Mathematics · Book 4 · Bachelor Year 2

University Mathematics — Year 2

University Mathematics — Year 2 · Bachelor Year 2

9Integration

The Year 1 volume built the integral on a segment. This chapter extends it to arbitrary intervals (improper integrals, with the full comparison toolkit), then studies integrals depending on a parametercontinuity and differentiation under the integral sign — powered by the dominated convergence theorem, the one result of this chapter taken on trust. The Γ\Gamma function serves as the running example, and as the gateway to half of the special functions of mathematics.

9.1 Integrals on an arbitrary interval

Definition 9.1

Let ff be piecewise continuous on [a,b)\intco{a}{b} (bRb \in \R or ++\infty). The integral converges when limxbaxf\lim_{x \to b^-} \int_a^x f exists; one then writes abf\int_a^b f for the limit. (Similarly on (a,b]\intoc{a}{b}, and on (a,b)\intoo{a}{b} by splitting at an interior point — the choice does not matter, by Chasles.) The integral converges absolutely when abf\int_a^b \abs f converges; absolute convergence implies convergence, by the Cauchy criterion:

xyfxyf\Bigl| \int_x^{y} f \Bigr| \leq \int_x^{y} \abs f

and completeness of R\R (the primitive has the Cauchy property). In detail: let F(x)=axfF(x) = \int_a^x f and G(x)=axfG(x) = \int_a^x \abs f. If bf\int^b\abs f converges, GG has a limit at bb^-, so for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is c<bc < b with G(y)G(x)εG(y) - G(x) \leq \varepsilon whenever cxy<bc \leq x \leq y < b; the display transfers this Cauchy property to FF. For any sequence xnbx_n \to b^- the values F(xn)F(x_n) then form a Cauchy sequence of reals, convergent by completeness, and interlacing two such sequences shows the limit is the same for all of them: FF has a limit at bb^-.

Theorem 9.2 (Positive comparison toolkit)

For f,g0f, g \geq 0 piecewise continuous on [a,b)\intco{a}{b}:

  1. abf\int_a^b f converges iff the primitive xaxfx \mapsto \int_a^x f is bounded;
  2. fgf \leq g: convergence of g\int g forces that of f\int f; divergence transfers the other way;
  3. fgf \sim g at bb: the two integrals have the same nature;
  4. the reference scales: at ++\infty,  ⁣dttα\int^{\infty} \frac{\dd t}{t^\alpha} converges iff α>1\alpha > 1, and  ⁣dtt(lnt)β\int^\infty \frac{\dd t}{t(\ln t)^\beta} iff β>1\beta > 1; at a finite endpoint bb, b ⁣dt(bt)α\int^b \frac{\dd t}{(b - t)^\alpha} converges iff α<1\alpha < 1.

Proof. (1) The primitive F(x)=axfF(x) = \int_a^x f is nondecreasing (f0f \geq 0). If it is bounded, =supx<bF\ell = \sup_{x < b}F is finite and F(x)F(x) \to \ell: given ε>0\varepsilon > 0, some F(x0)>εF(x_0) > \ell - \varepsilon, and monotonicity traps F(x)(ε,]F(x) \in \intoc{\ell - \varepsilon}{\ell} for x0x<bx_0 \leq x < b. If it is unbounded, F+F \to +\infty: divergence.

(2) From fgf \leq g: axfaxg\int_a^x f \leq \int_a^x g for all xx; if bg\int^b g converges, the right side is bounded, hence so is the left, and (1) concludes. Contraposition transfers divergence the other way.

(3) fgf \sim g at bb provides c<bc < b with

12g(t)    f(t)    2g(t)(ct<b):\tfrac12\,g(t) \;\leq\; f(t) \;\leq\; 2\,g(t) \qquad (c \leq t < b) :

by (2) applied both ways on [c,b)\intco{c}{b}, the two integrals have the same nature; the initial piece [a,c]\intcc{a}{c} is a proper integral and changes nothing.

(4) Explicit primitives: for α1\alpha \neq 1 and β1\beta \neq 1,

cx ⁣dttα=x1αc1α1α,cx ⁣dtt(lnt)β=(lnx)1β(lnc)1β1β,\int_c^x \frac{\dd t}{t^\alpha} = \frac{x^{1-\alpha} - c^{1-\alpha}}{1 - \alpha}, \qquad \int_c^x \frac{\dd t}{t(\ln t)^\beta} = \frac{(\ln x)^{1-\beta} - (\ln c)^{1-\beta}}{1 - \beta},

with logarithms in the excluded cases: bounded as x+x \to +\infty exactly when α>1\alpha > 1, resp. β>1\beta > 1. At a finite endpoint, the substitution u=btu = b - t reduces to the scale 0uα ⁣du\int_0 u^{-\alpha}\,\dd u, bounded iff α<1\alpha < 1. Apply (1) each time.

Example 9.3 (Two warm-ups, worked to the end)

(a) 01lnt ⁣dt\displaystyle\int_0^1 \ln t\,\dd t: the integrand blows up at 0+0^+, but lnt=o(t1/2)\abs{\ln t} = o\bigl(t^{-1/2}\bigr) there (logarithms lose to powers), and 0t1/2\int_0 t^{-1/2} converges: absolute convergence. The value, by parts on [ε,1]\intcc{\varepsilon}{1}:

ε1lnt ⁣dt=[tlntt]ε1=1εlnε+εε0+1.\int_\varepsilon^1 \ln t\,\dd t = \bigl[t\ln t - t\bigr]_\varepsilon^1 = -1 - \varepsilon\ln\varepsilon + \varepsilon \xrightarrow[\varepsilon\to0^+]{} -1 .

(b) 0lnt1+t2 ⁣dt\displaystyle\int_0^\infty \frac{\ln t}{1 + t^2}\,\dd t: trouble at both ends, so split at 11. Near 00: lnt\abs{\ln t} integrable as in (a); near \infty: lnt1+t2=o(t3/2)\frac{\ln t}{1+t^2} = o(t^{-3/2}): absolutely convergent. The substitution t=1ut = \frac1u maps (0,1)\intoo{0}{1} onto (1,)\intoo{1}{\infty} and

01lnt1+t2 ⁣dt=1lnu1+u2 ⁣duu2=1lnu1+u2 ⁣du:\int_0^1 \frac{\ln t}{1+t^2}\,\dd t = \int_1^{\infty} \frac{-\ln u}{1 + u^{-2}}\cdot \frac{\dd u}{u^2} = -\int_1^\infty \frac{\ln u}{1+u^2}\,\dd u :

the two halves cancel, and the integral is 00. Closing insight: symmetry under t1tt \mapsto \frac1t is worth a page of computation — the same trick already powered Exercise 9.3.

Example 9.4 (One value, three integrals)

Study I=01costt2 ⁣dtI = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{1 - \cos t}{t^2}\,\dd t. At 00: 1costt221 - \cos t \sim \frac{t^2}2, so the integrand extends continuously by the value 12\frac12 — no singularity at all. At \infty: 01costt22t20 \leq \frac{1 - \cos t}{t^2} \leq \frac{2}{t^2}: absolute convergence (Theorem 9.2). Value: integrate by parts on [ε,M]\intcc{\varepsilon}{M} with u=1costu = 1 - \cos t, v=t2v' = t^{-2}:

εM1costt2 ⁣dt=[1costt]εM+εMsintt ⁣dt.\int_\varepsilon^M \frac{1 - \cos t}{t^2}\,\dd t = \Bigl[-\frac{1 - \cos t}{t}\Bigr]_\varepsilon^M + \int_\varepsilon^M \frac{\sin t}{t}\,\dd t .

The bracket vanishes at both ends (1cosεεε2\frac{1 - \cos\varepsilon}{\varepsilon} \sim \frac\varepsilon2; bounded numerator at MM), and the integral tends to the Dirichlet value π2\frac\pi2 (Exercise 9.10): I=π2I = \frac\pi2. Closing insight: with 1cost=2sin2t21 - \cos t = 2\sin^2\frac t2 and u=t2u = \frac t2,

I=02sin2u(2u)2  2 ⁣du=0(sinuu) ⁣2 ⁣du:I = \int_0^\infty \frac{2\sin^2 u}{(2u)^2}\;2\,\dd u = \int_0^\infty \Bigl(\frac{\sin u}{u}\Bigr)^{\!2}\dd u :

the three classics 0sintt ⁣dt\int_0^\infty\frac{\sin t}{t}\dd t, 0(sintt)2 ⁣dt\int_0^\infty\bigl(\frac{\sin t}{t}\bigr)^2\dd t (Exercise 9.11) and II all share the value π2\frac\pi2, passed around by parts and substitution — and only the first is semi-convergent: integration by parts traded away the absolute convergence for a simpler integrand.

Example 9.5 (A semi-convergent integral)

1sintt ⁣dt\displaystyle\int_1^{\infty} \frac{\sin t}{t}\,\dd t converges: integrate by parts,

1xsintt ⁣dt=[costt]1x1xcostt2 ⁣dt,\int_1^x \frac{\sin t}{t}\dd t = \Bigl[\frac{-\cos t}{t}\Bigr]_1^x - \int_1^x \frac{\cos t}{t^2}\dd t ,

where the bracket has a limit and the last integral converges absolutely (cost/t2t2\abs{\cos t}/t^2 \leq t^{-2}). But not absolutely: from sintsin2t\abs{\sin t} \geq \sin^2 t,

1xsintt ⁣dt    1xsin2tt ⁣dt=1x ⁣dt2t= 12lnx      1xcos2t2t ⁣dtconvergent,\int_1^x \frac{\abs{\sin t}}{t}\,\dd t \;\geq\; \int_1^x \frac{\sin^2t}{t}\,\dd t = \underbrace{\int_1^x \frac{\dd t}{2t}}_{=\ \frac12\ln x \ \to\ \infty} \;-\; \underbrace{\int_1^x \frac{\cos 2t}{2t}\,\dd t}_{\text{convergent}} ,

where the last integral converges by the same integration by parts as above (with sin2t\sin 2t in the bracket): a divergent piece minus a convergent one diverges. So 1sintt ⁣dt\int_1^\infty\frac{\sin t}{t}\dd t converges without converging absolutely — the integral analogue of the alternating series, with integration by parts playing the role of the alternating test.

9.2 The convergence theorem

Theorem 9.6 (Dominated convergence)

Let (fn)(f_n) be piecewise continuous on an interval II, converging pointwise to a piecewise continuous ff, and suppose there is a fixed integrable φ0\varphi \geq 0 (Iφ<\int_I \varphi < \infty) with

fn(t)φ(t)(tI, nN).\abs{f_n(t)} \leq \varphi(t) \qquad (t \in I,\ n \in \N).

Then all Ifn\int_I f_n and If\int_I f converge absolutely, and

IfnnIf.\int_I f_n \xrightarrow[n \to \infty]{} \int_I f .

Proof. Admitted at this level.

Remark 9.7

The honest proof belongs to the Lebesgue integration theory of Year 3; the statement, however, is used constantly from now on. The domination hypothesis is the whole point: pointwise convergence alone does not suffice (fn=n1(0,1/n)f_n = n\,\mathbf{1}_{\intoo{0}{1/n}}, sliding bumps: fn=1↛0=f\int f_n = 1 \not\to 0 = \int f). The theorem also holds for a continuous parameter (fλf_\lambda, λλ0\lambda \to \lambda_0), by the sequential characterization of limits.

Example 9.8 (A Gaussian limit, by domination)

Compute limnIn\displaystyle\lim_{n\to\infty} I_n where In=0(1+t2n) ⁣n ⁣dtI_n = \int_0^\infty \Bigl(1 + \frac{t^2}{n}\Bigr)^{\!-n}\dd t. Pointwise, (1+t2/n)net2(1 + t^2/n)^n \to \eu^{t^2} (compound-interest limit), so the integrands tend to et2\eu^{-t^2}. Domination: the sequence n(1+u/n)nn \mapsto (1 + u/n)^n is nondecreasing for u0u \geq 0 (AM–GM on the n+1n + 1 factors 1,1+un,,1+un1, 1 + \frac un, \dots, 1 + \frac un gives (1+un+1)n+1(1+un)n(1 + \frac u{n+1})^{n+1} \geq (1 + \frac un)^n), so for n2n \geq 2:

(1+t2n) ⁣n(1+t22) ⁣2,\Bigl(1 + \frac{t^2}{n}\Bigr)^{\!-n} \leq \Bigl(1 + \frac{t^2}{2}\Bigr)^{\!-2},

an integrable dominator (4t4\sim 4t^{-4} at infinity). Dominated convergence:

Inn0et2 ⁣dt=π2I_n \xrightarrow[n\to\infty]{} \int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\dd t = \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2}

(the Gaussian integral of Exercise 9.8). Closing check: the substitution t=ntanθt = \sqrt n\tan\theta computes InI_n exactly, In=n0π/2cos2n2θ ⁣dθ=nW2n2I_n = \sqrt n\int_0^{\pi/2}\cos^{2n-2}\theta\,\dd\theta = \sqrt n\,W_{2n-2}, and the Wallis asymptotics Wmπ/(2m)W_m \sim \sqrt{\pi/(2m)} (Lemma 6.11) give nW2n2π2\sqrt n\,W_{2n-2} \to \frac{\sqrt\pi}2 again: the two pillars of this chapter and the last agree.

Example 9.9 (Dominated convergence, continuous parameter)

Compute

limx+0arctan(xt)1+t2 ⁣dt.\lim_{x\to+\infty}\int_0^\infty \frac{\arctan(xt)}{1+t^2}\,\dd t .

For each t>0t > 0, arctan(xt)π2\arctan(xt) \to \frac\pi2 as xx \to \infty; and the domination

arctan(xt)1+t2π/21+t2,integrable, independent of x,\Bigl|\frac{\arctan(xt)}{1+t^2}\Bigr| \leq \frac{\pi/2}{1+t^2}, \qquad\text{integrable, independent of } x,

holds for all xx. By the continuous-parameter form of Theorem 9.6 (sequential characterization: test along every xnx_n \to \infty),

0arctan(xt)1+t2 ⁣dtx+π20 ⁣dt1+t2=π24.\int_0^\infty\frac{\arctan(xt)}{1+t^2}\,\dd t \xrightarrow[x\to+\infty]{} \frac\pi2\int_0^\infty\frac{\dd t}{1+t^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{4} .

Closing insight: the single point t=0t = 0, where the pointwise limit is 00 rather than π2\frac\pi2, changes nothing — the limit function only enters through its integral, one of the quiet mercies of the theorem.

9.3 Integrals with a parameter

Theorem 9.10 (Continuity under the integral sign)

Let f ⁣:A×IRf \colon A \times I \to \R (AA a metric space, II an interval) with: tf(x,t)t \mapsto f(x, t) piecewise continuous for each xx; xf(x,t)x \mapsto f(x, t) continuous for each tt; and a domination f(x,t)φ(t)\abs{f(x,t)} \leq \varphi(t) (φ\varphi integrable on II, independent of xx). Then

F(x)=If(x,t) ⁣dtF(x) = \int_I f(x, t)\,\dd t

is defined and continuous on AA.

Proof. Definedness: domination gives absolute convergence. Continuity at x0x_0: for any sequence xnx0x_n \to x_0, the functions gn(t)=f(xn,t)g_n(t) = f(x_n, t) converge pointwise to f(x0,t)f(x_0, t) (continuity in xx) under the fixed domination φ\varphi: dominated convergence gives F(xn)F(x0)F(x_n) \to F(x_0); conclude by the sequential characterization of continuity (Definition 4.5).

Theorem 9.11 (Differentiation under the integral sign)

Let f ⁣:J×IRf \colon J \times I \to \R (JJ an interval of parameters) with: tf(x,t)t \mapsto f(x,t) integrable on II for each xx; xf(x,t)x \mapsto f(x,t) of class C1C^1 for each tt, the partial derivative fx\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} being piecewise continuous in tt and dominated: fx(x,t)ψ(t)\bigl|\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,t)\bigr| \leq \psi(t) with ψ\psi integrable. Then F(x)=If(x,t) ⁣dtF(x) = \int_I f(x,t)\dd t is C1C^1 on JJ and

F(x)=Ifx(x,t) ⁣dt.F'(x) = \int_I \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x, t)\,\dd t .

Proof. Fix xx and hn0h_n \to 0. The difference quotients

F(x+hn)F(x)hn=If(x+hn,t)f(x,t)hn ⁣dt\frac{F(x + h_n) - F(x)}{h_n} = \int_I \frac{f(x + h_n, t) - f(x, t)}{h_n}\,\dd t

have integrands converging pointwise to fx(x,t)\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x, t), and dominated by ψ(t)\psi(t): by the mean value inequality applied in xx at fixed tt,

f(x+hn,t)f(x,t)hnsupξfx(ξ,t)ψ(t).\Bigl|\frac{f(x + h_n, t) - f(x,t)}{h_n}\Bigr| \leq \sup_{\xi} \Bigl|\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(\xi, t)\Bigr| \leq \psi(t) .

Dominated convergence gives the limit Ifx(x,t) ⁣dt\int_I \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,t)\dd t of the quotients: FF is differentiable with the announced derivative, which is continuous by Theorem 9.10 applied to fx\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}.

Example 9.12 (A parameter integral checked against a formula)

Let F(x)=0 ⁣dtt2+xF(x) = \displaystyle\int_0^\infty \frac{\dd t}{t^2 + x} for x>0x > 0. On every [a,b](0,)\intcc{a}{b} \subset \intoo{0}{\infty}, the integrand is dominated by 1t2+a\frac{1}{t^2 + a}, integrable and independent of xx: FF is continuous (Theorem 9.10). Here the theorem can be checked against an explicit value:

F(x)=[1xarctantx]0=π2x,F(x) = \Bigl[\frac{1}{\sqrt x}\arctan\frac{t}{\sqrt x}\Bigr]_0^\infty = \frac{\pi}{2\sqrt x} ,

visibly continuous. Now differentiate under the integral: the xx-derivative 1(t2+x)2-\frac{1}{(t^2+x)^2} is dominated on [a,b]\intcc ab by 1(t2+a)2\frac{1}{(t^2+a)^2}, integrable: Theorem 9.11 gives

F(x)=0 ⁣dt(t2+x)2whileF(x)=π4x3/2,F'(x) = -\int_0^\infty \frac{\dd t}{(t^2 + x)^2} \qquad\text{while}\qquad F'(x) = -\frac{\pi}{4}\,x^{-3/2} ,

so we have computed a new integral for free: 0 ⁣dt(t2+x)2=π4x3/2\int_0^\infty\frac{\dd t}{(t^2+x)^2} = \frac{\pi}{4x^{3/2}}. Closing insight: differentiating a known parameter integral is a factory of new formulas — iterating gives 0 ⁣dt(t2+1)n\int_0^\infty\frac{\dd t}{(t^2+1)^n} for every nn, with no trigonometric substitutions.

Method 9.13 (Studying an improper integral)

Given abf\int_a^b f:

  1. Locate the trouble: list the endpoints (or interior points) where ff is unbounded or the interval is infinite, and split so that each piece has exactly one troublesome end.
  2. If ff has constant sign near that end, find an equivalent and compare with the reference scales of Theorem 9.2.
  3. If ff oscillates, test f\abs f first (absolute convergence). If f\int\abs f diverges, try integration by parts to trade the oscillation for decay, as in Example 9.5; minorations like sintsin2t\abs{\sin t} \geq \sin^2t detect genuine semi-convergence.
  4. For a value, not just the nature: parts, substitution, or a parameter (differentiate a simpler integral, as in Example 9.12 and Example 9.21).
  5. Sanity checks on any computed value: sign and rough size against a crude bound (0et2 ⁣dt(0,1+1et)\int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\dd t \in \intoo{0}{1 + \int_1^\infty \eu^{-t}}, so π20.886\frac{\sqrt\pi}{2} \approx 0.886 is plausible); and dimensional consistency under scaling (tλtt \mapsto \lambda t must rescale both sides the same way — the fastest detector of a lost factor).

Remark 9.14 (Common pitfalls)

Three recurring errors. (i) Parameter-dependent dominators: the domination f(x,t)φ(t)\abs{f(x,t)} \leq \varphi(t) must be uniform in xx on the set considered; it usually holds on segments [a,b]\intcc ab but not globally — for 0ext ⁣dt\int_0^\infty\eu^{-xt}\dd t there is no integrable dominator valid for all x>0x > 0, yet dominating on xa>0x \geq a > 0 is enough to work on the whole open half-line, since continuity and derivatives are local notions. (ii) Comparing signed integrands: the comparison toolkit is for nonnegative functions; from fg\abs f \leq g with g\int g divergent one may conclude nothing — 1sintt ⁣dt\int_1^\infty\frac{\sin t}t\,\dd t converges although every comparison with 1t\frac1t fails. (iii) Forgetting half the trouble: on (0,)\intoo{0}{\infty} always study both ends separately; 0 ⁣dtt\int_0^\infty\frac{\dd t}{t} diverges at both, and a convergent-looking split can silently cancel two infinities. The safe reflex is the checklist of Method 9.13.

Example 9.15 (A Bertrand boundary case, to the digit)

The scale  ⁣dtt(lnt)β\int^\infty\frac{\dd t}{t(\ln t)^\beta} of Theorem 9.2 sits exactly on the edge of the power scales; its boundary cases deserve one full computation. For β=2\beta = 2:

e ⁣dtt(lnt)2=[1lnt]e=0(1)=1,\int_\eu^{\infty}\frac{\dd t}{t(\ln t)^2} = \Bigl[-\frac{1}{\ln t}\Bigr]_\eu^{\infty} = 0 - (-1) = 1 ,

a convergent integral with a pleasantly exact value; while for β=1\beta = 1,

ex ⁣dttlnt=[lnlnt]ex=lnlnx,\int_\eu^{x}\frac{\dd t}{t\ln t} = \bigl[\ln\ln t\bigr]_\eu^{x} = \ln\ln x \longrightarrow \infty ,

divergent — but so slowly that reaching lnlnx=10\ln\ln x = 10 requires x=ee10109566x = \eu^{\eu^{10}} \approx 10^{9566}. Closing insight: between “every power t1εt^{-1-\varepsilon} converges” and “t1t^{-1} diverges” lives an infinite ladder of logarithmic scales, each refining the last; the substitution u=lntu = \ln t collapses each rung onto the previous one, which is why the Bertrand criteria echo the Riemann ones one level up.

Remark 9.16 (Perspectives within this volume)

This chapter’s tools are about to be everywhere. Dominated convergence is the engine behind the approximate identities of the next chapter (sliding kernels, Bernstein and Fejér alike); continuity and differentiation under the integral sign produce the Fourier coefficients’ calculus in the Fourier chapter, where every cn(f)c_n(f) is a parameter integral in disguise. The Γ\Gamma function returns twice: in the chapter on multiple integrals, where a double integral finally proves Euler’s Beta–Gamma formula in full, and in the probability chapters, where Γ\Gamma-type integrals normalize the standard densities and compute their moments. And the semi-convergent sintt\int\frac{\sin t}{t} resurfaces as the Gibbs constant of the Fourier chapter — the same integral, measuring the overshoot of partial sums at a jump.

Definition 9.17 (The Γ\Gamma function)

For x>0x > 0:

Γ(x)=0tx1et ⁣dt,\Gamma(x) = \int_0^{\infty} t^{x-1}\,\eu^{-t}\,\dd t ,

convergent at both ends (tx1t^{x-1} integrable at 0+0^+ for x>0x > 0; exponential decay at \infty).

Theorem 9.18

Γ\Gamma is continuous on (0,+)\intoo{0}{+\infty}, satisfies the functional equation

Γ(x+1)=xΓ(x),Γ(1)=1,henceΓ(n+1)=n!,\Gamma(x + 1) = x\,\Gamma(x), \qquad \Gamma(1) = 1, \qquad\text{hence}\qquad \Gamma(n + 1) = n! ,

and is of class C1C^1 (indeed CC^\infty) with Γ(x)=0tx1etlnt ⁣dt\Gamma'(x) = \int_0^\infty t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\ln t\,\dd t.

Proof. Functional equation: integrate by parts on [ε,M]\intcc{\varepsilon}{M} and let the ends go: txet=[txet]+xtx1et\int t^{x}\eu^{-t} = [-t^x\eu^{-t}] + x\int t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}, boundary terms vanishing — indeed εxeε0\varepsilon^x\eu^{-\varepsilon} \to 0 as ε0+\varepsilon \to 0^+ because x>0x > 0, and MxeM0M^x\eu^{-M} \to 0 as MM \to \infty because the exponential beats every power; both truncated integrals converge to their improper values by the convergence established in Definition 9.17. Γ(1)=et=1\Gamma(1) = \int \eu^{-t} = 1; induction gives the factorial.

Continuity on [a,b](0,)\intcc{a}{b} \subset \intoo{0}{\infty}: dominate tx1ett^{x-1}\eu^{-t} by φ(t)=(ta1+tb1)et\varphi(t) = (t^{a-1} + t^{b-1})\eu^{-t}, integrable and independent of x[a,b]x \in \intcc{a}{b}: Theorem 9.10 applies on every such segment, hence on the whole half-line. Differentiability: the xx-derivative tx1etlntt^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\ln t is dominated on [a,b]\intcc{a}{b} by (ta1+tb1)etlnt(t^{a-1} + t^{b-1})\eu^{-t}\,\abs{\ln t}, still integrable: Theorem 9.11; iterating gives all derivatives (each adds a power of lnt\ln t, harmless).

Example 9.19 (Half-integer factorials)

The functional equation and Γ(12)=π\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = \sqrt\pi (a substitution away from Exercise 9.8: set t=u2t = u^2 in the defining integral) generate all half-integer values:

Γ(32)=12Γ(12)=π2,Γ(52)=32π2=3π4,Γ(72)=15π8.\Gamma\Bigl(\frac32\Bigr) = \frac12\,\Gamma\Bigl(\frac12\Bigr) = \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2}, \qquad \Gamma\Bigl(\frac52\Bigr) = \frac32\cdot\frac{\sqrt\pi}{2} = \frac{3\sqrt\pi}{4}, \qquad \Gamma\Bigl(\frac72\Bigr) = \frac{15\sqrt\pi}{8} .

Since Γ(n+1)=n!\Gamma(n+1) = n!, it is fair to say “12!=π20.886\frac12! = \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2} \approx 0.886”: the factorial has been interpolated, and the interpolating curve dips below 11 between 0!=10! = 1 and 1!=11! = 1 (its minimum 0.8856\approx 0.8856 at x1.4616x \approx 1.4616 matches the convexity picture of the weekend problem’s Part I). Closing insight: nothing in the integral 0tx1et ⁣dt\int_0^\infty t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\dd t privileges integers — the factorial’s discreteness was an accident of counting, and π\sqrt\pi is what lives between 11 and 11.

Remark 9.20 (Where Γ\Gamma goes from here)

The weekend problem of this chapter builds the whole Euler calculus around Γ\Gamma: the Beta function, its integration-by-parts recursions, the Wallis integrals as Beta values, and Gauss’s limit formula. The chapter on multiple integrals proves Euler’s Beta–Gamma formula for all arguments by a double integral; the probability chapters meet Γ\Gamma again in the normalization of the most common densities and in the moments of waiting times. The Year 3 volume rebuilds Γ\Gamma on Lebesgue foundations, proves the Bohr–Mollerup uniqueness theorem, and extends Stirling’s formula from integers to the real half-line by dominated convergence.

Example 9.21 (A classical computation by differentiation)

For xRx \in \R, let F(x)=0et2cos(xt) ⁣dtF(x) = \int_0^{\infty} \eu^{-t^2}\cos(xt)\,\dd t (absolutely convergent, dominated by et2\eu^{-t^2}). By Theorem 9.11 (domination of the xx-derivative by tet2t\,\eu^{-t^2}, integrable):

F(x)=0tet2sin(xt) ⁣dt=[et22sin(xt)]0x20et2cos(xt) ⁣dt=x2F(x),F'(x) = -\int_0^\infty t\,\eu^{-t^2}\sin(xt)\,\dd t = \Bigl[\frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{2}\sin(xt)\Bigr]_0^\infty - \frac x2\int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\cos(xt)\,\dd t = -\frac x2\,F(x),

(parts with u=tet2u' = t\eu^{-t^2}). The differential equation F=x2FF' = -\frac x2 F integrates to F(x)=F(0)ex2/4F(x) = F(0)\,\eu^{-x^2/4}: the Gaussian-type integral reproduces itself. The constant F(0)=0et2 ⁣dt=π2F(0) = \int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\dd t = \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2} is computed in Exercise 9.8 — and again, by double integration, in Chapter 20.

9.4 Exercises

Exercise 9.1

Nature of: 01 ⁣dtt(1t)\displaystyle\int_0^1 \frac{\dd t}{\sqrt{t(1-t)}};   1lntt2 ⁣dt\;\displaystyle\int_1^\infty \frac{\ln t}{t^2}\dd t;   0 ⁣dt1+t2sin2t\;\displaystyle\int_0^\infty \frac{\dd t}{1 + t^2\sin^2 t} (compare with the divergent harmonic-type behavior near t=nπt = n\pi).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.1.

01 ⁣dtt(1t)\int_0^1 \frac{\dd t}{\sqrt{t(1-t)}}: near 00, t1/2\sim t^{-1/2} (α=12<1\alpha = \frac12 < 1: converges); near 11, (1t)1/2\sim (1-t)^{-1/2}: converges. Convergent (its value is π\pi, by the substitution t=sin2θt = \sin^2\theta).

1lntt2\int_1^\infty \frac{\ln t}{t^2}: lntt2=o(t3/2)\frac{\ln t}{t^2} = o(t^{-3/2}): convergent (value 11 by parts).

0 ⁣dt1+t2sin2t\int_0^\infty \frac{\dd t}{1 + t^2\sin^2 t}: divergent. Near t=nπt = n\pi, write t=nπ+ut = n\pi + u: sin2t=sin2uu2\sin^2 t = \sin^2 u \leq u^2, so on u1n\abs u \leq \frac{1}{n}, 1+t2sin2t1+(nπ+1)2u2Cn2u2+11 + t^2\sin^2 t \leq 1 + (n\pi + 1)^2u^2 \leq C n^2 u^2 + 1; hence

nπ1/nnπ+1/n ⁣dt1+t2sin2t1/n1/n ⁣du1+Cn2u2=2arctanCC1n,\int_{n\pi - 1/n}^{n\pi + 1/n} \frac{\dd t}{1 + t^2\sin^2 t} \geq \int_{-1/n}^{1/n} \frac{\dd u}{1 + Cn^2u^2} = \frac{2\arctan\sqrt C}{\sqrt C}\cdot\frac{1}{n} ,

a term of a divergent harmonic-type series: summing over nn, the primitive is unbounded.

Exercise 9.2

Compute 0tneλt ⁣dt\displaystyle\int_0^\infty t^n \eu^{-\lambda t}\,\dd t (λ>0\lambda > 0) via Γ\Gamma, and 01(lnt)n ⁣dt\displaystyle\int_0^1 (\ln t)^n \dd t via the substitution t=eut = \eu^{-u}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.2.

Substitute u=λtu = \lambda t:

0tneλt ⁣dt=1λn+10uneu ⁣du=Γ(n+1)λn+1=n!λn+1.\int_0^\infty t^n \eu^{-\lambda t}\dd t = \frac{1}{\lambda^{n+1}}\int_0^\infty u^n\eu^{-u}\dd u = \frac{\Gamma(n+1)}{\lambda^{n+1}} = \frac{n!}{\lambda^{n+1}} .

With t=eut = \eu^{-u} ( ⁣dt=eu ⁣du\dd t = -\eu^{-u}\dd u):

01(lnt)n ⁣dt=0(u)neu ⁣du=(1)nn!.\int_0^1 (\ln t)^n \dd t = \int_0^{\infty} (-u)^n \eu^{-u}\,\dd u = (-1)^n\, n! .

Exercise 9.3

Prove that 0 ⁣dt(1+t2)(1+tx)\displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\dd t}{(1 + t^2)(1 + t^x)} is well defined for every xRx \in \R and independent of xx. (Substitute t1tt \mapsto \frac1t and average the two expressions.) What is its value?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.3.

Convergence: the integrand is 11+t2\leq \frac{1}{1+t^2} near \infty and bounded near 00 (both factors bounded below away from 00): absolutely convergent, for every xx. Substituting t=1ut = \frac1u ( ⁣dt= ⁣duu2\dd t = -\frac{\dd u}{u^2}):

I(x)=01(1+1u2)(1+ux) ⁣duu2=0ux(1+u2)(1+ux) ⁣du.I(x) = \int_0^\infty \frac{1}{\bigl(1 + \frac1{u^2}\bigr)\bigl(1 + u^{-x}\bigr)}\cdot\frac{\dd u}{u^2} = \int_0^\infty \frac{u^x}{(1 + u^2)(1 + u^x)}\,\dd u .

Adding the two expressions of I(x)I(x):

2I(x)=01+tx(1+t2)(1+tx) ⁣dt=0 ⁣dt1+t2=π2:2I(x) = \int_0^\infty \frac{1 + t^x}{(1+t^2)(1+t^x)}\dd t = \int_0^\infty \frac{\dd t}{1 + t^2} = \frac{\pi}{2} :

I(x)=π4I(x) = \frac\pi4, independent of xx.

Exercise 9.4 ★★

(Bertrand integrals at a finite endpoint) For which (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) does 01/2 ⁣dttαlntβ\displaystyle\int_0^{1/2} \frac{\dd t}{t^\alpha\,\abs{\ln t}^\beta} converge?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.4.

Near 0+0^+, with u=lntu = \abs{\ln t} \to \infty. If α<1\alpha < 1: convergence regardless of β\beta (compare with tαt^{-\alpha'} for α<α<1\alpha < \alpha' < 1: the log factor is beaten). If α>1\alpha > 1: divergence regardless of β\beta (compare with tαt^{-\alpha''}, 1<α<α1 < \alpha'' < \alpha). If α=1\alpha = 1: substitute t=eut = \eu^{-u}:

01/2 ⁣dttlntβ=ln2 ⁣duuβ,\int_0^{1/2} \frac{\dd t}{t\,\abs{\ln t}^\beta} = \int_{\ln 2}^{\infty} \frac{\dd u}{u^\beta},

convergent iff β>1\beta > 1. Summary: convergence iff α<1\alpha < 1, or (α=1\alpha = 1 and β>1\beta > 1) — the mirror of the Bertrand series.

Exercise 9.5 ★★

Let F(x)=0ext1+t2 ⁣dtF(x) = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\eu^{-xt}}{1 + t^2}\,\dd t for x0x \geq 0. Prove that FF is continuous on [0,)\intco{0}{\infty}, C2C^2 on (0,)\intoo{0}{\infty}, satisfies F+F=1xF'' + F = \frac1x there, and that F(x)0F(x) \to 0 as x+x \to +\infty.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.5.

Continuity on [0,)\intco{0}{\infty}: domination ext1+t211+t2\bigl|\frac{\eu^{-xt}}{1+t^2}\bigr| \leq \frac{1}{1+t^2}, integrable, uniform in x0x \geq 0: Theorem 9.10.

C2C^2 on (0,)\intoo{0}{\infty}: on xa>0x \geq a > 0, the first two xx-derivatives text1+t2\frac{-t\,\eu^{-xt}}{1+t^2} and t2ext1+t2\frac{t^2\eu^{-xt}}{1+t^2} are dominated by teatt\,\eu^{-at} and eat\eu^{-at}: two applications of Theorem 9.11. Then

F(x)+F(x)=0t2+11+t2ext ⁣dt=0ext ⁣dt=1x.F''(x) + F(x) = \int_0^\infty \frac{t^2 + 1}{1 + t^2}\,\eu^{-xt}\dd t = \int_0^\infty \eu^{-xt}\dd t = \frac1x .

Limit: 0F(x)0ext ⁣dt=1x00 \leq F(x) \leq \int_0^\infty \eu^{-xt}\dd t = \frac1x \to 0.

Exercise 9.6 ★★

(Frullani) Let ff be continuous on [0,+)\intco{0}{+\infty} with a finite limit f()f(\infty) at ++\infty. Prove that for a,b>0a, b > 0:

0f(at)f(bt)t ⁣dt=(f(0)f())lnba.\int_0^{\infty} \frac{f(at) - f(bt)}{t}\,\dd t = \bigl(f(0) - f(\infty)\bigr)\,\ln\frac ba .

(On [ε,M]\intcc{\varepsilon}{M}, substitute in each piece and regroup into aεbεaMbM\int_{a\varepsilon}^{b\varepsilon} - \int_{aM}^{bM} of f(u)u ⁣du\frac{f(u)}u\,\dd u; squeeze using the continuity at 00 and the limit at \infty.) Compute 0ete2tt ⁣dt\int_0^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t} - \eu^{-2t}}{t}\dd t.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.6.

On [ε,M]\intcc{\varepsilon}{M}, substitute u=atu = at and u=btu = bt in the two halves:

εMf(at)f(bt)t ⁣dt=aεaMf(u)u ⁣dubεbMf(u)u ⁣du=aεbεf(u)u ⁣duaMbMf(u)u ⁣du.\int_\varepsilon^M \frac{f(at) - f(bt)}{t}\dd t = \int_{a\varepsilon}^{aM}\frac{f(u)}{u}\dd u - \int_{b\varepsilon}^{bM}\frac{f(u)}{u}\dd u = \int_{a\varepsilon}^{b\varepsilon} \frac{f(u)}{u}\dd u - \int_{aM}^{bM} \frac{f(u)}{u}\dd u .

First piece: f(u)=f(0)+o(1)f(u) = f(0) + o(1) near 00, and aεbε ⁣duu=lnba\int_{a\varepsilon} ^{b\varepsilon} \frac{\dd u}{u} = \ln\frac ba: the piece tends to f(0)lnbaf(0)\ln\frac ba. Second piece: f(u)f()f(u) \to f(\infty), same computation: tends to f()lnbaf(\infty)\ln\frac ba. Hence the improper integral converges to (f(0)f())lnba\bigl(f(0) - f(\infty)\bigr)\ln\frac ba.

With f(t)=etf(t) = \eu^{-t} (f(0)=1f(0) = 1, f()=0f(\infty) = 0), a=1a = 1, b=2b = 2:

0ete2tt ⁣dt=ln2.\int_0^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t} - \eu^{-2t}}{t}\dd t = \ln 2 .

Exercise 9.7 ★★

Justify and compute limn0n(1tn) ⁣ntx1 ⁣dt\lim_{n\to\infty} \displaystyle\int_0^n \Bigl(1 - \frac tn\Bigr)^{\!n} t^{x-1}\,\dd t for x>0x > 0 (dominated convergence with φ(t)=ettx1\varphi(t) = \eu^{-t}t^{x-1}, using (1t/n)net(1 - t/n)^n \leq \eu^{-t}; the limit is Γ(x)\Gamma(x)).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.7.

Extend the integrand by 00 beyond t=nt = n: gn(t)=(1tn)ntx11tng_n(t) = (1 - \frac tn)^n t^{x-1}\mathbf{1}_{t \leq n}. Pointwise, gn(t)ettx1g_n(t) \to \eu^{-t}t^{x-1} (the compound-interest limit, Year 1 volume). Domination: ln(1u)u\ln(1 - u) \leq -u gives (1tn)net(1 - \frac tn)^n \leq \eu^{-t} on [0,n]\intcc{0}{n}, so gn(t)ettx1=φ(t)\abs{g_n(t)} \leq \eu^{-t}t^{x-1} = \varphi(t), integrable. Dominated convergence:

0n(1tn)ntx1 ⁣dtn0ettx1 ⁣dt=Γ(x).\int_0^n \Bigl(1 - \frac tn\Bigr)^n t^{x-1}\dd t \xrightarrow[n\to\infty]{} \int_0^\infty \eu^{-t}t^{x-1}\dd t = \Gamma(x) .

(Computing the left side by repeated parts gives Euler’s product form Γ(x)=limn!nxx(x+1)(x+n)\Gamma(x) = \lim \frac{n!\,n^x}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)}.)

Exercise 9.8 ★★★

(The Gaussian integral by a parameter trick) For x0x \geq 0 set

G(x)=(0xet2 ⁣dt) ⁣2,H(x)=01ex2(1+t2)1+t2 ⁣dt.G(x) = \Bigl(\int_0^x \eu^{-t^2}\dd t\Bigr)^{\!2}, \qquad H(x) = \int_0^1 \frac{\eu^{-x^2(1+t^2)}}{1 + t^2}\,\dd t .

Prove that G+H=0G' + H' = 0 (differentiate HH under the integral and substitute u=xtu = xt in the resulting integral), deduce G(x)+H(x)=π4G(x) + H(x) = \frac\pi4 for all xx, and conclude

0et2 ⁣dt=π2.\int_0^{\infty} \eu^{-t^2}\,\dd t = \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2} .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.8.

HH is differentiable in xx (integrand C1C^1 in xx, derivative 2x(1+t2)ex2(1+t2)1+t2=2xex2ex2t2-2x(1+t^2)\cdot\frac{\eu^{-x^2(1+t^2)}}{1+t^2} = -2x\,\eu^{-x^2}\eu^{-x^2t^2}, continuous and bounded on compacts of xx, domination over t[0,1]t \in \intcc{0}{1} trivial):

H(x)=2xex201ex2t2 ⁣dt=u=xt2ex20xeu2 ⁣du=G(x),H'(x) = -2x\,\eu^{-x^2}\int_0^1 \eu^{-x^2t^2}\,\dd t \overset{u = xt}{=} -2\,\eu^{-x^2}\int_0^x \eu^{-u^2}\,\dd u = -G'(x),

since G(x)=2ex20xet2 ⁣dtG'(x) = 2\eu^{-x^2}\int_0^x \eu^{-t^2}\dd t (chain rule on the square, fundamental theorem of calculus). So G+HG + H is constant, equal to G(0)+H(0)=0+01 ⁣dt1+t2=π4G(0) + H(0) = 0 + \int_0^1 \frac{\dd t}{1+t^2} = \frac\pi4.

As xx \to \infty: 0H(x)ex201 ⁣dt00 \leq H(x) \leq \eu^{-x^2}\int_0^1 \dd t \to 0, so G(x)π4G(x) \to \frac\pi4:

0et2 ⁣dt=π4=π2.\int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\dd t = \sqrt{\frac\pi4} = \frac{\sqrt\pi}{2} .

(Consequently Γ(12)=20et2 ⁣dt=π\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = 2\int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\dd t = \sqrt\pi, by the substitution t=ut = \sqrt u.)

Exercise 9.9 ★★★

Prove that Γ\Gamma is log-convex: lnΓ\ln\Gamma is convex on (0,)\intoo{0}{\infty}. (Cauchy–Schwarz for integrals applied to t(x+y)/21et=(tx1et)1/2(ty1et)1/2t^{(x+y)/2 - 1}\eu^{-t} = \bigl(t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\bigr)^{1/2} \bigl(t^{y-1}\eu^{-t}\bigr)^{1/2} gives Γ(x+y2)2Γ(x)Γ(y)\Gamma\bigl(\frac{x+y}{2}\bigr)^2 \leq \Gamma(x)\Gamma(y); combine with continuity and Exercise 8.8.)

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.9.

Cauchy–Schwarz (Year 1 volume, valid on [ε,M]\intcc{\varepsilon}{M} and passed to the limit) applied to the factorization tx+y21et=(tx1et)1/2(ty1et)1/2t^{\frac{x+y}{2}-1}\eu^{-t} = \bigl(t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\bigr)^{1/2} \bigl(t^{y-1}\eu^{-t}\bigr)^{1/2}:

Γ(x+y2)Γ(x)1/2Γ(y)1/2lnΓ(x+y2)lnΓ(x)+lnΓ(y)2:\Gamma\Bigl(\frac{x+y}{2}\Bigr) \leq \Gamma(x)^{1/2}\,\Gamma(y)^{1/2} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \ln\Gamma\Bigl(\frac{x+y}{2}\Bigr) \leq \frac{\ln\Gamma(x) + \ln\Gamma(y)}{2} :

lnΓ\ln\Gamma is midpoint convex; being continuous (Theorem 9.18), it is convex (Exercise 8.8). (Log-convexity pins Γ\Gamma down uniquely among interpolations of the factorial — the Bohr–Mollerup theorem, a Year 3 pearl.)

Exercise 9.10 ★★★

(Dirichlet integral) Set F(x)=0sinttext ⁣dtF(x) = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin t}{t}\,\eu^{-xt}\,\dd t for x>0x > 0.

  1. Justify F(x)=11+x2F'(x) = -\frac{1}{1 + x^2} (differentiate under the integral; compute 0extsint ⁣dt\int_0^\infty \eu^{-xt}\sin t\,\dd t by two integrations by parts).
  2. Prove F(x)0F(x) \to 0 as x+x \to +\infty and deduce F(x)=π2arctanxF(x) = \frac\pi2 - \arctan x.
  3. Admitting the continuity of FF at 0+0^+ (an Abel-type theorem), conclude the value of the semi-convergent integral:

    0sintt ⁣dt=π2.\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin t}{t}\,\dd t = \frac{\pi}{2}.
Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.10.

  1. On xa>0x \geq a > 0: the xx-derivative of the integrand is sintext-\sin t\,\eu^{-xt}, dominated by eat\eu^{-at}: Theorem 9.11 gives F(x)=0extsint ⁣dtF'(x) = -\int_0^\infty \eu^{-xt}\sin t\,\dd t. Two integrations by parts (or the complex exponential):

    0extsint ⁣dt=0e(x+i)t ⁣dt=1xi=11+x2.\int_0^\infty \eu^{-xt}\sin t\,\dd t = \Im \int_0^\infty \eu^{(-x+\iu)t}\dd t = \Im\frac{1}{x - \iu} = \frac{1}{1 + x^2} .
  2. F(x)0ext ⁣dt=1x0\abs{F(x)} \leq \int_0^\infty \eu^{-xt}\dd t = \frac1x \to 0. Integrating F=11+x2F' = -\frac{1}{1+x^2} from xx to \infty: 0F(x)=(π2arctanx)0 - F(x) = -\bigl(\frac\pi2 - \arctan x\bigr), so F(x)=π2arctanxF(x) = \frac\pi2 - \arctan x.
  3. Letting x0+x \to 0^+ with the admitted continuity: F(0+)=π2F(0^+) = \frac\pi2, and F(0)=0sintt ⁣dtF(0) = \int_0^\infty \frac{\sin t}{t}\dd t (the semi-convergent Dirichlet integral, Example 9.5): its value is π2\frac\pi2.

Exercise 9.11 ★★

Justify the convergence of 0(sintt) ⁣2 ⁣dt\displaystyle\int_0^\infty \Bigl(\frac{\sin t}{t}\Bigr)^{\!2}\dd t, then compute it by one integration by parts and Exercise 9.10:

0(sintt) ⁣2 ⁣dt=π2.\int_0^\infty \Bigl(\frac{\sin t}{t}\Bigr)^{\!2}\dd t = \frac{\pi}{2} .

(The same value as 0sintt ⁣dt\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin t}{t}\dd t — but this time the convergence is absolute.)

Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.11.

Convergence: near 00 the integrand extends continuously by the value 11 (sintt\sin t \sim t); at infinity it is t2\leq t^{-2}: absolute convergence. On [ε,M]\intcc{\varepsilon}{M}, integrate by parts with u=sin2tu = \sin^2 t, v=t2v' = t^{-2}:

εMsin2tt2 ⁣dt=[sin2tt]εM+εM2sintcostt ⁣dt=[sin2tt]εM+2ε2Msinuu ⁣du\int_\varepsilon^M \frac{\sin^2 t}{t^2}\dd t = \Bigl[-\frac{\sin^2 t}{t}\Bigr]_\varepsilon^M + \int_\varepsilon^M \frac{2\sin t\cos t}{t}\dd t = \Bigl[-\frac{\sin^2 t}{t}\Bigr]_\varepsilon^M + \int_{2\varepsilon}^{2M} \frac{\sin u}{u}\dd u

(u=2tu = 2t in the last integral). The bracket tends to 00 at both ends (sin2ε/εε\sin^2\varepsilon/\varepsilon \leq \varepsilon; sin2M/M1/M\sin^2 M/M \leq 1/M), and the last integral tends to 0sinuu ⁣du=π2\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin u}{u}\dd u = \frac\pi2 (Exercise 9.10). Hence

0(sintt) ⁣2 ⁣dt=π2.\int_0^\infty \Bigl(\frac{\sin t}{t}\Bigr)^{\!2}\dd t = \frac\pi2 .

Exercise 9.12 ★★★

(The Gaussian tail) For x>0x > 0 set T(x)=xet2 ⁣dtT(x) = \displaystyle \int_x^\infty \eu^{-t^2}\dd t.

  1. Writing et2=12t(2tet2)\eu^{-t^2} = \frac{1}{-2t}\cdot(-2t\,\eu^{-t^2}), integrate by parts twice to obtain

    T(x)=ex2(12x14x3)+34xet2t4 ⁣dt.T(x) = \eu^{-x^2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{2x} - \frac{1}{4x^3}\Bigr) + \frac34\int_x^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{t^4}\,\dd t .
  2. Bound the remainder: 034xt4et2 ⁣dt38x5ex20 \leq \frac34\int_x^\infty t^{-4}\eu^{-t^2}\dd t \leq \frac{3}{8x^5}\,\eu^{-x^2}, and deduce the bracketing

    ex2(12x14x3)T(x)ex22x,henceT(x)ex22x(x+).\eu^{-x^2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{2x} - \frac{1}{4x^3}\Bigr) \leq T(x) \leq \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x}, \qquad\text{hence}\qquad T(x) \sim \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x} \quad (x \to +\infty).
  3. Why can the full alternating series obtained by iterating the parts never converge for fixed xx? (Compare the growth of the coefficients 13(2k1)1\cdot3\cdots(2k-1) with the powers (2x2)k(2x^2)^k.)
Solution

Solution of Exercise 9.12.

  1. Parts with u=12tu = \frac{-1}{2t}, v=2tet2v' = -2t\,\eu^{-t^2} (so v=et2v = \eu^{-t^2}):

    T(x)=[et22t]xxet22t2 ⁣dt=ex22xxet22t2 ⁣dt.T(x) = \Bigl[\frac{-\eu^{-t^2}}{2t}\Bigr]_x^\infty - \int_x^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{2t^2}\dd t = \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x} - \int_x^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{2t^2}\dd t .

    Same device on the new integral (u=14t3u = \frac{-1}{4t^3}, v=2tet2v' = -2t\,\eu^{-t^2}):

    xet22t2 ⁣dt=ex24x334xet2t4 ⁣dt,\int_x^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{2t^2}\dd t = \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{4x^3} - \frac34\int_x^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{t^4}\dd t ,

    whence the announced identity.

  2. One more integration by parts bounds the remainder:

    xet2t4 ⁣dt=ex22x552xet2t6 ⁣dtex22x5,\int_x^\infty \frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{t^4}\dd t = \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x^5} - \frac52\int_x^\infty\frac{\eu^{-t^2}}{t^6}\dd t \leq \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x^5},

    so 034xt4et2 ⁣dt38x5ex20 \leq \frac34\int_x^\infty t^{-4}\eu^{-t^2}\dd t \leq \frac{3}{8x^5}\eu^{-x^2}. Dropping the (positive) remainder in the identity of question 1 gives the lower bound; dropping the (negative) second term of the first parts gives T(x)ex22xT(x) \leq \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x}. Dividing the bracketing by ex22x\frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x}: the ratio is squeezed between 112x21 - \frac{1}{2x^2} and 11, so T(x)ex22xT(x) \sim \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x}.

  3. Iterating the parts produces the formal series

    T(x)ex22x(112x2+13(2x2)2135(2x2)3+),T(x) \approx \frac{\eu^{-x^2}}{2x}\Bigl(1 - \frac{1}{2x^2} + \frac{1\cdot3}{(2x^2)^2} - \frac{1\cdot3\cdot5}{(2x^2)^3} + \cdots\Bigr),

    whose kk-th coefficient 13(2k1)=(2k)!2kk!1\cdot3\cdots(2k-1) = \frac{(2k)!}{2^k k!} grows faster than any geometric sequence: for fixed xx the terms 13(2k1)(2x2)k\frac{1\cdot3\cdots(2k-1)}{(2x^2)^k} tend to infinity (their ratio is 2k+12x2\frac{2k+1}{2x^2} \to \infty), so the series diverges for every xx. It is an asymptotic expansion: truncated at any fixed order, the error is of the order of the first omitted term as xx \to \infty — but never a convergent series. (This tail estimate is the standard Gaussian tail bound of the probability chapters.)

9.5 Problem: Euler’s integrals — Beta, Gamma, and Gauss’s limit formula

Problem 9.1

The Γ\Gamma function of Definition 9.17 is one half of Euler’s calculus of integrals; the other half is the Beta function

B(x,y)=01tx1(1t)y1 ⁣dt.B(x, y) = \int_0^1 t^{x-1}(1 - t)^{y-1}\,\dd t .

This problem develops the pair (Γ,B)(\Gamma, B) with the tools of this chapter only — integration by parts, substitution, dominated convergence — and culminates in Euler’s Beta–Gamma formula B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)Γ(x+y)B(x,y) = \frac{\Gamma(x)\Gamma(y)} {\Gamma(x+y)} on the half-integers and in Gauss’s limit formula for Γ\Gamma. Along the way the Wallis integrals of Lemma 6.11 reappear as Beta values, and Legendre’s duplication formula drops out.

Part I — Fine structure of Γ\Gamma.

  1. Recall why Γ(x)=0tx1et ⁣dt\Gamma(x) = \int_0^\infty t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\dd t converges exactly for x>0x > 0, and show

    Γ(x)1x(x0+)\Gamma(x) \sim \frac1x \qquad (x \to 0^+)

    (functional equation plus continuity of Γ\Gamma at 11).

  2. Prove Γ(12)=π\Gamma\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) = \sqrt\pi (substitute t=u2t = u^2 and invoke Exercise 9.8), and deduce Reu2/2 ⁣du=2π\int_\R \eu^{-u^2/2}\dd u = \sqrt{2\pi}.
  3. Show by induction, for nNn \in \N:

    Γ(n+12)=(2n)!4nn!π.\Gamma\Bigl(n + \frac12\Bigr) = \frac{(2n)!}{4^n\,n!}\,\sqrt\pi .
  4. Justify Γ(x)=0tx1et(lnt)2 ⁣dt>0\Gamma''(x) = \int_0^\infty t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}(\ln t)^2\dd t > 0, and deduce that Γ\Gamma is strictly convex, attains a unique minimum at some x0(1,2)x_0 \in \intoo{1}{2} (Γ(1)=Γ(2)=1\Gamma(1) = \Gamma(2) = 1 and Rolle), decreases on (0,x0)\intoo{0}{x_0} and increases on (x0,)\intoo{x_0}{\infty}.
  5. Show that Γ\Gamma beats every power: for each kNk \in \N, xk=o(Γ(x))x^k = o\bigl(\Gamma(x)\bigr) as x+x \to +\infty (squeeze xx between integers and use Γ(n+1)=n!\Gamma(n+1) = n! with the monotonicity of question 4).

Part II — The Beta function, by parts.

  1. Show that B(x,y)B(x,y) converges exactly for x>0x > 0 and y>0y > 0, and that B(x,y)=B(y,x)B(x,y) = B(y,x).
  2. Compute B(x,1)=1xB(x, 1) = \frac1x, and prove by integration by parts, for x,y>0x, y > 0:

    B(x,y+1)=yxB(x+1,y).B(x, y+1) = \frac{y}{x}\,B(x+1, y) .
  3. From the splitting tx1(1t)y1=tx(1t)y1+tx1(1t)yt^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1} = t^{x}(1-t)^{y-1} + t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y} deduce B(x,y)=B(x+1,y)+B(x,y+1)B(x,y) = B(x+1,y) + B(x,y+1), and combine with question 7 into the descent relations

    B(x,y+1)=yx+yB(x,y),B(x+1,y)=xx+yB(x,y).B(x, y+1) = \frac{y}{x+y}\,B(x,y), \qquad B(x+1, y) = \frac{x}{x+y}\,B(x,y) .
  4. Deduce, for m,n1m, n \geq 1 integers:

    B(m,n)=(m1)!(n1)!(m+n1)!=1(m+n1)(m+n2m1).B(m, n) = \frac{(m-1)!\,(n-1)!}{(m+n-1)!} = \frac{1}{(m+n-1)\binom{m+n-2}{m-1}} .
  5. Prove Euler’s formula for one integer argument: for every x>0x > 0 and nNn \in \N^*,

    B(x,n)=Γ(x)Γ(n)Γ(x+n)B(x, n) = \frac{\Gamma(x)\,\Gamma(n)}{\Gamma(x + n)}

    (induction on nn: both sides equal 1x\frac1x at n=1n = 1 and obey the same descent relation).

Part III — Wallis integrals as Beta values.

  1. Substitute t=sin2θt = \sin^2\theta to obtain the trigonometric form

    B(x,y)=20π/2sin2x1θcos2y1θ ⁣dθ.B(x, y) = 2\int_0^{\pi/2} \sin^{2x-1}\theta\,\cos^{2y-1}\theta\,\dd\theta .
  2. Deduce Wn=12B(n+12,12)W_n = \frac12\,B\bigl(\frac{n+1}2, \frac12\bigr) for the Wallis integral Wn=0π/2sinnθ ⁣dθW_n = \int_0^{\pi/2}\sin^n \theta\,\dd\theta, and recover the recurrence Wn=n1nWn2W_n = \frac{n-1}{n}W_{n-2} of Lemma 6.11 from the descent relations of question 8 alone.
  3. Compute B(12,12)=2W0=πB\bigl(\frac12, \frac12\bigr) = 2W_0 = \pi and check it against Γ(12)2/Γ(1)\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr)^2/\Gamma(1): Euler’s formula holds at (12,12)\bigl(\frac12, \frac12\bigr).
  4. Derive the closed form W2n=π2(2n)!4n(n!)2W_{2n} = \frac\pi2\, \frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2} from the recurrence, and verify

    B(n+12,12)=Γ(n+12)Γ(12)Γ(n+1).B\Bigl(n + \frac12, \frac12\Bigr) = \frac{\Gamma\bigl(n + \frac12\bigr)\Gamma\bigl( \frac12\bigr)}{\Gamma(n+1)} .

    Conclude, by induction with the descent relations, that Euler’s formula B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)Γ(x+y)B(x,y) = \frac{\Gamma(x)\Gamma(y)}{\Gamma(x+y)} holds whenever 2x2x and 2y2y are positive integers.

  5. Substitute u=t1tu = \frac{t}{1-t} to obtain the third classical form

    B(x,y)=0ux1(1+u)x+y ⁣du,B(x,y) = \int_0^\infty \frac{u^{x-1}}{(1+u)^{x+y}}\,\dd u ,

    and check the case x=y=12x = y = \frac12 directly (u=v2u = v^2 reduces it to 02 ⁣dv1+v2\int_0^\infty\frac{2\,\dd v}{1+v^2}).

Part IV — Gauss’s limit formula.

  1. For x>0x > 0 and nNn \in \N^*, prove by nn successive integrations by parts:

    0n(1tn) ⁣ntx1 ⁣dt=n!  nxx(x+1)(x+n).\int_0^n \Bigl(1 - \frac tn\Bigr)^{\!n} t^{x-1}\,\dd t = \frac{n!\;n^x}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)} .
  2. Conclude with Exercise 9.7 (dominated convergence) Gauss’s limit formula:

    Γ(x)=limnn!  nxx(x+1)(x+n)(x>0).\Gamma(x) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{n!\;n^x}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)} \qquad (x > 0).
  3. Taking logarithms, show that for x>0x > 0:

    lnΓ(x)=lnxγx+k=1(xkln(1+xk)),\ln\Gamma(x) = -\ln x - \gamma x + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\Bigl(\frac xk - \ln\Bigl(1 + \frac xk\Bigr)\Bigr),

    where γ\gamma is Euler’s constant (Example 6.7); justify the convergence of the series (the general term is x22k2\sim \frac{x^2}{2k^2}).

  4. Use Gauss’s formula at x=12x = \frac12 and the central binomial asymptotics (2nn)4nπn\binom{2n}{n} \sim \frac{4^n}{\sqrt{\pi n}} (Example 6.14) to recompute Γ(12)=π\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr) = \sqrt\pi: Stirling’s constant and the Gaussian integral are the same number in two disguises.
  5. Check that Gauss’s formula reproves the functional equation: from the exact identity

    n!nx+1(x+1)(x+n+1)=n!nxx(x+1)(x+n)nxx+n+1,\frac{n!\,n^{x+1}}{(x+1)\cdots(x+n+1)} = \frac{n!\,n^{x}}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)}\cdot \frac{n\,x}{x+n+1},

    conclude Γ(x+1)=xΓ(x)\Gamma(x+1) = x\,\Gamma(x) again. (Gauss’s formula determines Γ\Gamma outright; the Year 3 volume proves the sharper Bohr–Mollerup theorem: the functional equation plus log-convexity already pin Γ\Gamma down.)

Part V — Dividends.

  1. For a>0a > 0 show 0eta ⁣dt=Γ(1+1a)\int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^a}\dd t = \Gamma\bigl(1 + \frac1a\bigr), and compute the limit as a+a \to +\infty by dominated convergence (pointwise limit 1t<1\mathbf 1_{t < 1}; dominate by 11 on (0,1]\intoc{0}{1} and by et2\eu^{-t^2} beyond, for a2a \geq 2). Check the answer against the continuity of Γ\Gamma.
  2. For n1n \geq 1 show

    01 ⁣dt1tn=1nB(1n,12),\int_0^1 \frac{\dd t}{\sqrt{1 - t^n}} = \frac1n\,B\Bigl(\frac1n, \frac12\Bigr),

    and recover the values 22 (n=1n = 1) and π2\frac\pi2 (n=2n = 2). (For n=4n = 4 this is the lemniscate constant, which has no elementary closed form; its story belongs to the theory of elliptic integrals.)

  3. (Moments) For x>0x > 0 and kNk \in \N, show

    1Γ(x)0tktx1et ⁣dt=Γ(x+k)Γ(x)=x(x+1)(x+k1),\frac{1}{\Gamma(x)}\int_0^\infty t^{k}\,t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}\,\dd t = \frac{\Gamma(x+k)}{\Gamma(x)} = x(x+1)\cdots(x+k-1),

    the rising factorial; check that x=1x = 1 gives k!k!. (In the probability chapters this is the kk-th moment of a standard waiting-time density.)

  4. Prove the Beta identity, valid for all x>0x > 0:

    B(x,x)=212xB(x,12)B(x, x) = 2^{1-2x}\,B\Bigl(x, \frac12\Bigr)

    (substitute t=1+s2t = \frac{1+s}2, exploit the symmetry in ss, then set s=vs = \sqrt v). Deduce, for 2xN2x \in \N^*, Legendre’s duplication formula

    Γ(x)Γ(x+12)=212xπ  Γ(2x),\Gamma(x)\,\Gamma\Bigl(x + \frac12\Bigr) = 2^{1-2x}\,\sqrt\pi\;\Gamma(2x),

    and verify it directly at x=nx = n via question 3. (For general xx it follows from the same identity once Euler’s formula is known for all arguments — the double-integral proof in the chapter on multiple integrals.)

  5. Synthesis. In one sentence each: (i) where integration by parts carried the whole of Part II; (ii) where dominated convergence entered Parts IV and V; (iii) which asymptotic inputs were imported from the comparison chapter; (iv) what is now proved of Euler’s formula B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)/Γ(x+y)B(x,y) = \Gamma(x)\Gamma(y)/\Gamma(x+y), and what remains for the double integral to settle.
Solution

Solution of Problem 9.1.

1. At 0+0^+ the integrand is tx1\sim t^{x-1}: the finite-endpoint scale converges iff 1x<11 - x < 1, i.e. x>0x > 0 (and for x0x \leq 0, tx1t1t^{x-1} \geq t^{-1} diverges); at ++\infty, tx1et=o(t2)t^{x-1}\eu^{-t} = o(t^{-2}) converges for every xx. Then Γ(x)=Γ(x+1)x\Gamma(x) = \frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x} and Γ(x+1)Γ(1)=1\Gamma(x+1) \to \Gamma(1) = 1 as x0+x \to 0^+ (continuity, Theorem 9.18): Γ(x)1x\Gamma(x) \sim \frac1x.

2. With t=u2t = u^2,  ⁣dt=2u ⁣du\dd t = 2u\,\dd u:

Γ(12)=0t1/2et ⁣dt=0eu2u2u ⁣du=20eu2 ⁣du=π\Gamma\Bigl(\frac12\Bigr) = \int_0^\infty t^{-1/2}\eu^{-t}\dd t = \int_0^\infty \frac{\eu^{-u^2}}{u}\,2u\,\dd u = 2\int_0^\infty \eu^{-u^2}\dd u = \sqrt\pi

by Exercise 9.8. With u=v/2u = v/\sqrt2:

Rev2/2 ⁣dv=220eu2 ⁣du=2π=2π.\int_\R \eu^{-v^2/2}\dd v = 2\sqrt2\int_0^\infty \eu^{-u^2}\dd u = \sqrt2\,\sqrt\pi = \sqrt{2\pi} .

3. True for n=0n = 0 (both sides π\sqrt\pi). If Γ(n+12)=(2n)!4nn!π\Gamma(n + \frac12) = \frac{(2n)!}{4^n n!}\sqrt\pi, the functional equation gives

Γ(n+1+12)=(n+12)Γ(n+12)=2n+12(2n)!4nn!π=(2n+2)!4n+1(n+1)!π,\Gamma\Bigl(n + 1 + \frac12\Bigr) = \Bigl(n + \frac12\Bigr)\Gamma\Bigl(n + \frac12\Bigr) = \frac{2n+1}{2}\cdot\frac{(2n)!}{4^n n!}\sqrt\pi = \frac{(2n+2)!}{4^{n+1}(n+1)!}\sqrt\pi ,

the last step because (2n+2)!(2n)!=(2n+2)(2n+1)\frac{(2n+2)!}{(2n)!} = (2n+2)(2n+1) and 2n+12=(2n+2)(2n+1)4(n+1)\frac{2n+1}{2} = \frac{(2n+2)(2n+1)}{4(n+1)}.

4. Theorem 9.18 gives Γ(x)=0tx1et(lnt)2 ⁣dt\Gamma''(x) = \int_0^\infty t^{x-1}\eu^{-t}(\ln t)^2\dd t (two applications of the Leibniz rule, dominations as in the theorem’s proof); the integrand is 0\geq 0 and not identically zero, so Γ>0\Gamma'' > 0: Γ\Gamma is strictly convex and Γ\Gamma' is strictly increasing. Since Γ(1)=Γ(2)=1\Gamma(1) = \Gamma(2) = 1, Rolle provides x0(1,2)x_0 \in \intoo12 with Γ(x0)=0\Gamma'(x_0) = 0; strict monotonicity of Γ\Gamma' makes x0x_0 its unique zero, with Γ<0\Gamma' < 0 before and Γ>0\Gamma' > 0 after: Γ\Gamma decreases on (0,x0)\intoo0{x_0}, increases on (x0,)\intoo{x_0}\infty, and x0x_0 is the unique minimum.

5. Let kNk \in \N and x3x \geq 3; choose the integer nn with n+1x<n+2n + 1 \leq x < n + 2 (so n1n \geq 1). By the monotonicity of question 4 (valid from x0<2x_0 < 2 on): Γ(x)Γ(n+1)=n!\Gamma(x) \geq \Gamma(n + 1) = n!, while xk(n+2)kx^k \leq (n+2)^k. Since n!(n+2)k\frac{n!}{(n+2)^k} \to \infty (factorials beat powers, Year 1 volume), Γ(x)xkn!(n+2)k\frac{\Gamma(x)}{x^k} \geq \frac{n!}{(n+2)^k} \to \infty as xx \to \infty: xk=o(Γ(x))x^k = o(\Gamma(x)).

6. Near 00 the integrand is tx1\sim t^{x-1} (convergent iff x>0x > 0), near 11 it is (1t)y1\sim (1-t)^{y-1} (iff y>0y > 0); both comparisons are between positive functions, so B(x,y)B(x,y) converges exactly for x,y>0x, y > 0. The substitution t1tt \mapsto 1 - t swaps the two factors: B(x,y)=B(y,x)B(x,y) = B(y,x).

7. B(x,1)=01tx1 ⁣dt=1xB(x,1) = \int_0^1 t^{x-1}\dd t = \frac1x. Parts on [ε,1ε]\intcc\varepsilon{1-\varepsilon} with u=(1t)yu = (1-t)^y, v=txxv = \frac{t^x}{x}:

tx1(1t)y ⁣dt=[tx(1t)yx]+yxtx(1t)y1 ⁣dt;\int t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y}\dd t = \Bigl[\frac{t^x(1-t)^y}{x}\Bigr] + \frac{y}{x}\int t^{x}(1-t)^{y-1}\dd t ;

the bracket vanishes at both ends as ε0\varepsilon \to 0 (x>0x > 0 at 00, y>0y > 0 at 11), leaving B(x,y+1)=yxB(x+1,y)B(x, y+1) = \frac yx\,B(x+1, y).

8. Since t+(1t)=1t + (1-t) = 1:

tx1(1t)y1=tx(1t)y1+tx1(1t)y,t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y-1} = t^{x}(1-t)^{y-1} + t^{x-1}(1-t)^{y},

so B(x,y)=B(x+1,y)+B(x,y+1)B(x,y) = B(x+1,y) + B(x,y+1). Question 7 reads B(x+1,y)=xyB(x,y+1)B(x+1,y) = \frac xy B(x,y+1); substituting,

B(x,y)=(xy+1)B(x,y+1)=x+yyB(x,y+1),B(x,y) = \Bigl(\frac xy + 1\Bigr)B(x,y+1) = \frac{x+y}{y}\,B(x,y+1),

i.e. B(x,y+1)=yx+yB(x,y)B(x,y+1) = \frac{y}{x+y}B(x,y); the twin relation follows by the symmetry of question 6.

9. Induction on nn at fixed mm: B(m,1)=1m=(m1)!0!m!B(m,1) = \frac1m = \frac{(m-1)!\,0!}{m!}, and if the formula holds at nn,

B(m,n+1)=nm+nB(m,n)=nm+n(m1)!(n1)!(m+n1)!=(m1)!n!(m+n)!.B(m, n+1) = \frac{n}{m+n}\,B(m,n) = \frac{n}{m+n}\cdot\frac{(m-1)!(n-1)!}{(m+n-1)!} = \frac{(m-1)!\,n!}{(m+n)!} .

Rewriting: B(m,n)=(m1)!(n1)!(m+n1)!=[(m+n1)(m+n2m1)]1B(m,n) = \frac{(m-1)!(n-1)!}{(m+n-1)!} = \bigl[(m+n-1)\binom{m+n-2}{m-1}\bigr]^{-1}.

10. Both sides of B(x,n)=Γ(x)Γ(n)Γ(x+n)B(x,n) = \frac{\Gamma(x)\Gamma(n)}{\Gamma(x+n)} equal 1x\frac1x at n=1n = 1 (Γ(1)=1\Gamma(1) = 1, Γ(x+1)=xΓ(x)\Gamma(x+1) = x\Gamma(x)). If they agree at nn, then by the descent relation and the functional equation:

B(x,n+1)=nx+nB(x,n),Γ(x)Γ(n+1)Γ(x+n+1)=nx+nΓ(x)Γ(n)Γ(x+n):B(x, n+1) = \frac{n}{x+n}\,B(x,n), \qquad \frac{\Gamma(x)\Gamma(n+1)}{\Gamma(x+n+1)} = \frac{n}{x+n}\cdot \frac{\Gamma(x)\Gamma(n)}{\Gamma(x+n)} :

the two sequences obey the same recursion from the same seed, hence agree for all nNn \in \N^* and all x>0x > 0.

11. With t=sin2θt = \sin^2\theta (θ(0,π/2)\theta \in \intoo0{\pi/2},  ⁣dt=2sinθcosθ ⁣dθ\dd t = 2\sin\theta\cos\theta\,\dd\theta), tx1=sin2x2θt^{x-1} = \sin^{2x-2}\theta and (1t)y1=cos2y2θ(1-t)^{y-1} = \cos^{2y-2}\theta:

B(x,y)=0π/2sin2x2θcos2y2θ2sinθcosθ ⁣dθ=20π/2sin2x1θcos2y1θ ⁣dθ.B(x,y) = \int_0^{\pi/2}\sin^{2x-2}\theta\,\cos^{2y-2}\theta \cdot 2\sin\theta\cos\theta\,\dd\theta = 2\int_0^{\pi/2}\sin^{2x-1}\theta\,\cos^{2y-1}\theta\, \dd\theta .

12. Take y=12y = \frac12 (killing the cosine factor) and 2x1=n2x - 1 = n: B(n+12,12)=2WnB\bigl(\frac{n+1}2, \frac12\bigr) = 2W_n, i.e. Wn=12B(n+12,12)W_n = \frac12 B\bigl(\frac{n+1}2,\frac12\bigr). The descent relation in the first variable gives

WnWn2=B(n12+1,12)B(n12,12)=n12n12+12=n1n:\frac{W_n}{W_{n-2}} = \frac{B\bigl(\frac{n-1}2 + 1, \frac12\bigr)} {B\bigl(\frac{n-1}2, \frac12\bigr)} = \frac{\frac{n-1}2}{\frac{n-1}2 + \frac12} = \frac{n-1}{n} :

the Wallis recurrence, this time with no integration by parts on sines — Part II did the work once and for all.

13. B(12,12)=2W0=2π2=πB\bigl(\frac12,\frac12\bigr) = 2W_0 = 2\cdot\frac\pi2 = \pi, while Γ(12)2/Γ(1)=(π)2=π\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr)^2/\Gamma(1) = (\sqrt\pi)^2 = \pi: Euler’s formula holds at (12,12)\bigl(\frac12,\frac12\bigr).

14. Iterating W2n=2n12nW2n2W_{2n} = \frac{2n-1}{2n}W_{2n-2} from W0=π2W_0 = \frac\pi2:

W2n=π2k=1n2k12k=π2(2n)!4n(n!)2,W_{2n} = \frac\pi2\prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{2k-1}{2k} = \frac\pi2\cdot\frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2},

since (2k1)=(2n)!2nn!\prod(2k-1) = \frac{(2n)!}{2^n n!} and 2k=2nn!\prod 2k = 2^n n!. Hence, using question 3:

B(n+12,12)=2W2n=π(2n)!4n(n!)2=(2n)!π4nn!πn!=Γ(n+12)Γ(12)Γ(n+1).B\Bigl(n+\frac12, \frac12\Bigr) = 2W_{2n} = \pi\,\frac{(2n)!}{4^n(n!)^2} = \frac{(2n)!\sqrt\pi}{4^n n!}\cdot\frac{\sqrt\pi}{n!} = \frac{\Gamma\bigl(n+\frac12\bigr)\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr)} {\Gamma(n+1)} .

Now fix x12Nx \in \frac12\N^*. Euler’s formula holds at (x,12)(x, \frac12): for xx integer this is question 10 (with symmetry), for x=n+12x = n + \frac12 it is the display above. Both sides of Euler’s formula obey the descent recursion yy+1y \mapsto y + 1 (question 8 on the left, the functional equation on the right, as in question 10): induction propagates the formula from y=12y = \frac12 and y=1y = 1 to every y12Ny \in \frac12\N^*. Euler’s formula therefore holds whenever 2x,2yN2x, 2y \in \N^*.

15. With u=t1tu = \frac{t}{1-t}, i.e. t=u1+ut = \frac{u}{1+u}, 1t=11+u1 - t = \frac{1}{1+u},  ⁣dt= ⁣du(1+u)2\dd t = \frac{\dd u}{(1+u)^2}:

B(x,y)=0(u1+u)x1(11+u)y1 ⁣du(1+u)2=0ux1(1+u)x+y ⁣du.B(x,y) = \int_0^\infty \Bigl(\frac{u}{1+u}\Bigr)^{x-1} \Bigl(\frac{1}{1+u}\Bigr)^{y-1} \frac{\dd u}{(1+u)^2} = \int_0^\infty \frac{u^{x-1}}{(1+u)^{x+y}}\,\dd u .

At x=y=12x = y = \frac12, with u=v2u = v^2:

0u1/21+u ⁣du=02 ⁣dv1+v2=π=B(12,12).\int_0^\infty \frac{u^{-1/2}}{1+u}\dd u = \int_0^\infty \frac{2\,\dd v}{1+v^2} = \pi = B\Bigl(\frac12,\frac12\Bigr) . \checkmark

16. One integration by parts, for 1kn1 \leq k \leq n and s>0s > 0 (u=(1t/n)ku = (1 - t/n)^k, v=ts/sv = t^s/s; the boundary terms vanish):

0n(1tn) ⁣kts1 ⁣dt=kns0n(1tn) ⁣k1ts ⁣dt.\int_0^n \Bigl(1-\frac tn\Bigr)^{\!k} t^{s-1}\dd t = \frac{k}{ns}\int_0^n \Bigl(1-\frac tn\Bigr)^{\!k-1} t^{s}\dd t .

Starting from k=nk = n, s=xs = x and iterating nn times:

0n(1tn) ⁣ntx1 ⁣dt=n(n1)1nnx(x+1)(x+n1)0ntx+n1 ⁣dt=n!nnnx+nx(x+1)(x+n),\int_0^n \Bigl(1-\frac tn\Bigr)^{\!n} t^{x-1}\dd t = \frac{n(n-1)\cdots1}{n^n\,x(x+1)\cdots(x+n-1)} \int_0^n t^{x+n-1}\dd t = \frac{n!}{n^n}\cdot \frac{n^{x+n}}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)} ,

which is n!nxx(x+1)(x+n)\dfrac{n!\,n^x}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)}.

17. By Exercise 9.7 the left side tends to Γ(x)\Gamma(x) (dominated convergence with dominator tx1ett^{x-1}\eu^{-t}); the right side is Gauss’s quotient:

Γ(x)=limnn!nxx(x+1)(x+n).\Gamma(x) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{n!\,n^x}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)} .

18. Taking logarithms in question 16’s quotient Gn(x)G_n(x) and splitting ln(x+k)=lnk+ln(1+x/k)\ln(x+k) = \ln k + \ln(1 + x/k) for k1k \geq 1:

lnGn(x)=xlnnlnxk=1nln(1+xk)=lnx+x(lnnHn)+k=1n(xkln(1+xk)).\ln G_n(x) = x\ln n - \ln x - \sum_{k=1}^n \ln\Bigl(1+\frac xk\Bigr) = -\ln x + x(\ln n - H_n) + \sum_{k=1}^n\Bigl(\frac xk - \ln\Bigl(1+\frac xk\Bigr)\Bigr).

For u0u \geq 0, uu22ln(1+u)uu - \frac{u^2}2 \leq \ln(1+u) \leq u, so the general term lies in [0,x2/(2k2)]\intcc{0}{x^2/(2k^2)}: the series converges (comparison with k2\sum k^{-2}). Since lnnHnγ\ln n - H_n \to -\gamma (Example 6.7) and lnGn(x)lnΓ(x)\ln G_n(x) \to \ln\Gamma(x) (question 17 and continuity of ln\ln):

lnΓ(x)=lnxγx+k=1(xkln(1+xk)).\ln\Gamma(x) = -\ln x - \gamma x + \sum_{k=1}^\infty\Bigl(\frac xk - \ln\Bigl(1+\frac xk\Bigr)\Bigr) .

19. At x=12x = \frac12, the denominator is k=0n(k+12)=(2n+1)!22n+1n!\prod_{k=0}^n\bigl(k+\frac12\bigr) = \frac{(2n+1)!}{2^{2n+1}n!} (multiply out the halves), so

Gn(12)=n!n  22n+1n!(2n+1)!=2n  4n(2n+1)(2nn).G_n\Bigl(\frac12\Bigr) = \frac{n!\,\sqrt n\;2^{2n+1}n!}{(2n+1)!} = \frac{2\sqrt n\;4^n}{(2n+1)\binom{2n}{n}} .

With (2nn)4nπn\binom{2n}{n} \sim \frac{4^n}{\sqrt{\pi n}} (Example 6.14):

Gn(12)2nπn2n+1π=Γ(12).G_n\Bigl(\frac12\Bigr) \sim \frac{2\sqrt n\,\sqrt{\pi n}}{2n+1} \longrightarrow \sqrt\pi = \Gamma\Bigl(\frac12\Bigr) .

The central binomial coefficient’s π\sqrt\pi (which came from Wallis, hence from Stirling’s constant) and the Gaussian integral’s π\sqrt\pi are the same number.

20. The identity is direct algebra: multiply n!nxx(x+1)(x+n)\frac{n!\,n^x}{x(x+1)\cdots(x+n)} by nxx+n+1\frac{nx}{x+n+1} and absorb xx into the product, nn into nxn^x. Letting nn \to \infty: the left side tends to Γ(x+1)\Gamma(x+1) (Gauss at x+1x+1), the right side to Γ(x)x1\Gamma(x)\cdot x\cdot 1 since nx+n+11\frac{n}{x+n+1} \to 1: Γ(x+1)=xΓ(x)\Gamma(x+1) = x\Gamma(x) — recovered without a single integration by parts.

21. With u=tau = t^a, t=u1/at = u^{1/a},  ⁣dt=1au1/a1 ⁣du\dd t = \frac1a u^{1/a - 1}\dd u:

0eta ⁣dt=1a0u1a1eu ⁣du=1aΓ(1a)=Γ(1+1a).\int_0^\infty \eu^{-t^a}\dd t = \frac1a\int_0^\infty u^{\frac1a - 1}\eu^{-u}\dd u = \frac1a\,\Gamma\Bigl(\frac1a\Bigr) = \Gamma\Bigl(1 + \frac1a\Bigr) .

As a+a \to +\infty (along any sequence): eta1\eu^{-t^a} \to 1 for 0<t<10 < t < 1, e1\to \eu^{-1} at t=1t = 1, 0\to 0 for t>1t > 1; for a2a \geq 2 dominate by 1t1+et21t>1\mathbf 1_{t \leq 1} + \eu^{-t^2}\mathbf 1_{t > 1} (tat2t^a \geq t^2 for t1t \geq 1), integrable. Dominated convergence: the integral tends to 011 ⁣dt=1\int_0^1 1\,\dd t = 1 — as it must, since Γ(1+1a)Γ(1)=1\Gamma(1 + \frac1a) \to \Gamma(1) = 1 by continuity.

22. With u=tnu = t^n,  ⁣dt=1nu1/n1 ⁣du\dd t = \frac1n u^{1/n - 1}\dd u:

01 ⁣dt1tn=1n01u1n1(1u)1/2 ⁣du=1nB(1n,12).\int_0^1 \frac{\dd t}{\sqrt{1-t^n}} = \frac1n\int_0^1 u^{\frac1n-1}(1-u)^{-1/2}\dd u = \frac1n\,B\Bigl(\frac1n, \frac12\Bigr) .

n=1n = 1: B(1,12)=B(12,1)=2B\bigl(1,\frac12\bigr) = B\bigl(\frac12,1\bigr) = 2, matching 01 ⁣dt1t=2\int_0^1\frac{\dd t}{\sqrt{1-t}} = 2. n=2n = 2: 12B(12,12)=π2=arcsin1\frac12 B\bigl(\frac12,\frac12\bigr) = \frac\pi2 = \arcsin 1. For n=4n = 4 the value 14B(14,12)\frac14 B\bigl(\frac14,\frac12\bigr) is the lemniscate constant: no elementary closed form.

23. Iterating the functional equation:

1Γ(x)0tx+k1et ⁣dt=Γ(x+k)Γ(x)=(x+k1)(x+k2)x,\frac{1}{\Gamma(x)}\int_0^\infty t^{x+k-1}\eu^{-t}\dd t = \frac{\Gamma(x+k)}{\Gamma(x)} = (x+k-1)(x+k-2)\cdots x ,

the rising factorial with kk factors. At x=1x = 1: Γ(1+k)/Γ(1)=k!\Gamma(1+k)/\Gamma(1) = k!, the moments of et\eu^{-t} from Exercise 9.2.

24. Substitute t=1+s2t = \frac{1+s}2 (s(1,1)s \in \intoo{-1}1,  ⁣dt= ⁣ds2\dd t = \frac{\dd s}2, t(1t)=1s24t(1-t) = \frac{1-s^2}4):

B(x,x)=11(1s24)x1 ⁣ds2=41x01(1s2)x1 ⁣dsB(x,x) = \int_{-1}^{1}\Bigl(\frac{1-s^2}{4}\Bigr)^{x-1} \frac{\dd s}{2} = 4^{1-x}\int_0^1 (1-s^2)^{x-1}\dd s

(the integrand is even). Then s=vs = \sqrt v ( ⁣ds= ⁣dv2v\dd s = \frac{\dd v}{2\sqrt v}):

B(x,x)=41x201v1/2(1v)x1 ⁣dv=212xB(12,x).B(x,x) = \frac{4^{1-x}}{2}\int_0^1 v^{-1/2}(1-v)^{x-1}\dd v = 2^{1-2x}\,B\Bigl(\frac12, x\Bigr) .

For 2xN2x \in \N^* every argument in sight lies in 12N\frac12\N^*, so Euler’s formula (question 14) applies to both sides:

Γ(x)2Γ(2x)=212xΓ(12)Γ(x)Γ(x+12)Γ(x)Γ(x+12)=212xπ  Γ(2x).\frac{\Gamma(x)^2}{\Gamma(2x)} = 2^{1-2x}\, \frac{\Gamma\bigl(\frac12\bigr)\Gamma(x)} {\Gamma\bigl(x+\frac12\bigr)} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \Gamma(x)\,\Gamma\Bigl(x+\frac12\Bigr) = 2^{1-2x}\sqrt\pi\;\Gamma(2x) .

Direct check at x=nx = n: the left side is (n1)!(2n)!π4nn!=(2n)!π4nn(n-1)!\cdot \frac{(2n)!\sqrt\pi}{4^n n!} = \frac{(2n)!\sqrt\pi}{4^n n}, the right side 24nπ(2n1)!=(2n)!π4nn2\cdot4^{-n}\sqrt\pi\,(2n-1)! = \frac{(2n)!\sqrt\pi}{4^n n}: equal.

25. (i) Integration by parts produced B(x,y+1)=yxB(x+1,y)B(x,y+1) = \frac yx B(x+1,y), the single identity from which every descent relation, the integer and half-integer values, and the Wallis recurrence all flow. (ii) Dominated convergence turned the elementary integrals 0n(1t/n)ntx1\int_0^n(1-t/n)^n t^{x-1} into Γ(x)\Gamma(x) (Gauss’s formula, question 17) and computed the limit aa \to \infty in question 21. (iii) From the comparison chapter we imported Euler’s constant (lnnHnγ\ln n - H_n \to -\gamma, question 18) and the central binomial asymptotics (question 19) — i.e. Stirling’s formula in disguise. (iv) Euler’s formula B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)/Γ(x+y)B(x,y) = \Gamma(x)\Gamma(y)/\Gamma(x+y) is now proved for yNy \in \N^* with x>0x > 0 arbitrary (question 10) and for all half-integer pairs (question 14); the general case x,y>0x, y > 0 awaits the double-integral computation of the chapter on multiple integrals, which factorizes Γ(x)Γ(y)\Gamma(x)\Gamma(y) over a quarter-plane.