Physics · Book 4 · Bachelor Year 2

University Physics — Year 2

University Physics — Year 2 · Bachelor Year 2

29The Boltzmann Factor

Climb a mountain and the air thins: at three thousand metres the pressure has dropped to 0.7 bar0.7\,\mathrm{bar}, at the top of Everest to a third of its sea-level value. Nothing confines the atmosphere from above; it is held by gravity and spread out by thermal agitation, and the compromise between the two is an exponential, n∝e−mgz/kBTn \propto \eu^{-mgz/k_BT} — the ratio of the potential energy of a molecule to kBTk_BT decides how rare it is up there. The same exponential governs the fraction of atoms in an excited level, the number of molecules fast enough to escape a planet, the magnetisation of a paramagnet, the populations that a laser must invert, and the quanta that Planck’s law counts: it is the Boltzmann factor, the single most useful formula of statistical physics. This chapter motivates it with the atmosphere, states it in general, and draws from it, with nothing but sums and Gaussian integrals, the two-level system and its heat capacity, the equipartition of energy, the distribution of molecular speeds, and the Curie law of paramagnetism — with, on the way, the mean energy of a quantum oscillator, which is Planck’s formula.

From a summit, the haze of the lower atmosphere and the deep blue above: the air’s density falls by a factor  every 8\, km — the Boltzmann factor of a molecule’s potential energy in the Earth’s gravity.
From a summit, the haze of the lower atmosphere and the deep blue above: the air’s density falls by a factor e\eu every 8 km8\,\mathrm{km} — the Boltzmann factor of a molecule’s potential energy in the Earth’s gravity.

29.1 The isothermal atmosphere

Proposition 29.1 (Barometric law)

In an atmosphere of perfect gas (molecular mass mm) at uniform temperature TT in the uniform gravity gg, the pressure and the number density fall exponentially with altitude:

P(z)=P0 e−z/H,n(z)=n0 e−mgz/kBT,H=kBTmg,P(z) = P_0\,\eu^{-z/H}, \qquad n(z) = n_0\,\eu^{-mgz/k_BT}, \qquad H = \frac{k_BT}{mg} ,

with the scale height H≈8.4 kmH \approx 8.4\,\mathrm{km} for air at 288 K288\,\mathrm{K}. The exponent is the ratio of the potential energy mgzmgz of a molecule to the thermal energy kBTk_BT.

Proof. Hydrostatics,  ⁣dP/ ⁣dz=−ρg=−nmg\dd P/\dd z = -\rho g = -nmg, and the perfect-gas law P=nkBTP = nk_BT:  ⁣dP/ ⁣dz=−(mg/kBT)P\dd P/\dd z = -(mg/k_BT)P, an exponential. The real atmosphere cools with altitude (about 6.5 K/km6.5\,\mathrm{K}/\mathrm{km} in the lowest ten kilometres), which makes the fall somewhat faster; the isothermal model is good to 20%20\%. ∎

The isothermal atmosphere: pressure and density fall by 1/ every scale height H = k_BT/mg; a lighter gas would have a larger H — but below 100\, km turbulence keeps the air mixed, and all gases share the mean H.
The isothermal atmosphere: pressure and density fall by 1/e1/\eu every scale height H=kBT/mgH = k_BT/mg; a lighter gas would have a larger HH — but below 100 km100\,\mathrm{km} turbulence keeps the air mixed, and all gases share the mean HH.

29.2 The Boltzmann factor

Theorem 29.2 (Boltzmann factor)

A system in thermal equilibrium with a thermostat at the temperature TT is found in a given microscopic state of energy EE with a probability proportional to

e−E/kBT.\eu^{-E/k_BT} .

Hence, for a set of discrete states of energies EiE_i,

pi=e−Ei/kBTZ,Z=∑ie−Ei/kBT,p_i = \frac{\eu^{-E_i/k_BT}}{Z}, \qquad Z = \sum_i\eu^{-E_i/k_BT} ,

the sum ZZ (the partition function) normalising the probabilities; two states (or two levels of equal degeneracy) are populated in the ratio N2/N1=e−(E2−E1)/kBTN_2/N_1 = \eu^{-(E_2 - E_1)/k_BT}; and for a continuous variable (a position, a velocity) the probability density is proportional to e−E/kBT\eu^{-E/k_BT} in that variable. At 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, kBT=4.1×10−21 J=0.026 eVk_BT = 4.1 \times 10^{-21}\,\mathrm{J} = 0.026\,\mathrm{eV}: anything that costs much more than this is rare, anything that costs much less is freely excited.

Proof. The barometric law is the factor for the potential energy mgzmgz; we admit its generality, but here is the argument (made rigorous in the Year 3 volume). The thermostat RR is large; when our small system is in a state of energy EE, the thermostat has the energy Etot−EE_{\text{tot}} - E, and can be in ΩR(Etot−E)\Omega_R(E_{\text{tot}} - E) microscopic states, all equally probable (the fundamental postulate for an isolated whole). So p(E)∝ΩR(Etot−E)p(E) \propto \Omega_R(E_{\text{tot}} - E). With Boltzmann’s definition of the entropy, SR=kBln⁡ΩRS_R = k_B\ln\Omega_R, and 1/T= ⁣dSR/ ⁣dER1/T = \dd S_R/\dd E_R for the thermostat, ln⁡ΩR(Etot−E)≈ln⁡ΩR(Etot)−E/kBT\ln\Omega_R(E_{\text{tot}} - E) \approx \ln\Omega_R(E_{\text{tot}}) - E/k_BT since E≪EtotE \ll E_{\text{tot}}; exponentiate. ∎

Example 29.3 (Populations of atomic levels)

Hydrogen’s first excited level lies 10.2 eV10.2\,\mathrm{eV} above the ground state: at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, e−395\eu^{-395} — not one atom in the universe; at 6000 K6000\,\mathrm{K}, the Sun’s surface, e−19.7≈3×10−9\eu^{-19.7} \approx 3 \times 10^{-9} (times a degeneracy of 44): enough, in the Sun’s huge column of gas, for the Balmer absorption lines, which are strongest in stars near 10 000 K10\,000\,\mathrm{K}. The sodium D line (2.1 eV2.1\,\mathrm{eV}) in a 2500 K2500\,\mathrm{K} flame: e−9.8=6×10−5\eu^{-9.8} = 6 \times 10^{-5} of the atoms are excited, which gives the yellow flame of a pinch of salt. And the laser medium of Chapter 23: the factor says its upper level is empty at equilibrium, and the pump must fight it.

29.3 Discrete levels: the two-level system and the oscillator

Proposition 29.4 (Mean energy from the partition function)

With β=1/kBT\beta = 1/k_BT,

⟨E⟩=∑ipiEi=−∂ln⁡Z∂β,C= ⁣d⟨E⟩ ⁣dT.\langle E\rangle = \sum_ip_iE_i = -\frac{\partial\ln Z}{\partial\beta}, \qquad C = \frac{\dd\langle E\rangle}{\dd T} .

Proof. ∂βZ=−∑Eie−βEi\partial_\beta Z = -\sum E_i\eu^{-\beta E_i}, divide by ZZ. ∎

Proposition 29.5 (Two-level system)

NN independent systems with two levels 00 and ε\varepsilon (spins in a field, atoms with one excited level, defects with two positions):

N2N=1eε/kBT+1,⟨E⟩=Nεeε/kBT+1,C=NkB x2ex(ex+1)2,x=εkBT.\frac{N_2}{N} = \frac{1}{\eu^{\varepsilon/k_BT} + 1}, \qquad \langle E\rangle = \frac{N\varepsilon}{\eu^{\varepsilon/k_BT} + 1}, \qquad C = Nk_B\,\frac{x^2\eu^x}{(\eu^x + 1)^2}, \quad x = \frac{\varepsilon}{k_BT} .

The upper level is empty at low temperature and at most half-filled at high temperature (never inverted at equilibrium); the heat capacity vanishes at both ends and peaks at 0.44 NkB0.44\,Nk_B near kBT=0.42εk_BT = 0.42 \varepsilon — the Schottky anomaly, the signature of a gap in the spectrum.

Proof. Z=1+e−xZ = 1 + \eu^{-x}; p2=e−x/(1+e−x)p_2 = \eu^{-x}/(1 + \eu^{-x}); differentiate ⟨E⟩\langle E\rangle with respect to TT. ∎

The two-level system: populations against temperature (the upper level fills toward one half, never beyond) and the Schottky heat capacity, a bump where k_BT matches the gap.
The two-level system: populations against temperature (the upper level fills toward one half, never beyond) and the Schottky heat capacity, a bump where kBTk_BT matches the gap.

Proposition 29.6 (The quantum oscillator and Planck’s formula)

A harmonic oscillator of frequency ν\nu has the levels En=nhνE_n = nh\nu (plus a constant); at temperature TT,

Z=11−e−hν/kBT,⟨E⟩=hνehν/kBT−1 ⟶ {kBT(hν≪kBT),hν e−hν/kBT(hν≫kBT).Z = \frac{1}{1 - \eu^{-h\nu/k_BT}}, \qquad \langle E\rangle = \frac{h\nu}{\eu^{h\nu/k_BT} - 1} \ \longrightarrow\ \begin{cases} k_BT & (h\nu \ll k_BT), \\ h\nu\,\eu^{-h\nu/k_BT} & (h\nu \gg k_BT). \end{cases}

This is the mean energy of a mode of the radiation field that Planck’s law (Chapter 26) multiplies by the number of modes, and the mean energy of a vibration in a solid: at high temperature the classical kBTk_BT, at low temperature a frozen mode.

Proof. Geometric series, then −∂βln⁡Z-\partial_\beta\ln Z. ∎

Example 29.7 (Heat capacity of solids)

Treat each atom of a solid as three oscillators of the same frequency ν\nu (Einstein, 1907): C=3NkB x2ex/(ex−1)2C = 3Nk_B\,x^2\eu^x/(\eu^x - 1)^2 with x=hν/kBTx = h\nu/k_BT. Above θE=hν/kB\theta_{\text{E}} = h\nu/k_B, C→3NkB=3RC \to 3Nk_B = 3R per mole — the law of Dulong and Petit (25 J/mol/K25\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{K}), obeyed by lead, copper, iron at room temperature; far below it, CC collapses. Diamond (θE≈1300 K\theta_{\text{E}} \approx 1300\,\mathrm{K}) has only 6 J/mol/K6\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{K} at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, which classical physics could not explain, and every solid’s heat capacity vanishes at low temperature — the first success of the quantum outside radiation.

29.4 Equipartition and Maxwell’s distribution

Theorem 29.8 (Equipartition of energy)

Every variable qq that enters the energy quadratically, E=aq2+…E = aq^2 + \dots, and ranges over all real values, contributes 12kBT\tfrac12k_BT to the mean energy at equilibrium:

⟨aq2⟩=12kBT.\langle aq^2\rangle = \tfrac12k_BT .

A monatomic gas (three translations) has U=32NkBTU = \tfrac32Nk_BT and CV=32RC_V = \tfrac32R per mole; a diatomic gas adds two rotations, CV=52RC_V = \tfrac52R, and its vibration (two quadratic terms, but quantised with hν≫kBTh\nu \gg k_BT at room temperature) stays frozen until a few thousand kelvins.

Proof. The probability density in qq is ∝e−aq2/kBT\propto\eu^{-aq^2/k_BT}, a Gaussian:

⟨aq2⟩=∫aq2 e−aq2/kBT  ⁣dq∫e−aq2/kBT  ⁣dq=12kBT\langle aq^2\rangle = \frac{\int aq^2\,\eu^{-aq^2/k_BT}\,\dd q}{\int\eu^{-aq^2/k_BT}\,\dd q} = \tfrac12k_BT

(differentiate ∫e−λq2 ⁣dq=π/λ\int\eu^{-\lambda q^2}\dd q = \sqrt{\pi/\lambda} with respect to λ\lambda). The result needs the continuum: when the levels are spaced by more than kBTk_BT the factor freezes the variable, as for the oscillator above. ∎

Theorem 29.9 (Maxwell’s distribution of speeds)

In a gas at TT, the velocity components are independent Gaussians of variance kBT/mk_BT/m, and the speed v=∣v→∣v = |\vect v| has the probability density

f(v)=4π(m2πkBT)3/2v2 e−mv2/2kBT,f(v) = 4\pi\Big(\frac{m}{2\pi k_BT}\Big)^{3/2}v^2\,\eu^{-mv^2/2k_BT} ,

with the most probable, mean and root-mean-square speeds

vp=2kBTm,⟨v⟩=8kBTπm,vrms=3kBTm,v_{\text{p}} = \sqrt{\frac{2k_BT}{m}}, \qquad \langle v\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{8k_BT}{\pi m}}, \qquad v_{\text{rms}} = \sqrt{\frac{3k_BT}{m}} ,

in the ratios 1:1.13:1.221 : 1.13 : 1.22. For nitrogen at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}: 422 422\,, 476 476\,, 517 m/s517\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}; for hydrogen, 3.73.7 times more; the distribution’s tail, ∝e−mv2/2kBT\propto\eu^{-mv^2/2k_BT}, is what lets the fastest molecules evaporate, react, or leave a planet.

Proof. The kinetic energy 12m(vx2+vy2+vz2)\tfrac12m(v_x^2 + v_y^2 + v_z^2) gives a factor e−mvx2/2kBTe−mvy2/2kBTe−mvz2/2kBT\eu^{-mv_x^2/2k_BT}\eu^{-mv_y^2/2k_BT}\eu^{-mv_z^2/2k_BT}: three independent Gaussians, each normalised by m/2πkBT\sqrt{m/2\pi k_BT}. The speed distribution collects all velocities in the shell of radius vv and volume 4πv2 ⁣dv4\pi v^2\dd v. Then vpv_{\text{p}} from  ⁣df/ ⁣dv=0\dd f/\dd v = 0, and the moments from ∫0∞v3e−av2 ⁣dv=1/2a2\int_0^\infty v^3\eu^{-av^2}\dd v = 1/2a^2, ∫0∞v4e−av2 ⁣dv=38π/a5\int_0^\infty v^4\eu^{-av^2}\dd v = \tfrac38\sqrt{\pi/a^5}; vrmsv_{\text{rms}} also follows from equipartition, 12m⟨v2⟩=32kBT\tfrac12m\langle v^2\rangle = \tfrac32k_BT. ∎

Maxwell’s speed distribution for nitrogen at three temperatures: the peak moves as √ T, the curve broadens, and the high-speed tail grows fastest of all — the tail that decides escape and reaction rates.
Maxwell’s speed distribution for nitrogen at three temperatures: the peak moves as T\sqrt T, the curve broadens, and the high-speed tail grows fastest of all — the tail that decides escape and reaction rates.

Example 29.10 (Who leaves the planet)

The Earth’s escape speed is 11.2 km/s11.2\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}. In the exosphere, near 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K}, helium has vp=2.0 km/sv_{\text{p}} = 2.0\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}: the fraction of atoms above the escape speed is of order e−(11.2/2.0)2=e−31≈10−13\eu^{-(11.2/2.0)^2} = \eu^{-31} \approx 10^{-13} — small, but renewed at every collision for billions of years: helium leaks away, and its abundance in the air is only 5 ppm5\,\mathrm{ppm} despite its constant production by radioactive decay. For nitrogen the exponent is seven times larger, e−220\eu^{-220}: nitrogen stays. On the Moon (vesc=2.4 km/sv_{\text{esc}} = 2.4\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}) even nitrogen at 400 K400\,\mathrm{K} (vp=490 m/sv_{\text{p}} = 490\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}) has e−24\eu^{-24} per collision time: over the age of the solar system, no atmosphere survives.

29.5 Paramagnetism and the Curie law

Proposition 29.11 (Spin-1/2 paramagnet)

NN independent magnetic moments that can only point along or against the field BB, with energies ∓μB\mp\mu B, have at temperature TT the mean moment and magnetisation

⟨μz⟩=μtanh⁡μBkBT,M=nμtanh⁡μBkBT ⟶ {nμ2B/kBT(μB≪kBT): Curie’s law,nμ(μB≫kBT): saturation.\langle\mu_z\rangle = \mu\tanh\frac{\mu B}{k_BT}, \qquad M = n\mu\tanh\frac{\mu B}{k_BT} \ \longrightarrow\ \begin{cases} n\mu^2B/k_BT & (\mu B \ll k_BT):\ \text{Curie's law}, \\ n\mu & (\mu B \gg k_BT):\ \text{saturation}. \end{cases}

The susceptibility χ=μ0M/B=μ0nμ2/kBT\chi = \mu_0M/B = \mu_0n\mu^2/k_BT varies as 1/T1/T (Curie’s law); with μ=μB=9.27×10−24 J/T\mu = \mu_B = 9.27 \times 10^{-24}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{T}, μB/kBT=2.2×10−3\mu B/k_BT = 2.2 \times 10^{-3} at 1 T1\,\mathrm{T} and 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, so ordinary paramagnets are barely magnetised; at 1 K1\,\mathrm{K} the same field gives 0.670.67 and the saturation begins.

Proof. p±∝e±μB/kBTp_\pm \propto\eu^{\pm\mu B/k_BT}: ⟨μz⟩=μ(ex−e−x)/(ex+e−x)\langle\mu_z\rangle = \mu(\eu^x - \eu^{-x})/(\eu^x + \eu^{-x}) with x=μB/kBTx = \mu B/k_BT; tanh⁡x≈x\tanh x \approx x for small xx. ∎

Magnetisation of a spin-1/2 paramagnet: linear in B/T at small fields (Curie), saturating when B exceeds k_BT — reached at a tesla only below a kelvin, which makes the curve a thermometer for the coldest experiments.
Magnetisation of a spin-1/2 paramagnet: linear in B/TB/T at small fields (Curie), saturating when μB\mu B exceeds kBTk_BT — reached at a tesla only below a kelvin, which makes the curve a thermometer for the coldest experiments.

Remark 29.12 (What the factor does not do)

The Boltzmann factor describes equilibrium at a temperature; it says nothing of rates (how fast the equilibrium is reached — though an activation energy EaE_{\text{a}} gives rates ∝e−Ea/kBT\propto\eu^{-E_{\text{a}}/k_BT}, the Arrhenius law met for diffusion in solids). It applies to independent subsystems or to the whole; for identical quantum particles at high density (electrons in a metal, photons, helium near absolute zero) it is replaced by the Fermi–Dirac and Bose–Einstein distributions of the Year 3 volume, of which it is the dilute limit.

Method 29.13 (Boltzmann estimates)

(1) Compute E/kBTE/k_BT; kBT=0.026 eVk_BT = 0.026\,\mathrm{eV} at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, 1 eV1\,\mathrm{eV} at 11 600 K11\,600\,\mathrm{K}. (2) Ratios of populations: e−ΔE/kBT\eu^{-\Delta E/k_BT} (times degeneracies). (3) Discrete levels: ZZ, then ⟨E⟩=−∂βln⁡Z\langle E\rangle = -\partial_\beta\ln Z, then CC. (4) Quadratic continuous variables: 12kBT\tfrac12k_BT each, if not frozen. (5) Speeds: vp=2kBT/mv_{\text{p}} = \sqrt{2k_BT/m} and the Gaussian tail. (6) Spins: tanh⁡(μB/kBT)\tanh(\mu B/k_BT), Curie’s 1/T1/T.

29.6 Exercises

Exercise 29.1 ★

Scale height of air at 288 K288\,\mathrm{K} (M=29 g/molM = 29\,\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{mol}); pressure at 3000 m3000\,\mathrm{m}, at 8849 m8849\,\mathrm{m}, at 10 km10\,\mathrm{km} (compare with the measured 0.26 bar0.26\,\mathrm{bar}); scale height of helium alone; of the Martian atmosphere (CO2_2, 210 K210\,\mathrm{K}, g=3.7 m/s2g = 3.7\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^{2}).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.1.

H=kBT/mg=8.4 kmH = k_BT/mg = 8.4\,\mathrm{km}; 0.70 0.70\,, 0.35 0.35\,, 0.30 bar0.30\,\mathrm{bar} (the real 0.26 0.26\,: the air cools with height); helium 61 km61\,\mathrm{km}; Mars 10.7 km10.7\,\mathrm{km}.

Exercise 29.2 ★

Populations: hydrogen’s n=2n = 2 level (10.2 eV10.2\,\mathrm{eV}, degeneracy 44 against 11) at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, 6000 K6000\,\mathrm{K}, 10 000 K10\,000\,\mathrm{K}; sodium’s 2.1 eV2.1\,\mathrm{eV} level in a 2500 K2500\,\mathrm{K} flame; a molecular rotation level at 1×10−3 eV1 \times 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV} at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}; a nuclear spin level split by 1×10−7 eV1 \times 10^{-7}\,\mathrm{eV} in a magnet at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.2.

Hydrogen: 4e−395≈10−1714\eu^{-395} \approx 10^{-171}; 4e−19.7=10−84\eu^{-19.7} = 10^{-8}; 4e−11.8=3×10−54\eu^{-11.8} = 3 \times 10^{-5}. Sodium: e−9.8=6×10−5\eu^{-9.8} = 6 \times 10^{-5}. Rotation: e−0.04=0.96\eu^{-0.04} = 0.96, almost equal. Nuclear spin: 1−4×10−61 - 4 \times 10^{-6} — the tiny polarisation that magnetic resonance works with.

Exercise 29.3 ★

Maxwell speeds (vpv_{\text{p}}, ⟨v⟩\langle v\rangle, vrmsv_{\text{rms}}) for N2_2 at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K} and 77 K77\,\mathrm{K}, H2_2 at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, and for a smoke particle of 1×10−18 kg1 \times 10^{-18}\,\mathrm{kg}. Fraction of molecules faster than 2vp2v_{\text{p}} (about 4.6%4.6\%) and than 3vp3v_{\text{p}} (about 4×10−44 \times 10^{-4}): comment on the tail.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.3.

N2_2 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}: 422 422\,, 476 476\,, 517 m/s517\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}; 77 K77\,\mathrm{K}: 214 214\,, 241 241\,, 262 m/s262\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}; H2_2: 1580 1580\,, 1780 1780\,, 1930 m/s1930\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}; smoke particle: 9 cm/s9\,\mathrm{cm}/\mathrm{s} (its Brownian shiver). Above 2vp2v_{\text{p}} one molecule in twenty; above 3vp3v_{\text{p}} one in 25002500 — still 102210^{22} per cubic metre.

Exercise 29.4 ★

Spin-1/2 moments μ=μB\mu = \mu_B, n=1×1028 m−3n = 1 \times 10^{28}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}, B=1 TB = 1\,\mathrm{T}: x=μB/kBTx = \mu B/k_BT at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K} and 1 K1\,\mathrm{K}; M/MsatM/M_{\text{sat}}; MsatM_{\text{sat}}; the susceptibility at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}. Compare with iron’s saturation magnetisation (1.7×106 A/m1.7 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m}).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.4.

x=2.2×10−3x = 2.2 \times 10^{-3} and 0.670.67; M/Msat=2.2×10−3M/M_{\text{sat}} = 2.2 \times 10^{-3} and 0.590.59; Msat=nμ=9.3×104 A/mM_{\text{sat}} = n\mu = 9.3 \times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m}; χ=μ0nμ2/kBT=2.6×10−4\chi = \mu_0n\mu^2/k_BT = 2.6 \times 10^{-4}. Iron’s 1.7×106 A/m1.7 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m} is cooperative, not a Boltzmann effect.

Exercise 29.5 ★★

Two levels. (a) Derive p1p_1, p2p_2, ⟨E⟩\langle E\rangle from ZZ. (b) Show that N2<N1N_2 < N_1 at every positive temperature; what would N2>N1N_2 > N_1 mean for TT? (c) Entropy S=−NkB∑piln⁡piS = -Nk_B\sum p_i\ln p_i of the system at T→0T \to 0 and T→∞T \to \infty. (d) A defect in a crystal can sit in two positions 0.05 eV0.05\,\mathrm{eV} apart: occupation of the upper one at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K} and at 77 K77\,\mathrm{K}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.5.

(a) Proposition 29.5. (b) e−x<1\eu^{-x} < 1 for T>0T > 0; N2>N1N_2 > N_1 would need T<0T < 0 — a population inversion. (c) 00 and NkBln⁡2Nk_B\ln 2. (d) x=1.93x = 1.93: 0.130.13; at 77 K77\,\mathrm{K}, x=7.5x = 7.5: 5×10−45 \times 10^{-4}.

Exercise 29.6 ★★

Schottky. (a) Derive C(T)C(T) of the two-level system. (b) Locate its maximum numerically (x=2.40x = 2.40) and its value. (c) Limits at low and high TT, with their physical meaning. (d) Nuclear spins of copper in 1 T1\,\mathrm{T} have ε≈1×10−7 eV\varepsilon \approx 1 \times 10^{-7}\,\mathrm{eV}: at what temperature does their Schottky peak sit, and why does it matter for the coldest cryostats?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.6.

(a) Derivative of Nε/(ex+1)N\varepsilon/(\eu^x + 1). (b) x=2.40x = 2.40, C=0.44 NkBC = 0.44\,Nk_B. (c) ∝x2e−x→0\propto x^2\eu^{-x} \to 0: frozen; ∝1/T2→0\propto 1/T^2 \to 0: both levels full, nothing left to absorb. (d) kBT=0.42εk_BT = 0.42\varepsilon: 0.5 mK0.5\,\mathrm{mK}; below a millikelvin the nuclear spins hold most of the heat capacity and slow every cooling.

Exercise 29.7 ★★

Equipartition and its failure. (a) Derive ⟨aq2⟩=kBT/2\langle aq^2\rangle = k_BT/2 with the Gaussian integral. (b) CVC_V of a monatomic and of a rigid diatomic gas. (c) Nitrogen’s vibration has hν/kB=3400 Kh\nu/k_B = 3400\,\mathrm{K}: using the oscillator’s mean energy, CVC_V at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K}, 3000 K3000\,\mathrm{K}. (d) Einstein solid: CC at T=θET = \theta_{\text{E}}, θE/4\theta_{\text{E}}/4, 4θE4\theta_{\text{E}} in units of 3R3R; diamond at room temperature.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.7.

(a) Theorem 29.8. (b) 32R\tfrac32R, 52R\tfrac52R. (c) Cvib/R=x2ex/(ex−1)2C_{\text{vib}}/R = x^2\eu^x/(\eu^x - 1)^2: 0.0020.002, 0.410.41, 0.900.90; CV=2.50RC_V = 2.50R, 2.91R2.91R, 3.40R3.40R. (d) 0.920.92, 0.300.30, 0.9950.995; diamond x=4.3x = 4.3: 0.26×3R=6.5 J/mol/K0.26 \times 3R = 6.5\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{K}.

Exercise 29.8 ★★

Maxwell in detail. (a) Show that the velocity components are independent Gaussians and derive f(v)f(v). (b) Compute vpv_{\text{p}}, ⟨v⟩\langle v\rangle, vrmsv_{\text{rms}}. (c) Mean kinetic energy: check with equipartition. (d) The flux of molecules hitting a wall is 14n⟨v⟩\tfrac14n\langle v\rangle per unit area and time (admitted): number of N2_2 molecules hitting 1 cm21\,\mathrm{cm}^{2} per second at 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar}, 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}; and the rate at which a 1 µm1\,\text{µ}\mathrm{m} pinhole lets air into a vacuum chamber (effusion).

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.8.

(a), (b) Theorem 29.9. (c) 32kBT\tfrac32k_BT. (d) 14n⟨v⟩=2.9×1027 m−2 s−1\tfrac14n\langle v\rangle = 2.9 \times 10^{27}\,\mathrm{m}^{-2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}: 3×10233 \times 10^{23} per square centimetre per second; through 7.9×10−13 m27.9 \times 10^{-13}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}: 2.3×10152.3 \times 10^{15} molecules per second, a leak of 1×10−5 Pa m3/s1 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{Pa}\,\mathrm{m}^{3}/\mathrm{s}.

Exercise 29.9 ★★

Escape. (a) Fraction of a Maxwell gas faster than vv: show it is approximately (2/π) x e−x2(2/\sqrt\pi)\,x\,\eu^{-x^2} for x=v/vp≫1x = v/v_{\text{p}} \gg 1. (b) Helium at 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K} above 11.2 km/s11.2\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}; nitrogen. (c) Moon, vesc=2.4 km/sv_{\text{esc}} = 2.4\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}, 400 K400\,\mathrm{K}: nitrogen, and what temperature would hold it for the age of the solar system (take 101710^{17} collision times: escape fraction below 10−1710^{-17}). (d) Why does Titan (2.6 km/s2.6\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}, 94 K94\,\mathrm{K}) keep a thick nitrogen atmosphere?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.9.

(a) Integrate ff by parts; the leading term is (2/π)xe−x2(2/\sqrt\pi)x\eu^{-x^2}. (b) Helium x=5.5x = 5.5: 5×10−135 \times 10^{-13}; nitrogen x=14.5x = 14.5: e−211\eu^{-211}. (c) x=4.9x = 4.9: 10−1010^{-10} per collision time — gone; 10−1710^{-17} needs x≈6.6x \approx 6.6, T≲230 KT \lesssim 230\,\mathrm{K}. (d) x=11x = 11: e−121\eu^{-121}; cold enough.

Exercise 29.10 ★★★

Other potentials. (a) In a centrifuge rotating at ω\omega, the effective potential energy is −12mω2r2-\tfrac12m\omega^2r^2: density profile n(r)n(r). (b) Uranium hexafluoride, two isotopes Δm=3 u\Delta m = 3\,\mathrm{u}, ω=2π×1000 Hz\omega = 2\pi \times 1000\,\mathrm{Hz}, r=10 cmr = 10\,\mathrm{cm}, 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}: enrichment factor of one stage. (c) Colloidal spheres (buoyant mass m′=2.6×10−17 kgm' = 2.6 \times 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{kg}) in water at 293 K293\,\mathrm{K}: scale height of their sedimentation equilibrium; how did this give Avogadro’s number? (d) An electron gas in a field EE: why is the Boltzmann profile eeEx/kBT\eu^{eEx/k_BT} the basis of the Debye screening length λD=ε0kBT/ne2\lambda_{\text{D}} = \sqrt{\varepsilon_0k_BT/ne^2} of a plasma (sketch the argument)?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.10.

(a) n=n0emω2r2/2kBTn = n_0\eu^{m\omega^2r^2/2k_BT}. (b) eΔmω2r2/2kBT=e0.24=1.27\eu^{\Delta m\omega^2r^2/2k_BT} = \eu^{0.24} = 1.27. (c) H=kBT/m′g=16 µmH = k_BT/m'g = 16\,\text{µ}\mathrm{m}; counting spheres at several heights gives kBk_B, hence NA=R/kBN_A = R/k_B. (d) Ions follow e∓eφ/kBT\eu^{\mp e\varphi/k_BT} around a charge; linearised in Poisson’s equation this gives φ′′=φ/λD2\varphi'' = \varphi/\lambda_{\text{D}}^2: the potential is screened beyond λD\lambda_{\text{D}}.

Exercise 29.11 ★★★

Planck from Boltzmann. (a) Compute ZZ and ⟨E⟩\langle E\rangle for levels nhνnh\nu. (b) The two limits and their meaning. (c) Multiply by the density of modes 8πν2/c38\pi\nu^2/c^3 (given) and recover Planck’s law; show the Rayleigh–Jeans law is equipartition applied to every mode. (d) Why does the classical count fail, in one sentence?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.11.

(a) Z=1/(1−e−x)Z = 1/(1 - \eu^{-x}), ⟨E⟩=hν/(ex−1)\langle E\rangle = h\nu/(\eu^x - 1). (b) kBTk_BT: equipartition; hνe−hν/kBTh\nu\eu^{-h\nu/k_BT}: frozen. (c) uν=(8πν2/c3)⟨E⟩u_\nu = (8\pi\nu^2/c^3)\langle E \rangle; Rayleigh–Jeans gives each mode kBTk_BT. (d) A mode cannot be excited by less than one quantum.

Exercise 29.12 ★★★

Adiabatic demagnetisation. The entropy of NN spins 1/2 is S=NkB[ln⁡(2cosh⁡x)−xtanh⁡x]S = Nk_B[\ln(2\cosh x) - x\tanh x], x=μB/kBTx = \mu B/k_BT. (a) Show it depends only on B/TB/T, with S→NkBln⁡2S \to Nk_B\ln 2 for B/T→0B/T \to 0 and S→0S \to 0 for B/T→∞B/T \to \infty. (b) A salt at 1 K1\,\mathrm{K} is magnetised isothermally from 00 to 1 T1\,\mathrm{T}: entropy removed (per spin, with μ=μB\mu = \mu_B). (c) The field is then reduced adiabatically to 0.01 T0.01\,\mathrm{T}: final temperature. (d) What limits the method, and how does the same tanh⁡\tanh curve serve as a thermometer?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 29.12.

(a) x=μB/kBTx = \mu B/k_BT only; ln⁡2\ln 2 and 00. (b) x=0.67x = 0.67: S/NkB=0.51S/Nk_B = 0.51, so 0.18 kB0.18\,k_B per spin removed. (c) B/TB/T constant: 10 mK10\,\mathrm{mK}. (d) The spins’ own field (millitesla) replaces BB at the end and caps the cooling; measuring M=nμtanh⁡(μB/kBT)M = n\mu\tanh(\mu B/k_BT) gives TT.

Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906), whose factor -E/k_BT is the subject of this chapter, and whose formula S = k_B is engraved on his tomb in Vienna.
Ludwig Boltzmann (1844–1906), whose factor e−E/kBT\eu^{-E/k_BT} is the subject of this chapter, and whose formula S=kBln⁡ΩS = k_B\ln\Omega is engraved on his tomb in Vienna.

29.7 Problem: The isothermal atmosphere, helium escape and a spin thermometer

Problem 29.1

Weekend problem — three uses of one exponential

Data: kB=1.38×10−23 J/Kk_B = 1.38 \times 10^{-23}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}, NA=6.02×1023 mol−1N_A = 6.02 \times 10^{23}\,\mathrm{mol}^{-1}, g=9.8 m/s2g = 9.8\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}^{2}, R⊕=6.37×106 mR_{\oplus} = 6.37 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{m}, μB=9.27×10−24 J/T\mu_B = 9.27 \times 10^{-24}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{T}; air M=29 g/molM = 29\,\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{mol}, helium 4 g/mol4\,\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{mol}, nitrogen 28 g/mol28\,\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{mol}.

Part I — The isothermal atmosphere.

  1. From hydrostatics and the perfect-gas law, derive P(z)=P0e−z/HP(z) = P_0\eu^{-z/H} and give HH for air at 288 K288\,\mathrm{K}.
  2. Identify the Boltzmann factor in the result; which energy, which temperature?
  3. Pressure at 3000 m3000\,\mathrm{m}, 5500 m5500\,\mathrm{m} and 8849 m8849\,\mathrm{m}; the altitude where the pressure is halved.
  4. Mass of the atmosphere per square metre (from P0=1.013×105 PaP_0 = 1.013 \times 10^{5}\,\mathrm{Pa}), and the total mass; check that ∫0∞ρ  ⁣dz=ρ0H\int_0^\infty \rho\,\dd z = \rho_0H.
  5. Number of molecules in the atmosphere.
  6. If each gas followed its own HH, what would be the ratio O2_2/N2_2 at 50 km50\,\mathrm{km} compared with the ground? Why is the composition in fact uniform up to 100 km100\,\mathrm{km}?
  7. The real troposphere cools at 6.5 K/km6.5\,\mathrm{K}/\mathrm{km}: is the pressure at 10 km10\,\mathrm{km} higher or lower than the isothermal estimate? Explain.
  8. Number density at sea level and at 100 km100\,\mathrm{km} (isothermal model, 288 K288\,\mathrm{K}): comment on “the edge of space”.

Part II — Helium escape. The exosphere, above 500 km500\,\mathrm{km}, is at about 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K} and collisionless: a molecule moving upward faster than the escape speed leaves.

  1. Escape speed from the Earth at that altitude.
  2. Most probable and mean speeds of helium and nitrogen at 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K}.
  3. Fraction of helium atoms with v>vescv > v_{\text{esc}} (use (2/π)xe−x2(2/\sqrt\pi)x\eu^{-x^2}); same for nitrogen.
  4. The flux of escaping helium is roughly 14nHe⟨v⟩×\tfrac14n_{\text{He}}\langle v\rangle \times (that fraction) ×12\times\tfrac12; with nHe=1×1012 m−3n_{\text{He}} = 1 \times 10^{12}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3} at the exobase, estimate the loss per square metre per second and per year for the whole Earth.
  5. Helium in the air is 5 ppm5\,\mathrm{ppm} by volume: total helium in the atmosphere; its residence time against the loss computed.
  6. Radioactivity in the crust produces about 3×106 kg3 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{kg} of helium per year: is the atmosphere’s helium in steady state, and what does the comparison with question 11 teach?
  7. At solar maximum the exosphere reaches 2000 K2000\,\mathrm{K}: by what factor does the helium escape fraction rise?
  8. Why does the Moon have no atmosphere, and Titan (escape 2.6 km/s2.6\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}, 94 K94\,\mathrm{K}) a thick one?

Part III — A spin thermometer. A paramagnetic salt contains n=2×1027 m−3n = 2 \times 10^{27}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3} spins 1/2 with μ=μB\mu = \mu_B, in a field BB.

  1. Populations of the two levels and the magnetisation M(B,T)M(B,T).
  2. At B=0.1 TB = 0.1\,\mathrm{T}: MM at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, 4 K4\,\mathrm{K}, 0.05 K0.05\,\mathrm{K}; where is Curie’s law valid?
  3. Why is MM a thermometer, and in which range is it most sensitive? What is measured in practice?
  4. Mean energy and heat capacity of the spins (Schottky); temperature of the peak at 0.1 T0.1\,\mathrm{T}.
  5. Entropy of the spins at high and at zero temperature; what “ordering” occurs as T→0T \to 0?
  6. Adiabatic demagnetisation from 1 K1\,\mathrm{K}, 1 T1\,\mathrm{T} to 0.01 T0.01\,\mathrm{T}: final temperature; why cannot B→0B \to 0 give T→0T \to 0?
  7. A nuclear-spin thermometer uses μN=μB/1836\mu_{\text{N}} = \mu_B/1836: at 1 T1\,\mathrm{T}, down to what temperature does Curie’s law hold, and why is such a thermometer used in the microkelvin range?
  8. Compare the Doppler width of a spectral line (from Maxwell’s distribution) as a thermometer for gases: which quantity, and how does it scale with TT?
  9. Summarise: the three systems and the single formula.
Solution

Solution of Problem 29.1.

1.  ⁣dP/ ⁣dz=−nmg=−(mg/kBT)P\dd P/\dd z = -nmg = -(mg/k_BT)P; H=8.4 kmH = 8.4\,\mathrm{km}.

2. e−mgz/kBT\eu^{-mgz/k_BT}: the potential energy of one molecule, the air’s temperature.

3. 0.70 0.70\,, 0.52 0.52\,, 0.35 bar0.35\,\mathrm{bar}; Hln⁡2=5.8 kmH\ln 2 = 5.8\,\mathrm{km}.

4. P0/g=1.03×104 kg/m2P_0/g = 1.03 \times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^{2}; ×4πR2\times 4\pi R^2: 5.3×1018 kg5.3 \times 10^{18}\,\mathrm{kg}; ρ0H=1.22×8400=1.03×104 kg/m2\rho_0H = 1.22 \times 8400 = 1.03 \times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^{2}.

5. 5.3×1018/(29×10−3/NA)=1.1×10445.3 \times 10^{18}/(29 \times 10^{-3}/N_A) = 1.1 \times 10^{44}.

6. HO2=7.6H_{\text{O}_2} = 7.6, HN2=8.7 kmH_{\text{N}_2} = 8.7\,\mathrm{km}: the ratio at 50 km50\,\mathrm{km} would be e−50/7.6+50/8.7=0.44\eu^{-50/7.6 + 50/8.7} = 0.44 of its ground value; turbulence mixes faster than diffusion separates.

7. Lower: colder air is denser and the pressure falls faster.

8. 2.5×1025 m−32.5 \times 10^{25}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3}; e−11.9\eu^{-11.9}: 1.7×1020 m−31.7 \times 10^{20}\,\mathrm{m}^{-3} — no edge, only a convention.

9. 11.26370/6870=10.8 km/s11.2\sqrt{6370/6870} = 10.8\,\mathrm{km}/\mathrm{s}.

10. Helium 2040 2040\,, 2300 m/s2300\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}; nitrogen 770 770\,, 870 m/s870\,\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}.

11. x=5.3x = 5.3: 4×10−124 \times 10^{-12}; nitrogen e−196\eu^{-196}: none.

12. 14×1012×2300×4×10−12×12≈103\tfrac14 \times 10^{12} \times 2300 \times 4 \times 10^{-12} \times \tfrac12 \approx 10^3 atoms per square metre per second; over the Earth and a year, 2×10252 \times 10^{25} atoms — 0.1 kg0.1\,\mathrm{kg}.

13. 5×10−6×1.1×1044=5.5×10385 \times 10^{-6} \times 1.1 \times 10^{44} = 5.5 \times 10^{38} atoms, 3.7×1012 kg3.7 \times 10^{12}\,\mathrm{kg}; against 0.1 kg/yr0.1\,\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{yr} the residence time would be absurd.

14. Steady state requires a loss of 3×106 kg/yr3 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{yr}: a residence time of about a million years, which is the accepted value — so the thermal estimate at 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K} is far too small: the escape is dominated by hotter episodes and by non-thermal (ionic) processes.

15. x=3.75x = 3.75: e−14\eu^{-14} instead of e−28\eu^{-28} — a factor 10610^6: the loss is extraordinarily sensitive to the exospheric temperature.

16. The Moon is hot and light: everything escapes in geological time; Titan is cold, x=11x = 11 for nitrogen.

17. p±=e±x/2cosh⁡xp_\pm = \eu^{\pm x}/2\cosh x; M=nμtanh⁡xM = n\mu\tanh x.

18. x=μB/kBTx = \mu B/k_BT: 4.2 A/m4.2\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m}, 310 A/m310\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m}, 1.6×104 A/m1.6 \times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m} (saturation 1.9×104 A/m1.9 \times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{A}/\mathrm{m}); Curie for x≪1x \ll 1, i.e. T≫70 mKT \gg 70\,\mathrm{mK}.

19. MM depends on TT alone once BB is known; steepest near x≈1x \approx 1, T≈μB/kB=70 mKT \approx \mu B/k_B = 70\,\mathrm{mK}; one measures the susceptibility with a coil.

20. ⟨E⟩=−NμBtanh⁡x\langle E\rangle = -N\mu B\tanh x; C=NkBx2/cosh⁡2xC = Nk_Bx^2/\cosh^2x, peaking at x=1.2x = 1.2: 56 mK56\,\mathrm{mK}.

21. NkBln⁡2Nk_B\ln 2 and 00: all the spins align with the field.

22. 10 mK10\,\mathrm{mK}; the spins’ own field of a millitesla replaces BB and fixes the floor.

23. x=1x = 1 at μNB/kB=0.37 mK\mu_{\text{N}}B/k_B = 0.37\,\mathrm{mK}: Curie holds down to a millikelvin, and the thermometer is useful to microkelvins.

24. Δν/ν=8kBTln⁡2/mc2∝T\Delta\nu/\nu = \sqrt{8k_BT\ln2/mc^2} \propto \sqrt T: the width of a line measures the gas temperature.

25. Atmosphere, escaping gas, spins: e−E/kBT\eu^{-E/k_BT} with E=mgzE = mgz, 12mv2\tfrac12mv^2, ∓μB\mp\mu B.