Physics · Book 3 · Bachelor Year 1

University Physics — Year 1

University Physics — Year 1 · Bachelor Year 1

27Electric Potential; Conductors and Capacitors

A field is three numbers at every point; a potential is one. Because the electrostatic force is conservative, the whole field of a charge distribution can be folded into a single scalar function, the potential, from which it is recovered by differentiation — the same economy that turned forces into potential energy in mechanics. The potential is what a voltmeter reads, what a battery maintains, what accelerates electrons in a tube; its level surfaces map a field at a glance. This chapter builds it, uses it on the dipole (the first electric model of a molecule), and then turns to the two objects every circuit is made of: conductors, on which charge arranges itself so as to kill the field inside, and capacitors, which store charge and energy in a field.

Charged to a few hundred kilovolts by a Van de Graaff generator, a person is an equipotential conductor whose hairs, all at the same potential and all charged alike, repel one another.
Charged to a few hundred kilovolts by a Van de Graaff generator, a person is an equipotential conductor whose hairs, all at the same potential and all charged alike, repel one another.

27.1 The electrostatic potential

Theorem 27.1 (The electrostatic field is conservative)

There exists a scalar function V(M)V(M), the electrostatic potential (volt, V\mathrm{V}), such that

E=gradV,VAVB=ABE ⁣dl\vect E = -\overrightarrow{\operatorname{grad}}\,V , \qquad V_A - V_B = \int_A^B \vect E\cdot\dd\vect l

along any path from AA to BB (the circulation of E\vect E from AA to BB is independent of the path, and zero round a closed loop). For a point charge qq at OO, V(M)=q4πε0OMV(M) = \dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0\,OM} with the convention V()=0V(\infty) = 0; for several charges the potentials add. The potential energy of a charge qq' at MM is Ep=qV(M)E_p = q'V(M), and the work of the electric force from AA to BB is q(VAVB)q'(V_A - V_B).

Proof. The Coulomb force of a fixed charge qq on qq' has the form of Newton’s gravitation with Gm1m2-Gm_1m_2 replaced by qq/4πε0qq'/4\pi\varepsilon_0; the same computation that gave Ep=Gm1m2/rE_p = -Gm_1m_2/r (Proposition 13.7) gives Ep=qq/4πε0rE_p = qq'/4\pi\varepsilon_0r: dividing by qq' gives VV, and E=F/q=grad(Ep)/q\vect E = \vect F/q' = -\overrightarrow{\operatorname{grad}}(E_p)/q'. Superposition carries the result to any distribution; the circulation formula is the definition of the gradient integrated along the path.

Proposition 27.2 (Reading a potential)

  1. The equipotential surfaces V=constV = \text{const} are everywhere perpendicular to the field lines, and the field points toward decreasing potential.
  2. E|\vect E| is the rate of change of VV along the steepest direction: where equipotentials are close, the field is strong.
  3. VV is defined up to an additive constant; only differences (voltages) are measurable. Ground or infinity is set to zero by convention.
  4. In spherical coordinates with symmetry about OO, Er= ⁣dV/ ⁣drE_r = -\dd V/ \dd r; in polar coordinates (r,θ)(r, \theta) in a plane, Er=V/rE_r = -\partial V/\partial r and Eθ=1rV/θE_\theta = -\dfrac1r\,\partial V/\partial\theta.

Proof. On an equipotential  ⁣dV=E ⁣dl=0\dd V = -\vect E\cdot\dd\vect l = 0 for every displacement in the surface, so E\vect E is normal to it; moving along E\vect E,  ⁣dV=E ⁣dl<0\dd V = -E\,\dd l < 0. The polar components follow from  ⁣dV=(V/r) ⁣dr+(V/θ) ⁣dθ\dd V = (\partial V/\partial r)\dd r + (\partial V/\partial\theta)\dd\theta and  ⁣dl= ⁣drer+r ⁣dθeθ\dd\vect l = \dd r\,\vect e_r + r\,\dd\theta\,\vect e_\theta.

Equipotentials (orange) and field lines (blue) of a point charge and of a plane capacitor. The lines cross the equipotentials at right angles and run from high to low potential; where the equipotentials crowd, the field is strong.
Equipotentials (orange) and field lines (blue) of a point charge and of a plane capacitor. The lines cross the equipotentials at right angles and run from high to low potential; where the equipotentials crowd, the field is strong.

Method 27.3 (Computing a potential)

Either sum  ⁣dq/4πε0r\dd q/4\pi\varepsilon_0r over the distribution (when the sum is tractable and the distribution is finite, so that V()=0V(\infty) = 0 makes sense), or integrate  ⁣dV=E ⁣dl\dd V = -\vect E\cdot\dd\vect l along a convenient path from a point where VV is known, using the field found by Gauss’s law. For infinite distributions (wire, plane) only the second way works, and the zero of VV must be chosen at a finite point.

Proposition 27.4 (Potentials of the classic distributions)

  1. Sphere of radius RR with QQ in its volume: V(r)=Q4πε0rV(r) = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0r} outside; V(r)=Q4πε03R2r22R3V(r) = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\,\dfrac{3R^2 - r^2}{2R^3} inside, so V(0)=32Q/4πε0RV(0) = \tfrac32\,Q/4\pi\varepsilon_0R. With QQ on the surface, VV is uniform inside, equal to Q/4πε0RQ/4\pi\varepsilon_0R.
  2. Infinite wire λ\lambda: V(r)=λ2πε0lnrr0V(r) = -\dfrac{\lambda}{2\pi\varepsilon_0}\ln\dfrac{r}{r_0}.
  3. Plane capacitor, field EE from plate 1 to plate 2 a distance dd apart: VV decreases linearly across the gap and V1V2=EdV_1 - V_2 = Ed.

Proof. Integrate Er= ⁣dV/ ⁣drE_r = -\dd V/\dd r with the fields of Proposition 26.12, from infinity inward for the sphere (continuity at RR fixes the inside constant), from r0r_0 for the wire, across the gap for the capacitor.

Potential (solid) and field (dashed) of a uniformly charged sphere. The potential is continuous with a continuous slope; it is parabolic inside, where the field is linear, and in 1/r outside. Its maximum sits at the centre, where the field vanishes — a maximum of V is a point of zero field, not the reverse.
Potential (solid) and field (dashed) of a uniformly charged sphere. The potential is continuous with a continuous slope; it is parabolic inside, where the field is linear, and in 1/r1/r outside. Its maximum sits at the centre, where the field vanishes — a maximum of VV is a point of zero field, not the reverse.

Example 27.5 (The electron-volt, again)

An electron crossing a gap of 100V100\,\mathrm{V} gains eU=100eV=1.6×1017JeU = 100\,\mathrm{eV} = 1.6 \times 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{J}, whatever the shape of the field between the electrodes: the potential makes the path irrelevant (Definition 17.3). A 1µC1\,\text{µ}\mathrm{C} charge at 1m1\,\mathrm{m} from another has V=9kVV = 9\,\mathrm{kV} and the pair stores 9mJ9\,\mathrm{mJ}; the potential at the centre of a gold nucleus is 24MV24\,\mathrm{MV} (Exercise 27.6).

27.2 The electric dipole

Definition 27.6 (Electric dipole)

Two opposite charges q-q at NN and +q+q at PP, a distance a=NPa = NP apart, form an electric dipole of dipole moment p=qNP\vect p = q\,\vect{NP} (Cm\mathrm{C}\,\mathrm{m}), pointing from - to ++. The dipole approximation is the study of its field at distances rar \gg a. A molecule whose centres of positive and negative charge do not coincide (water, p=6.2×1030Cmp = 6.2 \times 10^{-30}\,\mathrm{C}\,\mathrm{m}) is a dipole; a neutral atom in a field becomes one (induced dipole).

Proposition 27.7 (Field of a dipole)

At MM with OM=raOM = r \gg a (OO the middle of NPNP) and θ\theta the angle between p\vect p and OM\vect{OM},

V(M)=pcosθ4πε0r2,Er=2pcosθ4πε0r3,Eθ=psinθ4πε0r3.V(M) = \frac{p\cos\theta}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r^2}, \qquad E_r = \frac{2p\cos\theta}{4\pi\varepsilon_0r^3}, \qquad E_\theta = \frac{p\sin\theta}{4\pi\varepsilon_0r^3} .

The field of a dipole falls as 1/r31/r^3, faster than a charge’s 1/r21/r^2: from afar the two charges almost cancel, and what remains is their separation.

Proof. V=q4πε0(1PM1NM)V = \dfrac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\Bigl(\dfrac1{PM} - \dfrac1{NM}\Bigr) with PMra2cosθPM \approx r - \tfrac a2\cos\theta and NMr+a2cosθNM \approx r + \tfrac a2\cos\theta (projection of ±a2\pm\tfrac a2 on OM\vect{OM}); to first order in a/ra/r, 1/PM1/NMacosθ/r21/PM - 1/NM \approx a\cos\theta/r^2. Then Er=V/rE_r = -\partial V/\partial r and Eθ=(1/r)V/θE_\theta = -(1/r)\,\partial V/\partial\theta.

Left: the geometry of the dipole approximation — M seen from the centre O at distance r and angle  from p, with the radial and orthoradial field components. Right: field lines (blue, r 2) and equipotentials (orange, r √| |) of a dipole pointing right; the plane through O perpendicular to p is the equipotential V = 0.
Left: the geometry of the dipole approximation — MM seen from the centre OO at distance rr and angle θ\theta from p\vect p, with the radial and orthoradial field components. Right: field lines (blue, rsin2θr \propto \sin^2\theta) and equipotentials (orange, rcosθr \propto \sqrt{|\cos\theta|}) of a dipole pointing right; the plane through OO perpendicular to p\vect p is the equipotential V=0V = 0.

Proposition 27.8 (Dipole in an external field)

A dipole p\vect p in a uniform field E\vect E feels no net force, a torque Γ=pE\vect\Gamma = \vect p\wedge\vect E that tends to align it with the field, and has the potential energy Ep=pEE_p = -\vect p\cdot\vect E, minimal when aligned. In a non-uniform field it is moreover pulled toward the regions of strong field (in one dimension, Fx=p ⁣dE/ ⁣dxF_x = p\,\dd E/\dd x for an aligned dipole).

Proof. Forces ±qE\pm q\vect E cancel; their moment about OO is OPqE+ON(qE)=qNPE\vect{OP}\wedge q\vect E + \vect{ON}\wedge(-q\vect E) = q\vect{NP}\wedge\vect E. Energy: qV(P)qV(N)=qNPEqV(P) - qV(N) = -q\,\vect{NP}\cdot\vect E for a uniform field (since V(P)V(N)=ENPV(P) - V(N) = -\vect E\cdot\vect{NP}). Non-uniform, aligned along xx: Fx=qE(x+a)qE(x)qa ⁣dE/ ⁣dxF_x = qE(x + a) - qE(x) \approx qa\,\dd E/\dd x.

Example 27.9 (Why the comb attracts the paper)

A charged comb creates a field that falls off with distance; a scrap of paper, neutral, is polarized by it (induced dipole along E\vect E), and the force p ⁣dE/ ⁣dxp\,\dd E/\dd x on an aligned dipole pulls it toward the strong-field region: the comb. Sign of the comb’s charge irrelevant; the same mechanism holds the balloon on the wall and makes the water stream bend. For water molecules, pEpE in a 1MV/m1\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m} field is 6×1024J6 \times 10^{-24}\,\mathrm{J}, 600600 times less than kBTk_BT at room temperature: only a slight net alignment survives the thermal tumbling (Exercise 27.7).

27.3 Conductors in electrostatic equilibrium

Theorem 27.10 (Properties of a conductor in equilibrium)

In a conductor where the free charges are at rest:

  1. E=0\vect E = \vect 0 inside, and the conductor is an equipotential volume: VV uniform in it and on its surface.
  2. Any net charge sits on the surface, with a surface density σ\sigma; the inside is neutral.
  3. Just outside, the field is normal to the surface and equals E=σε0n\vect E = \dfrac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}\,\vect n (Coulomb’s theorem).
  4. A cavity inside a conductor, empty of charge, has E=0\vect E = \vect 0 and uniform VV whatever happens outside (Faraday cage).

Proof. (1) A field would move the free charges: equilibrium requires E=0\vect E = \vect 0, hence  ⁣dV=0\dd V = 0 between any two inner points; the surface is the limit. (2) Gauss’s law on any closed surface drawn inside the conductor: zero flux, zero enclosed charge. (3) The surface is an equipotential, so E\vect E just outside is normal to it; a pillbox straddling the surface has flux E ⁣dSE\,\dd S through its outer face only (inside E=0\vect E = \vect 0) and charge σ ⁣dS\sigma\,\dd S. (4) The cavity wall is an equipotential; a field line inside the cavity would have to go from the wall to the wall across a potential drop — impossible on an equipotential; so no line, no field (admitted in this form).

Example 27.11 (Point effect and lightning rod)

Two spheres of radii R1>R2R_1 > R_2, far apart and joined by a wire, share the same V=Qi/4πε0RiV = Q_i/4\pi\varepsilon_0R_i, so σi=Qi/4πRi2=ε0V/Ri\sigma_i = Q_i/4\pi R_i^2 = \varepsilon_0V/R_i: the smaller the radius of curvature, the larger the surface charge and the field σ/ε0=V/R\sigma/\varepsilon_0 = V/R. At a sharp point the field exceeds the breakdown value of air (3MV/m3\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}) long before it does anywhere else: the air ionizes and charge leaks away quietly. A lightning rod works by this point effect — it does not attract the stroke so much as offer it a path, and bleed the charge under a cloud before it builds up.

Left: a hollow conductor in an external field — induced charges on its surface cancel the field inside and in the cavity (the Faraday cage). Right: the point effect — on a single equipotential conductor the surface charge and the outside field are largest where the curvature is sharpest.
Left: a hollow conductor in an external field — induced charges on its surface cancel the field inside and in the cavity (the Faraday cage). Right: the point effect — on a single equipotential conductor the surface charge and the outside field are largest where the curvature is sharpest.

27.4 Capacitors

Definition 27.12 (Capacitance)

An isolated conductor at potential VV carries a charge QQ proportional to VV: Q=CVQ = CV, with CC its capacitance (farad, F\mathrm{F}); for a sphere C=4πε0RC = 4\pi\varepsilon_0R. A capacitor is a pair of conductors (plates) carrying opposite charges ±Q\pm Q and facing each other so that the field is confined between them; its capacitance is C=Q/UC = Q/U with U=V1V2U = V_1 - V_2 the voltage between the plates. The symbol and the circuit law i=C ⁣du/ ⁣dti = C\,\dd u/\dd t were used in Chapter 7.

Proposition 27.13 (Three capacitors)

  1. Plane: plates of area SS a distance dSd \ll \sqrt S apart: C=ε0SdC = \dfrac{\varepsilon_0S}{d}.
  2. Spherical: concentric spheres of radii R1<R2R_1 < R_2: C=4πε0R1R2R2R1C = \dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0R_1R_2}{R_2 - R_1}.
  3. Cylindrical (coaxial), radii a<ba < b, length LbL \gg b: C=2πε0Lln(b/a)C = \dfrac{2\pi\varepsilon_0L}{\ln(b/a)}.

Filling the gap with an insulator of relative permittivity εr\varepsilon_r multiplies CC by εr\varepsilon_r (the dielectric’s molecules polarize and weaken the field, εr=2\varepsilon_r = 2 to 1010 for common plastics and glass, 8080 for water).

Proof. In each case the field between the plates is that of Proposition 26.12: E=σ/ε0=Q/ε0SE = \sigma/\varepsilon_0 = Q/\varepsilon_0S, U=EdU = Ed; E=Q/4πε0r2E = Q/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^2, U=R1R2E ⁣dr=Q4πε0(1R11R2)U = \int_{R_1}^{R_2}E\,\dd r = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \Bigl(\dfrac1{R_1} - \dfrac1{R_2}\Bigr); E=Q/2πε0LrE = Q/2\pi\varepsilon_0Lr, U=Q2πε0LlnbaU = \dfrac{Q}{2\pi\varepsilon_0L}\ln\dfrac ba. Divide QQ by UU. The dielectric factor is admitted.

Theorem 27.14 (Energy of a capacitor)

A capacitor charged to QQ under UU stores

W=12CU2=12QU=Q22C,W = \tfrac12 CU^2 = \tfrac12 QU = \frac{Q^2}{2C} ,

the work needed to carry the charge from one plate to the other against the growing voltage. In a plane capacitor W=12ε0E2×SdW = \tfrac12\varepsilon_0E^2 \times Sd: the energy is in the field, at a density 12ε0E2\tfrac12\varepsilon_0E^2 per unit volume — a statement that holds for every electrostatic field.

Proof. Moving  ⁣dq\dd q from the negative to the positive plate when the charge is qq costs  ⁣dW=(q/C) ⁣dq\dd W = (q/C)\,\dd q; integrate from 00 to QQ. Then substitute C=ε0S/dC = \varepsilon_0S/d and U=EdU = Ed; the general density is admitted.

Example 27.15 (Three capacitors and their energies)

A square metre of foil pair 1mm1\,\mathrm{mm} apart: C=8.85×1012/103=8.9nFC = 8.85 \times 10^{-12}/ 10^{-3} = 8.9\,\mathrm{nF} — the farad is a huge unit. A defibrillator’s 150µF150\,\text{µ}\mathrm{F} at 2kV2\,\mathrm{kV}: 300J300\,\mathrm{J}, delivered in milliseconds. A supercapacitor of 3000F3000\,\mathrm{F} at 2.7V2.7\,\mathrm{V}: 11kJ11\,\mathrm{kJ} in a can the size of a soda bottle — its capacitance comes from a molecular gap dd and an enormous porous SS. The energy density of a field at the breakdown of air, 12ε0(3×106)2=40J/m3\tfrac12\varepsilon_0(3 \times 10^6)^2 = 40\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{m}^{3}, is why capacitors store so little compared with batteries.

Plane, spherical and dielectric-filled capacitors. The field (orange) is confined between the plates except for the fringing at the edges, neglected when d is small; the energy 1/2 _0E2 per unit volume lives in that field.
Plane, spherical and dielectric-filled capacitors. The field (orange) is confined between the plates except for the fringing at the edges, neglected when dd is small; the energy 12ε0E2\tfrac12\varepsilon_0E^2 per unit volume lives in that field.

Remark 27.16 (Capacitors in association)

In parallel (same UU) the charges add: C=C1+C2C = C_1 + C_2; in series (same QQ) the voltages add: 1/C=1/C1+1/C21/C = 1/C_1 + 1/C_2 — the opposite of resistors, because CC measures an ease (charge per volt) where RR measures a difficulty. These rules follow from Q=CUQ = CU and the circuit laws of Chapter 6.

27.5 Exercises

Exercise 27.1

Potential at 1.0m1.0\,\mathrm{m} from a 1.0µC1.0\,\text{µ}\mathrm{C} charge; energy needed to bring a second 1.0µC1.0\,\text{µ}\mathrm{C} from infinity to that point; speed with which it would fly off if released, if its mass is 1g1\,\mathrm{g}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.1.

V=8.99×109×106/1=9.0kVV = 8.99 \times 10^9 \times 10^{-6}/1 = 9.0\,\mathrm{kV}; W=qV=9.0mJW = qV = 9.0\,\mathrm{mJ}; released, 12mv2=9mJ\tfrac12mv^2 = 9\,\mathrm{mJ}: v=18=4.2m/sv = \sqrt{18} = 4.2\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}.

Exercise 27.2

Plates 1.0mm1.0\,\mathrm{mm} apart under 100V100\,\mathrm{V}: field; kinetic energy and speed gained by an electron crossing the gap from rest; time of flight.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.2.

E=100/103=1×105V/mE = 100/10^{-3} = 1 \times 10^{5}\,\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{m}; Ek=eU=100eV=1.6×1017JE_k = eU = 100\,\mathrm{eV} = 1.6 \times 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{J}, so v=2Ek/me=5.9×106m/sv = \sqrt{2E_k/m_e} = 5.9 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}; uniformly accelerated, t=2d/v=3.4×1010st = 2d/v = 3.4 \times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{s}.

Exercise 27.3

On a map of equipotentials drawn every 10V10\,\mathrm{V}, the lines are 2mm2\,\mathrm{mm} apart near AA and 8mm8\,\mathrm{mm} apart near BB. Field at AA and at BB; which way does the field point relative to the increasing potentials; which way does an electron accelerate?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.3.

EA=10/0.002=5kV/mE_A = 10/0.002 = 5\,\mathrm{kV}/\mathrm{m}, EB=10/0.008=1.25kV/mE_B = 10/0.008 = 1.25\,\mathrm{kV}/\mathrm{m}. The field points toward decreasing potential; an electron (q<0q < 0) accelerates the other way, toward increasing VV.

Exercise 27.4

A Van de Graaff sphere of radius 15cm15\,\mathrm{cm} is charged to 200kV200\,\mathrm{kV}. Capacitance, charge, field at its surface. Maximum potential before the air around it breaks down (3MV/m3\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.4.

C=4πε0R=1.11×1010×0.15=17pFC = 4\pi\varepsilon_0R = 1.11 \times 10^{-10} \times 0.15 = 17\,\mathrm{pF}; Q=CV=3.3µCQ = CV = 3.3\,\text{µ}\mathrm{C}; E=V/R=2×105/0.15=1.3MV/mE = V/R = 2 \times 10^5/0.15 = 1.3\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}. Breakdown at V=EmaxR=3×106×0.15=450kVV = E_{\max}R = 3 \times 10^6 \times 0.15 = 450\,\mathrm{kV} — big machines use big spheres.

Exercise 27.5 ★★

Potential on the axis of a ring of radius RR and charge QQ; recover the axial field by differentiation. Same for the uniformly charged disk (use Exercise 26.5): V(z)=σ2ε0(z2+R2z)V(z) = \dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0} \bigl(\sqrt{z^2 + R^2} - z\bigr).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.5.

Every element of the ring is at distance R2+z2\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}: V=Q/4πε0R2+z2V = Q/4\pi\varepsilon_0\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}; Ez= ⁣dV/ ⁣dz=Qz/4πε0(R2+z2)3/2E_z = -\dd V/\dd z = Qz/4\pi\varepsilon_0(R^2 + z^2)^{3/2}. Disk:  ⁣dq=2πσa ⁣da\dd q = 2\pi\sigma a\,\dd a at a2+z2\sqrt{a^2 + z^2}: V=σ2ε00Ra ⁣daa2+z2=σ2ε0(z2+R2z)V = \dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\displaystyle\int_0^R\dfrac{a\,\dd a}{\sqrt{a^2 + z^2}} = \dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\bigl(\sqrt{z^2 + R^2} - z\bigr), and  ⁣dV/ ⁣dz=σ2ε0(1zz2+R2)-\dd V/\dd z = \dfrac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0}\Bigl(1 - \dfrac{z}{\sqrt{z^2 + R^2}}\Bigr).

Exercise 27.6 ★★

Derive the potential inside a uniformly charged sphere from its field. Potential at the centre of a gold nucleus (Z=79Z = 79, R=7.0fmR = 7.0\,\mathrm{fm}); energy a proton would need to reach the centre from far away, in MeV\mathrm{MeV}; comment on Rutherford’s 5MeV5\,\mathrm{MeV} alpha particles.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.6.

V(r)=V(R)+rRQr ⁣dr4πε0R3=Q4πε0R+Q(R2r2)8πε0R3=Q4πε03R2r22R3V(r) = V(R) + \displaystyle\int_r^R\dfrac{Qr'\,\dd r'}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R^3} = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0R} + \dfrac{Q(R^2 - r^2)}{8\pi\varepsilon_0R^3} = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \dfrac{3R^2 - r^2}{2R^3}. Gold: V(0)=1.5×8.99×109×1.26×1017/7×1015=24MVV(0) = 1.5 \times 8.99 \times 10^9 \times 1.26 \times 10^{-17}/7 \times 10^{-15} = 24\,\mathrm{MV}: a proton needs 24MeV24\,\mathrm{MeV}, an alpha (2e2e) 48MeV48\,\mathrm{MeV} to reach the centre and 32MeV32\,\mathrm{MeV} to touch the surface. Rutherford’s 5MeV5\,\mathrm{MeV} alphas turn back at rr where 2eV=5MeV2eV = 5\,\mathrm{MeV}: V=2.5MVV = 2.5\,\mathrm{MV}, r=45fmr = 45\,\mathrm{fm} — far outside the nucleus, which is why his point-charge analysis worked.

Exercise 27.7 ★★

Water molecule, p=6.2×1030Cmp = 6.2 \times 10^{-30}\,\mathrm{C}\,\mathrm{m}. Field it creates at 1.0nm1.0\,\mathrm{nm} along its axis and perpendicular to it; torque and energy difference between aligned and anti-aligned positions in E=1.0MV/mE = 1.0\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}; compare with kBTk_BT at 300K300\,\mathrm{K}. Field of a sodium ion at 0.3nm0.3\,\mathrm{nm} and the energy of the water dipole aligned in it (hydration).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.7.

Axis: 2p/4πε0r3=2×8.99×109×6.2×1030/1027=1.1×108V/m2p/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^3 = 2 \times 8.99 \times 10^9 \times 6.2 \times 10^{-30}/10^{-27} = 1.1 \times 10^{8}\,\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{m}; perpendicular, half: 5.6×107V/m5.6 \times 10^{7}\,\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{m}. Torque pE=6.2×1024NmpE = 6.2 \times 10^{-24}\,\mathrm{N}\,\mathrm{m}; energy gap 2pE=1.2×1023J2pE = 1.2 \times 10^{-23}\,\mathrm{J} against kBT=4.1×1021Jk_BT = 4.1 \times 10^{-21}\,\mathrm{J}: 330330 times smaller — only a 0.1%0.1\% net alignment. Sodium ion at 0.3nm0.3\,\mathrm{nm}: E=e/4πε0r2=1.6×1010V/mE = e/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^2 = 1.6 \times 10^{10}\,\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{m}, pE=1.0×1019J=0.6eV-pE = -1.0 \times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{J} = -0.6\,\mathrm{eV}, 24kBT24\,k_BT: the water molecules lock onto the ion — hydration.

Exercise 27.8 ★★

A conducting sphere of radius 1.0cm1.0\,\mathrm{cm} in air: maximum charge and potential before breakdown. Two conducting spheres, R1=10cmR_1 = 10\,\mathrm{cm} and R2=1.0mmR_2 = 1.0\,\mathrm{mm}, joined by a thin wire and raised to 20kV20\,\mathrm{kV}: surface field on each; which one discharges into the air?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.8.

Q=4πε0R2E=104×3×106/8.99×109=33nCQ = 4\pi\varepsilon_0R^2E = 10^{-4} \times 3 \times 10^6/8.99 \times 10^9 = 33\,\mathrm{nC}, V=ER=30kVV = ER = 30\,\mathrm{kV}. Joined spheres: E1=V/R1=0.2MV/mE_1 = V/R_1 = 0.2\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}, E2=V/R2=20MV/m>3MV/mE_2 = V/R_2 = 20\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m} > 3\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}: the small sphere ionizes the air and leaks the charge — the point effect.

Exercise 27.9 ★★

Capacitances: two 1.0m21.0\,\mathrm{m}^{2} foils 10µm10\,\text{µ}\mathrm{m} apart with a polymer film εr=2.2\varepsilon_r = 2.2 (a film capacitor); the same foils rolled up — does rolling change CC? Energy at 400V400\,\mathrm{V}. A 150µF150\,\text{µ}\mathrm{F} capacitor at 2.0kV2.0\,\mathrm{kV} (defibrillator): charge, energy, mean power if delivered in 5ms5\,\mathrm{ms}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.9.

C=εrε0S/d=2.2×8.85×1012/105=2.0µFC = \varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0S/d = 2.2 \times 8.85 \times 10^{-12}/10^{-5} = 2.0\,\text{µ}\mathrm{F}; rolling changes the shape, not the facing area: same CC (with a second film so that each foil faces the other on both sides, it doubles). W=12×2×106×4002=0.16JW = \tfrac12 \times 2 \times 10^{-6} \times 400^2 = 0.16\,\mathrm{J}. Defibrillator: Q=150×106×2000=0.30CQ = 150 \times 10^{-6} \times 2000 = 0.30\,\mathrm{C}, W=12CU2=300JW = \tfrac12CU^2 = 300\,\mathrm{J}, P=300/0.005=60kWP = 300/0.005 = 60\,\mathrm{kW}.

Exercise 27.10 ★★★

Spherical and cylindrical capacitors. (a) Derive CC for concentric spheres and check that for R2R1=dR1R_2 - R_1 = d \ll R_1 it reduces to the plane formula, and for R2R_2 \to \infty to the isolated sphere. (b) Coaxial cable, a=0.5mma = 0.5\,\mathrm{mm}, b=2.5mmb = 2.5\,\mathrm{mm}, polyethylene εr=2.3\varepsilon_r = 2.3: capacitance per metre (compare with the 100pF/m100\,\mathrm{pF}/\mathrm{m} of standard cables). (c) Field at the inner conductor under 1kV1\,\mathrm{kV}; safe?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.10.

(a) E=Q/4πε0r2E = Q/4\pi\varepsilon_0r^2, U=Q4πε0(1R11R2)U = \dfrac{Q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\Bigl(\dfrac1{R_1} - \dfrac1{R_2}\Bigr), C=4πε0R1R2/(R2R1)C = 4\pi\varepsilon_0R_1R_2/(R_2 - R_1); with R2R1=dR1R_2 - R_1 = d \ll R_1, R1R2R2R_1R_2 \approx R^2 and C4πR2ε0/d=ε0S/dC \approx 4\pi R^2\varepsilon_0/d = \varepsilon_0S/d; with R2R_2 \to \infty, C4πε0R1C \to 4\pi\varepsilon_0R_1. (b) C/L=2πεrε0/ln(b/a)=2π×2.3×8.85×1012/ln5=79pF/mC/L = 2\pi\varepsilon_r\varepsilon_0/\ln(b/a) = 2\pi \times 2.3 \times 8.85 \times 10^{-12}/\ln5 = 79\,\mathrm{pF}/\mathrm{m}, the right order. (c) E(a)=U/[aln(b/a)]=1000/(5×104×1.61)=1.2MV/mE(a) = U/[a\ln(b/a)] = 1000/(5 \times 10^{-4} \times 1.61) = 1.2\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}: below the 20MV/m20\,\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m} of polyethylene, safe; in air it would be marginal.

Exercise 27.11 ★★★

Energy in the field. (a) Energy of a charged conducting sphere (QQ, RR) from Q2/2CQ^2/2C. (b) Set it equal to the electron’s rest energy mec2=0.511MeVm_ec^2 = 0.511\,\mathrm{MeV} and solve for RR: the “classical electron radius” (within a factor). (c) An isolated plane capacitor charged to QQ has its plates pulled from dd to 2d2d: change of stored energy, and the force between the plates deduced from it; check against Exercise 26.8. (d) Same with the capacitor kept at fixed UU by a battery: energy change, and where the difference goes.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.11.

(a) W=Q2/2C=Q2/8πε0RW = Q^2/2C = Q^2/8\pi\varepsilon_0R. (b) R=e2/8πε0mec2=2.31×1028/(2×8.19×1014)=1.4×1015mR = e^2/8\pi\varepsilon_0m_ec^2 = 2.31 \times 10^{-28}/(2 \times 8.19 \times 10^{-14}) = 1.4 \times 10^{-15}\,\mathrm{m} (the usual “classical radius” e2/4πε0mec2=2.8fme^2/4\pi\varepsilon_0m_ec^2 = 2.8\,\mathrm{fm} drops the 12\tfrac12). (c) W=Q2/2C=Q2d/2ε0SW = Q^2/2C = Q^2d/2\varepsilon_0S doubles: ΔW=Q2d/2ε0S=Fd\Delta W = Q^2d/2\varepsilon_0S = F\,d with F=Q2/2ε0S=σ2S/2ε0F = Q^2/2\varepsilon_0S = \sigma^2S/2\varepsilon_0, as found directly. (d) At fixed UU, W=ε0SU2/2dW = \varepsilon_0SU^2/2d halves: ΔW=W/2\Delta W = -W/2; the puller still works W/2W/2 (integrating F=ε0SU2/2x2F = \varepsilon_0SU^2/2x^2 from dd to 2d2d); both halves, WW in all, flow back into the battery as the charge CU/2CU/2 returns to it at voltage UU.

Exercise 27.12 ★★★

Coulomb energy of a nucleus. (a) Build a uniformly charged sphere (QQ, RR) shell by shell and show that its electrostatic energy is W=3Q220πε0RW = \dfrac{3Q^2}{20\pi\varepsilon_0R}. (b) Uranium-238: Z=92Z = 92, R=7.4fmR = 7.4\,\mathrm{fm}: WW in MeV\mathrm{MeV}. (c) Split it into two equal fragments (Z/2Z/2, A/2A/2, radius R/21/3R/2^{1/3}) far apart: Coulomb energy released. (d) The measured energy of fission is about 200MeV200\,\mathrm{MeV}: what opposes the Coulomb gain?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 27.12.

(a) The sphere of radius rr carries q=Qr3/R3q = Qr^3/R^3 at surface potential q/4πε0rq/4\pi\varepsilon_0r; adding the shell  ⁣dq=3Qr2 ⁣dr/R3\dd q = 3Qr^2\,\dd r/R^3 costs  ⁣dW=q ⁣dq/4πε0r=3Q2r4 ⁣dr/4πε0R6\dd W = q\,\dd q/4\pi\varepsilon_0r = 3Q^2r^4\,\dd r/4\pi\varepsilon_0R^6; integrate: W=3Q2/20πε0RW = 3Q^2/20\pi\varepsilon_0R. (b) Q=92e=1.47×1017CQ = 92e = 1.47 \times 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{C}: W=3×2.17×1034/(20π×8.85×1012×7.4×1015)=1.6×1010J=990MeVW = 3 \times 2.17 \times 10^{-34}/(20\pi \times 8.85 \times 10^{-12} \times 7.4 \times 10^{-15}) = 1.6 \times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{J} = 990\,\mathrm{MeV}. (c) Each fragment: charge Q/2Q/2, radius R/21/3R/2^{1/3}, energy 1421/3W\tfrac14 2^{1/3}W; two of them: 21/3W/2=0.63W2^{1/3}W/2 = 0.63W: released 0.37×990=370MeV0.37 \times 990 = 370\,\mathrm{MeV}. (d) The nuclear “surface tension”: two fragments have more surface than one nucleus, which costs about 170MeV170\,\mathrm{MeV}; the balance, near 200MeV200\,\mathrm{MeV}, appears mostly as the kinetic energy of the two fragments flying apart under their mutual repulsion.

Millikan’s oil-drop apparatus, about 1916 (Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago): the brass chamber holds the two horizontal plates between which the drops were watched.
Millikan’s oil-drop apparatus, about 1916 (Museum of Science and Industry, Chicago): the brass chamber holds the two horizontal plates between which the drops were watched.

27.6 Problem: Millikan’s oil drop

Problem 27.1

Weekend problem — weighing the electron’s charge with a drop of oil: Stokes, the plane capacitor, and a table of numbers that refuse to be anything but multiples of one

Oil drops are sprayed between two horizontal plates d=16mmd = 16\,\mathrm{mm} apart, 20cm20\,\mathrm{cm} in diameter, and watched through a microscope. Data: oil density ρ=900kg/m3\rho = 900\,\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^{3}, air density 1.2kg/m31.2\,\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^{3}, air viscosity η=1.8×105Pas\eta = 1.8 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{Pa}\,\mathrm{s}, g=9.8m/s2g = 9.8\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^{2}, ε0=8.85×1012F/m\varepsilon_0 = 8.85 \times 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{F}/\mathrm{m}. A small sphere of radius rr moving at vv in air feels the Stokes drag 6πηrv6\pi\eta rv.

Part I — The falling drop.

  1. Forces on a drop falling with no voltage applied; show that it reaches a terminal velocity v1=2ρgr2/9ηv_1 = 2\rho gr^2/9\eta (neglect the air’s buoyancy — justify).
  2. A drop falls 1.0mm1.0\,\mathrm{mm} in 10s10\,\mathrm{s}: its radius and mass.
  3. Time constant of the approach to v1v_1; distance covered meanwhile. Is the drop ever seen accelerating?
  4. Reynolds number ρairv1r/η\rho_{\text{air}}v_1r/\eta of the motion: is Stokes’s law legitimate?
  5. Why must the drops be so small? (Compare the weight with the electric force on one elementary charge in a field of 3×105V/m3 \times 10^{5}\,\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{m}.)
  6. The drop is seen to jitter slightly around its mean fall: what is this, and why does it limit the precision?

Part II — The field. A voltage UU is applied, the upper plate positive.

  1. Field between the plates for U=5.0kVU = 5.0\,\mathrm{kV}; why is it uniform, and what are the equipotentials?
  2. Capacitance of the plates, charge on them at 5.0kV5.0\,\mathrm{kV}, and stored energy.
  3. The drop of question 2 is held stationary for U0=1080VU_0 = 1080\,\mathrm{V}: sign and value of its charge, in coulombs and in units of ee.
  4. With U=5.0kVU = 5.0\,\mathrm{kV} the same drop rises at v2v_2: show that q=6πηr(v1+v2)d/Uq = 6\pi\eta r(v_1 + v_2)d/U and compute v2v_2.
  5. Why is timing a rise and a fall better than hunting for the balance voltage?
  6. Potential energy of the drop’s charge between the plates at 5kV5\,\mathrm{kV}, and the energy dissipated by drag during a rise of 1cm1\,\mathrm{cm}.

Part III — The table of charges. Exposed to a weak source of X-rays between measurements, the same drop changes its charge; successive measurements give (in 101910^{-19} C): 4.804.80, 8.018.01, 6.426.42, 3.193.19, 9.639.63.

  1. Show that all five are close to integer multiples of one quantity, and give the integers.
  2. Best estimate of the elementary charge from the five values; standard uncertainty of the mean (Chapter 1).
  3. Why does the charge change by whole numbers of ee between measurements?
  4. Show that, in this method, qη3/2q \propto \eta^{3/2}: by how much does a 1%1\% error on the viscosity shift ee? (Millikan’s original value was 0.6%0.6\% low, for this very reason.)
  5. Quarks carry ±e/3\pm e/3 and ±2e/3\pm 2e/3: why has no oil drop ever shown a third of ee?
  6. The Faraday constant, the charge of one mole of electrons, is F=96485C/molF = 96\,485\,\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{mol}: deduce Avogadro’s number.
  7. Thomson had measured e/me=1.76×1011C/kge/m_e = 1.76 \times 10^{11}\,\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{kg} for the electron: deduce its mass, and compare with a hydrogen atom (1.67×1027kg1.67 \times 10^{-27}\,\mathrm{kg}).

Part IV — The apparatus, by the potential.

  1. Sketch the equipotentials and field lines between the plates, including the fringing near the edges; justify neglecting it.
  2. A positively charged drop at height zz above the lower plate (at 0V0\,\mathrm{V}): potential energy as a function of zz; total potential energy including gravity; condition on UU for the stationary point.
  3. Compare the energy of the drop’s charge (question 12) with the energy stored in the capacitor: does the drop disturb the field?
  4. The voltage is reversed (lower plate positive) with U=5.0kVU = 5.0\,\mathrm{kV}: what does the drop of question 9 do, and at what speed?
  5. A dust grain of 1µg1\,\text{µ}\mathrm{g} carrying 104e10^4e in the same field: ratio of electric force to weight; why such grains cannot be levitated and why Millikan chose oil mist.
  6. Sum up: what was measured (three times), what was deduced, with which uncertainty, and what two constants followed from it.
Solution

Solution of Problem 27.1.

1. Weight 43πr3ρg\tfrac43\pi r^3\rho g down, drag 6πηrv6\pi\eta rv up, buoyancy 43πr3ρairg\tfrac43\pi r^3\rho_{\text{air}}g up — 1.2/900=0.13%1.2/900 = 0.13\% of the weight, negligible. Terminal: 43πr3ρg=6πηrv1\tfrac43\pi r^3\rho g = 6\pi\eta rv_1, v1=2ρgr2/9ηv_1 = 2\rho gr^2/9\eta.

2. v1=1.0×104m/sv_1 = 1.0 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}: r=9ηv1/2ρg=9×1.8×105×104/(2×900×9.8)=9.6×107mr = \sqrt{9\eta v_1/2\rho g} = \sqrt{9 \times 1.8 \times 10^{-5} \times 10^{-4}/(2 \times 900 \times 9.8)} = 9.6 \times 10^{-7}\,\mathrm{m}, a micrometre; m=43πr3ρ=3.3×1015kgm = \tfrac43\pi r^3\rho = 3.3 \times 10^{-15}\,\mathrm{kg}.

3. τ=m/6πηr=3.3×1015/3.3×1010=1×105s\tau = m/6\pi\eta r = 3.3 \times 10^{-15}/3.3 \times 10^{-10} = 1 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{s}; distance v1τ=1nm\sim v_1\tau = 1\,\mathrm{nm}. Never.

4. Re=1.2×104×9.6×107/1.8×105=6×1061\mathrm{Re} = 1.2 \times 10^{-4} \times 9.6 \times 10^{-7}/1.8 \times 10^{-5} = 6 \times 10^{-6} \ll 1: Stokes holds.

5. eE=1.6×1019×3×105=4.8×1014NeE = 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 3 \times 10^5 = 4.8 \times 10^{-14}\,\mathrm{N} against mg=3.2×1014Nmg = 3.2 \times 10^{-14}\,\mathrm{N}: comparable only for micron drops. A 10µm10\,\text{µ}\mathrm{m} drop weighs a thousand times more; one elementary charge would change its speed by 0.1%0.1\%, invisible.

6. Brownian motion: the bombardment by air molecules jostles the drop randomly; the timings scatter, limiting the precision and setting a lower bound on useful drop size.

7. E=U/d=5000/0.016=3.1×105V/mE = U/d = 5000/0.016 = 3.1 \times 10^{5}\,\mathrm{V}/\mathrm{m}; plates much wider than dd, so the two-plane superposition gives a uniform field; the equipotentials are horizontal planes, V=Uz/dV = Uz/d.

8. C=ε0π(0.1)2/0.016=17pFC = \varepsilon_0\pi(0.1)^2/0.016 = 17\,\mathrm{pF}; Q=CU=87nCQ = CU = 87\,\mathrm{nC}; W=12CU2=0.22mJW = \tfrac12CU^2 = 0.22\,\mathrm{mJ}.

9. Upper plate positive: E\vect E points down; the force must point up, so q<0q < 0. q=mgd/U0=3.3×1015×9.8×0.016/1080=4.8×1019C=3e|q| = mgd/U_0 = 3.3 \times 10^{-15} \times 9.8 \times 0.016/ 1080 = 4.8 \times 10^{-19}\,\mathrm{C} = 3e: q=3eq = -3e.

10. Rising at constant speed: qE=mg+6πηrv2|q|E = mg + 6\pi\eta rv_2 and mg=6πηrv1mg = 6\pi\eta rv_1, so qE=6πηr(v1+v2)|q|E = 6\pi\eta r(v_1 + v_2) and q=6πηr(v1+v2)d/U|q| = 6\pi\eta r(v_1 + v_2)d/U. v2=(qEmg)/6πηr=(1.5×10133.2×1014)/3.3×1010=3.6×104m/sv_2 = (|q|E - mg)/6\pi\eta r = (1.5 \times 10^{-13} - 3.2 \times 10^{-14})/ 3.3 \times 10^{-10} = 3.6 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}: 1mm1\,\mathrm{mm} in 2.8s2.8\,\mathrm{s}.

11. Balance is a null judgment on a drifting, jittering speck whose charge may change meanwhile; timings over a fixed distance can be repeated at will, rr is fixed once for all by v1v_1, and one drop then yields a whole series of charges.

12. qU=3×1.6×1019×5000=2.4×1015J|q|U = 3 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 5000 = 2.4 \times 10^{-15}\,\mathrm{J} (15keV15\,\mathrm{keV}) across the gap; drag over 1cm1\,\mathrm{cm}: (qEmg)×0.01=1.2×1015J(|q|E - mg) \times 0.01 = 1.2 \times 10^{-15}\,\mathrm{J}, turned into heat in the air.

13. Divide by 1.601.60: 3.003.00, 5.015.01, 4.014.01, 1.991.99, 6.026.02 — integers 3,5,4,2,63, 5, 4, 2, 6.

14. q/nq/n: 1.600,1.602,1.605,1.595,1.6051.600, 1.602, 1.605, 1.595, 1.605; mean 1.6011.601, standard deviation 0.0040.004, uncertainty of the mean 0.004/5=0.0020.004/\sqrt5 = 0.002: e=(1.601±0.002)×1019e = (1.601 \pm 0.002) \times 10^{-19} C.

15. The X-rays ionize the air; the drop picks up ions one at a time, each carrying a whole number of ee.

16. rη1/2r \propto \eta^{1/2} from v1v_1, mr3η3/2m \propto r^3 \propto \eta^{3/2}, and q=mgd/U0η3/2|q| = mgd/U_0 \propto \eta^{3/2}: 1%1\% on η\eta gives 1.5%1.5\% on ee. Millikan’s η\eta was 0.4%0.4\% low, hence his ee 0.6%0.6\% low.

17. Quarks never come alone: they are confined inside hadrons, and every free object carries an integer charge.

18. NA=F/e=96485/1.602×1019=6.02×1023mol1N_A = F/e = 96485/1.602 \times 10^{-19} = 6.02 \times 10^{23}\,\mathrm{mol}^{-1}.

19. me=1.602×1019/1.76×1011=9.1×1031kgm_e = 1.602 \times 10^{-19}/1.76 \times 10^{11} = 9.1 \times 10^{-31}\,\mathrm{kg}: 18401840 times lighter than the hydrogen atom.

20. Horizontal planes between the plates, bulging round the rims; vertical field lines fanning outward at the edges over a width of order d=1.6cmd = 1.6\,\mathrm{cm} — small against the 20cm20\,\mathrm{cm} diameter, and the drop is watched at the centre.

21. Ep=qUz/d+mgzE_p = qUz/d + mgz, linear in zz: no minimum; a stationary drop requires the slope to vanish, q=mgd/Uq = -mgd/U, and the equilibrium is then indifferent — any residual drift persists, which is why the balance is hard to judge.

22. 2.4×10152.4 \times 10^{-15} against 2.2×1042.2 \times 10^{-4} J: 101110^{-11}. The drop does not disturb the field.

23. Field up, force on the negative drop down: it falls at (mg+qE)/6πηr=(3.2×1014+1.5×1013)/3.3×1010=5.6×104m/s(mg + |q|E)/6\pi\eta r = (3.2 \times 10^{-14} + 1.5 \times 10^{-13})/3.3 \times 10^{-10} = 5.6 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}.

24. F=104×1.6×1019×3.1×105=5×1010NF = 10^4 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} \times 3.1 \times 10^5 = 5 \times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{N} against 9.8×109N9.8 \times 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{N}: 5%5\% of the weight — not liftable, and with 10410^4 charges a change of one ee is invisible. Oil mist gives drops that are small, non-evaporating and spherical.

25. Measured: v1v_1, v2v_2 and UU (with dd, η\eta, ρ\rho known); deduced rr, mm, then qq, found to be always an integer multiple of e=(1.601±0.002)×1019e = (1.601 \pm 0.002) \times 10^{-19} C (0.1%0.1\%); from it NA=F/eN_A = F/e and me=e/(e/me)m_e = e/(e/m_e).

Terms defined in this chapter

See all 393 terms in the glossary