地球与空间科学 · 第 5 册 · 本科三年级

University Earth and Space Sciences — Year 3

书籍暂未推出简体中文版——当前显示英文版。

University Earth and Space Sciences — Year 3 · 本科三年级

5Thermal Models of the Lithosphere

Sail away from a mid-ocean ridge and the sea floor deepens: about 2.5 km2.5\,\mathrm{km} at the axis, more than 5 km5\,\mathrm{km} beneath the oldest ocean floor. Nothing has been added to the plate or taken away from it; it has only cooled, contracted and sunk. The ocean floor is a thermometer of the plate beneath it, and a heat-flow probe pushed into its sediment reads the same cooling from above. This chapter solves the cooling of a plate in two ways, as a half-space and as a plate of finite thickness, compares both with the depth of the real ocean floor and its heat flow, and then turns to the continents, whose heat comes partly from their own crust.

You already know

The diffusion equation for heat, ∂T/∂t=κ∇2T\partial T/\partial t = \kappa\nabla^2T, with the thermal conductivity kk and the thermal diffusivity κ=k/(ρc)\kappa = k/(\rho c), is the physics books’; Fourier series and the error function erf⁡x=(2/π)∫0xe−u2 du\operatorname{erf}x = (2/\sqrt\pi)\int_0^xe^{-u^2}\,\mathrm du are in the mathematics books’ university volumes. The heat flow, the radiogenic heat production, the geotherm, the conductive time scale L2/κL^2/\kappa, the thermal boundary layer and the thermal lithosphere were defined in the Year 1 volume, in its chapter on the Earth’s heat budget; isostasy in its chapter on isostasy and gravity anomalies; the depth–age law d=dr+Ctd = d_r + C\sqrt t was proved in its chapter on rifts, ridges and passive margins, admitting the temperature profile that this chapter derives. The stretching model of basins, post-rift subsidence and the thermal time constant are in the Year 2 volume, in its chapter on sedimentary basins.

5.1 Conduction, advection and their ratio

Heat in the lithosphere moves in two ways: it diffuses down the temperature gradient, and it is carried by moving rock, the plate leaving a ridge, an eroded mountain rising, a magma ascending. Which one wins depends on a single number.

Definition 5.1 (Thermal Péclet number)

For rock moving at the speed uu across a length LL, the thermal Péclet number is

Pe=uLκ,\mathrm{Pe} = \frac{uL}{\kappa},

the ratio of the conductive time L2/κL^2/\kappa to the advective time L/uL/u. Advection dominates where Pe≫1\mathrm{Pe} \gg 1, conduction where Pe≪1\mathrm{Pe} \ll 1.

A plate leaving a ridge at 25 mm/yr25\,\mathrm{mm}/\mathrm{yr} has, over a distance of 95 km95\,\mathrm{km}, Pe≈94\mathrm{Pe} \approx 94 with κ=0.8×10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 0.8 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}: heat is carried sideways by the plate far faster than it diffuses sideways. Each vertical column of the plate therefore cools as if alone, by vertical conduction to the cold sea floor, its age tt standing for the time since it left the axis. That turns a problem in two dimensions into one in depth and time.

5.2 The cooling half-space

Definition 5.2 (Half-space cooling model)

The half-space cooling model of the oceanic lithosphere takes each column as a half-space z≥0z \ge 0 of uniform diffusivity, at the uniform temperature TmT_m of the mantle when it leaves the ridge axis, whose surface is held from then on at the temperature T0T_0 of the sea floor, with no heat production and no bottom.

Theorem 5.3 (Error-function geotherm)

In the half-space cooling model, the temperature at the depth zz below the sea floor of age tt is

T(z,t)=T0+(Tm−T0)erf⁡z2κt.T(z, t) = T_0 + (T_m - T_0)\operatorname{erf}\frac{z}{2\sqrt{\kappa t}} .

This is the error-function geotherm.

Proof. Let θ=(T−T0)/(Tm−T0)\theta = (T - T_0)/(T_m - T_0); it solves ∂θ/∂t=κ ∂2θ/∂z2\partial\theta/\partial t = \kappa\,\partial^2\theta/\partial z^2 with θ(z,0)=1\theta(z, 0) = 1 for z>0z > 0 and θ(0,t)=0\theta(0, t) = 0 for t>0t > 0. The problem has no length scale of its own: if θ(z,t)\theta(z, t) is a solution, so is θ(λz,λ2t)\theta(\lambda z, \lambda^2t) for every λ>0\lambda > 0, with the same initial and boundary values; the solution being unique, θ\theta depends on zz and tt only through η=z/(2κt)\eta = z/(2\sqrt{\kappa t}). Writing θ=f(η)\theta = f(\eta), with ∂η/∂t=−η/(2t)\partial\eta/\partial t = -\eta/(2t) and ∂η/∂z=1/(2κt)\partial\eta/\partial z = 1/(2\sqrt{\kappa t}),

−η2tf′(η)=κ f′′(η)4κt,sof′′+2ηf′=0.-\frac{\eta}{2t}f'(\eta) = \kappa\,\frac{f''(\eta)}{4\kappa t}, \qquad\text{so}\qquad f'' + 2\eta f' = 0 .

Hence f′=Ae−η2f' = Ae^{-\eta^2} and f=A∫0ηe−u2 du+Bf = A\int_0^\eta e^{-u^2}\,\mathrm du + B. The surface condition, at η=0\eta = 0, gives B=0B = 0; the initial condition, which holds at every depth as t→0t \to 0, that is as η→∞\eta \to \infty, gives Aπ/2=1A\sqrt\pi/2 = 1. So f=erf⁡ηf = \operatorname{erf}\eta. ∎

The temperature at a given depth depends only on z/tz/\sqrt t: an isotherm sinks as the square root of age, and the cooled layer at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr} is twice as thick as at 10 Myr10\,\mathrm{Myr}. The surface heat flow follows by differentiation.

Proposition 5.4 (Heat flow–age relation)

In the half-space cooling model, the heat flow through the sea floor of age tt is

q(t)=k ∂T∂z∣z=0=k(Tm−T0)πκt=Cqt.q(t) = k\,\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\Big|_{z=0} = \frac{k(T_m - T_0)}{\sqrt{\pi\kappa t}} = \frac{C_q}{\sqrt t} .

Proof. ∂erf⁡(z/2κt)/∂z=(2/π)e−z2/4κt/(2κt)\partial\operatorname{erf}(z/2\sqrt{\kappa t})/\partial z = (2/\sqrt\pi) e^{-z^2/4\kappa t}/(2\sqrt{\kappa t}), which at z=0z = 0 is 1/πκt1/\sqrt{\pi\kappa t}. ∎

With the values of the plate model below (k=3.1 W m−1 K−1k = 3.1\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}, Tm−T0=1450 KT_m - T_0 = 1450\,\mathrm{K}, κ=0.8×10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 0.8 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}), Cq=505 mW m−2 Myr1/2C_q = 505\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{1/2}, close to the values of 430 to 510 mW m−2 Myr1/2510\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{1/2} fitted to the global measurements by different studies; a recent compilation prefers 490490. Measured heat flow on young oceanic crust, however, grossly underestimates the heat that leaves it: sea water circulating through the cracked crust carries part of the heat away in hot springs, out of reach of the probes. Over old crust the measurements follow 1/t1/\sqrt t, and estimates of the Earth’s heat loss replace the measurements on crust younger than 66.5 Myr66.5\,\mathrm{Myr} with Cq/tC_q/\sqrt t.

The Year 1 volume integrated the same profile over depth, through isostasy, to obtain the depth–age law, d=dr+Ctd = d_r + C\sqrt t with C=2ρmα(Tm−T0)κ/(π(ρm−ρw))C = 2\rho_m\alpha(T_m - T_0)\sqrt\kappa/\bigl(\sqrt\pi(\rho_m - \rho_w)\bigr) (figure below). With ρm=3300 kg m−3\rho_m = 3300\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}, ρw=1030 kg m−3\rho_w = 1030\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3} and α=3.1×10−5 K−1\alpha = 3.1 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}, C=370 m Myr−1/2C = 370\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2}, against the 350 m Myr−1/2350\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2} fitted to the North Pacific and North Atlantic floors younger than 70 Myr70\,\mathrm{Myr}.

Isostasy of the cooling plate: the column at the ridge and the column of age t have the same mass above the compensation depth. The cooled, denser plate sinks, and water fills the space above it.
Isostasy of the cooling plate: the column at the ridge and the column of age tt have the same mass above the compensation depth. The cooled, denser plate sinks, and water fills the space above it.

5.3 The plate model

Old ocean floor stops deepening: in the North Pacific and North Atlantic the depth departs from t\sqrt t between 60 and 80 Myr80\,\mathrm{Myr}, and heat flow levels off. The half-space keeps cooling for ever; something must hold the base of the plate warm.

Definition 5.5 (Plate cooling model)

The plate cooling model of the oceanic lithosphere takes each column as a layer 0≤z≤L0 \le z \le L of uniform diffusivity, at the uniform temperature TmT_m when it leaves the ridge, whose surface is held at T0T_0 and whose base is held at TmT_m from then on.

Theorem 5.6 (Plate-model temperature series)

In the plate cooling model, with T0=0T_0 = 0,

T(z,t)=Tm[zL+2π∑n=1∞1nsin⁡nπzL e−n2t/τ],τ=L2π2κ.T(z, t) = T_m\Bigl[\frac zL + \frac2\pi\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1n \sin\frac{n\pi z}{L}\,e^{-n^2t/\tau}\Bigr],\qquad \tau = \frac{L^2}{\pi^2\kappa} .

This is the plate-model temperature series.

Proof. The steady state, reached as t→∞t \to \infty, is the linear profile Tmz/LT_mz/L. The departure u=T−Tmz/Lu = T - T_mz/L solves the diffusion equation with u=0u = 0 at z=0z = 0 and z=Lz = L, and starts as u(z,0)=Tm(1−z/L)u(z, 0) = T_m(1 - z/L). Separating the variables, u=Z(z)Θ(t)u = Z(z)\Theta(t) gives Z′′/Z=Θ′/(κΘ)=−μ2Z''/Z = \Theta'/(\kappa\Theta) = -\mu^2; the boundary conditions leave Z=sin⁡(nπz/L)Z = \sin(n\pi z/L), μ=nπ/L\mu = n\pi/L, and Θ=e−n2π2κt/L2=e−n2t/τ\Theta = e^{-n^2\pi^2\kappa t/L^2} = e^{-n^2t/\tau}. The initial values fix the coefficients bnb_n of the sine series of Tm(1−z/L)T_m(1 - z/L) on [0,L][0, L]:

bn=2L∫0LTm(1−zL)sin⁡nπzL dz=2Tmnπ,b_n = \frac2L\int_0^LT_m\Bigl(1 - \frac zL\Bigr)\sin\frac{n\pi z}{L}\,\mathrm dz = \frac{2T_m}{n\pi},

by an integration by parts. Summing the modes gives the series. ∎

Each mode decays with its own time, τ/n2\tau/n^2: the higher harmonics, the fine structure of the initial step, vanish first, and after a time of order τ\tau only the first one is left. The same separation of variables gives the heat flow and, through the isostatic balance of the figure above, the depth.

Proposition 5.7 (Depth and heat flow of the plate model)

In the plate cooling model, with the densities and expansion of the depth–age law,

q(t)=kTmL[1+2∑n=1∞e−n2t/τ],d(t)=dr+ρmαTmL2(ρm−ρw)[1−8π2∑n odde−n2t/τn2].q(t) = \frac{kT_m}{L}\Bigl[1 + 2\sum_{n=1}^\infty e^{-n^2t/\tau}\Bigr],\qquad d(t) = d_r + \frac{\rho_m\alpha T_mL}{2(\rho_m - \rho_w)} \Bigl[1 - \frac{8}{\pi^2}\sum_{n\ \text{odd}}\frac{e^{-n^2t/\tau}}{n^2}\Bigr].

As t→∞t \to \infty, the depth tends to dr+ρmαTmL/(2(ρm−ρw))d_r + \rho_m\alpha T_mL/\bigl(2(\rho_m - \rho_w)\bigr) and the heat flow to kTm/LkT_m/L, both exponentially, with the time constant τ\tau.

Proof. Differentiating the series at z=0z = 0, ∂T/∂z=(Tm/L)[1+2∑e−n2t/τ]\partial T/\partial z = (T_m/L)[1 + 2\sum e^{-n^2t/\tau}]. For the depth, the isostatic balance gives (ρm−ρw)(d−dr)=ρmα∫0L(Tm−T) dz(\rho_m - \rho_w)(d - d_r) = \rho_m\alpha\int_0^L(T_m - T)\,\mathrm dz. The linear part contributes TmL/2T_mL/2; each mode contributes −(2Tm/nπ)e−n2t/τ∫0Lsin⁡(nπz/L) dz=−(2Tm/nπ)(L/nπ)(1−cos⁡nπ)e−n2t/τ-(2T_m/n\pi)e^{-n^2t/\tau} \int_0^L\sin(n\pi z/L)\,\mathrm dz = -(2T_m/n\pi)(L/n\pi)(1 - \cos n\pi) e^{-n^2t/\tau}, which is zero for even nn and −(4TmL/n2π2)e−n2t/τ-(4T_mL/n^2\pi^2) e^{-n^2t/\tau} for odd nn. Factoring TmL/2T_mL/2 gives the bracket. At t=0t = 0 it vanishes, since ∑n odd1/n2=π2/8\sum_{n\ \text{odd}}1/n^2 = \pi^2/8. ∎

The plate model that best fits the global depths and heat flows has a plate 95 km95\,\mathrm{km} thick with a base at 1450 ∘C1450\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, α=3.1×10−5 K−1\alpha = 3.1 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1} and k=3.1 W m−1 K−1k = 3.1\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}, thinner and hotter than the earlier 125 km125\,\mathrm{km} and 1350 ∘C1350\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}. With κ=0.8×10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 0.8 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, τ=36.2 Myr\tau = 36.2\,\mathrm{Myr}; the depth levels off at 2500+3104=5604 m2500 + 3104 = 5604\,\mathrm{m} and the heat flow at 47 mW m−247\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}. Young floor cannot tell the two models apart: they differ by less than a metre at 2 Myr2\,\mathrm{Myr}, by 100 m100\,\mathrm{m} at 44 Myr44\,\mathrm{Myr}. Seismology gives a similar answer: Pacific Rayleigh waves are best fitted by cooling plates whose asymptotic thickness is 85 to 95 km95\,\mathrm{km}.

The two cooling models with the parameters of the text. (a) Depth of the isotherms from 200\, C (top) to 1400\, C (bottom): those of the half-space go on sinking as √ t, those of the plate stop as the profile becomes linear. (b) Surface heat flow: the plate model levels off at 47\, mW\, m-2, the half-space falls as 1/√ t.
The two cooling models with the parameters of the text. (a) Depth of the isotherms from 200 ∘C200\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} (top) to 1400 ∘C1400\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} (bottom): those of the half-space go on sinking as t\sqrt t, those of the plate stop as the profile becomes linear. (b) Surface heat flow: the plate model levels off at 47 mW m−247\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, the half-space falls as 1/t1/\sqrt t.

The real ocean floor can be put on the same graph (figure below). Every cell of one degree of latitude and longitude whose age is known is placed at its age and its depth; the median of each five-million-year bin rises with age as the models say for the first 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}, but the observed floor is shallower than both models, and more and more so with age. Nothing has been corrected: old floor carries a thicker blanket of sediment, more than a kilometre in the older North Atlantic, which loads it and raises its top, and old floor has had time to collect seamounts, volcanic plateaus and the swells of hotspots. The published fits remove the sediment load and the obvious swells first; the depth–age law of the Year 1 volume, and the plate models above, come from such corrected depths.

Depth of the ocean floor against its age: the median and the quartiles of the depths of the one-degree cells of each five-million-year bin (sea floor deeper than 1000\, m, ages from a global age grid, depths from a global relief model, no correction for sediment, seamounts or swells), with the two cooling models of the text.
Depth of the ocean floor against its age: the median and the quartiles of the depths of the one-degree cells of each five-million-year bin (sea floor deeper than 1000 m1000\,\mathrm{m}, ages from a global age grid, depths from a global relief model, no correction for sediment, seamounts or swells), with the two cooling models of the text.

Definition 5.8 (Thermal subsidence)

Thermal subsidence is the sinking of the surface of the lithosphere as it cools and contracts towards thermal equilibrium, the space above it being filled by water or sediment; isostasy converts the heat lost by a column into its sinking.

The ocean floor is the pure case. A stretched continental basin is another: a lithosphere thinned by a factor β\beta brings hot asthenosphere up, and the post-rift subsidence of the Year 2 volume is the same plate cooling, starting from a different profile, with the same modes and the same decay times τ/n2\tau/n^2. Keeping only the first mode is therefore a good approximation once the higher ones have died away, and a poor one before: for the ocean floor of the plate model above, the first term alone gives the depth to within two metres after 20 Myr20\,\mathrm{Myr}, but is 84 m84\,\mathrm{m} too deep at 5 Myr5\,\mathrm{Myr}.

5.4 Continental geotherms

Continental crust makes heat: granite carries uranium, thorium and potassium in concentrations that make the heat produced in the upper crust a large part of the heat flow at the surface. How the production is distributed with depth decides the temperature at depth.

Definition 5.9 (Heat-production depth scale; reduced heat flow)

When the radiogenic heat production of the crust decreases with depth as A(z)=A0e−z/hrA(z) = A_0e^{-z/h_r}, hrh_r is the heat-production depth scale. The reduced heat flow qmq_m of a province is the heat flow that would remain at its surface if the crust produced no heat: the heat flow from below the radiogenic layer.

Proposition 5.10 (Exponential heat production)

In steady conduction with uniform conductivity kk, surface temperature 00, heat production A0e−z/hrA_0e^{-z/h_r} and heat flow qmq_m from great depth, the surface heat flow is

q0=qm+A0hr,q_0 = q_m + A_0h_r,

and the geotherm is

T(z)=qmzk+A0hr2k(1−e−z/hr).T(z) = \frac{q_mz}{k} + \frac{A_0h_r^2}{k}\bigl(1 - e^{-z/h_r}\bigr).

If the plutons of a province share the same hrh_r and the same qmq_m, their surface heat flows and surface heat productions lie on the straight line q0=qm+hrA0q_0 = q_m + h_rA_0.

Proof. In steady state the upward heat flow q(z)=k dT/dzq(z) = k\,\mathrm dT/\mathrm dz decreases upwards by the heat produced: dq/dz=−A(z)\mathrm dq/\mathrm dz = -A(z). With q→qmq \to q_m at depth, q(z)=qm+A0hre−z/hrq(z) = q_m + A_0h_re^{-z/h_r}, so q0=qm+A0hrq_0 = q_m + A_0h_r. Integrating dT/dz=q(z)/k\mathrm dT/\mathrm dz = q(z)/k from T(0)=0T(0) = 0 gives the geotherm. The last statement is the first one, read for each pluton. ∎

The line is observed: in several provinces, the heat flows and the surface heat productions of plutons fall on straight lines, with depth scales of 7.5 to 10 km10\,\mathrm{km} and a reduced heat flow of 0.8 HFU0.8\,\mathrm{HFU} (about 33.5 mW m−233.5\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}) east of the Rocky Mountains. The exponential form is not the only one that gives a line, but it keeps the line through erosion: removing a slice of thickness ee from the top multiplies A0A_0 and the radiogenic part of q0q_0 by the same factor e−e/hre^{-e/h_r}.

The figure below shows geotherms for surface heat flows of 40, 60 and 80 mW m−280\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, the first typical of cratons and the last of back-arc regions, with k=2.5 W m−1 K−1k = 2.5\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}, hr=10 kmh_r = 10\,\mathrm{km} and a crustal share A0hr=0.4 q0A_0h_r = 0.4\,q_0. The 1300 ∘C1300\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} isotherm, taken as the base of the thermal lithosphere, lies at 129, 84 and 61 km61\,\mathrm{km}. Seismology finds cratonic mantle fast down to about 250 km250\,\mathrm{km}, and back-arc lithosphere 50 to 60 km60\,\mathrm{km} thick: the cold, thick roots of cratons need a smaller reduced heat flow than this simple model gives them, and their conductivity changes with temperature, but the order of the contrast is right.

Steady continental geotherms with exponentially decreasing heat production (h_r = 10\, km, A_0h_r = 0.4\,q_0, k = 2.5\, W\, m-1\, K-1) for three surface heat flows. The curvature near the surface is the crust’s own heat; below a few depth scales each geotherm is a straight line of gradient q_m/k.
Steady continental geotherms with exponentially decreasing heat production (hr=10 kmh_r = 10\,\mathrm{km}, A0hr=0.4 q0A_0h_r = 0.4\,q_0, k=2.5 W m−1 K−1k = 2.5\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}) for three surface heat flows. The curvature near the surface is the crust’s own heat; below a few depth scales each geotherm is a straight line of gradient qm/kq_m/k.

In the field — Measuring heat flow at sea

A heat-flow lance about to be lowered from the stern of a research ship (AI-generated illustration).

A marine heat-flow probe is a long steel lance with a heavy weight on top and a slender tube of temperature sensors along its side. From the stern of a research ship it is lowered on the winch cable to the sea floor and lets itself fall into the soft sediment, sensors and all. It stays still for some minutes while the frictional heat of the penetration dies away and the sensors settle to the temperature of the mud around them: their readings, metres apart, give the temperature gradient. A short pulse of heat is then sent along the tube, and the rate at which it decays gives the conductivity of the sediment around it; the product of the two is the heat flow. The lance is pulled out and set down again a few hundred metres further along the line, without coming back on deck.

5.5 Exercises

Exercise 5.1 ★

With κ=10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, compute the conductive time L2/κL^2/\kappa for L=1L = 1, 10 and 100 km100\,\mathrm{km}, in millions of years.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.1.

L2/κ=1012 sL^2/\kappa = 10^{12}\,\mathrm{s}, 1014 s10^{14}\,\mathrm{s} and 1016 s10^{16}\,\mathrm{s}: 0.032, 3.2 and 317 Myr317\,\mathrm{Myr}. A kilometre forgets its temperature in tens of thousands of years, a hundred kilometres in hundreds of millions.

Exercise 5.2 ★

A mountain range is eroded at 1 mm/yr1\,\mathrm{mm}/\mathrm{yr}, and rock rises through the upper 30 km30\,\mathrm{km} of crust to replace it. With κ=10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, compute the Péclet number. Can the geotherm of the range be computed by conduction alone?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.2.

u=10−3 m/3.156×107 s=3.17×10−11 m s−1u = 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{m}/3.156 \times 10^{7}\,\mathrm{s} = 3.17 \times 10^{-11}\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, so Pe=3.17×10−11×3×104/10−6=0.95\mathrm{Pe} = 3.17\times10^{-11}\times3 \times 10^{4}/10^{-6} = 0.95. Advection and conduction are of the same importance: the rising rock carries heat upwards and steepens the geotherm near the surface, and conduction alone would underestimate the gradient.

Exercise 5.3 ★

In the half-space model (T0=0T_0 = 0, Tm=1450 ∘CT_m = 1450\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, κ=0.8×10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 0.8 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}), compute the temperature 10 km10\,\mathrm{km} below sea floor 5 Myr5\,\mathrm{Myr} old (1 Myr1\,\mathrm{Myr} =3.156×1013 s= 3.156 \times 10^{13}\,\mathrm{s}; erf⁡0.445=0.471\operatorname{erf} 0.445 = 0.471).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.3.

κt=0.8×10−6×5×3.156×1013=11 236 m\sqrt{\kappa t} = \sqrt{0.8 \times 10^{-6}\times5\times3.156 \times 10^{13}} = 11\,236\,\mathrm{m}, η=10000/(2×11236)=0.445\eta = 10000/(2\times11236) = 0.445, and T=1450×0.471=683 ∘CT = 1450\times0.471 = 683\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}.

Exercise 5.4 ★

With Cq=490 mW m−2 Myr1/2C_q = 490\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{1/2}, compute the heat flow through sea floor 1, 25 and 100 Myr100\,\mathrm{Myr} old. Which of the three would a probe most likely underestimate?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.4.

490/1=490490/\sqrt1 = 490, 490/5=98490/5 = 98 and 490/10=49 mW m−2490/10 = 49\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}. The probe would most likely underestimate the first: young crust is cracked and open to circulating sea water, which carries part of the heat away by hot springs.

Exercise 5.5 ★★

In the half-space model, the temperature reaches 90 %90\,\% of TmT_m where erf⁡η=0.9\operatorname{erf}\eta = 0.9, η=1.163\eta = 1.163. With κ=0.8×10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 0.8 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, compute that depth at 10, 40 and 100 Myr100\,\mathrm{Myr}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.5.

z=2×1.163κtz = 2\times1.163\sqrt{\kappa t}: with κt=15.89\sqrt{\kappa t} = 15.89, 31.78 and 50.25 km50.25\,\mathrm{km}, z=37.0z = 37.0, 73.9 and 116.9 km116.9\,\mathrm{km}. The cooled layer doubles from 10 to 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}; by 100 Myr100\,\mathrm{Myr} it is already deeper than a 95 km95\,\mathrm{km} plate.

Exercise 5.6 ★★

With the values of the text, the half-space model gives C=370.5 m Myr−1/2C = 370.5\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2}. Keeping every other value, what thermal expansion coefficient would give the fitted 350 m Myr−1/2350\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2}? What other parameter could be changed instead?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.6.

CC is proportional to α\alpha: α=3.1×10−5×350/370.5=2.93×10−5 K−1\alpha = 3.1 \times 10^{-5}\times350/370.5 = 2.93 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}. CC is also proportional to Tm−T0T_m - T_0 (a mantle at 1450×350/370.5=1370 ∘C1450\times350/370.5 = 1370\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}) and to κ\sqrt\kappa (a diffusivity 0.8×(350/370.5)2=0.71×10−6 m2 s−10.8\times(350/370.5)^2 = 0.71 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}): depth alone cannot separate them, which is why heat flow is used as well.

Exercise 5.7 ★★

Compute the asymptotic heat flow kTm/LkT_m/L of the plate model for L=95 kmL = 95\,\mathrm{km}, Tm=1450 ∘CT_m = 1450\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, and for L=125 kmL = 125\,\mathrm{km}, Tm=1350 ∘CT_m = 1350\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, with k=3.1 W m−1 K−1k = 3.1\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1} in both. Which is closer to the heat flow of old ocean floor computed from Cq/tC_q/\sqrt t at 150 Myr150\,\mathrm{Myr} with Cq=490 mW m−2 Myr1/2C_q = 490\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{1/2}?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.7.

3.1×1450/95×103=47.3 mW m−23.1\times1450/95 \times 10^{3} = 47.3\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2} and 3.1×1350/125×103=33.5 mW m−23.1\times1350/125 \times 10^{3} = 33.5\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}. The half-space reaches them at (490/47.3)2=107 Myr(490/47.3)^2 = 107\,\mathrm{Myr} and (490/33.5)2=214 Myr(490/33.5)^2 = 214\,\mathrm{Myr}: the thin, hot plate holds the heat flow of old floor at 47 mW m−247\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2} from about 100 Myr100\,\mathrm{Myr} on, whereas the thicker, colder one would let it fall below 40 mW m−240\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, the half-space value at 150 Myr150\,\mathrm{Myr}.

Exercise 5.8 ★★

A province has q0=60 mW m−2q_0 = 60\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, hr=10 kmh_r = 10\,\mathrm{km} and A0hr=0.4 q0A_0h_r = 0.4\,q_0. Compute A0A_0, qmq_m and the temperature at the Moho, 35 km35\,\mathrm{km} deep, with k=2.5 W m−1 K−1k = 2.5\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.8.

A0hr=0.4×60=24 mW m−2A_0h_r = 0.4\times60 = 24\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, so A0=24×10−3/104=2.4 µW m−3A_0 = 24 \times 10^{-3}/10^{4} = 2.4\,\text{µ}\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3} and qm=60−24=36 mW m−2q_m = 60 - 24 = 36\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}. At 35 km35\,\mathrm{km}, T=36×10−3×35×103/2.5+2.4×10−6×108/2.5×(1−e−3.5)=504+96×0.970=597 ∘CT = 36 \times 10^{-3}\times35 \times 10^{3}/2.5 + 2.4 \times 10^{-6}\times10^{8}/2.5\times(1 - e^{-3.5}) = 504 + 96\times0.970 = 597\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}.

Exercise 5.9 ★★

Two granite plutons of one province give q0=66 mW m−2q_0 = 66\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2} with A0=3.0 µW m−3A_0 = 3.0\,\text{µ}\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}, and q0=48 mW m−2q_0 = 48\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2} with A0=1.2 µW m−3A_0 = 1.2\,\text{µ}\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}. Assuming they lie on the line of Proposition 5.10, compute hrh_r and qmq_m.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.9.

hr=Δq0/ΔA0=18×10−3/1.8×10−6=10 kmh_r = \Delta q_0/\Delta A_0 = 18 \times 10^{-3}/1.8 \times 10^{-6} = 10\,\mathrm{km}, and qm=q0−hrA0=66−30=36 mW m−2q_m = q_0 - h_rA_0 = 66 - 30 = 36\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, since hrA0=104×3.0×10−6 W m−3=30 mW m−2h_rA_0 = 10^{4}\times3.0 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3} = 30\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}.

Exercise 5.10 ★★★

(a) Show that the heat lost through the sea floor between ages 0 and tt, per unit area, is Q(t)=2k(Tm−T0)t/(πκ)Q(t) = 2k(T_m - T_0)\sqrt{t/(\pi\kappa)} in the half-space model. (b) Show that the subsidence is d−dr=αQ/(c(ρm−ρw))d - d_r = \alpha Q/\bigl(c(\rho_m - \rho_w)\bigr), where c=k/(ρmκ)c = k/(\rho_m\kappa) is the specific heat. (c) Check it numerically at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr} with the values of the text.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.10.

(a) Q(t)=∫0tk(Tm−T0)/πκt′ dt′=2k(Tm−T0)t/(πκ)Q(t) = \int_0^tk(T_m - T_0)/\sqrt{\pi\kappa t'}\,\mathrm dt' = 2k(T_m - T_0)\sqrt{t/(\pi\kappa)}. (b) The heat lost is the heat content removed from the column, Q=ρmc∫0∞(Tm−T) dzQ = \rho_mc\int_0^\infty(T_m - T)\,\mathrm dz, and isostasy gives (ρm−ρw)(d−dr)=ρmα∫0∞(Tm−T) dz=αQ/c(\rho_m - \rho_w)(d - d_r) = \rho_m\alpha\int_0^\infty(T_m - T)\,\mathrm dz = \alpha Q/c. (c) c=3.1/(3300×0.8×10−6)=1174 J kg−1 K−1c = 3.1/(3300\times0.8 \times 10^{-6}) = 1174\,\mathrm{J}\,\mathrm{kg}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}; at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}, t=1.262×1015 st = 1.262 \times 10^{15}\,\mathrm{s} and Q=2×3.1×1450×1.262×1015/(π×0.8×10−6)=2.015×1014 J m−2Q = 2\times3.1\times1450\times\sqrt{1.262 \times 10^{15}/(\pi\times0.8 \times 10^{-6})} = 2.015 \times 10^{14}\,\mathrm{J}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}; d−dr=3.1×10−5×2.015×1014/(1174×2270)=2343 md - d_r = 3.1 \times 10^{-5}\times2.015 \times 10^{14}/ (1174\times2270) = 2343\,\mathrm{m}, which is 370.540370.5\sqrt{40}.

Exercise 5.11 ★★★

In the plate model of the text (τ=36.2 Myr\tau = 36.2\,\mathrm{Myr}, ρmαTmL/(2(ρm−ρw))=3104 m\rho_m\alpha T_mL/ \bigl(2(\rho_m - \rho_w)\bigr) = 3104\,\mathrm{m}), the depth computed with the first Fourier term alone exceeds the full series mainly by the n=3n = 3 term. Compute that term’s size at 1, 10 and 20 Myr20\,\mathrm{Myr}, and the age after which the first term alone is within 10 m10\,\mathrm{m} of the series.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.11.

The n=3n = 3 term is 3104×(8/π2)×19e−9t/36.2=280 e−9t/36.23104\times(8/\pi^2)\times\tfrac19e^{-9t/36.2} = 280\,e^{-9t/36.2} metres: 218 m218\,\mathrm{m} at 1 Myr1\,\mathrm{Myr}, 23 m23\,\mathrm{m} at 10 Myr10\,\mathrm{Myr} and 1.9 m1.9\,\mathrm{m} at 20 Myr20\,\mathrm{Myr}. It falls to 10 m10\,\mathrm{m} when e−9t/36.2=10/280e^{-9t/36.2} = 10/280, at t=(36.2/9)ln⁡28=13.4 Myrt = (36.2/9)\ln28 = 13.4\,\mathrm{Myr}.

Exercise 5.12 ★★★

(a) Show that, in the geotherm of Proposition 5.10, T(z)≈qmz/k+A0hr2/kT(z) \approx q_mz/k + A_0h_r^2/k for z≫hrz \gg h_r. (b) Deduce the depth of the 1300 ∘C1300\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} isotherm for q0=40 mW m−2q_0 = 40\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, with the values of exercise 8. (c) By how much must qmq_m fall for that depth to reach 250 km250\,\mathrm{km}, the depth of the fast roots of cratons?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 5.12.

(a) For z≫hrz \gg h_r, e−z/hr→0e^{-z/h_r} \to 0. (b) qm=24 mW m−2q_m = 24\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, A0hr2/k=16×10−3×104/2.5=64 KA_0h_r^2/k = 16 \times 10^{-3}\times10^{4}/2.5 = 64\,\mathrm{K}, and z=(1300−64)×2.5/24×10−3=128.8 kmz = (1300 - 64)\times2.5/24 \times 10^{-3} = 128.8\,\mathrm{km}. (c) qm=2.5×1236/250×103=12.4 mW m−2q_m = 2.5\times1236/250 \times 10^{3} = 12.4\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}: the reduced heat flow must be about halved, as under a craton whose thick, cold root lets little heat in from below.

5.6 Problem: Forty Million Years off the Ridge

Problem 5.1

Weekend problem — the half-space and the plate, the depth of an invented ocean, and the thickness of its plate

Take T0=0T_0 = 0, Tm=1450 ∘CT_m = 1450\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}, κ=0.8×10−6 m2 s−1\kappa = 0.8 \times 10^{-6}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, k=3.1 W m−1 K−1k = 3.1\,\mathrm{W}\,\mathrm{m}^{-1}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}, α=3.1×10−5 K−1\alpha = 3.1 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{K}^{-1}, ρm=3300 kg m−3\rho_m = 3300\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}, ρw=1030 kg m−3\rho_w = 1030\,\mathrm{kg}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}, a ridge 2500 m2500\,\mathrm{m} deep, and 1 Myr1\,\mathrm{Myr} =3.156×1013 s= 3.156 \times 10^{13}\,\mathrm{s}.

Part I — The half-space.

  1. Compute κt\sqrt{\kappa t} at 10 and 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}.
  2. Compute the temperature 20 km20\,\mathrm{km} below the floor at both ages (erf⁡0.6294=0.6266\operatorname{erf}0.6294 = 0.6266, erf⁡0.3147=0.3437\operatorname{erf}0.3147 = 0.3437).
  3. The 1000 ∘C1000\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} isotherm lies where erf⁡η=0.6897\operatorname{erf}\eta = 0.6897, η=0.7174\eta = 0.7174. Compute its depth at both ages, and the age at which it reaches 60 km60\,\mathrm{km}.
  4. Compute the heat flow at both ages, and CqC_q.
  5. A ridge spreads at 25 mm/yr25\,\mathrm{mm}/\mathrm{yr} on each side. Compute the Péclet number of the plate over 95 km95\,\mathrm{km}. Why may each column be cooled alone?
  6. Compute the conductive time across 95 km95\,\mathrm{km}. What does it say of a half-space model of floor 150 Myr150\,\mathrm{Myr} old?

Part II — Subsidence.

  1. Recall the isostatic balance that turns the temperature deficit of a column into subsidence, and why the integral may be taken to infinity in the half-space.
  2. Compute CC of the depth–age law, and the depths at 10 and 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}.
  3. The median depth of the real ocean floor between 40 and 45 Myr45\,\mathrm{Myr} is 4475 m4475\,\mathrm{m}, uncorrected. Compare with the model at 42.5 Myr42.5\,\mathrm{Myr}, and list what the median includes that the model leaves out.
  4. By how much would CC change if TmT_m were 1350 ∘C1350\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C}? Compare with the fitted 350 m Myr−1/2350\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2}.
  5. Why do measured heat flows on young floor fall below Cq/tC_q/\sqrt t?

Part III — The plate. Take L=95 kmL = 95\,\mathrm{km}.

  1. Compute τ\tau and the amplitude ρmαTmL/(2(ρm−ρw))\rho_m\alpha T_mL/\bigl(2(\rho_m - \rho_w)\bigr).
  2. Compute the depth at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr} with the terms n=1n = 1, 3 and 5.
  3. How much does the first term alone differ from that, and why so little?
  4. Compute the difference between the half-space and the plate at 40 and 50 Myr50\,\mathrm{Myr}, and estimate by linear interpolation the age at which it reaches 100 m100\,\mathrm{m}.
  5. Compute the heat flow of the plate at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}, with the terms n=1n = 1 to 3, and compare with the half-space.
  6. Give the asymptotic depth and heat flow.

Part IV — An invented ocean. In an invented ocean whose ridge is 2500 m2500\,\mathrm{m} deep, the floor, once corrected for sediment and away from seamounts and swells, is 5700 m5700\,\mathrm{m} deep at 120 Myr120\,\mathrm{Myr} and 4800 m4800\,\mathrm{m} at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}. The plate’s LL is unknown; every other value is as above.

  1. Keeping the first Fourier term only, write the depth at 120 Myr120\,\mathrm{Myr} as a function of LL, with τ\tau itself depending on LL.
  2. Solve it for LL by iteration, starting from L=100 kmL = 100\,\mathrm{km}: compute τ\tau, then the LL that matches 5700 m5700\,\mathrm{m} with that τ\tau, and repeat.
  3. With the LL found, compute the depth at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr} and compare with the half-space and with the 4800 m4800\,\mathrm{m} measured.
  4. Compute τ\tau for that LL and the asymptotic depth of this ocean.
  5. After what age does the floor lie within 100 m100\,\mathrm{m} of its asymptotic depth?
  6. Give the thickness LL of the plate that fits the old floor of the invented ocean.
Solution

Solution of Problem 5.1.

1. 0.8×10−6×3.156×1014=15 889 m\sqrt{0.8 \times 10^{-6}\times3.156 \times 10^{14}} = 15\,889\,\mathrm{m} and 0.8×10−6×1.2624×1015=31 778 m\sqrt{0.8 \times 10^{-6}\times1.2624 \times 10^{15}} = 31\,778\,\mathrm{m}.

2. η=20000/31778=0.6294\eta = 20000/31778 = 0.6294 and 20000/63556=0.314720000/63556 = 0.3147: T=1450×0.6266=909 ∘CT = 1450\times0.6266 = 909\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} at 10 Myr10\,\mathrm{Myr} and 1450×0.3437=498 ∘C1450\times0.3437 = 498\,{}^{\circ}\mathrm{C} at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}.

3. z=2×0.7174κtz = 2\times0.7174\sqrt{\kappa t}: 22.8 km22.8\,\mathrm{km} and 45.6 km45.6\,\mathrm{km}. It reaches 60 km60\,\mathrm{km} when κt=60/1.4348=41.82 km\sqrt{\kappa t} = 60/1.4348 = 41.82\,\mathrm{km}, at t=(41.82×103)2/0.8×10−6=2.186×1015 st = (41.82 \times 10^{3})^2/0.8 \times 10^{-6} = 2.186 \times 10^{15}\,\mathrm{s}, 69.3 Myr69.3\,\mathrm{Myr}.

4. q=3.1×1450/(π×15889)=159.6 mW m−2q = 3.1\times1450/(\sqrt\pi\times15889) = 159.6\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2} at 10 Myr10\,\mathrm{Myr} and 79.8 mW m−279.8\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2} at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}; Cq=159.610=505 mW m−2 Myr1/2C_q = 159.6\sqrt{10} = 505\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{1/2}.

5. u=7.92×10−10 m s−1u = 7.92 \times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}, Pe=7.92×10−10×95×103/0.8×10−6=94\mathrm{Pe} = 7.92\times10^{-10} \times95 \times 10^{3}/0.8 \times 10^{-6} = 94. Heat travels sideways with the plate a hundred times faster than it diffuses sideways, so each column cools by vertical conduction only.

6. (95×103)2/0.8×10−6=1.13×1016 s(95 \times 10^{3})^2/0.8 \times 10^{-6} = 1.13 \times 10^{16}\,\mathrm{s}, 357 Myr357\,\mathrm{Myr}. At 150 Myr150\,\mathrm{Myr}, κt=61.5 km\sqrt{\kappa t} = 61.5\,\mathrm{km} and the cooled layer, a few times that, reaches far below 95 km95\,\mathrm{km}: a half-space model of so old a floor assumes that cold has reached depths where the mantle convects.

7. (ρm−ρw)(d−dr)=ρmα∫(Tm−T) dz(\rho_m - \rho_w)(d - d_r) = \rho_m\alpha\int(T_m - T)\,\mathrm dz, the masses of the ridge column and of the old column being equal above a compensation depth. Tm−T=Tmerfc⁡ηT_m - T = T_m\operatorname{erfc}\eta falls below 0.5 %0.5\,\% of TmT_m for η>2\eta > 2, so the deep part adds nothing.

8. C=2×3300×3.1×10−5×1450/2270×0.8×10−6×3.156×1013/π=0.13069×2834.8=370.5 m Myr−1/2C = 2\times3300\times3.1 \times 10^{-5}\times1450/2270\times \sqrt{0.8 \times 10^{-6}\times3.156 \times 10^{13}/\pi} = 0.13069\times2834.8 = 370.5\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2}; d=2500+370.510=3672 md = 2500 + 370.5\sqrt{10} = 3672\,\mathrm{m} and 2500+370.540=4843 m2500 + 370.5\sqrt{40} = 4843\,\mathrm{m}.

9. The model gives 2500+370.542.5=4915 m2500 + 370.5\sqrt{42.5} = 4915\,\mathrm{m}, 440 m440\,\mathrm{m} deeper than the median. The median includes the load of the sediment, the seamounts and volcanic plateaus, the swells of hotspots, and cells on the flanks of fracture zones and margins, all of which make the floor shallower.

10. CC is proportional to TmT_m: 370.5×1350/1450=344.9 m Myr−1/2370.5\times1350/1450 = 344.9\,\mathrm{m}\,\mathrm{Myr}^{-1/2}, close to the fitted 350.

11. Sea water circulating through the cracked young crust carries part of the heat out through hot springs, between the probes.

12. τ=(95×103)2/(π2×0.8×10−6)=1.143×1015 s=36.2 Myr\tau = (95 \times 10^{3})^2/(\pi^2\times0.8 \times 10^{-6}) = 1.143 \times 10^{15}\,\mathrm{s} = 36.2\,\mathrm{Myr}; the amplitude is 3300×3.1×10−5×1450×95×103/4540=3104 m3300\times 3.1 \times 10^{-5}\times1450\times95 \times 10^{3}/4540 = 3104\,\mathrm{m}.

13. e−40/36.2=0.33124e^{-40/36.2} = 0.33124, e−360/36.2/9=5.3×10−6e^{-360/36.2}/9 = 5.3 \times 10^{-6} and the n=5n = 5 term is smaller still; the bracket is 1−0.81057×0.33125=0.731501 - 0.81057\times0.33125 = 0.73150, and d=2500+3104×0.73150=4771 md = 2500 + 3104\times0.73150 = 4771\,\mathrm{m}.

14. By the n=3n = 3 term, 3104×0.81057×5.3×10−6=0.013 m3104\times0.81057\times5.3 \times 10^{-6} = 0.013\,\mathrm{m}: at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}, e−9t/τe^{-9t/\tau} is 10−410^{-4} of e−t/τe^{-t/\tau}, and only the first mode is left.

15. At 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr}, 4843−4771=73 m4843 - 4771 = 73\,\mathrm{m}; at 50 Myr50\,\mathrm{Myr}, 2500+370.550=51202500 + 370.5\sqrt{50} = 5120 against 2500+3104×(1−0.81057×0.25127)=49722500 + 3104\times(1 - 0.81057\times0.25127) = 4972: 148 m148\,\mathrm{m}. Interpolating, 40+10×(100−73)/(148−73)=43.6 Myr40 + 10\times (100 - 73)/(148 - 73) = 43.6\,\mathrm{Myr}, about 44 Myr44\,\mathrm{Myr} (the full series gives 44.0).

16. q=(3.1×1450/95×103)[1+2(0.33124+0.01204+0.00005)]=47.32×1.68666=79.8 mW m−2q = (3.1\times1450/95 \times 10^{3})[1 + 2(0.33124 + 0.01204 + 0.00005)] = 47.32\times1.68666 = 79.8\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}, the same as the half-space: at 40 Myr40\,\mathrm{Myr} the base has not yet made itself felt at the surface.

17. 2500+3104=5604 m2500 + 3104 = 5604\,\mathrm{m} and kTm/L=47.3 mW m−2kT_m/L = 47.3\,\mathrm{mW}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}.

18. d(120)=2500+aL[1−(8/π2)e−120/τ]d(120) = 2500 + aL\bigl[1 - (8/\pi^2)e^{-120/\tau}\bigr], with a=ρmαTm/(2(ρm−ρw))=32.673 m/kma = \rho_m\alpha T_m/\bigl(2(\rho_m - \rho_w)\bigr) = 32.673\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{km} and τ=L2/(π2κ)\tau = L^2/(\pi^2\kappa).

19. L=3200/(32.673 [1−0.81057e−120/τ])L = 3200/\bigl(32.673\,[1 - 0.81057e^{-120/\tau}]\bigr). From L=100 kmL = 100\,\mathrm{km}: τ=40.13 Myr\tau = 40.13\,\mathrm{Myr}, bracket 0.95925, L=102.10 kmL = 102.10\,\mathrm{km}; then τ=41.83\tau = 41.83, L=102.67L = 102.67; τ=42.30\tau = 42.30, L=102.82L = 102.82; τ=42.43\tau = 42.43, L=102.87L = 102.87; it settles at L=102.9 kmL = 102.9\,\mathrm{km}.

20. τ=42.48 Myr\tau = 42.48\,\mathrm{Myr}, aL=3362 maL = 3362\,\mathrm{m}: d(40)=2500+3362×(1−0.81057e−40/42.48)=4799 md(40) = 2500 + 3362\times(1 - 0.81057e^{-40/42.48}) = 4799\,\mathrm{m}, against 4843 m4843\,\mathrm{m} for the half-space and 4800 m4800\,\mathrm{m} measured: the plate fits both ages.

21. τ=42.5 Myr\tau = 42.5\,\mathrm{Myr}; asymptotic depth 2500+3362=5862 m2500 + 3362 = 5862\,\mathrm{m}.

22. 3362×0.81057 e−t/42.48=1003362\times0.81057\,e^{-t/42.48} = 100 gives t=42.48ln⁡27.25=140 Myrt = 42.48\ln27.25 = 140\,\mathrm{Myr}.

23. The plate that fits the old floor of the invented ocean is 102.9 km102.9\,\mathrm{km} thick.

本章定义的术语

在术语表中查看全部 957 个术语