Mathematics · Book 1 · Grades 1–9

Primary & Middle School Mathematics

Primary & Middle School Mathematics · Grades 1–9

54Multiplying Negative Numbers

Grade 7 added and subtracted relative numbers (Chapter 46); it remains to multiply and divide them. One question dominates the chapter: why should “minus times minus” be plus? We give a reason, not just a rule.

54.1 The sign rules

Theorem 54.1 (Sign of a product)

The product of two relative numbers has distance to zero equal to the product of the distances, and its sign is given by:

×\times++-
++++-
--++

Same signs: positive product. Opposite signs: negative product. The same table governs quotients.

Why (1)×(1)=+1(-1) \times (-1) = +1. First, 3×(4)3 \times (-4) means (4)+(4)+(4)=12(-4) + (-4) + (-4) = -12: a positive times a negative is negative. Now watch the pattern:

3×(4)=12,2×(4)=8,1×(4)=4,0×(4)=0.3 \times (-4) = -12, \quad 2 \times (-4) = -8, \quad 1 \times (-4) = -4, \quad 0 \times (-4) = 0 .

Each step, the first factor drops by 11 and the result rises by 44. Continuing the pattern one more step:

(1)×(4)=0+4=+4.(-1) \times (-4) = 0 + 4 = +4 .

Any other choice would break the regularity of arithmetic (distributivity). So minus times minus must be plus.

The pattern argument in a picture: the points (k,\ k × (-4)) line up, and continuing the line past k = 0 forces (-1)×(-4) = +4 and (-2)×(-4) = +8.
The pattern argument in a picture: the points (k, k×(4))(k,\ k \times (-4)) line up, and continuing the line past k=0k = 0 forces (1)×(4)=+4(-1)\times(-4) = +4 and (2)×(4)=+8(-2)\times(-4) = +8.

Example 54.2

(7)×(+6)=42(opposite signs)(5)×(8)=+40(same signs)(+2.5)×(4)=10(36)÷(9)=+4(+15)÷(2)=7.5.\begin{align*} (-7) \times (+6) &= -42 && \text{(opposite signs)} \\ (-5) \times (-8) &= +40 && \text{(same signs)} \\ (+2.5) \times (-4) &= -10 \\ (-36) \div (-9) &= +4 \\ (+15) \div (-2) &= -7.5 . \end{align*}

54.2 Products of several factors

Proposition 54.3 (Sign of a long product)

The sign of a product of several nonzero factors depends only on the number of negative factors:

Proof. Negative factors pair up, and each pair contributes a positive sign (Theorem 54.1); an odd count leaves one unpaired negative factor, which makes the whole product negative.

Example 54.4

(2)×(+3)×(5)×(1)(-2) \times (+3) \times (-5) \times (-1): three negative factors (odd), so the product is negative; distances: 2×3×5×1=302 \times 3 \times 5 \times 1 = 30. Result: 30-30. Decide the sign first, then multiply the distances — two easy tasks instead of one error-prone one.

Example 54.5 (Powers of negatives)

(2)2=(2)×(2)=+4(-2)^2 = (-2) \times (-2) = +4, and (2)3=(2)2×(2)=8(-2)^3 = (-2)^2 \times (-2) = -8: even exponents give positive values, odd exponents keep the sign. Careful with notation: (3)2=9(-3)^2 = 9 but 32=(3×3)=9-3^2 = -(3 \times 3) = -9.

54.3 Computing with all four operations

Method 54.6 (Safe computation with relative numbers)

  1. Respect the priorities of Chapter 45: brackets, then ×\times and ÷\div, then ++ and -;
  2. at each multiplication or division, find the sign first, then the distance;
  3. rewrite one step per line.

Example 54.7

53×(4)=5(12)(product first: opposite signs)=5+12=17.\begin{align*} 5 - 3 \times (-4) &= 5 - (-12) && \text{(product first: opposite signs)}\\ &= 5 + 12 = 17 . \end{align*}
(6)×(10)4=+604(numerator: same signs)=15(quotient: opposite signs).\begin{align*} \frac{(-6) \times (-10)}{-4} &= \frac{+60}{-4} && \text{(numerator: same signs)}\\ &= -15 && \text{(quotient: opposite signs).} \end{align*}

Example 54.8 (Substituting negative values)

Evaluate E=3x22xE = 3x^2 - 2x for x=5x = -5, brackets around the value:

E=3×(5)22×(5)=3×25(10)=75+10=85.E = 3 \times (-5)^2 - 2 \times (-5) = 3 \times 25 - (-10) = 75 + 10 = 85 .

The brackets in (5)2(-5)^2 are essential: without them the square would apply to 55 only.

54.4 Exercises

Exercise 54.1

Compute:

(8)×(+7),(9)×(6),(+12)×(0.5),(1)×(1)×(1).(-8) \times (+7), \qquad (-9) \times (-6), \qquad (+12) \times (-0.5), \qquad (-1) \times (-1) \times (-1).
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.1.

(8)×(+7)=56(-8) \times (+7) = -56; (9)×(6)=+54(-9) \times (-6) = +54; (+12)×(0.5)=6(+12) \times (-0.5) = -6; (1)×(1)×(1)=1(-1) \times (-1) \times (-1) = -1 (three negative factors: odd).

Exercise 54.2

Compute:

(63)÷(+9),(8)÷(16),455,7.28.(-63) \div (+9), \qquad (-8) \div (-16), \qquad \frac{45}{-5}, \qquad \frac{-7.2}{-8} .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.2.

(63)÷(+9)=7(-63) \div (+9) = -7; (8)÷(16)=+0.5(-8) \div (-16) = +0.5; 455=9\dfrac{45}{-5} = -9; 7.28=+0.9\dfrac{-7.2}{-8} = +0.9.

Exercise 54.3

Give only the sign of each product, without computing it:

(3)×(7)×(+2)×(5);(1)10;(2)7;(4)×0×(6).(-3) \times (-7) \times (+2) \times (-5); \qquad (-1)^{10}; \qquad (-2)^{7}; \qquad (-4) \times 0 \times (-6).
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.3.

Three negative factors: negative. (1)10(-1)^{10}: ten negative factors, even: positive (it equals 11). (2)7(-2)^7: seven factors, odd: negative. (4)×0×(6)=0(-4) \times 0 \times (-6) = 0: neither positive nor negative.

Exercise 54.4

Compute:

(2)4,24,(3)3,(1)2026.(-2)^4, \qquad -2^4, \qquad (-3)^3, \qquad (-1)^{2026} .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.4.

(2)4=+16(-2)^4 = +16; 24=16-2^4 = -16 (the minus is not squared); (3)3=27(-3)^3 = -27; (1)2026=+1(-1)^{2026} = +1 (even exponent).

Exercise 54.5

Compute step by step, respecting priorities:

7+2×(6),(4)×(59),18÷(3)(2).7 + 2 \times (-6), \qquad (-4) \times (5 - 9), \qquad 18 \div (-3) - (-2) .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.5.

7+2×(6)=7+(12)=57 + 2 \times (-6) = 7 + (-12) = -5.

(4)×(59)=(4)×(4)=+16(-4) \times (5 - 9) = (-4) \times (-4) = +16.

18÷(3)(2)=6+2=418 \div (-3) - (-2) = -6 + 2 = -4.

Exercise 54.6

Compute:

(5)×(+8)4,(3)×(6)(2)×(+9).\frac{(-5) \times (+8)}{-4}, \qquad \frac{(-3) \times (-6)}{(-2) \times (+9)} .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.6.

(5)×(+8)4=404=+10\dfrac{(-5) \times (+8)}{-4} = \dfrac{-40}{-4} = +10.

(3)×(6)(2)×(+9)=+1818=1\dfrac{(-3) \times (-6)}{(-2) \times (+9)} = \dfrac{+18}{-18} = -1.

Exercise 54.7

Evaluate for x=3x = -3:

5x,x2,x2,2x2+4x,(2x)2.5x, \qquad x^2, \qquad -x^2, \qquad 2x^2 + 4x, \qquad (2x)^2 .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.7.

For x=3x = -3: 5x=155x = -15; x2=(3)2=9x^2 = (-3)^2 = 9; x2=9-x^2 = -9; 2x2+4x=1812=62x^2 + 4x = 18 - 12 = 6; (2x)2=(6)2=36(2x)^2 = (-6)^2 = 36.

Exercise 54.8 ★★

Complete each equality:

(6)×  ?  =42,  ?  ÷(4)=2.5,(5)×  ?  =1.(-6) \times \;?\; = 42, \qquad \;?\; \div (-4) = -2.5, \qquad (-5) \times \;?\; = -1 .
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.8.

(6)×(7)=42(-6) \times (-7) = 42; 10÷(4)=2.510 \div (-4) = -2.5; (5)×15=1(-5) \times \frac15 = -1, so the missing number is +15=0.2+\frac15 = 0.2.

Exercise 54.9 ★★

True or false? Justify or give a counterexample.

  1. The product of two relative numbers is always at least as large as their sum.
  2. The square of a relative number is never negative.
  3. If a product of three factors is positive, all three factors are positive.
Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.9.

1. False: 0.5×0.5=0.250.5 \times 0.5 = 0.25 is smaller than 0.5+0.5=10.5 + 0.5 = 1 (or: 2×3=6>52 \times 3 = 6 > 5, but the claim must hold always).

2. True: a square is a product of two numbers of the same sign, hence positive or zero.

3. False: (2)×(3)×4=+24(-2) \times (-3) \times 4 = +24 is positive with two negative factors.

Exercise 54.10 ★★

Each wrong answer at a quiz counts 3-3 points, each right answer +5+5. Zoe answered 2020 questions and scored 3636 points. How many answers were right? (Try values, or set up the computation 5r3(20r)=365r - 3(20 - r) = 36.)

Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.10.

Let rr be the number of right answers; then 20r20 - r are wrong, and

5r3(20r)=36  5r60+3r=36  8r=96  r=12.5r - 3(20 - r) = 36 \ \Longrightarrow\ 5r - 60 + 3r = 36 \ \Longrightarrow\ 8r = 96 \ \Longrightarrow\ r = 12 .

Twelve right answers (and eight wrong: check, 6024=3660 - 24 = 36).

Exercise 54.11 ★★★

Using distributivity (as in the proof of Theorem 54.1), expand and justify each step of

0=(1)×0=(1)×(1+(1))=(1)×1+(1)×(1),0 = (-1) \times 0 = (-1) \times \bigl(1 + (-1)\bigr) = (-1) \times 1 + (-1) \times (-1),

and conclude that (1)×(1)(-1) \times (-1) must equal +1+1.

Solution

Solution of Exercise 54.11.

Zero times anything is zero, so (1)×0=0(-1) \times 0 = 0. Writing 0=1+(1)0 = 1 + (-1) and distributing:

0=(1)×(1+(1))=(1)×1+(1)×(1)=1+(1)×(1).0 = (-1) \times \bigl(1 + (-1)\bigr) = (-1) \times 1 + (-1) \times (-1) = -1 + (-1) \times (-1).

The number (1)×(1)(-1) \times (-1) added to 1-1 gives 00: it must be the opposite of 1-1, that is +1+1. Distributivity leaves no other choice.

54.5 Problem: Why minus times minus is plus

Problem 54.1

Weekend problem — the sign rules deduced from distributivity, and the alternating sum 12+34+1 - 2 + 3 - 4 + \dots

The proof of Theorem 54.1 continued a pattern and claimed that “any other choice would break distributivity”. This problem makes the claim exact: starting from distributivity alone (Theorem 45.6), you will prove the sign rules — no picture, no pattern, the way algebra does it — then put them to work on powers of 1-1 and on a famous sum with alternating signs. Throughout, aa and bb are relative numbers; we take for granted the addition rules of Chapter 46, that 1×a=a1 \times a = a, and that a product may be computed in any order (so distributivity applies on either side of a product).

Part I — The sign rules are theorems.

  1. Prove that 0×a=00 \times a = 0 for every relative number aa. (Write 0=0+00 = 0 + 0, expand (0+0)×a(0 + 0) \times a, and ask which number, added to 0×a0 \times a, gives 0×a0 \times a back.)
  2. Expand (1+(1))×a\bigl(1 + (-1)\bigr) \times a to show that (1)×a+a=0(-1) \times a + a = 0, and conclude that

    (1)×a=a:(-1) \times a = -a :

    multiplying by 1-1 gives the opposite. Compare with Exercise 54.11, which is the case a=1a = -1.

  3. Deduce that (a)×b=(a×b)(-a) \times b = -(a \times b): one minus sign comes out of a product unchanged.
  4. Deduce that (a)×(b)=a×b(-a) \times (-b) = a \times b: two minus signs cancel.
  5. Every relative number is its distance to zero with a sign in front: a=+da = +d or a=da = -d. Explain how questions 3 and 4 prove all four cases of the sign table of Theorem 54.1, distances included.

Part II — Powers of 1-1.

  1. Compute (1)2(-1)^2, (1)3(-1)^3, (1)4(-1)^4, (1)5(-1)^5, then give, with justification from Proposition 54.3, the value of (1)n(-1)^n for every whole number n1n \geq 1.
  2. Give (without computing any distance) the sign of

    (1)×(2)×(3)××(10),(-1) \times (-2) \times (-3) \times \dots \times (-10),

    and write the distance of this product as a product of whole numbers, without working it out.

  3. Show that (a)2=a2(-a)^2 = a^2 and that (a)3=a3(-a)^3 = -a^3. For which exponents does the minus sign survive?
  4. Use the sign rules to show that the square of a relative number is never negative, and deduce that no relative number xx satisfies x2=4x^2 = -4.
  5. Zoe claims: “(1)2026+(1)2027=0(-1)^{2026} + (-1)^{2027} = 0, and more generally two consecutive powers of 1-1 always cancel.” Is she right? Justify.

Part III — The alternating sum. With the sign rules secured, we can compute sums that mix both signs. For a whole number n1n \geq 1, let

An=12+34+A_n = 1 - 2 + 3 - 4 + \dots

be the sum of the whole numbers from 11 to nn with alternating signs: the last term is +n+n when nn is odd, n-n when nn is even. So A1=1A_1 = 1 and A2=12=1A_2 = 1 - 2 = -1.

  1. Compute A3A_3, A4A_4, A5A_5, A6A_6 and A7A_7. What do you conjecture?
  2. Suppose nn is even. Group the terms two by two, (12)+(34)+(1 - 2) + (3 - 4) + \dots, count the pairs, and prove that An=n2A_n = -\frac{n}{2}.
  3. Suppose nn is odd. Explain why An=An1+nA_n = A_{n-1} + n, and deduce from the previous question that An=n+12A_n = \frac{n + 1}{2}.
  4. Compute A100A_{100}, A101A_{101} and A2026A_{2026}.
  5. Alma computed A101A100=51(50)=101A_{101} - A_{100} = 51 - (-50) = 101 and was surprised to find exactly 101101. Should she have been? Explain in one sentence, and state the value of A2027A2026A_{2027} - A_{2026} without any further computation.
Solution

Solution of Problem 54.1.

1. Since 0=0+00 = 0 + 0, distributivity (Theorem 45.6) gives

0×a=(0+0)×a=0×a+0×a.0 \times a = (0 + 0) \times a = 0 \times a + 0 \times a .

So adding 0×a0 \times a to itself changes nothing — and the only number one can add without changing anything is 00. (Directly: subtract 0×a0 \times a from both sides.) Hence 0×a=00 \times a = 0.

2. Expanding, then using 1+(1)=01 + (-1) = 0 and question 1:

a+(1)×a=1×a+(1)×a=(1+(1))×a=0×a=0.a + (-1) \times a = 1 \times a + (-1) \times a = \bigl(1 + (-1)\bigr) \times a = 0 \times a = 0 .

So (1)×a(-1) \times a is the number which, added to aa, gives 00: that is exactly the opposite of aa, and (1)×a=a(-1) \times a = -a. Exercise 54.11 is the special case a=1a = -1: there, (1)×(1)=(1)=+1(-1) \times (-1) = -(-1) = +1.

3. Write a=(1)×a-a = (-1) \times a (question 2) and regroup the factors:

(a)×b=((1)×a)×b=(1)×(a×b)=(a×b).(-a) \times b = \bigl((-1) \times a\bigr) \times b = (-1) \times (a \times b) = -(a \times b) .

4. Apply question 3 twice (once on each factor):

(a)×(b)=(a×(b))=((a×b))=a×b,(-a) \times (-b) = -\bigl(a \times (-b)\bigr) = -\bigl(-(a \times b)\bigr) = a \times b ,

since the opposite of the opposite of a number is the number itself.

5. Write a=+da = +d or a=da = -d and b=+eb = +e or b=eb = -e, where dd and ee are the distances to zero. The four cases:

(+d)×(+e)=de,(+d)×(e)=de,(d)×(+e)=de,(d)×(e)=+de,(+d) \times (+e) = de, \quad (+d) \times (-e) = -de, \quad (-d) \times (+e) = -de, \quad (-d) \times (-e) = +de,

the middle two by question 3, the last by question 4. In every case the distance of the result is d×ed \times e, the product of the distances, and the sign is the one announced by the table of Theorem 54.1: same signs positive, opposite signs negative.

6. (1)2=+1(-1)^2 = +1, (1)3=1(-1)^3 = -1, (1)4=+1(-1)^4 = +1, (1)5=1(-1)^5 = -1. In general (1)n(-1)^n is a product of nn negative factors, each of distance 11: by Proposition 54.3 it is +1+1 when nn is even and 1-1 when nn is odd.

7. There are ten negative factors — an even number — so the product is positive (Proposition 54.3). Its distance is 1×2×3××101 \times 2 \times 3 \times \dots \times 10.

8. By question 4, (a)2=(a)×(a)=a×a=a2(-a)^2 = (-a) \times (-a) = a \times a = a^2. Then by question 3,

(a)3=(a)2×(a)=a2×(a)=(a2×a)=a3.(-a)^3 = (-a)^2 \times (-a) = a^2 \times (-a) = -(a^2 \times a) = -a^3 .

The minus sign disappears for even exponents and survives for odd ones, in line with Example 54.5.

9. If a=0a = 0 then a2=0a^2 = 0. Otherwise aa and aa have the same sign, so a2=a×aa^2 = a \times a is positive (Theorem 54.1). A square is therefore never negative; since 4-4 is negative, no relative number xx satisfies x2=4x^2 = -4.

10. Zoe is right. The exponents 20262026 and 20272027 have opposite parities, so (1)2026=+1(-1)^{2026} = +1 and (1)2027=1(-1)^{2027} = -1, which add to 00. In general, of two consecutive exponents one is even and one is odd, so the two powers are +1+1 and 1-1 in some order: opposite numbers, whose sum is always 00.

11. A3=12+3=2A_3 = 1 - 2 + 3 = 2, then A4=A34=2A_4 = A_3 - 4 = -2, A5=A4+5=3A_5 = A_4 + 5 = 3, A6=A56=3A_6 = A_5 - 6 = -3, A7=A6+7=4A_7 = A_6 + 7 = 4. Conjecture: An=n2A_n = -\frac{n}{2} for even nn, and An=n+12A_n = \frac{n+1}{2} for odd nn.

12. For even nn the terms pair up completely:

An=(12)+(34)++((n1)n),A_n = (1 - 2) + (3 - 4) + \dots + \bigl((n-1) - n\bigr),

and each pair equals 1-1. There are n2\frac{n}{2} pairs (two terms per pair, nn terms in all), so An=n2×(1)=n2A_n = \frac{n}{2} \times (-1) = -\frac{n}{2}.

13. For odd nn, the sum AnA_n is the sum An1A_{n-1} of the first n1n - 1 terms, plus the last term, which is +n+n since nn is odd. As n1n - 1 is even, question 12 gives

An=An1+n=n12+n=(n1)+2n2=n+12.A_n = A_{n-1} + n = -\frac{n-1}{2} + n = \frac{-(n-1) + 2n}{2} = \frac{n+1}{2} .

14. A100=1002=50A_{100} = -\frac{100}{2} = -50, A101=1022=51A_{101} = \frac{102}{2} = 51, A2026=20262=1013A_{2026} = -\frac{2026}{2} = -1013.

15. No surprise: passing from A100A_{100} to A101A_{101} adds exactly one term, namely +101+101, so the difference had to be 101101. For the same reason, A2027A2026=+2027A_{2027} - A_{2026} = +2027 — without computing A2027A_{2027} at all.