All books

Professional

Apps About Coach Log in Start reading

Biology · Glossary

What is Multiple alignment and profiles?

Definition 5.11 University Biology — Year 3 · Chapter 5 — Bioinformatics and Sequence Analysis

A multiple sequence alignment arranges a family of sequences in columns of homologous residues. Exact dynamic programming over kk sequences costs nkn^{k} and is impossible beyond three; practical programs align progressively, first the closest pair by a guide tree, then sequences and groups to the growing alignment, with rounds of refinement. A finished alignment is summarised as a profile: for each column, the frequency of each residue and of gaps. A profile hidden Markov model formalises this as a chain of match states, one per conserved column, each emitting residues with its own probabilities, with insert and delete states allowing extra or missing residues at each position; the model of a family (a Pfam entry) scores a new sequence by the probability of the best path through the states, and finds homologues far below the twilight zone of pairwise comparison, because a column that tolerates only hydrophobic residues says so, while a single sequence cannot.

A profile hidden Markov model of a four-column family. Each match state M emits a residue with the column’s own frequencies; insert states I (with self-loops) admit extra residues, delete states D skip a column. Scoring a sequence is finding its most probable path.
A profile hidden Markov model of a four-column family. Each match state M emits a residue with the column’s own frequencies; insert states I (with self-loops) admit extra residues, delete states D skip a column. Scoring a sequence is finding its most probable path.

Examples

Example 5.7 (Identity, similarity and the twilight zone)

Two random protein sequences aligned optimally with gaps reach about 15 to 20 %15\text{ to }20\,\% identity by chance. Above 35 %35\,\% identity over a hundred residues two proteins are almost surely homologous; between 20 %20\,\% and 35 %35\,\% is the twilight zone, where identity alone cannot decide and the statistics below must. Homologues can fall far below the zone: haemoglobin and myoglobin subunits share 25 %25\,\% identity, lysozyme and α\alpha-lactalbumin 40 %40\,\%, and many pairs of proteins with the same fold share less than 15 %15\,\%, detectable only by comparing profiles or structures.

Example 5.10 (Reading an E-value)

A query of 250250 residues against a database of 5×10105\times 10^{10} residues has mn=1.25×1013≈243.5mn = 1.25\times 10^{13} \approx 2^{43.5}. A hit with a bit score of 6060 has E=243.5−60=2−16.5≈10−5E = 2^{43.5 - 60} = 2^{-16.5} \approx 10^{-5}: essentially certainly a homologue. A hit with S′=40S' = 40 has E=23.5≈11E = 2^{3.5} \approx 11: eleven such scores are expected by chance, and the hit means nothing. The same alignment, with the same bit score, searched against a database ten times larger, has an EE ten times larger — significance is a property of the search, not of the pair. The threshold in common use is E<10−3E < 10^{-3} for a confident homologue; E≈0.01E \approx 0.01–11 deserves a second look with a profile method.

Read in context →