Mathematics · Glossary

What is First fundamental form?

Definition 19.12 University Mathematics — Year 2 · Chapter 19 — Surfaces

Let σ ⁣:UR3\sigma \colon U \to \R^3 be a regular C1\mathcal{C}^1 surface. Its first fundamental form at (u,v)(u,v) is the positive definite quadratic form on R2\R^2

I(h,k)=hσu+kσv2=Eh2+2Fhk+Gk2,I(h, k) = \norm{h\,\sigma_u + k\,\sigma_v}^2 = E\,h^2 + 2F\,hk + G\,k^2,

where

E=σu2,F=σu,σv,G=σv2.E = \norm{\sigma_u}^2, \qquad F = \langle \sigma_u, \sigma_v\rangle, \qquad G = \norm{\sigma_v}^2 .

Examples

Example 19.14 (Angles between coordinate curves)

The first fundamental form also measures angles: the coordinate curves uσ(u,v0)u \mapsto \sigma(u, v_0) and vσ(u0,v)v \mapsto \sigma(u_0, v) meet at the angle θ\theta with

cosθ=σu,σvσuσv=FEG:\cos\theta = \frac{\langle\sigma_u, \sigma_v\rangle}{\norm{\sigma_u}\,\norm{\sigma_v}} = \frac{F}{\sqrt{EG}} :

the single coefficient FF decides orthogonality of the parameter net. For the sphere chart and the helicoid, F=0F = 0: meridians cut parallels, and helices cut the horizontal rulings, at right angles — which is why their area integrands collapsed to EG\sqrt{EG}. For a graph chart, F=fxfyF = f_xf_y vanishes only where a partial derivative does: the coordinate net of a tilted graph is not orthogonal, even though the (x,y)(x, y)-net downstairs is. When computations on a surface look heavy, the first move is to seek a chart with F=0F = 0.

Example 19.17 (Why airliners fly over the pole)

Two airports sit at latitude φ0\varphi_0 and opposite longitudes: A=σ(0,φ0)A = \sigma(0, \varphi_0) and B=σ(π,φ0)B = \sigma(\pi, \varphi_0) on the sphere of radius RR. Along the parallel (φφ0\varphi \equiv \varphi_0), the length is 0πRcosφ0 ⁣dθ=πRcosφ0\int_0^\pi R\cos\varphi_0\,\dd\theta = \pi R\cos\varphi_0. Along the route over the pole (up the meridian θ=0\theta = 0, down the meridian θ=π\theta = \pi), it is 2R(π2φ0)2R(\frac\pi2 - \varphi_0). At latitude φ0=π3\varphi_0 = \frac\pi3 (sixty degrees): parallel route πR/21.571R\pi R/2 \approx 1.571\,R, polar route πR/31.047R\pi R/3 \approx 1.047\,R — a third shorter. In fact πcosφ0π2φ0\pi\cos\varphi_0 \geq \pi - 2\varphi_0 on [0,π/2]\intcc0{\pi/2} (the function πcosφπ+2φ\pi\cos\varphi - \pi + 2\varphi vanishes at both ends and its derivative 2πsinφ2 - \pi\sin\varphi changes sign once, so it is first increasing then decreasing, hence nonnegative): the polar route never loses. The first fundamental form turned a navigation question into two one-line integrals; Exercise 19.6 pushes the idea to a genuine minimality proof for meridians.

Example 19.22 (Two different graphs, one area)

Over the unit disk, compare the bowl z=12(x2+y2)z = \frac12(x^2 + y^2) and the saddle z=xyz = xy. Their area integrands (Exercise 19.5) are

1+x2+y2and1+y2+x2:\sqrt{1 + x^2 + y^2} \qquad\text{and}\qquad \sqrt{1 + y^2 + x^2} :

identical. The two surfaces — one curving the same way in all directions, the other saddle-shaped — have exactly equal areas over every domain, 2π3(221)\frac{2\pi}3(2\sqrt2 - 1) over the unit disk. The area element only sees the length of the gradient, not the arrangement of the bending; telling the bowl from the saddle requires second-order data (the sign structure exhibited in Figure 19.1), which no amount of area measurement detects. First fundamental form: metric, blind to shape; the shape-seeing second form belongs to Year 3.

Read in context →