .

The bound makes the series converge for every complex ξ\xi; around any point ξ0\xi_0, regrouping (absolute convergence) gives a power series in ξ−ξ0\xi - \xi_0: f^\hat f is real-analytic with infinite radius everywhere.

20. Let gg be real-analytic on R\R (Taylor series converging to gg near each point) and Z={ξ:g(k)(ξ)=0 ∀k}Z = \{\xi : g^{(k)}(\xi) = 0\ \forall k\}. ZZ is closed (intersection of closed sets); it is open, since at ξ0∈Z\xi_0 \in Z the local Taylor expansion of gg is the zero series, so gg vanishes identically near ξ0\xi_0, together with all derivatives. If gg vanishes on an interval, Z≠∅Z \neq \varnothing; by connectedness of R\R, Z=RZ = \R: g≡0g \equiv 0. Now if f≠0f \neq 0 had compact support together with f^\hat f: question 19 makes f^\hat f real-analytic, vanishing outside a compact, hence on intervals: f^≡0\hat f \equiv 0, so f=0f = 0 a.e. by injectivity — contradiction. Likewise a nonzero f∈PWΩf \in PW_\Omega cannot be compactly supported (swap the roles of ff and f^\hat f via inversion): band-limited signals never die, time-limited signals occupy unbounded spectrum.

21. For f=e−ax2f = \eu^{-ax^2}: ∥f∥22=π2a\norm f_2^2 = \sqrt{\frac\pi{2a}} and ∫x2∣f∣2=14aπ2a\int x^2\abs f^2 = \frac1{4a}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2a}} (Gaussian second moment); f^=πa e−ξ2/4a\hat f = \sqrt{\frac\pi a}\,\eu^{-\xi^2/4a} (Example 14.2) and

12π∫ξ2∣f^∣2 ⁣dξ=12π⋅πa∫ξ2e−ξ2/2a ⁣dξ=12a⋅a2πa=2πa2.\frac1{2\pi}\int\xi^2\abs{\hat f}^2\dd\xi = \frac1{2\pi}\cdot\frac\pi a\int\xi^2 \eu^{-\xi^2/2a}\dd\xi = \frac1{2a}\cdot a\sqrt{2\pi a} = \frac{\sqrt{2\pi a}}2 .

Normalized product: 14aπ2a⋅2πa2/π2a=14\frac1{4a}\sqrt{\frac\pi{2a}}\cdot \frac{\sqrt{2\pi a}}2\big/\frac{\pi}{2a} = \frac14, independent of aa. Scaling explains the constancy: replacing ff by f(λ⋅)f(\lambda\cdot) multiplies ∫x2∣f∣2/∥f∥2\int x^2\abs f^2/\norm f^2 by λ−2\lambda^{-2} and 12π∫ξ2∣f^∣2/∥f∥2\frac1{2\pi}\int\xi^2\abs{\hat f}^2/\norm f^2 by λ2\lambda^{2}: the product is a dilation invariant, and the Gaussians form one dilation orbit.

22. With ∣f∣2\abs f^2 the position density and 12π∣f^∣2\frac1{2\pi}\abs{\hat f}^2 the momentum density of a quantum state (physical units insert ℏ\hbar), Exercise 14.8 reads σxσp≥ℏ2\sigma_x\sigma_p \geq \frac\hbar2: no state is sharp in both observables. Across the chapter, one law wears five suits: heat instantly smooths because e−tξ2\eu^{-t\xi^2} annihilates high frequencies (Part II); the flow cannot run backward because restoring them is unbounded (Part IV); a band-limited signal is rigid enough to live on a countable grid (Part V); no function beats Heisenberg’s floor; and no function is compactly supported on both sides of the transform (questions 19–20). What f^\hat f does at infinity governs what ff may do anywhere.

23. Both gtg_t and gsg_s are in L1L^1 with gt^(ξ)=e−tξ2\widehat{g_t}(\xi) = \eu^{-t\xi^2} (question 1’s computation), so the convolution theorem gives gt∗gs^=e−tξ2e−sξ2=e−(t+s)ξ2=gt+s^\widehat{g_t * g_s} = \eu^{-t\xi^2}\eu^{-s\xi^2} = \eu^{-(t+s)\xi^2} = \widehat{g_{t+s}}; two L1L^1 functions with the same transform agree a.e. (injectivity, via the inversion theorem — here both sides are continuous, so they agree everywhere): gt∗gs=gt+sg_t * g_s = g_{t+s}. Consequently u(t+s)=gt+s∗f=gs∗(gt∗f)=gs∗u(t)u(t + s) = g_{t+s} * f = g_s * (g_t * f) = g_s * u(t) (associativity of convolution, Tonelli). Log-convexity: let N(t)=∥u(t)∥22=12π∫e−2tξ2∣f^∣2 ⁣dξN(t) = \norm{u(t)}_2^2 = \frac1{2\pi}\int \eu^{-2t\xi^2}\abs{\hat f}^2\dd\xi (Plancherel, question 8). For t=t1+t22t = \frac{t_1 + t_2}2, write

e−2tξ2∣f^∣2=(e−2t1ξ2∣f^∣2)1/2(e−2t2ξ2∣f^∣2)1/2,\eu^{-2t\xi^2}\abs{\hat f}^2 = \Bigl(\eu^{-2t_1\xi^2}\abs{\hat f}^2\Bigr)^{1/2} \Bigl(\eu^{-2t_2\xi^2}\abs{\hat f}^2\Bigr)^{1/2},

and Cauchy–Schwarz gives N(t1+t22)≤N(t1) N(t2)N\bigl(\frac{t_1+t_2}2\bigr) \leq \sqrt{N(t_1)\,N(t_2)}: ln⁡N\ln N is midpoint-convex, and being continuous (dominated convergence in tt), convex; so is ln⁡∥u(t)∥2=12ln⁡N(t)\ln\norm{u(t)}_2 = \frac12\ln N(t). Decay with a convex logarithm: the heat flow cannot lose energy in a burst and then stall.

24. The kernel’s moments: ∫gt=1\int g_t = 1 (question 7 with f=gsf = g_s, or directly the Gaussian integral), ∫x gt(x) ⁣dx=0\int x\,g_t(x)\dd x = 0 (odd integrand), and, substituting x=2t vx = 2\sqrt t\,v,

∫Rx2gt(x)  ⁣dx=4tπ∫Rv2e−v2 ⁣dv=2t.\int_\R x^2g_t(x)\,\dd x = \frac{4t}{\sqrt\pi}\int_\R v^2\eu^{-v^2}\dd v = 2t .

Substituting x=z+yx = z + y in the convolution and noting ∬(∣z∣+∣y∣)2gt(z)f(y)  ⁣dz  ⁣dy<∞\iint(\abs z + \abs y)^2g_t(z)f(y)\,\dd z\,\dd y < \infty (each of ∫∣z∣kgt\int\abs z^kg_t, ∫∣y∣kf\int\abs y^kf is finite for k≤2k \leq 2, using ∣y∣≤1+y22\abs y \leq \frac{1 + y^2}2), Fubini and Tonelli apply to the moment integrals below:

∫x u(t,x) ⁣dx=∬(z+y) gt(z)f(y)  ⁣dz  ⁣dy=0⋅ ⁣∫ ⁣f+1⋅ ⁣∫ ⁣yf(y) ⁣dy,\int x\,u(t,x)\dd x = \iint (z + y)\,g_t(z)f(y)\,\dd z\,\dd y = 0\cdot\!\int\! f + 1\cdot\!\int\! yf(y)\dd y,

which is the first claim; and

∬(z+y)2gt(z)f(y)  ⁣dz  ⁣dy=2t∫f+2⋅0⋅ ⁣∫ ⁣yf+∫y2f(y) ⁣dy,\iint (z+y)^2g_t(z)f(y)\,\dd z\,\dd y = 2t\int f + 2\cdot0\cdot\!\int\! yf + \int y^2f(y)\dd y ,

the second. Means add, variances add, and the kernel contributes mean 00 and variance 2t2t: after time tt the heat has spread over a width of order 2t\sqrt{2t} — distance grows like the square root of time, the signature of diffusion (and of the Brownian paths of Chapter 22).

25. Transform side: f^(ξ)=π e−ξ2/4\hat f(\xi) = \sqrt\pi\,\eu^{-\xi^2/4}, so u^(t,ξ)=π e−(t+14)ξ2\hat u(t,\xi) = \sqrt\pi\,\eu^{-(t + \frac14)\xi^2}, which is the transform of (1+4t)−1/2exp⁡(−x2/(1+4t))(1 + 4t)^{-1/2}\exp\bigl(-x^2/(1+4t)\bigr) (the Gaussian dictionary e−ax2↦π/a e−ξ2/4a\eu^{-ax^2} \mapsto \sqrt{\pi/a}\,\eu^{-\xi^2/4a} with a=11+4ta = \frac1{1+4t}): the closed form. Direct check, with σ=1+4t\sigma = 1 + 4t:

∂tu=σ−1/2e−x2/σ(−2σ+4x2σ2)=∂xx2u,\partial_tu = \sigma^{-1/2}\eu^{-x^2/\sigma} \Bigl(-\frac2\sigma + \frac{4x^2}{\sigma^2}\Bigr) = \partial^2_{xx}u ,

both sides computed from ∂xu=−2xσ u\partial_xu = -\frac{2x}\sigma\,u. Conservation: ∫u(t)=σ−1/2πσ=π\int u(t) = \sigma^{-1/2}\sqrt{\pi\sigma} = \sqrt\pi for all tt. Dissipation:

∥u(t)∥22=1σ∫e−2x2/σ ⁣dx=1σπσ2=π2 (1+4t)−1/2,\norm{u(t)}_2^2 = \frac1\sigma\int\eu^{-2x^2/\sigma}\dd x = \frac1\sigma\sqrt{\frac{\pi\sigma}2} = \sqrt{\frac\pi2}\,(1+4t)^{-1/2},

so ∥u(t)∥2=(π/2)1/4(1+4t)−1/4\norm{u(t)}_2 = (\pi/2)^{1/4}(1+4t)^{-1/4}, nonincreasing with convex logarithm (question 23); the L2L^2 norm decays like t−1/4t^{-1/4}, exactly half the t−1/2t^{-1/2} exponent of ∥u(t)∥∞\norm{u(t)}_\infty — consistent with ∥u∥22≤∥u∥∞∥u∥1\norm u_2^2 \leq \norm u_\infty\norm u_1 and conservation of ∥u∥1\norm u_1. Variance: ∫x2u(t)=1σ⋅σ3/2π2=π2 (1+4t)=∫x2f+2tπ\int x^2u(t) = \frac1\sigma\cdot\frac{\sigma^{3/2}\sqrt\pi}2 = \frac{\sqrt\pi}2\,(1 + 4t) = \int x^2f + 2t\sqrt\pi, as question 24 predicts (∫x2f=π2\int x^2f = \frac{\sqrt\pi}2, ∫f=π\int f = \sqrt\pi). At t=6t = 6: σ=25\sigma = 25, peak height u(6,0)=15u(6, 0) = \frac15 versus u(0,0)=1u(0,0) = 1, width scale σ=5\sqrt\sigma = 5 times the initial one, and ∫u=π≈1.7725\int u = \sqrt\pi \approx 1.7725 throughout: the spot is five times lower, five times wider, and not a calorie is missing.

Terms defined in this chapter

See all 395 terms in the glossary