Chemistry · Book 3 · Bachelor Year 2

University Chemistry — Year 2

University Chemistry — Year 2 · Bachelor Year 2

6Ellingham Diagrams and Metallurgy

A blast furnace turns red rock into liquid iron with coke and hot air, at a rate of thousands of tonnes a day. No furnace of that kind will ever make aluminium, magnesium or titanium, although carbon is just as cheap for them. Most metals are found in the ground as oxides, and winning a metal means taking its oxygen away: which reducing agents can do it, and at what temperature, is a question of standard Gibbs energies. In 1944 Harold Ellingham drew them all on one chart, against temperature, for one mole of dioxygen each. The chart answers at a glance which metal reduces which oxide, why carbon wins at high temperature, and why some metals must be made by electrolysis.

You already know

Chapter 2: ΔrG∘=ΔrH∘−TΔrS∘\Delta_r G^\circ = \Delta_r H^\circ - T\Delta_r S^\circ and the Ellingham approximation (straight lines in TT, changes of state excepted). Chapter 4: K∘K^\circ from ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ, variance, the end of an equilibrium when a phase disappears. The Year 1 volume: oxidation numbers, redox couples, basic and acidic oxides. The school volume: ores.

Tapping a blast furnace: liquid iron runs along a refractory channel, watched by workers in heat-reflecting suits. The temperature and the gas inside the furnace are those that let carbon monoxide take the oxygen away from iron oxide.
Tapping a blast furnace: liquid iron runs along a refractory channel, watched by workers in heat-reflecting suits. The temperature and the gas inside the furnace are those that let carbon monoxide take the oxygen away from iron oxide.

6.1 The Ellingham diagram

To compare the affinity of different metals for oxygen, the reactions are written so that they all consume the same amount of the common reagent.

Definition 6.1 (Ellingham diagram)

The Ellingham diagram of a family of oxides is the graph, against temperature, of the standard Gibbs energies of their formation reactions written for one mole of dioxygen,

2xy M+OX2⟶2y MxOy,ΔrG∘(T) per mole of OX2.\tfrac{2x}{y}\,\mathrm M + \ce{O2} \longrightarrow \tfrac{2}{y}\,\mathrm{M}_x\mathrm O_y , \qquad \Delta_r G^\circ(T) \ \text{per mole of } \ce{O2} .

For example 2 Zn+OX2→2 ZnO\ce{2Zn + O2 -> 2ZnO}, 43 Al+OX2→23 AlX2OX3\ce{4/3Al + O2 -> 2/3Al2O3}, 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO}. The ordinate is in kJ\mathrm{kJ} per mole of OX2\ce{O2}, always negative for the metals of the chart.

Proposition 6.2 (Straight lines)

In the Ellingham approximation, each line is straight, of slope −ΔrS∘-\Delta_r S^\circ. For a metal and its oxide, both condensed, ΔrS∘\Delta_r S^\circ is close to minus the entropy of the mole of dioxygen consumed, about −200 J/(K mol)-200\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}): the lines rise with temperature, all with nearly the same slope.

Proof. ΔrG∘=ΔrH∘−TΔrS∘\Delta_r G^\circ = \Delta_r H^\circ - T\Delta_r S^\circ with constant ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^\circ, ΔrS∘\Delta_r S^\circ. The molar entropies of solids are tens of J/(K mol)\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}) and largely cancel between metal and oxide, while one mole of gas is consumed, of entropy S∘(OX2)=205 J/(K mol)S^\circ(\ce{O2}) = 205\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}). For zinc, 2(43.65)−2(41.63)−205.15=−201.1 J/(K mol)2(43.65) - 2(41.63) - 205.15 = -201.1\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}). ∎

Proposition 6.3 (Breaks in the lines)

At the temperature where the metal melts or boils, the line changes slope: its slope increases by ν ΔtrsS\nu\,\Delta_{\text{trs}}S, where ν\nu is the amount of metal in the reaction and ΔtrsS=ΔtrsH/Ttrs\Delta_{\text{trs}}S = \Delta_{\text{trs}}H/T_{\text{trs}}. A change of state of the oxide decreases the slope instead.

Proof. Above the transition the metal reacts from its new phase, whose entropy is higher by ΔtrsS\Delta_{\text{trs}}S: ΔrS∘\Delta_r S^\circ decreases by ν ΔtrsS\nu\,\Delta_{\text{trs}}S and the slope −ΔrS∘-\Delta_r S^\circ increases by as much. ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ itself is continuous, because at TtrsT_{\text{trs}} both phases have the same chemical potential. For the oxide, the opposite sign. ∎

Melting changes the slope a little; boiling, which turns a condensed reactant into a gas, changes it a lot. Zinc boils at 1180 K1180\,\mathrm{K}: above that temperature the formation of zinc oxide consumes three moles of gas per two of oxide, and its line climbs steeply. The same happens to magnesium above its boiling point.

The Ellingham diagram: standard Gibbs energy of formation of oxides per mole of O2, against temperature, from tabulated Gibbs energies. The lower a line, the more stable the oxide and the more reducing the metal. Each metal line is labelled by its oxide; C/CO is 2C + O2 -> 2CO, C/CO2 is C + O2 -> CO2, CO/CO2 is 2CO + O2 -> 2CO2 and H2/H2O is 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O, water as a gas.
The Ellingham diagram: standard Gibbs energy of formation of oxides per mole of OX2\ce{O2}, against temperature, from tabulated Gibbs energies. The lower a line, the more stable the oxide and the more reducing the metal. Each metal line is labelled by its oxide; C\ce{C}/CO\ce{CO} is 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO}, C\ce{C}/COX2\ce{CO2} is C+OX2→COX2\ce{C + O2 -> CO2}, CO\ce{CO}/COX2\ce{CO2} is 2 CO+OX2→2 COX2\ce{2CO + O2 -> 2CO2} and HX2\ce{H2}/HX2O\ce{H2O} is 2 HX2+OX2→2 HX2O\ce{2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O}, water as a gas.

6.2 Reading the diagram

Definition 6.4 (Equilibrium oxygen pressure)

The equilibrium oxygen pressure of a metal–oxide pair at temperature TT is the pressure of dioxygen at which metal and oxide coexist at equilibrium: RTln⁡(pOX2/p∘)=ΔrG∘(T)RT\ln(p_{\ce{O2}}/p^\circ) = \Delta_r G^\circ(T) for the reaction written per mole of OX2\ce{O2}.

Theorem 6.5 (Domains of the metal and of the oxide)

In an atmosphere of oxygen pressure pOX2p_{\ce{O2}} at temperature TT, the metal is oxidised if RTln⁡(pOX2/p∘)>ΔrG∘(T)RT\ln(p_{\ce{O2}}/p^\circ) > \Delta_r G^\circ(T), and the oxide is reduced to the metal if RTln⁡(pOX2/p∘)<ΔrG∘(T)RT\ln(p_{\ce{O2}}/p^\circ) < \Delta_r G^\circ(T). On the diagram, the oxide is stable above its line, the metal below.

Proof. With condensed metal and oxide of activity 1, Q=p∘/pOX2Q = p^\circ/p_{\ce{O2}} and ΔrG=ΔrG∘+RTln⁡Q=ΔrG∘−RTln⁡(pOX2/p∘)\Delta_r G = \Delta_r G^\circ + RT\ln Q = \Delta_r G^\circ - RT\ln(p_{\ce{O2}}/ p^\circ). The oxidation runs forward when ΔrG<0\Delta_r G < 0. ∎

Under air (pOX2=0.21 barp_{\ce{O2}} = 0.21\,\mathrm{bar}, RTln⁡0.21RT\ln 0.21 is −4 kJ/mol-4\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol} at room temperature and −13 kJ/mol-13\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol} at 1000 K1000\,\mathrm{K}, almost zero on this scale) every metal of the diagram whose line is below the axis is oxidised: at room temperature all of them, even copper. Only the oxides near the top (silver, mercury) decompose on moderate heating.

Example 6.6 (The oxide of mercury)

For 2 Hg+OX2→2 HgO\ce{2Hg + O2 -> 2HgO}, the CODATA key values give ΔrH∘=−181.6 kJ/mol\Delta_r H^\circ = -181.6\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol} with liquid mercury; above the boiling point of mercury the metal is a gas and ΔrH∘=−304.3 kJ/mol\Delta_r H^\circ = -304.3\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}, ΔrS∘=−414.6 J/(K mol)\Delta_r S^\circ = -414.6\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}). The line crosses zero at T=304.3/0.4146≈734 KT = 304.3/0.4146 \approx 734\,\mathrm{K}: heated above that temperature in air, or under 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar} of oxygen, red mercury oxide gives off its oxygen — the way oxygen was first isolated in 1774.

Proposition 6.7 (Which metal reduces which oxide)

At a given temperature, a metal M reduces the oxide of a metal N, under standard conditions, when the line of M lies below that of N. The standard reaction Gibbs energy of the reduction, per mole of OX2\ce{O2} transferred, is the difference of the two ordinates.

Proof. The reduction is the formation of M’s oxide minus that of N’s oxide, both per mole of OX2\ce{O2}: ΔrG∘=ΔrGM∘−ΔrGN∘\Delta_r G^\circ = \Delta_r G^\circ_{\mathrm M} - \Delta_r G^\circ_{\mathrm N}, negative when M’s line is lower. ∎

Method 6.8 (Reading an Ellingham diagram)

  1. Find the two lines at the temperature of interest. The lower one is the more stable oxide; its metal reduces the other oxide.
  2. The vertical gap is ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ per mole of OX2\ce{O2}: a gap of 100 kJ100\,\mathrm{kJ} or more means a practically complete reduction.
  3. Where two lines cross, the reduction changes direction: read the crossing temperature.
  4. Watch the breaks: a metal that boils inside the interval leaves as a vapour, which can be distilled off — or which reoxidises on cooling.

Definition 6.9 (Aluminothermic reduction)

An aluminothermic reduction is the reduction of a metal oxide by aluminium powder, possible for every oxide whose line lies above that of alumina, and so exothermic that the mixture melts: FeX2OX3+2 Al→AlX2OX3+2 Fe\ce{Fe2O3 + 2Al -> Al2O3 + 2Fe} (thermite) welds rails; CrX2OX3+2 Al→AlX2OX3+2 Cr\ce{Cr2O3 + 2Al -> Al2O3 + 2Cr} makes chromium free of carbon.

Thermite welding of a rail: the reaction of iron oxide with aluminium in the crucible above the joint gives liquid iron, which runs down into the mould between the two rail ends. (Photograph: PetrS., CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons.)
Thermite welding of a rail: the reaction of iron oxide with aluminium in the crucible above the joint gives liquid iron, which runs down into the mould between the two rail ends. (Photograph: PetrS., CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons.)

6.3 Carbon and carbon monoxide

Three lines involve carbon:

  • C+OX2→COX2\ce{C + O2 -> CO2}: one mole of gas gives one, ΔrS∘≈0\Delta_r S^\circ \approx 0, an almost horizontal line near −395 kJ-395\,\mathrm{kJ};
  • 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO}: one mole of gas gives two, ΔrS∘≈+180 J/(K mol)\Delta_r S^\circ \approx +180\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}), a line that falls with temperature;
  • 2 CO+OX2→2 COX2\ce{2CO + O2 -> 2CO2}: three moles of gas give two, a rising line.

Proposition 6.10 (Carbon reduces almost everything when hot)

The line of 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO} decreases with temperature and crosses the lines of most metal oxides: above the crossing temperature, carbon reduces the oxide, giving carbon monoxide. The crossing for iron(II) oxide is near 1040 K1040\,\mathrm{K}, for zinc oxide near 1220 K1220\,\mathrm{K}; for titania and magnesia it lies near or above 2000 K2000\,\mathrm{K}, for alumina higher still, where the metals combine with carbon into carbides or reoxidise as the gas cools.

Proof. The slope −ΔrS∘-\Delta_r S^\circ of the carbon line is negative (Δνgas=+1\Delta\nu_{\text{gas}} = +1), that of the oxide lines positive: they meet once. The temperatures are read on the computed lines. ∎

Definition 6.11 (Boudouard equilibrium)

The Boudouard equilibrium is C(s)+COX2(g)⇌2 CO(g)\ce{C(s) + CO2(g) <=> 2CO(g)}, endothermic, between carbon and the two oxides of carbon.

Proposition 6.12 (Composition of the gas over carbon)

The system carbon + CO\ce{CO} + COX2\ce{CO2} has variance 2: at a given TT and total pressure pp, the mole fraction xx of carbon monoxide is fixed by x2/(1−x)=K∘(T) p∘/px^2/(1 - x) = K^\circ(T)\,p^\circ/p. At 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar} the gas is almost pure COX2\ce{CO2} below 700 K700\,\mathrm{K} and almost pure CO\ce{CO} above 1200 K1200\,\mathrm{K}; the crossing of the three carbon lines, near 975 K975\,\mathrm{K}, is where K∘=1K^\circ = 1.

Proof. Three species, one reaction, two phases: v=3−1+2−2=2v = 3 - 1 + 2 - 2 = 2. With pCO=xpp_{\ce{CO}} = xp and pCOX2=(1−x)pp_{\ce{CO2}} = (1 - x)p, Q=x2p/[(1−x)p∘]Q = x^2p/[(1 - x)p^\circ]. At K∘=1K^\circ = 1, the standard Gibbs energies of 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO} and C+OX2→COX2\ce{C + O2 -> CO2} are equal: the two lines, and so the third, meet. ∎

The Boudouard equilibrium at 1\, bar: mole fraction of carbon monoxide in a gas in equilibrium with carbon.
The Boudouard equilibrium at 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar}: mole fraction of carbon monoxide in a gas in equilibrium with carbon.

6.4 The blast furnace

Iron ore (hematite FeX2OX3\ce{Fe2O3}, magnetite FeX3OX4\ce{Fe3O4}), coke and limestone are charged at the top of a tall shaft; hot air is blown in near the bottom. Going down, the solids meet a hot rising gas; the gas leaves at the top, cooled.

  • At the tuyeres, coke burns in the hot air: C+OX2→COX2\ce{C + O2 -> CO2}, and above, with excess carbon, COX2+C→2 CO\ce{CO2 + C -> 2CO} (Boudouard): the gas that rises is mostly carbon monoxide and nitrogen.
  • In the upper part, carbon monoxide reduces the iron oxides step by step, 3 FeX2OX3+CO→2 FeX3OX4+COX2\ce{3Fe2O3 + CO -> 2Fe3O4 + CO2}, FeX3OX4+CO→3 FeO+COX2\ce{Fe3O4 + CO -> 3FeO + CO2}, FeO+CO→Fe+COX2\ce{FeO + CO -> Fe + CO2}. The first two steps are easy; for the last, the CO\ce{CO}/COX2\ce{CO2} line runs a little above the line of FeO\ce{FeO}: its standard reaction Gibbs energy is slightly positive (K∘≈0.3K^\circ \approx 0.3 at 900 K900\,\mathrm{K}), and the reduction needs a gas holding at least three times more CO\ce{CO} than COX2\ce{CO2} — which the Boudouard equilibrium supplies in the hot zone below.
  • Lower and hotter, carbon itself reduces what remains, FeO+C→Fe+CO\ce{FeO + C -> Fe + CO}; the iron dissolves carbon, melts, and collects at the bottom with a molten slag formed by lime and the silica of the ore.
The blast furnace as a counter-current reactor. Solids go down, hot reducing gas goes up; the iron oxides are reduced by carbon monoxide in the upper, cooler part, and by carbon in the lower, hotter part. Iron and slag are tapped at the bottom.
The blast furnace as a counter-current reactor. Solids go down, hot reducing gas goes up; the iron oxides are reduced by carbon monoxide in the upper, cooler part, and by carbon in the lower, hotter part. Iron and slag are tapped at the bottom.
A blast furnace preserved as a monument (Duisburg-Nord, shut down in 1985): the tall shaft with its ring of pipes for the hot air, the gas off-takes at the top. (Photograph: Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.)
A blast furnace preserved as a monument (Duisburg-Nord, shut down in 1985): the tall shaft with its ring of pipes for the hot air, the gas off-takes at the top. (Photograph: Dietmar Rabich, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.)

6.5 Other routes to a metal

Definition 6.13 (Pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy)

Pyrometallurgy extracts a metal at high temperature, by reduction of its oxide in a furnace. Hydrometallurgy extracts it from an aqueous solution. Their usual steps are roasting (heating a sulfide ore in air to turn it into an oxide, 2 ZnS+3 OX2→2 ZnO+2 SOX2\ce{2ZnS + 3O2 -> 2ZnO + 2SO2}), leaching (dissolving the metal’s compound, often in sulfuric acid, ZnO+2 HX+→ZnX2++HX2O\ce{ZnO + 2H+ -> Zn^2+ + H2O}), purification of the solution, for instance by cementation (reduction of the ions of a nobler metal by a powder of a less noble one, CuX2++Zn→Cu+ZnX2+\ce{Cu^2+ + Zn -> Cu + Zn^2+}), and the recovery of the metal, often by electrolysis.

The diagram explains the division of labour. Iron, zinc, lead, tin are won by carbon in a furnace. Aluminium, whose line lies far below that of carbon at any practicable temperature, is made by electrolysis of its molten oxide (Chapter 11); magnesium by electrolysis or by reduction with silicon under vacuum, which removes the magnesium vapour; titanium by converting the oxide to the chloride, TiOX2+2 ClX2+C→TiClX4+COX2\ce{TiO2 + 2Cl2 + C -> TiCl4 + CO2} (Exercise 2.12), then reducing the chloride with magnesium (the Kroll process). Most of the world’s zinc is made by roasting, leaching and electrolysis: the hydrometallurgical route gives a purer metal and avoids handling zinc vapour.

The hydrometallurgical route to zinc. The sulfur dioxide of the roaster is made into the sulfuric acid of the leach; the acid regenerated at the electrolysis anode is returned to it.
The hydrometallurgical route to zinc. The sulfur dioxide of the roaster is made into the sulfuric acid of the leach; the acid regenerated at the electrolysis anode is returned to it.

6.6 Exercises

Exercise 6.1 ★

Write the reactions represented by the lines of copper(I) oxide, alumina, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, each for one mole of OX2\ce{O2}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.1.

4 Cu+OX2→2 CuX2O\ce{4Cu + O2 -> 2Cu2O}; 43 Al+OX2→23 AlX2OX3\ce{4/3Al + O2 -> 2/3Al2O3}; 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO}; C+OX2→COX2\ce{C + O2 -> CO2}.

Exercise 6.2 ★

From the CODATA key values (ΔfH∘(ZnO)=−350.46 kJ/mol\Delta_f H^\circ(\ce{ZnO}) = -350.46\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}, S∘S^\circ: ZnO\ce{ZnO} 43.65, Zn\ce{Zn} 41.63, OX2\ce{O2} 205.15 J/(K mol)205.15\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol})), write ΔrG∘(T)\Delta_r G^\circ(T) of 2 Zn+OX2→2 ZnO\ce{2Zn + O2 -> 2ZnO} for solid zinc.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.2.

ΔrH∘=2(−350.46)=−700.92 kJ\Delta_r H^\circ = 2(-350.46) = -700.92\,\mathrm{kJ}; ΔrS∘=2(43.65)−2(41.63)−205.15=−201.1 J/K\Delta_r S^\circ = 2(43.65) - 2(41.63) - 205.15 = -201.1\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}. So ΔrG∘=−700.9+0.2011 T\Delta_r G^\circ = -700.9 + 0.2011\,T (kJ\mathrm{kJ}, TT in K\mathrm{K}), valid up to the melting point of zinc.

Exercise 6.3 ★

Using the diagram, list the metals that can reduce chromium(III) oxide at 1500 K1500\,\mathrm{K}, and those that cannot.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.3.

At 1500 K1500\,\mathrm{K} the line of CrX2OX3\ce{Cr2O3} is near −495 kJ-495\,\mathrm{kJ}. Below it, so able to reduce chromium oxide: silicon, titanium, aluminium, magnesium, calcium. Above it, unable: copper, iron, zinc. Carbon, at −488 kJ-488\,\mathrm{kJ}, lies just above: it reduces chromium oxide only at a slightly higher temperature, and then gives a chromium loaded with carbide — one reason why chromium for alloys free of carbon is made by aluminothermy.

Exercise 6.4 ★

Explain the sign of the slope of each of the three carbon lines.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.4.

The slope is −ΔrS∘-\Delta_r S^\circ, governed by the change in the amount of gas. C+OX2→COX2\ce{C + O2 -> CO2}: one mole of gas gives one, ΔrS∘≈0\Delta_r S^\circ \approx 0, horizontal. 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO}: one gives two, ΔrS∘>0\Delta_r S^\circ > 0, the line falls. 2 CO+OX2→2 COX2\ce{2CO + O2 -> 2CO2}: three give two, ΔrS∘<0\Delta_r S^\circ < 0, the line rises, like those of the metals.

Exercise 6.5 ★★

Compute the equilibrium oxygen pressure of mercury(II) oxide at 600 K600\,\mathrm{K} (mercury liquid, ΔrH∘=−181.6 kJ\Delta_r H^\circ = -181.6\,\mathrm{kJ}, ΔrS∘=−216.5 J/K\Delta_r S^\circ = -216.5\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K} per mole of OX2\ce{O2}). Is mercury oxidised in air at that temperature?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.5.

ΔrG∘(600 K)=−181.6+600×0.2165=−51.7 kJ\Delta_r G^\circ(600\,\mathrm{K}) = -181.6 + 600 \times 0.2165 = -51.7\,\mathrm{kJ}, pOX2=p∘exp⁡(−51 710/(8.314×600))=3.2×10−5 barp_{\ce{O2}} = p^\circ\exp(-51\,710/(8.314 \times 600)) = 3.2 \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{bar}. Air holds 0.21 bar0.21\,\mathrm{bar}, much more: mercury is oxidised at 600 K600\,\mathrm{K} (slowly — this is how the oxide was first prepared), and the oxide decomposes only above about 730 K730\,\mathrm{K}.

Exercise 6.6 ★★

Compute ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K} of the thermite reaction, FeX2OX3+2 Al→AlX2OX3+2 Fe\ce{Fe2O3 + 2Al -> Al2O3 + 2Fe}, given ΔfG∘=−743.5 kJ/mol\Delta_f G^\circ = -743.5\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol} for FeX2OX3\ce{Fe2O3} and −1582.3 kJ/mol-1582.3\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol} for AlX2OX3\ce{Al2O3}, and say why the reaction, though very exergonic, does not start at room temperature.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.6.

ΔrG∘=−1582.3−(−743.5)=−838.8 kJ\Delta_r G^\circ = -1582.3 - (-743.5) = -838.8\,\mathrm{kJ}. The reagents are two solids in contact only at the surface of their grains, and the reaction has a high activation energy: it must be ignited locally (a magnesium fuse); then the heat it releases keeps it going.

Exercise 6.7 ★★

Find on the diagram the temperature above which carbon reduces iron(II) oxide to iron with formation of carbon monoxide, and write the reaction.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.7.

The line of 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO} crosses that of 2 Fe+OX2→2 FeO\ce{2Fe + O2 -> 2FeO} near 1040 K1040\,\mathrm{K}; above, FeO+C→Fe+CO\ce{FeO + C -> Fe + CO} has a negative standard reaction Gibbs energy.

Exercise 6.8 ★★

At 1100 K1100\,\mathrm{K}, ΔfG∘(CO)=−209.1 kJ/mol\Delta_f G^\circ(\ce{CO}) = -209.1\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol} and ΔfG∘(COX2)=−396.0 kJ/mol\Delta_f G^\circ(\ce{CO2}) = -396.0\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}. Compute K∘K^\circ of the Boudouard equilibrium and the mole fraction of carbon monoxide over carbon at 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar}. What happens to the gas, in contact with soot or iron, when it is cooled to 700 K700\,\mathrm{K}?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.8.

ΔrG∘=2(−209.1)−(−396.0)=−22.2 kJ\Delta_r G^\circ = 2(-209.1) - (-396.0) = -22.2\,\mathrm{kJ}, K∘=exp⁡(22 200/(8.314×1100))=11.3K^\circ = \exp(22\,200/(8.314 \times 1100)) = 11.3. Then x2/(1−x)=11.3x^2/(1 - x) = 11.3, x=0.92x = 0.92. On cooling to 700 K700\,\mathrm{K} the equilibrium moves back towards COX2\ce{CO2} (x=0.016x = 0.016): carbon monoxide disproportionates, 2 CO→C+COX2\ce{2CO -> C + CO2}, and soot deposits — slowly, unless a surface such as iron catalyses it.

Exercise 6.9 ★★

Hydrogen is sometimes used to reduce tungsten oxide. Using the line of water, explain why hydrogen is a better reductant than carbon monoxide at high temperature but a worse one at low temperature.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.9.

The water line (three moles of gas give two) rises less steeply than the CO\ce{CO}/COX2\ce{CO2} line, also three for two but with a larger entropy loss. The two cross near 1100 K1100\,\mathrm{K}: below, the CO\ce{CO}/COX2\ce{CO2} line is lower and carbon monoxide is the stronger reductant; above, the water line is lower and hydrogen wins. It is the same statement as the shift of the water-gas equilibrium CO+HX2O⇌COX2+HX2\ce{CO + H2O <=> CO2 + H2} towards the left at high temperature.

Exercise 6.10 ★★★

Magnesium oxide can be reduced by silicon, 2 MgO+Si→SiOX2+2 Mg\ce{2MgO + Si -> SiO2 + 2Mg}, though the line of silica lies above that of magnesia at every temperature of the diagram. At 1500 K1500\,\mathrm{K}, magnesium is a gas and the tables give, per mole of OX2\ce{O2}, −845.5 kJ-845.5\,\mathrm{kJ} for magnesia and −643.7 kJ-643.7\,\mathrm{kJ} for silica. Compute ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ of the reduction, then the pressure of magnesium vapour below which it runs forward. How does a vacuum furnace use this?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.10.

Per mole of OX2\ce{O2}, that is for 2 MgO+Si→SiOX2+2 Mg(g)\ce{2MgO + Si -> SiO2 + 2Mg(g)}: ΔrG∘=−643.7−(−845.5)=+201.8 kJ\Delta_r G^\circ = -643.7 - (-845.5) = +201.8\,\mathrm{kJ}. With silicon and silica of activity 1, ΔrG=ΔrG∘+RTln⁡(pMg/p∘)2\Delta_r G = \Delta_r G^\circ + RT\ln(p_{\ce{Mg}}/p^\circ)^2, negative when pMg<p∘exp⁡(−201 800/(2×8.314×1500))=3×10−4 barp_{\ce{Mg}} < p^\circ\exp(-201\,800/(2 \times 8.314 \times 1500)) = 3 \times 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{bar}. A vacuum furnace pumps the magnesium vapour away as fast as it forms and condenses it on a cold surface, so its pressure never reaches that value; lime added to the charge binds the silica and lowers its activity, which helps further.

Exercise 6.11 ★★★

Compute the variance of the system FeO(s)\ce{FeO(s)}, Fe(s)\ce{Fe(s)}, CO(g)\ce{CO(g)}, COX2(g)\ce{CO2(g)} at equilibrium. What does it mean for the gas leaving the upper part of a blast furnace?

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.11.

Four species, one reaction, three phases (two solids and the gas): v=4−1+2−3=2v = 4 - 1 + 2 - 3 = 2. At given temperature and pressure the ratio pCO/pCOX2p_{\ce{CO}}/p_{\ce{CO2}} is fixed: the gas cannot give up all its carbon monoxide to the iron oxide, and the top gas still contains much of it — which is burnt to preheat the air.

Exercise 6.12 ★★★

Copper is purified from its leach solution by cementation with iron scrap. Using the standard potentials of the Year 1 volume (E∘(CuX2+/Cu)=0.34 VE^\circ(\ce{Cu^2+}/\ce{Cu}) = 0.34\,\mathrm{V}, E∘(FeX2+/Fe)=−0.41 VE^\circ(\ce{Fe^2+}/\ce{Fe}) = -0.41\,\mathrm{V}), compute the equilibrium constant of CuX2++Fe→Cu+FeX2+\ce{Cu^2+ + Fe -> Cu + Fe^2+} and the residual concentration of copper ions when the solution holds 1.0 mol/L1.0\,\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{L} of FeX2+\ce{Fe^2+}.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 6.12.

log⁡K=2(0.34+0.41)/0.059=25.4\log K = 2(0.34 + 0.41)/0.059 = 25.4, K=3×1025K = 3 \times 10^{25}. With [FeX2+]=1.0 mol/L[\ce{Fe^2+}] = 1.0\,\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{L}, [CuX2+]=1/K≈4×10−26 mol/L[\ce{Cu^2+}] = 1/K \approx 4 \times 10^{-26}\,\mathrm{mol}/\mathrm{L}: the copper is removed completely.

6.7 Problem: Zinc by Fire

Problem 6.1

Weekend problem — the Ellingham lines of zinc oxide and of carbon monoxide, the temperature at which carbon reduces zinc oxide, the variance of the furnace, and the condensation of zinc vapour

Before electrolysis, zinc was made by heating its oxide with carbon in clay retorts. Data (CODATA, and the JANAF table of zinc): ΔfH∘(ZnO)=−350.46 kJ/mol\Delta_f H^\circ(\ce{ZnO}) = -350.46\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}; S∘S^\circ (J/(K mol)\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol})): ZnO\ce{ZnO} 43.65, Zn\ce{Zn} 41.63, OX2\ce{O2} 205.15; zinc melts at 692.7 K692.7\,\mathrm{K} (ΔfusH=7.32 kJ/mol\Delta_{\text{fus}}H = 7.32\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}) and boils at 1180.2 K1180.2\,\mathrm{K} under 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar} (ΔvapH=115.3 kJ/mol\Delta_{\text{vap}}H = 115.3\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}). For 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO}, the tables give ΔrG∘=−418.2 kJ\Delta_r G^\circ = -418.2\,\mathrm{kJ} at 1100 K1100\,\mathrm{K} and −453.0 kJ-453.0\,\mathrm{kJ} at 1300 K1300\,\mathrm{K}.

Part I — The line of zinc oxide.

  1. Compute ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^\circ and ΔrS∘\Delta_r S^\circ of 2 Zn(s)+OX2→2 ZnO\ce{2Zn(s) + O2 -> 2ZnO} at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}.
  2. Write ΔrG∘(T)\Delta_r G^\circ(T) below the melting point.
  3. Compute the entropies of fusion and of vaporisation of zinc.
  4. Write ΔrG∘(T)\Delta_r G^\circ(T) between the melting and the boiling points.
  5. Write it above the boiling point.
  6. Compute the three slopes and explain why the last is much steeper.
  7. Check that the three expressions agree at the transition temperatures.

Part II — The carbon line.

  1. From the two tabulated values, write the line of 2 C+OX2→2 CO\ce{2C + O2 -> 2CO} in the form a+bTa + bT between 1100 K1100\,\mathrm{K} and 1300 K1300\,\mathrm{K}.
  2. Deduce its ΔrS∘\Delta_r S^\circ and explain its sign.
  3. Write the reduction ZnO+C→Zn(g)+CO\ce{ZnO + C -> Zn(g) + CO} and its ΔrG∘(T)\Delta_r G^\circ(T) as a difference of the two lines (per mole of OX2\ce{O2}).
  4. Find the temperature where the two lines cross.
  5. Why is it important that this temperature is above the boiling point of zinc?

Part III — The retort.

  1. Compute the variance of the system ZnO(s)\ce{ZnO(s)}, C(s)\ce{C(s)}, Zn(g)\ce{Zn(g)}, CO(g)\ce{CO(g)}, with zinc and carbon monoxide formed only by the reduction.
  2. In a retort at 1300 K1300\,\mathrm{K} under 1 bar1\,\mathrm{bar}, what are the partial pressures of zinc and carbon monoxide if the reaction is complete?
  3. Compute ΔrG∘\Delta_r G^\circ of the reduction at 1300 K1300\,\mathrm{K} and the corresponding K∘K^\circ.
  4. Explain why the retort is operated slightly above the crossing temperature and not far above it.

Part IV — The condenser.

  1. The vapour is led into a cooler condenser. Write the reaction by which zinc vapour can be reoxidised by carbon dioxide.
  2. Using the diagram, explain why the gas must be kept free of carbon dioxide.
  3. Why must the zinc be condensed quickly rather than slowly?
  4. Compute the mass of carbon needed per tonne of zinc, taking the reduction as written.
  5. Compute the heat absorbed per tonne of zinc by the reduction at about 1300 K1300\,\mathrm{K} (take ΔrH∘\Delta_r H^\circ from the expressions of Parts I and II).
  6. State the temperature above which carbon reduces zinc oxide under standard conditions.
Solution

Solution of Problem 6.1.

1. ΔrH∘=−700.92 kJ\Delta_r H^\circ = -700.92\,\mathrm{kJ}, ΔrS∘=−201.1 J/K\Delta_r S^\circ = -201.1\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}. 2. ΔrG∘=−700.9+0.2011 T\Delta_r G^\circ = -700.9 + 0.2011\,T (kJ\mathrm{kJ}), below 692.7 K692.7\,\mathrm{K}. 3. ΔfusS=7320/692.7=10.6 J/(K mol)\Delta_{\text{fus}}S = 7320/692.7 = 10.6\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}); ΔvapS=115 300/1180.2=97.7 J/(K mol)\Delta_{\text{vap}}S = 115\,300/1180.2 = 97.7\,\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{mol}). 4. Liquid zinc: ΔrH∘=−700.92−2(7.32)=−715.6 kJ\Delta_r H^\circ = -700.92 - 2(7.32) = -715.6\,\mathrm{kJ}, ΔrS∘=−201.1−2(10.6)=−222.2 J/K\Delta_r S^\circ = -201.1 - 2(10.6) = -222.2\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}: ΔrG∘=−715.6+0.2222 T\Delta_r G^\circ = -715.6 + 0.2222\,T. 5. Gaseous zinc: ΔrH∘=−715.6−2(115.3)=−946.2 kJ\Delta_r H^\circ = -715.6 - 2(115.3) = -946.2\,\mathrm{kJ}, ΔrS∘=−222.2−2(97.7)=−417.7 J/K\Delta_r S^\circ = -222.2 - 2(97.7) = -417.7\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}: ΔrG∘=−946.2+0.4177 T\Delta_r G^\circ = -946.2 + 0.4177\,T. 6. Slopes 0.2010.201, 0.2220.222 and 0.4180.418 kJ/K\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{K}. Above the boiling point the reaction consumes three moles of gas instead of one: the entropy loss, hence the slope, doubles. 7. At 692.7 K692.7\,\mathrm{K}: −700.9+139.3=−715.6+153.9=−561.6 kJ-700.9 + 139.3 = -715.6 + 153.9 = -561.6\,\mathrm{kJ}; at 1180.2 K1180.2\,\mathrm{K}: −715.6+262.3=−946.2+492.9=−453.3 kJ-715.6 + 262.3 = -946.2 + 492.9 = -453.3\,\mathrm{kJ}. The lines join, as they must. 8. Slope (−453.0+418.2)/200=−0.174 kJ/K(-453.0 + 418.2)/200 = -0.174\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{K}, a=−418.2+0.174×1100=−226.8 kJa = -418.2 + 0.174 \times 1100 = -226.8\,\mathrm{kJ}: ΔrG∘=−226.8−0.174 T\Delta_r G^\circ = -226.8 - 0.174\,T. 9. ΔrS∘=+174 J/K\Delta_r S^\circ = +174\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{K}: one mole of gas gives two. 10. 2 ZnO+2 C→2 Zn(g)+2 CO\ce{2ZnO + 2C -> 2Zn(g) + 2CO}, ΔrG∘=(−226.8−0.174 T)−(−946.2+0.4177 T)=719.4−0.592 T\Delta_r G^\circ = (-226.8 - 0.174\,T) - (-946.2 + 0.4177\,T) = 719.4 - 0.592\,T (kJ\mathrm{kJ}). 11. Zero at T=719.4/0.592=1215 KT = 719.4/0.592 = 1215\,\mathrm{K}. 12. Above its boiling point zinc forms as a vapour: the reaction makes gas from solids, its entropy is large and positive, and the vapour leaves the charge, which separates the metal from the ore and the coke by distillation. 13. Four species, one reaction, one particular condition (pZn=pCOp_{\ce{Zn}} = p_{\ce{CO}}), three phases: v=4−1−1+2−3=1v = 4 - 1 - 1 + 2 - 3 = 1. Fixing the pressure fixes the temperature of equilibrium. 14. One mole of zinc vapour per mole of carbon monoxide: pZn=pCO=0.5 barp_{\ce{Zn}} = p_{\ce{CO}} = 0.5\,\mathrm{bar}. 15. Per mole of ZnO\ce{ZnO}, ΔrG∘=12(719.4−0.592×1300)=−25.1 kJ/mol\Delta_r G^\circ = \frac12(719.4 - 0.592 \times 1300) = -25.1\,\mathrm{kJ}/\mathrm{mol}, K∘=exp⁡(25 100/(8.314×1300))=10K^\circ = \exp(25\,100/(8.314 \times 1300)) = 10; Q=0.25<K∘Q = 0.25 < K^\circ: the reduction runs. 16. Just above the crossing the reduction is already favoured (with 0.5 bar0.5\,\mathrm{bar} of each gas, from about 1170 K1170\,\mathrm{K}); hotter costs fuel, wears the clay retorts and does not make more zinc, since the reaction goes to completion anyway. 17. Zn(g)+COX2→ZnO+CO\ce{Zn(g) + CO2 -> ZnO + CO}. 18. The line of zinc oxide lies below the CO\ce{CO}/COX2\ce{CO2} line (−445-445 against −357 kJ-357\,\mathrm{kJ} at 1200 K1200\,\mathrm{K}): zinc vapour reduces carbon dioxide and turns back into oxide. In the retort the hot carbon destroys any COX2\ce{CO2} (Boudouard); in the cooler condenser nothing does, and COX2\ce{CO2} — from air leaking in, or from 2 CO→C+COX2\ce{2CO -> C + CO2} on cooling — spoils the zinc into a grey oxidised powder. 19. Slow cooling leaves the vapour for a long time in the range where it is reoxidised, and gives a fine dust instead of liquid metal; quick condensation to the liquid limits both. 20. 106/65.38=1.53×104 mol10^6/65.38 = 1.53 \times 10^{4}\,\mathrm{mol} of zinc, as many of carbon: 1.53×104×12.011=184 kg1.53 \times 10^4 \times 12.011 = 184\,\mathrm{kg} (much more in practice, to heat the retorts). 21. ΔrH∘=12(−226.8+946.2)=+360 kJ\Delta_r H^\circ = \frac12(-226.8 + 946.2) = +360\,\mathrm{kJ} per mole of zinc; per tonne, 1.53×104×360=5.5×106 kJ1.53 \times 10^4 \times 360 = 5.5 \times 10^{6}\,\mathrm{kJ}, that is 5.5 GJ5.5\,\mathrm{GJ} — supplied by burning more coal around the retorts. 22. Carbon reduces zinc oxide under standard conditions above T≈1.22×103 K\boldsymbol{T \approx 1.22 \times 10^{3}\,\mathrm{K}}.

Terms defined in this chapter

See all 852 terms in the glossary