Let be weighted points with . The barycenter is the unique point with
Barycenters are associative (subgroups of points may be replaced by their partial barycenter with the summed weight) and invariant under rescaling of all weights.
Examples
Example 17.7 (Classical barycenter geometry)
The centroid of a triangle is the barycenter . Associativity with the midpoint shows
lies on the median at two-thirds of it — and likewise for the other two medians: the three medians are concurrent, in one line of barycentric calculus.
Example 17.8 (The bimedians of a quadrilateral)
Let be any quadrilateral (planar or not!) and consider its bimedians: the segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides, and . Introduce the barycenter of and group the weights two ways:
is the midpoint of both bimedians — so the two bimedians always bisect each other, and the quadrilateral of the four midpoints is a parallelogram (its diagonals are the bimedians). No case analysis, no coordinates, and the argument survives unchanged for a skew quadrilateral in , where a picture-based proof would already be delicate: associativity does not care about dimension.
Example 17.12 (Epigraphs are convex sets)
The region above the parabola is convex: for and , the convexity inequality of the square function gives
so the barycenter stays above the parabola. The computation is general: is convex exactly when is a convex function — convex sets and convex functions (Chapter 8) are two faces of one notion, epigraphs being the dictionary. This is the geometric reason support lines exist for convex functions, the fact that will prove Jensen’s inequality in Chapter 22.