全部书籍

专业

应用 关于 Coach 登录 开始阅读

书籍暂未推出简体中文版——当前显示英文版。

Mathematics · 术语表

什么是 Ideal?

又称: quotient ring

Definition 1.25 University Mathematics — Year 2 · 第 1 章 — Sets and Structures

Let AA be a commutative ring. An ideal I⊆AI \subseteq A is an additive subgroup such that ax∈Ia x \in I for all a∈Aa \in A, x∈Ix \in I. Kernels of ring morphisms are ideals; I=AI = A iff 1∈I1 \in I iff II contains a unit. The ideal generated by xx is xA={xa}xA = \{xa\} (a principal ideal).

示例

Example 1.27 (A polynomial gcd, two ways)

Compute gcd⁡(X3−1, X2−1)\gcd(X^3 - 1,\ X^2 - 1) in Q[X]\Q[X]. By Euclid:

X3−1=X (X2−1)+(X−1),X2−1=(X+1)(X−1)+0,X^3 - 1 = X\,(X^2 - 1) + (X - 1), \qquad X^2 - 1 = (X + 1)(X - 1) + 0 ,

so the gcd is X−1X - 1, and back-substitution gives the Bézout relation

X−1=1⋅(X3−1)−X⋅(X2−1).X - 1 = 1\cdot(X^3 - 1) - X\cdot(X^2 - 1).

By ideals: the ideal (X3−1)Q[X]+(X2−1)Q[X](X^3 - 1)\Q[X] + (X^2 - 1)\Q[X] is principal (Theorem 1.26); it contains X−1X - 1 (the display) and is contained in (X−1)Q[X](X - 1)\Q[X] (both generators vanish at 11, hence are multiples of X−1X - 1): the monic generator is X−1X - 1. The closing insight: the ideal viewpoint identifies the gcd without dividing — common roots locate the ideal, and Euclid merely certifies it.

Example 1.34 (An evaluation morphism and its kernel)

Take A=(0100)A = \begin{pmatrix}0 & 1\\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix} and the evaluation εA ⁣:R[X]→M2(R)\varepsilon_A \colon \R[X] \to \mathcal{M}_2(\R), P↦P(A)P \mapsto P(A). Since A2=0A^2 = 0,

P(A)=P(0) I+P′(0) A=(P(0)P′(0)0P(0)),P(A) = P(0)\,I + P'(0)\,A = \begin{pmatrix} P(0) & P'(0)\\ 0 & P(0)\end{pmatrix},

(only the constant and linear terms of PP survive). Hence ker⁡εA={P:P(0)=P′(0)=0}=X2 R[X]\ker\varepsilon_A = \{P : P(0) = P'(0) = 0\} = X^2\,\R[X]: a principal ideal, exactly as Theorem 1.26 predicts, generated by the monic X2X^2 of least degree in the kernel — the minimal polynomial of AA, star of Chapter 3. The image is the two-dimensional commutative algebra {aI+bA}\{aI + bA\}: evaluation morphisms shrink the infinite-dimensional R[X]\R[X] onto small, computable algebras.

在原文中阅读 →
Definition 2.1 University Mathematics — Year 3 · 第 2 章 — Rings and Arithmetic

An ideal II of a ring AA is an additive subgroup such that AI⊆IAI \subseteq I. The quotient ring A/IA/I is the quotient group (A,+)/I(A, +)/I with the multiplication (a+I)(b+I)=ab+I(a + I)(b + I) = ab + I: well defined, since changing aa to a+xa + x, bb to b+yb + y (x,y∈Ix, y \in I) changes abab by ay+xb+xy∈Iay + xb + xy \in I. The projection π ⁣:A→A/I\pi \colon A \to A/I is a surjective ring morphism with kernel II, and kernels of ring morphisms are exactly the ideals.

示例

Example 2.20 (A ring without unique factorization)

None of the implications Euclidean ⇒\Rightarrow PID ⇒\Rightarrow UFD is an equivalence, and the failure of the last is worth seeing once in complete detail. In

A=Z[i5]={a+ib5:a,b∈Z},N(a+ib5)=a2+5b2,A = \Z[\iu\sqrt5] = \{a + \iu b\sqrt5 : a, b \in \Z\}, \qquad N(a + \iu b\sqrt5) = a^2 + 5b^2,

the norm is multiplicative and N(z)=1N(z) = 1 iff z∈A×={±1}z \in A^\times = \{\pm1\}. Consider

6=2⋅3=(1+i5)(1−i5).6 = 2 \cdot 3 = (1 + \iu\sqrt5)(1 - \iu\sqrt5).

All four factors are irreducible: their norms are 4,9,6,64, 9, 6, 6, and a proper factorization z=z1z2z = z_1z_2 would force N(z1)∈{2,3}N(z_1) \in \{2, 3\} — but a2+5b2a^2 + 5b^2 never equals 22 or 33 (b=0b = 0 leaves the non-squares 2,32, 3; ∣b∣≥1\abs b \geq 1 gives ≥5\geq 5). Yet 22 is associate to neither 1±i51 \pm \iu\sqrt5 (norms 4≠64 \neq 6): two genuinely different factorizations of 66 into irreducibles. Equivalently, irreducible ≠\neq prime here: 22 divides the product (1+i5)(1−i5)=6(1 + \iu\sqrt5)(1 - \iu\sqrt5) = 6 but neither factor (norms again). The ideal-theoretic repair of this failure — factorizing ideals rather than elements — is the birth of algebraic number theory; at our level, the example calibrates how special the Euclidean rings Z\Z, K[X]K[X], Z[i]\Z[\iu] of this chapter really are.

在原文中阅读 →