In a group (multiplicative notation), set , and for ; then for all , so is a morphism whose image is a subgroup, the subgroup generated by . The order of is the least with if one exists (then has exactly elements, and ), and otherwise.
Examples
Example 7.15
In : has order , with ; more generally has order and . In , every has infinite order. Why the claims in the definition hold: if has order , divide any by (, , Theorem 6.2): , so the powers cycle with period , the listed elements are pairwise distinct by minimality of , and forces . Orders of permutations are computed in the weekend problem below.
Example 7.16 (Orders inside )
What is the order of in , for ? One has iff , and writing , , with : (Gauss’s lemma, Theorem 6.8). The least such is . In for instance, has order (indeed ), while has order : it generates the whole group, though it is not the “standard” generator. Counting the generators — the with — recovers the coprime counts of Example 2.25: group theory and counting meet.
Example 7.6 (The symmetries of a rectangle)
A (non-square) rectangle admits exactly four isometries onto itself: the identity , the horizontal-axis reflection , the vertical-axis reflection , and the half-turn about the center. Composition makes this four-element set a group: each element is its own inverse (), and the product of any two distinct non-identity elements is the third (: reflecting in both axes is the half-turn). The full table is symmetric, so the group is abelian — yet it is not the same group as the rotations of Example 7.15: there, has order , while here every element has order . Two groups of the same size can thus have genuinely different multiplication structures — the figure below displays both tables side by side. This four-element group returns as , and Exercise 7.7 explains why any group with all squares trivial must, like this one, be abelian.